This study examines effects of structurally anchored organisational democracy on
perceived sociomoral atmosphere and on employees' prosocial, democratic behavioural
orientations. Data result from the ODEM research project. Beside a description of the
concept of sociomoral atmosphere, within this project, 30 small and medium sized
enterprises from Austria, North Italy, South Germany, and Liechtenstein (542 participants)
were surveyed with questionnaires, interviews, and document analyses. Based on
organisational science criteria, several types of enterprises were derived and pooled into
three groups of structurally anchored organisational democracy (no, medium, and high
democracy). Multivariate group analyses show significant differences between those groups
in parts of their prosocial and democratic behavioural orientations and in their
sociomoral atmosphere.
AlwinD.
F. (1989): Social
stratification, conditions of work, and parental socialisation values.
In: EisenbergNReykowskiJ.StaubE.
(Eds.): Social and Moral Values. Hillsdale
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
327–346.
2.
AshkanasyN. M.WilderomC. P. M.PetersonM. F.
(2000): Introduction. In: AshkanasyN.
M.WilderomC. P. M.PetersonM. F.
(Eds.): Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate.
Thousand Oaks, Ca.:
Sage,
1–18.
3.
BanduraA.
(1979): Social Learning Theory. Oxford,
England:
Prentice-Hall.
4.
BabinB. J.BolesJ. S.RobinD. P.
(2000): Representing the Perceived Ethical Work Climate
among marketing employees. In: Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science, 28 (3),
345–358.
5.
BarberB.
R. (1984): Strong Democracy:
Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley,
CA: University of California
Press.
6.
BiboucheS.
(2003): Neue Orientierungen und Engagementformen von
Jugendlichen Arbeitnehmer/inne/n. Unveröffentlichte
Dissertation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität,
Tübingen, Germany.
7.
BriefA. P.MotowidloS. J.
(1986): Prosocial organizational behaviors.
In: Academy of Management Review, 11,
710–725.
8.
ColbyA.KohlbergL.SnareyJ.ReimerJ.
(1987): The development of moral reasoning among Kibbutz
Adolescents: A longitudinal study. In: ColbyA.KohlbergL.
(Eds.): The Measurement of Moral Judgment (Vol.1).
Cambridge NY: Cambridge University
Press, 129–149.
9.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O. L. H.NgK. Y.
(2001): Justice at the millenium: A meta-analytic review of
25 years of organizational justice research. In: Journal of
Applied Psychology, 86,
425–445.
CullenJ. B.VictorB.BronsonJ. W.
(1993): The Ethical Climate Questionnaire: An assessment of
its development and validity. In: Psychological
Reports, 73,
667–674.
12.
DamonW.
(1998): Political development for a democratic
future. In: Journal of Social Issues,
54, 612–627.
13.
DavisM.
H. (1980): A
multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. In:
JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology,
10, 85.
14.
DicksonM. W.SmithD. B.GrojeanM. W.EhrhartM.
(2001): An organizational climate regarding ethics: The
outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. In:
Leadership Quarterly, 12,
197–217.
15.
DollJ.DickM.
(2000): Protestantische Ethik und humanitär-egalitäre Ethik.
Studien zur Entwicklung zweier deutschsprachiger Ethikskalen. In:
Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie,
21, 138–151.
16.
EisenbergN.MillerP. A.
(1987): The relation of empathy to prosocial and related
behaviors. In: Psychological Bulletin,
101, 91–119.
17.
FlodellC.
(1989): Miteinander oder Gegeneinander – eine sozialpsychologische
Untersuchung über Solidarität und Konkurrenz in der Arbeitswelt.
Wiesbaden: Deutscher
Universitätsverlag.
18.
GebertD.BoernerS.MatiaskeW.
(1998): Offenheit und Geschlossenheit in Organisationen –
Zur Validierung eines Meßinstruments (FOGO-Fragebogen). In:
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie,
42, 15–26.
19.
HabermasJ.
(1983): Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives
Handeln. In: J. Habermas: Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives
Handeln (S.127–206).Frankfurt/M.:
Suhrkamp.
20.
HellerF. A.DrenthP.KoopmanP.RusV.
(1988): Decisions in Organizations: A Three Country Comparative
Study. London:
Sage.
21.
HellerF.PusicE.StraussG.WilpertB.
(eds.) (1998): Organizational Participation – Myth and
Reality. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
22.
HögeT.
(2006): Mitarbeiterkapitalbeteiligung. Zum Stand der
Forschung zu den psychologischen Effekten. In: Arbeit,
15 (4),
246–258.
23.
HoffE-H.LempertW.LappeL.
(1991): Persönlichkeitsentwicklung in
Facharbeiterbiographien. Bern:
Hans Huber.
24.
HoffmanM.
L. (1989): Empathy and
prosocial activism. In: EisenbergN.ReykowskiJ.StaubE.
(Eds.): Social and Moral Values. Hillsdale
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
65–85.
25.
Holz-EbelingF.SteinmetzM.
(1995): Wie brauchbar sind die vorliegenden Fragebogen zur
Messung von Empathie? Kritische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung der
Iteminhalte. In: Zeitschrift für Differentielle und
Diagnostische Psychologie, 16,
11–32.
26.
Industrial Democracy in Europe (IDE)
International Research Group. (1981): Industrial Democracy
in Europe. London: Oxford
University Press.
27.
JurschitzP.
(2008): Demokratie dynamisch: Demokratische Strukturen in
Wirtschaft und Gemeinde. Wien:
Braumüller.
28.
KatzI.HassR. G.
(1988): Racial ambivalence and American value conflict:
Correlational studies of dual cognitive structures. In: Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,
893–905.
29.
Klicperová-BakerM.
(Ed.). (1998): Ready for Democracy?Civic Culture and Civility with a Focus on Czech Society.
Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech
Republic.
30.
KohlbergL.
(1984): Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 2: The Psychology
of Moral Development. The Nature and Validity of Moral
Stages. San Francisco: Harper
& Row.
31.
KonovskyM.
A. (2000): Understanding
procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. In:
Journal of Management, 26,
489–511.
32.
LeibetsederM.LaireiterA.-R.RieplerA.KoellerT.
(2001): E-Skala: Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Empathie –
Beschreibung und psychometrische Eigenschaften. In: Zeitschrift
für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22,
70–85.
33.
LempertW.
(1993): Moralische Sozialisation im Beruf.
In: Zeitschrift für Erziehungssoziologie und Sozialisationsforschung,
13, 2–35.
34.
LePineJ. A.ErezA.JohnsonD. E.
(2002): The nature and dimensionality of organizational
citizenship behavior: A critical review and metaanalysis. In:
Journal of Applied Psychology, 87,
52–65.
35.
LindG.
(2002): Ist Moral lehrbar?Berlin:
Nomos.
36.
MohiyeddiniC.MontadaL.
(1998): BJW and self-efficacy in coping with observed
victimization. In: MontadaL.LernerM. J.
(Eds.): Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World.
New York: Plenum,
41–54.
37.
MoldaschlM.
(2004): Partizipation und/als/statt Demokratie. Zum
Entwicklungsverhältnis von gesellschaftlicher Demokratisierung und organisationaler
Partizipation. In: WeberW. G.PasqualoniP.-P.BurtscherC.
(Eds.): Wirtschaft, Demokratie und Soziale Verantwortung.
Goettingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck &
Ruprecht, 216–245.
38.
MoormanR. H.BlakelyG.L.
(1995): Individualism-collectivism as an individual
difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. In:
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16,
127–142.
39.
OrganD.
W. (1988): Organizational
Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington,
MA: Lexington Books.
40.
OrganD. W.PaineJ. B.
(1999): A new kind of performance for industrial and
organizational psychology: Recent contributions to the study of organizational
behavior. In: CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T.
(Eds.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Vol.
14. Chichester:
Wiley,
337–368.
41.
OserF.AlthofW.
(2001): Moralische Selbstbestimmung.
Modelle der Entwicklung und Erziehung im Wertebereich.
Stuttgart:
Klett-Cotta.
42.
PattersonM. G.WestM. A.ShackletonV. J.DawsonJ. F.LawthomRe.MaitlisS.RobinsonD. L.WallaceA. M.
(2005): Validating the Organizational Climate Measure: Links
to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. In:
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26,
379–408.
43.
PierceJ. L.KostovaT.DirksK. T.
(2001): Towards a theory of psychological ownership in
organizations. In: Academy of Management Review,
26, 298–310.
44.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P.
(2003): Common method biases in behavioral research: A
critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In:
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88,
879–903.
45.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PaineJ. B.BachrachD.
(2000): Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical
review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future
research. In: Journal of Management,
26, 513–563.
46.
PorterL. W.LawlerE.
E.IIIHackmanJ. R.
(1996): Ways groups influence individual work
effectiveness. In: SteersR. M.PorterL. W.BigleyG. A.
(Eds.): Motivation and Leadership at Work. New
York: McGraw-Hill,
346–354.
47.
PowerF. C.HigginsA.KohlbergL.
(1989): Assessing the moral culture of
schools. In: PowerF. C.HigginsA.KohlbergL.
(Eds.): Lawrence Kohlberg's Approach to Moral Education.
New York: Columbia University
Press, 99–145.
48.
RousseauD.
(1988): The construction of climate in organizational
research. In: CooperC. L.RobertsonI.
(Eds.): International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
(Vol.3), 139–158.
49.
SchoolerC.MulatuM. S.OatesG.
(2004): Occupational self-direction, intellectual
functioning, and self-directed orientation in older workers: Findings and implications
for individuals and societies. In: American Journal of
Sociology, 110,
161–197.
50.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L.
(1979): Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater
reliability. In: Psychological Bulletin,
86, 420–428.
51.
StaufenbielT.HartzC.
(2000): Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Entwicklung und
erste Validierung eines Messinstruments. In:
Diagnostica, 46,
73–83.
52.
TannenbaumA. S.KavcicB.RosnerM.VianelloM.WieserG.
(1974): Hierarchy in Organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey
Bass.
53.
TrevinoL. K.ButterfieldD.McCabeD. L.
(1998): The ethical context in organizations: Influence on
employee attitudes and behaviors. In: Business Ethics
Quarterly, 8,
447–477.
UlrichP.
(2001): Integrative Wirtschaftsethik – Grundlagen einer
lebensdienlichen Ökonomie (3rd ed.).
Bern: Paul
Haupt.
56.
VandewalleD.Van DyneL.KostovaT.
(1995): Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of
its consequences. In: Group & Organization
Management, 20,
210–226.
57.
Van DyneL.PierceJ. P.
(2004): Psychological ownership and feelings of possession:
Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship
behavior. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior,
25, 439–459.
58.
VilmarF.WeberW. G.
(2004): Demokratisierung und Humanisierung der Arbeit – ein
Überblick. In: WeberW. G.PasqualoniP.-P.BurtscherC.
(Eds.): Wirtschaft, Demokratie und Soziale Verantwortung.
Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck &
Ruprecht, 105–143.
59.
WeberW.
G. (1999):
Organisationale Demokratie – Anregungen für innovative Arbeitsformen
jenseits bloßer Partizipation? In: Zeitschrift für
Arbeitswissenschaft, 53,
270–281.
60.
WeberW. G.HögeT.
(2008): Mitarbeiterbeteiligung oder demokratische
Mitentscheidung? Zum Stand der organisationspsychologischen Forschung über deren
Auswirkungen. In: LeitsmüllerH.
(Eds.): Mitarbeiterbeteiligung und Gewinnbeteiligung in Österreich.
Wien, Austria:
ÖGB-Verlag,
187–208.
61.
WeberW. G.UnterrainerC.SchmidB. E.IwanowaA. N.
(2007): Solidarisches Handeln in demokratischen Betrieben –
Illusion oder Realität? In: Internationale Zeitschrift für
Sozialpsychologie und Gruppendynamik in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft,
1, 22–37.
62.
YaffeeR.
(1998): Enhancement of reliability analysis. Application of
intraclass correlations with SPSS/Windows v.8 [www-document]. URL http://www.nyu.edu/acf/socsci/Docs/intracls.html
[22.02.2007].
