The Local Impacts of World Bank Development Projects Near Sites of Conservation Significance

Abstract

We evaluated the local impacts of World Bank development projects on sites of recognized conservation significance (Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas [IBAs]) using tree cover change data and in situ state, pressure, and response monitoring data. IBAs adjacent to World Bank project locations and a matched set of IBAs distant from World Bank project locations had similar rates of tree loss and similar in situ measurements of conservation outcomes. Thus, we did not detect any significant net negative impacts of World Bank projects on tree cover or conservation outcomes. These results are encouraging because 89% of World Bank projects that are close to IBAs are environmentally sensitive projects (so-called Category A and Category B projects) subjected to the organization’s most stringent safeguards. However, the limitations of our evaluation design do not allow us to rule out the possibility that World Bank projects had positive or negative effects that were undetectable.

Keywords

aid development finance forest loss Important Bird and Biodiversity Area sustainable development biodiversity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AidData. (2015). Geocoded data from the World Bank IBRD-IDA, Version 1.0. Retrieved from http://aiddata.org.

Avelino

A. F. T.

Baylis

Honey-Rosés

(2016) Goldilocks and the raster grid: Selecting scale when evaluating conservation programs. PLoS One 11(12): e0167945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167945.

Andam

Ferraro

Pfaff

Sanchez

(2007) Protected areas and avoided deforestation: A statistical evaluation, Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office.

Andam

Ferraro

Pfaff

Sanchez

Robalino

(2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation: A rigorous impact evaluation approach. Proceedings of National Academy of Science 105(42): 16089–16094.

Bartholomé

Belward

A. S.

(2005) GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26: 1959–1977.

Batra, G., Anand, A., Goodman, S., Nyoteshwar, J., & Runfola, D. (2017). A value for money analysis of GEF interventions in land degradation and biodiversity. Washington, DC: GEF. Retrieved from http://www.gefieo.org/evaluations/value-money-analysis-gef-interventions-land-degradation-and-biodiversity.

BenYishay, A., Bradley, P., Daniel, R., & Rachel, T. (2016, December). Forest cover impacts of Chinese development projects in ecologically sensitive areas (AidData Working Paper No. 32). Williamsburg, VA: AidData.

BenYishay

Silke

Daniel

Rachel

(2017) Indigenous land rights and deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 86(C): 29–47.

Beresford

A. E.

Buchanan

G. M.

Phalan

Eshiamwata

G. W.

Balmford

Brink

A. B.

Donald

P. F.

(2017) Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa. Environmental Conservation 45(1): 49–57.

10.

Beresford

A. E.

Eshiamwata

G. W.

Donald

P. F.

Balmford

Bertzky

Brink

A. B.

Buchanan

G. M.

(2013) Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa. PLoS One 8(5): e65370.

11.

BirdLife International (2006) Monitoring Important Bird Areas: A global framework, Cambridge, England: Author.

12.

BirdLife International (2014) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: A global network for conserving nature and benefiting people, Cambridge, England: Author.

13.

Buchanan

G. M.

Fishpool

L. D. C.

Evans

M. I.

Butchart

S. H. M.

(2013) Comparing field-based monitoring and remote-sensing, using deforestation from logging at Important Bird Areas as a case study. Biological Conservation 167: 334–338.

14.

Buntaine

(2011) Does the Asian Development Bank respond to past environmental performance when allocating environmentally-risky financing? World Development 39: 336–350.

15.

Buntaine

(2016) Giving aid effectively: The politics of environmental performance and selectivity at multilateral development banks, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

16.

Buntaine

Hamilton

Millones

(2015) Titling community land to prevent deforestation: An evaluation of a best-case program in Morona-Santiago, Ecuador. Global Environmental Change 33: 32–43.

17.

Center for International Earth Science Information Network (2013) Gridded Population of the World, Version 3 (GPWv3), Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Columbia University.

18.

Chomitz

(2007) At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests, Washington, DC: The World Bank.

19.

Cook

T. D.

Shadish

W. R.

Wong

V. C.

(2008) Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27: 724–750.

20.

Dani

Freeman

Thomas

(2011) Evaluative directions for the World Bank Group’s safeguards and sustainability policies, Washington, DC: World Bank.

21.

Findley, M., Marineau, J., Powell, J., & Weaver, C. (2015). ‘The swarm principle’: A sub-national spatial analysis of aid targeting and donor coordination in sub-Saharan Africa. Retrieved from http://www.josiahmarineau.com/uploads/4/0/1/2/40124603/swarm_principle_coordination_13_august_2015.pdf.

22.

Gutner

T. L.

(2002) Banking on the environment: Multilateral development banks and their environmental performance in Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Hansen

M. C.

Potapov

P. V.

Moore

Hancher

Turubanova

S. A.

Tyukavina

Townshend

J. R.

(2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342: 850–853.

24.

Hickey

Pimm

S. L.

(2011) How the World Bank funds protected areas. Conservation Letters 4(4): 269–277.

25.

Hicks

R. L.

Parks

B. C.

Roberts

J. T.

Tierney

M. J.

(2008) Greening aid? Understanding the environmental impact of development assistance, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

26.

D. E.

Imai

King

Ferrer

E. A.

(2011) MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software 42: 1–28.

27.

Holland

M. B.

Jones

K. W.

Freire

J. L.

Morales

Naughton-Treves

Suárez

(2017) Titling land to conserve forests: The case of Cuyabeno Reserve in Ecuador. Global Environmental Change 44: 27–38.

28.

Independent Evaluation Office of the Global Environment Facility. (2016). Value for money analysis for the land degradation projects of the GEF. Washington, DC: GEF. Retrieved from https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/council-meeting-documents/EN_GEF.ME_C.51.Inf_02_VFM%20Analysis%20for%20LD%20Projects%20of%20GEF.pdf.

29.

International Union for Conservation of Nature and United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (2013). The World Database on Protected Areas. Retrieved from http://www.wdpa.org/.

30.

Jones

K. W.

Holland

M. B.

Naughton-Treves

Morales

Suárez

Keenan

(2017) Forest conservation incentives and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Environmental Conservation 44(1): 56–65.

31.

Joppa

Pfaff

(2010) Re-assessing the forest impacts of protection: The challenge of non-random protection and a corrective method. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185: 135–149.

32.

Keohane

R. O.

Levy

M. A.

(1996) Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

33.

Ledec

Posas

P. J.

(2003) Biodiversity conservation in road projects: Lessons from World Bank experience in Latin America. Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies 1819: 198–201.

34.

Miller

D. C.

(2014) Explaining global patterns of international aid for linked biodiversity conservation and development. World Development 59: 341–359.

35.

National Imagery and Mapping Agency. (2012). VMap0. Retrieved from http://www.mapability.com/info/vmap0_download.html.

36.

Nielson

Tierney

M. J.

(2003) Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International Organization 57: 241–277.

37.

Nunnenkamp

Albena

S. A.

Rainer

(2016) Do aid donors specialize and coordinate within recipient countries? The case of Malawi. Development Policy Review 34(6): 831–849.

38.

Pandey, K. D., & Wheeler, D. (2001, April). Structural adjustment and forest resources: The impact of World Bank operations (Policy Research Working Paper 2584). Washington, DC: World Bank.

39.

Park

(2010) The World Bank’s global safeguard policy norm? In: Park

Vetterlein

(eds) Owning development: Creating policy norms in the IMF and the World Bank, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–203.

40.

Quintero

J. D.

(2007) Mainstreaming conservation in infrastructure projects: Case studies from Latin America, Washington, DC: World Bank.

41.

Rich

(1994) Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, environmental impoverishment, and the crisis of development, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

42.

Riley

S. J.

DeGloria

S. D.

Elliot

(1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences 5(1–4): 23–27.

43.

Runfola

Yishay

A. B.

Tanner

Buchanan

Nagol

Leu

Marty

(2017) A top-down approach to estimating spatially heterogeneous impacts of development aid on vegetative carbon sequestration. Sustainability 9(3): 409.

44.

Shandra

J. M.

Rademacher

Coburn

(2016) The World Bank and organized hypocrisy? A cross-national analysis of structural adjustment and forest loss. Environmental Sociology 2(2): 192–207.

45.

Shandra

J. M.

Shircliff

London

(2011) World Bank lending and deforestation: A cross-national analysis. International Sociology 26: 292–314.

46.

Sims

K. R. E.

(2010) Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(2): 94–114.

47.

Sommer

J. M.

Shandra

J. M.

Restivo

(2017) The World Bank, contradictory lending, and forests: A cross-national analysis of organized hypocrisy. International Sociology 32(6): 707–730.

48.

Tracewski

Ł.

Butchart

S. H. M.

Donald

P. F.

Evans

Fishpool

L. D. C.

Buchanan

G. M.

(2016) Patterns of twenty-first century forest loss across a global network of important sites for biodiversity. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2(1): 37–44.

49.

United States Geological Survey (2004) Shuttle radar topography mission, College Park, MD: Global Land Cover Facility, University of Maryland.

50.

Wade

(1997) Greening the Bank: The struggle over the environment, 1970-1995. In: Kapur

Lewis

J. P.

Webb

(eds) The World Bank: Its first half century Vol. 2, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 611–734.

51.

Wade

(2016) Boulevard to broken dreams, part 1: The Polonoroeste road project in the Brazilian Amazon, and the World Bank’s environmental and indigenous peoples’ norms. Revista de Economia Política 36(1): 214–230.

52.

Waldron

Miller

D. C.

Redding

Mooers

Kuhn

T. S.

Nibbelink

Gittleman

J. L.

(2017) Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending. Nature 551: 364–367.

53.

World Bank (1999) Environmental assessment. Operational policy/bank procedures/good practices 4.01, Washington, DC: Author.

54.

World Bank (2001) Natural habitats. Operational policy/bank procedures/good practices 4.04, Washington, DC: Author.

55.

World Bank (2002) Promoting environmental sustainability in development: An evaluation of the World Bank’s performance, Washington, DC: Author.

56.

World Bank. (2016). GDP per capita. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB

0.17 MB

0.02 MB

0.01 MB