This article provides a brief overview of artificial intelligence (AI), and its perceived value-creation potential as well as its perceived risks from a multi-stakeholder perspective. It also draws some guidelines for exploring a high-level AI business strategy by taking a multi-stakeholder perspective into consideration, i.e., shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers and society. A short survey among European business professionals reveals a perception that AI serves mainly financial purposes and is perceived predominantly as creating value for shareholders and customers, while employees and society are perceived as negatively impacted stakeholders.
DNB. (2019, 25 July). DNB issues guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence. DNBulletin.
8.
European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Ec.europe.eu/digital
9.
European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence—A European approach to excellence and trust. COM (2020) 65 final.
10.
FinlayS. (2018). Artificial intelligence and machine learning for business (3rd ed.). Relativistic.
11.
FlemingO.FountaineT.HenkeN.SalehT. (2018). Ten red flags signaling your analytics program will fail. McKinsey & Co.
12.
GDPR. (2016). European Union General Data Protection Regulation(2016/79).
13.
GoswamiP. (2015). Employee value proposition: A tool for employment branding. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(12), 263–264.
14.
GüngörH. (2018a). Towards machine-to-machine marketing with artificial intelligence. LinkedIn.
15.
GüngörH. (2018b). Evolution of marketing and the impact of artificial intelligence. CamEd Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics and Social Sciences, 3, 15–35.
16.
HBR. (2018, January–February). The risks and rewards of AI: Assessing the opportunities and the potential pitfalls. Insights Center Collection. Published on Hbr.Org.
17.
HuangM-H.RustR. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172.
18.
IFC. (2019). The use of big data analytics and AI in central banking. IFC Bulletin, 50, 1–20.
19.
KandemirliB. (2018). Amazon.Com’s Digital strategies—Case study. Researchgate.net
20.
KaplanA.HaenleinM. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of AI. Business Horizons, 62, 15–25.
21.
KenneyM.ZysmanJ. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, Spring2016, 61–69.
22.
KumarV.LahiriA.DoganO. (2018). A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 147–160.
23.
MahajanG. (2016). Value creation: The definitive guide for business leaders. SAGE Publications.
24.
MakridakisS. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46–60.
25.
MarrB.WardM. (2019). Artificial intelligence in practice. Wiley
26.
McKinsey. (2018a). An executive’s guide to AI. McKinsey Analytics.
27.
McKinsey. (2019). Global AI survey: AI proves its worth, but few scale impact. McKinsey Analytics.
28.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity.
29.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). AI, automation, and the future of work: Ten things to solve for. Briefing note prepared for the tech4good summit, organized by the French Presidency.
30.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
31.
Microsoft. (2018). The future computed: Artificial intelligence and its role in society. Redmond, Washington, DC: Microsoft Corporation.
32.
MicrosoftEY. (2018). Artificial intelligence in Europe—The Netherlands: Outlook for 2019 and beyond. Report commissioned by Microsoft and conducted by EY.
33.
MollerK.TorronenP. (2003). Business suppliers’ value creation potential: A capacity-based analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 109–118.
34.
Nvidia. (2017). Science in the News, Rockwell Anyoha, “The history of AI”, August 28, 2017, sit.hms.harvard.edu
35.
OECD. (2020). Recommendation of the council on artificial intelligence. OECD/Legal/0449.
36.
Pega Global Study. (2017). What consumers really think about AI: A global study. Retrieved from Pega.com.
37.
PorterM. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
38.
SAS. (2017). The enterprise AI promise: Path to value. An interview survey exploring enterprise readiness for artificial intelligence. SAS Institute Inc.
39.
SAS. (2018a). Artificial intelligence for executives. SAS Institute Inc.
40.
SAS. (2018b). Building your data and analytics strategy. SAS Institute Inc.
41.
SAS. (2018c). How to do deep learning with SAS. SAS Institute Inc.
42.
SinghA. (2016). The concepts of ‘social value creation’ and ‘social value’. In The process of social value creation. Contributions to economics (pp. 105–116). New Delhi, India: Springer.
43.
SlapperT. F.HallT. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4.
44.
Stanford AI Index Report. (2019). The AI index 2019 annual report. Stanford University.
45.
Stanford. (2018). Value chain innovation: The promise of AI. Whitepaper, Stanford value chain innovation initiative. Stanford Graduate School of Business.
46.
The Guardian. (2020, February 5). Welfare surveillance system violates human rights. www.theguardian.com
47.
The Royal Society. (2019). Explainable AI: The basics—Policy briefing.
48.
TIME. How China is using ‘social credit scores’ to reward and punish its citizens. Retrieved from https://time.com/collection/davos-2019/5502592/china-social-credit-score/
49.
VinuesaR.AzizpourH.LeiteI. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11, 233.
