Bad management can never lead to good development decisions. This also holds true for conservation and management of biodiversity and ecosystem benefits that lie at the heart of sound development practice and central to solving environmental crises. Conserving biodiversity becomes even more relevant in the context of developing and emerging economies where the dependence on bio-resources is disproportionately high for sustaining economy and buffering humanity from environmental risks and hazards.
Significant inroads into monetization of biodiversity provides convincing ground in favor of exercising options to prevent ‘no net loss’ and promote ‘a positive gain’ of the natural capital, vital for life and ascending trajectory of economic growth.
Corporate groups and resource managers must explore ‘out of the box’ solutions to address the existing and potential threats to biodiversity linked to business actions that are rationalized as ‘unavoidable for economic growth’. Just as incentives are important in business management as mechanisms that shape human and collective actions, offsets are being globally accepted as development-led conservation actions for incentivizing biodiversity conservation through business initiatives, especially when the ‘traditional’ conservation approaches are not always effective.
Based on accumulating experience, biodiversity offsets have not only become saleable business drivers but are also being recognized as innovative and forward-looking solutions to resolve conservation–development conflicts in the developed, developing, and emerging economies.
BekessyS.WintleB.LindenmayerD.BMccarthyM.ColyvanM.BurgmanM.(2010). The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank.Conservation Letters, 3, 151–158.
2.
BertandN. (2002). Biodiversity resources. A companion volume to Business & Biodiversity: The Handbook for Corporate Action.Earthwatch Institute (Europe): International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Europe.
3.
BullJoseph W.SuttleK.BGordonA.SinghNavinder J.Milner-gullandE.J. (2013). Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice fauna & flora international.Oryx, 47(03), 369–380. Retrieved November 18, 2014 from http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3908.pdf
4.
BullJosephKenwynW.SuttleB.SinghNavinder J.Milner-GullandE.J. (2013). Conservation when nothing stands still: Moving targets and biodiversity offsets.Front Ecol Environ. doi:10.1890/120020
5.
Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). (2009a). Glossary. Washington, DC: BBOP.
6.
———. (2009b). Compensatory conservation case studies. Washington, DC:BBOP.
DunfordR.WGinnT.CDesvousgesW.H. (2004). The use of habitat equivalency analysis in natural resource damage assessments.Ecological Economics, 48, 49–70.
14.
EBI (2003). Integrating biodiversity conservation into oil and gas development. Energy and Biodiversity Initiative (EBI) BP, Chevron Texaco, Conservation International, Fauna and Flora International, IUCN, The Nature Conservancy, Shell, Smithsonian Institution, Statoil. Retrieved December 7, 2014 from www.theebi.org/org/pdfs/sources.pdf
15.
Ecologic (2006). The use of market incentives to preserve biodiversity. Final report. ENV.G.1/FRA/2004/0081. Germany:Ecologic.
16.
FishS.SnashallD.StreaterJ. (2004). Offsetting environmental impacts to facilitate mining. Paper presented at the Inaugural Global Sustainable Development Conference,25–29 October 2004, Sofitel Hotel Melbourne, Melbourne.
17.
FoxJ.Nino-MurciaA. (2005).Status of species conservation banking in the United States.Conservation Biology19, 996–1007.
18.
GibbonsP.LindenmayerD.B. (2007). Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog?Ecological Management and Restoration, 8, 26–31.
19.
HannisMikeSullivanSian (2012). Offsetting nature? Habitat banking and biodiversity offsets in the English land use planning system. UK:Green House Publication. ISBN 978-0-9569545-7-2.
20.
IAIA (2005). Biodiversity in impact assessment. Special Publication Series No. 3 July 2005. Fargo, USA: International Association of Impact Assessment (IAIA).
21.
ICMM–IUCN (2012). Independent report on biodiversity offsets. Prepared by The Biodiversity Consultancy. Retrieved October 27, 2014 from http://www.icmm.com/biodiversity-offsets
22.
International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2012). Performance standard 6. Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources. Washington, DC, USA:International Finance Corporation.
23.
Landell-MillsN.PorrasI.T. (2002). Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. London:International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) Publication.
MannC.VoBJ.PSimonsA.AmelungN.RungeT. (2014). Challenging futures of biodiversity offsets and banking. Critical issues for robust forms of biodiversity conservation. A Report based on an interactive, anticipatory assessment of the dynamics of governance instruments, 19 April 2013.Berlin, Technische Universität (TU) Berlin. Retrieved October 20, 2014 from http://www.innovation-in-governance.org
26.
McKenneyB. (2005). Environmental offset policies, principles, and methods: A review of selected legislative frameworks. Amherst (NH):Biodiversity Neutral Initiative.
27.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington, DC:World Resources Institute.
28.
MissrieM.NelsonKristen (2005). Direct payments for conservation: Lessons from the monarch butterfly conservation fund. Research Summary/Paper No. 8, College of Natural Resources, University of Minnesota.
29.
MoilanenA.Van TeeffelenA.J.A.Ben-haimY.FerrierS. (2009). How much compensation is enough? A framework for incorporating uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat.Restoration Ecology, 17, 470–478.
30.
MorgeraE. (2012). From corporate social responsibility to accountability mechanisms: The role of the convention on biological diversity. University of Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper Series.
31.
MorrisR.K.A.AlonsoI.JeffersonR.GKirbyK.J. (2006). The creation of compensatory habitat—can it secure sustainable development?Journal for Nature Conservation, 14, 106–116.
HawkenPaulLovinsAmoryLovinsHunter. L. (2008). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Little, Brown and Co. ISBN-13: 978-0316353007. p. 322.
35.
PilgrimJ.DBrownlieS.EkstromJ.M.M.GardnerT.Avon HaseA.ten KateK. et al. (2013). A framework for assessing offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conservation Letters.
36.
QuetierF.LavorelS. (2011). Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation, 144, 2991–2999.
37.
RaceM.SFonsecaM. S. (1996). Fixing compensatory mitigation: What will it take?Ecological Applications, 6, 94–101.
38.
RaineyHugo J.PollardEdward H.B.DutsonGuyEkstromJonathan M.M.LivingstoneSuzanne R.TempleHelen J.PilgrimJohn D. (2014). A review of corporate goals of no net loss and net positive impact on biodiversity.ORYX,1–7.
39.
RajvanshiA.MathurV.B. (2010). Reconciling conservation and development: The role of biodiversity offsets. In R. Slootweg, Asha Rajvanshi, Vinod B. Mathur, & Arend Kolhoff (Eds), Biodiversity in environmental assessment—enhancing ecosystem services for human well-being (pp. 255–286). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
40.
RajvanshiA.BrownlieS.SlootwegR.AroraR. (2011). Maximizing benefits for biodiversity: The potential of enhancement strategies in impact assessment.Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(3), 181–193.
41.
RojasM.AylwardB. (2001). The case of La Esperanza: A small, private hydropower producer and a conservation NGO in Costa Rica. In Land Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series, FAO.
42.
SalzmanJ.RuhlJ.B. (2005). ‘No net loss’—instrument choice in wetlands protection.Duke Law School Science, technology, and innovation Research Paper Series 1.Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Retrieved May 2013, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=796771
ten KateK.LairdS.A. (2002). The commercial use of biodiversity: Access to genetic resources and benefit sharing. London:Earthscan.
46.
ten KateK.BishopJ.BayonR. (2004). Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Cambridge, UK and London, UK:Insight Investment.ISBN: 2-8317-0854-0.
——— (2006). Environmental offsets. Position Statement No. 9. Western Australia Environmental Protection Authority January 2006.
51.
WilkinsonJ.KennedyC. (2002). Banks and fees: The status of off-site wetland mitigation in the United States. Washington, DC:Environmental Law Institute.
52.
WilcoveD.SLeeJ. (2004). Using economic and regulatory incentives to restore endangered species: Lessons learned from three new programs.Conservation Biology, 18(3), 639–645.
53.
World Bank (2007). Global economic prospects 2007: Managing the next wave of globalization. Washington, DC: World Bank.
54.
Worldwatch (1999). State of the world 1999: A Worldwatch Institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. by Lester R. Brown, Christopher Flavin, Hilary French, and Janet Abramovitz, Seth Dunn, Gary Gardner, Ashley Mattoon, Anne Platt McGinn, Molly O'Meara, Michael Renner David Roodman, Payal Sampat, John Tuxill, and Linda Starke, editor. W. W. Norton., New York, London.
55.
YoungM.DGunninghamN.ElixJ.LambertJ.HowardB.GraboskyP.McCroneE. (1996). Reimbursing the future: An evaluation of motivational, voluntary, price-based, property-right, and regulatory incentives for the conservation of biodiversity. Biodiversity Series, Paper No. 9 Prepared by CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, the Australian Centre for Environmental Law, and Community Solutions.
