The study was carried out to examine the level of work engagement and whether socio-demographic and job-related characteristics influence work engagement level of Indian business executives. Study variables included gender, age, education, income, nature of organization, position in organizational hierarchy, and job tenure. A total of 404 business executives from select public and private sector organizations in India participated in the study. The study results suggest above-average level of work engagement among Indian business executives. Findings also suggest that there are significant differences in the work engagement level of employees with different demographic and job characteristics, such as age, nature of organization, position in the organizational hierarchy, income, etc. However, gender, education, and organizational tenure failed to contribute to our understanding of work engagement. By examining the level of work engagement among select Indian business executives and how it varies with respect to various socio-demographic and job-related variables, the study adds to the scarce literature on employee engagement, especially in Indian context, where little work has been undertaken in this direction.
AlarconG. M.EdwardsJ. M. (2011). The relationship of engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Stress and Health, 27(3), e294–e298.
2.
AveryD. R.McKayP. F.WilsonD. C. (2007). Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1542–1556.
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.VerbekeW. (2004). Using the job demands—Resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83–104.
4.
BalainS.SparrowP. (2009). Engaged to perform: A new perspective on employee engagement. Centre for Performance-led HR White Paper 09/04.Lancaster: Lancaster University Management School.
5.
BuckinghamM. (2001 October). What a waste. People Management, 11, 36–39.
6.
Business World. (2008, May). HR special survey: Engage the employee, pp. 32–35.
7.
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2006). Working Life: Employee attitudes and engagement. Research Report.
8.
ChaudharyH. C. (2005). Knowledge management for competitive advantage: Changing the world through knowledge. New Delhi: Excel Books.
9.
ChristianM. S.GarzaA. S.SlaughterJ. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.
10.
CoetzeeM.de VilliersM. (2010). Sources of job stress, work engagement and career orientations of employees in a South African financial institution. Southern African Business Review, 14(1), 27–57.
11.
CoetzeeS. E.RothmannS. (2005). Work engagement of employees at a higher education institution in South Africa. Southern African Business Review, 9(3), 23–34.
12.
ColanL. J. (2009). Engaging the hearts and minds of all your employees: How to ignite passionate performance for better business results. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
13.
DeeryS. J.IversonR. D.WalshJ. T. (2006). Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 166–175.
14.
GarrosaE.Moreno-JimenezB.Rodrıguez-MunozA.Rodrıguez-CarvajalR. (2011). Role stress and personal resources in nursing: Across-sectional study of burnout and engagement. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(4), 479–489.
15.
GierveldJ. H.BakkerA. B. (2005). De invloed van de secretaresse [The influence of the secretary]. Diemen, The Netherlands: Manpower.
16.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In A. B.BakkerM. P.Leiter, Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 118–131). New York: Psychology Press.
17.
HallbergU.SchaufeliW. B. (2006). Same same but different: Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 119–127.
18.
HarterJ. K.SchmidtF. L.HayesT. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.
19.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: An attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
20.
Indiastat.com (2011–2012). Workforce participation rate by sex and by sector in India. Retrieved December 21, 2016, from http://www.indiastat.com/labourandworkforce/380987/workparticipation/299/stats.aspx#0
21.
JohnsonL. B. (1991). Job strain among police officers: Gender comparison. Police Studies, 14(1), 12–16.
22.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
23.
LangelaanS.BakkerA. B.Van DoornenL. J. P.SchaufeliW. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521–532.
24.
LockwoodN. R. (2006). Talent management: Driver for organization success. Research Quarterly, June, 1–13. Retrieved December 8, 2011, from http://www.shrm.org
25.
MartelL. (2003). Finding and keeping high performers: Best practices from 25 best companies. Employee Relations Today, 30(1), 27–43.
26.
MaslachC.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.
27.
MaunoS.KinnunenU.MakikangasA.NattiJ. (2005). Psychological consequences of fixed-term employment and perceived job insecurity among health care staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 209–237.
28.
MontesS. D.IrvingP. G. (2008). Disentangling the effects of promised and delivered inducements: Relational and transactional contract elements and the mediating role of trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1367–1381.
29.
MostertK.RothmannS. (2006). Work-related well-being in the South African police service. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 479–491.
RothbardN. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655–684.
35.
SaksA. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
36.
SalanovaM.AgutS.PeiroJ. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227.
37.
SalanovaM.SchaufeliW. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 19(1), 226–231.
38.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B. (2003). UWES—Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test manual. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Utrecht University.
39.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B.BakkerM. P.Leiter, Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). New York: Psychology Press.
40.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
41.
SchaufeliW. B.EnzmannD. (1998). The burnout companion to 892 study and practice: A critical analysis. London: Taylor and Francis.
42.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.Gonzalez-RomaV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
43.
Scottish Executive Social Research. (2007). Employee engagement in the public sector: A review of literature.Edinburgh, Retrieved November 28, 2010, from www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch
44.
SinghI. S. (2010). Globalization and human resource development.New Delhi: Excel Books.
45.
SlattenT.MehmetogluM. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: A study from the hospitality industry. Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 88–107.
46.
TrussC. (2014). The future for research in employee engagement.Contribution to Engage for Success White Paper: The Future of Engagement: A Thought Piece Collection. London: Engage for Success. Retrieved November 16, 2015, from http://www.engageforsuccess.org/future-employee-engagement/
47.
VanamS. (2009). Job engagement: Examining the relationship with situational and personal factors.Master’s thesis, San Jose State University.
48.
WelchM. (2011). The evolution of the employee engagement concept: Communication implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 16(4), 328–346.
49.
WissingM. P.Van EedenC. (2002). Empirical clarification of the nature of psychological wellbeing. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(1), 32–44.
50.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183–200.
51.
XuJ.Cooper-ThomasH. D. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399–416.
