We evaluated the local impacts of World Bank development projects on sites of recognized conservation significance (Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas [IBAs]) using tree cover change data and in situ state, pressure, and response monitoring data. IBAs adjacent to World Bank project locations and a matched set of IBAs distant from World Bank project locations had similar rates of tree loss and similar in situ measurements of conservation outcomes. Thus, we did not detect any significant net negative impacts of World Bank projects on tree cover or conservation outcomes. These results are encouraging because 89% of World Bank projects that are close to IBAs are environmentally sensitive projects (so-called Category A and Category B projects) subjected to the organization’s most stringent safeguards. However, the limitations of our evaluation design do not allow us to rule out the possibility that World Bank projects had positive or negative effects that were undetectable.
AidData. (2015). Geocoded data from the World Bank IBRD-IDA, Version 1.0. Retrieved from http://aiddata.org.
2.
AvelinoA. F. T.BaylisK.Honey-RosésJ. (2016) Goldilocks and the raster grid: Selecting scale when evaluating conservation programs. PLoS One11(12): e0167945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167945.
3.
AndamK.FerraroP.PfaffA.SanchezA. (2007) Protected areas and avoided deforestation: A statistical evaluation, Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility Evaluation Office.
4.
AndamK.FerraroP.PfaffA.SanchezA.RobalinoJ. (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation: A rigorous impact evaluation approach. Proceedings of National Academy of Science105(42): 16089–16094.
5.
BartholoméE.BelwardA. S. (2005) GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing26: 1959–1977.
BenYishay, A., Bradley, P., Daniel, R., & Rachel, T. (2016, December). Forest cover impacts of Chinese development projects in ecologically sensitive areas (AidData Working Paper No. 32). Williamsburg, VA: AidData.
8.
BenYishayA.SilkeH.DanielR.RachelT. (2017) Indigenous land rights and deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management86(C): 29–47.
9.
BeresfordA. E.BuchananG. M.PhalanB.EshiamwataG. W.BalmfordA.BrinkA. B.DonaldP. F. (2017) Correlates of long-term land-cover change and protected area performance at priority conservation sites in Africa. Environmental Conservation45(1): 49–57.
10.
BeresfordA. E.EshiamwataG. W.DonaldP. F.BalmfordA.BertzkyB.BrinkA. B.BuchananG. M. (2013) Protection reduces loss of natural land-cover at sites of conservation importance across Africa. PLoS One8(5): e65370.
11.
BirdLife International (2006) Monitoring Important Bird Areas: A global framework, Cambridge, England: Author.
12.
BirdLife International (2014) Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas: A global network for conserving nature and benefiting people, Cambridge, England: Author.
13.
BuchananG. M.FishpoolL. D. C.EvansM. I.ButchartS. H. M. (2013) Comparing field-based monitoring and remote-sensing, using deforestation from logging at Important Bird Areas as a case study. Biological Conservation167: 334–338.
14.
BuntaineM. (2011) Does the Asian Development Bank respond to past environmental performance when allocating environmentally-risky financing?World Development39: 336–350.
15.
BuntaineM. (2016) Giving aid effectively: The politics of environmental performance and selectivity at multilateral development banks, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
16.
BuntaineM.HamiltonS.MillonesM. (2015) Titling community land to prevent deforestation: An evaluation of a best-case program in Morona-Santiago, Ecuador. Global Environmental Change33: 32–43.
17.
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (2013) Gridded Population of the World, Version 3 (GPWv3), Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Columbia University.
18.
ChomitzK. (2007) At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
19.
CookT. D.ShadishW. R.WongV. C. (2008) Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management27: 724–750.
20.
DaniA.FreemanA.ThomasV. (2011) Evaluative directions for the World Bank Group’s safeguards and sustainability policies, Washington, DC: World Bank.
GutnerT. L. (2002) Banking on the environment: Multilateral development banks and their environmental performance in Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HansenM. C.PotapovP. V.MooreR.HancherM.TurubanovaS. A.TyukavinaA.TownshendJ. R. (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science342: 850–853.
24.
HickeyV.PimmS. L. (2011) How the World Bank funds protected areas. Conservation Letters4(4): 269–277.
25.
HicksR. L.ParksB. C.RobertsJ. T.TierneyM. J. (2008) Greening aid? Understanding the environmental impact of development assistance, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
26.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.FerrerE. A. (2011) MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software42: 1–28.
27.
HollandM. B.JonesK. W.FreireJ. L.MoralesM.Naughton-TrevesL.SuárezL. (2017) Titling land to conserve forests: The case of Cuyabeno Reserve in Ecuador. Global Environmental Change44: 27–38.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (2013). The World Database on Protected Areas. Retrieved from http://www.wdpa.org/.
30.
JonesK. W.HollandM. B.Naughton-TrevesL.MoralesM.SuárezL.KeenanK. (2017) Forest conservation incentives and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Environmental Conservation44(1): 56–65.
31.
JoppaL.PfaffA. (2010) Re-assessing the forest impacts of protection: The challenge of non-random protection and a corrective method. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences1185: 135–149.
32.
KeohaneR. O.LevyM. A. (1996) Institutions for environmental aid: Pitfalls and promise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
LedecG.PosasP. J. (2003) Biodiversity conservation in road projects: Lessons from World Bank experience in Latin America. Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies1819: 198–201.
34.
MillerD. C. (2014) Explaining global patterns of international aid for linked biodiversity conservation and development. World Development59: 341–359.
NielsonD.TierneyM. J. (2003) Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International Organization57: 241–277.
37.
NunnenkampP.AlbenaS. A.RainerT. (2016) Do aid donors specialize and coordinate within recipient countries? The case of Malawi. Development Policy Review34(6): 831–849.
38.
Pandey, K. D., & Wheeler, D. (2001, April). Structural adjustment and forest resources: The impact of World Bank operations (Policy Research Working Paper 2584). Washington, DC: World Bank.
39.
ParkS. (2010) The World Bank’s global safeguard policy norm? In: ParkS.VetterleinA. (eds) Owning development: Creating policy norms in the IMF and the World Bank, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–203.
40.
QuinteroJ. D. (2007) Mainstreaming conservation in infrastructure projects: Case studies from Latin America, Washington, DC: World Bank.
41.
RichB. (1994) Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, environmental impoverishment, and the crisis of development, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
42.
RileyS. J.DeGloriaS. D.ElliotR. (1999) A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences5(1–4): 23–27.
43.
RunfolaD.YishayA. B.TannerJ.BuchananG.NagolJ.LeuM.MartyR. (2017) A top-down approach to estimating spatially heterogeneous impacts of development aid on vegetative carbon sequestration. Sustainability9(3): 409.
44.
ShandraJ. M.RademacherH.CoburnC. (2016) The World Bank and organized hypocrisy? A cross-national analysis of structural adjustment and forest loss. Environmental Sociology2(2): 192–207.
45.
ShandraJ. M.ShircliffE.LondonB. (2011) World Bank lending and deforestation: A cross-national analysis. International Sociology26: 292–314.
46.
SimsK. R. E. (2010) Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management60(2): 94–114.
47.
SommerJ. M.ShandraJ. M.RestivoM. (2017) The World Bank, contradictory lending, and forests: A cross-national analysis of organized hypocrisy. International Sociology32(6): 707–730.
48.
TracewskiŁ.ButchartS. H. M.DonaldP. F.EvansM.FishpoolL. D. C.BuchananG. M. (2016) Patterns of twenty-first century forest loss across a global network of important sites for biodiversity. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation2(1): 37–44.
49.
United States Geological Survey (2004) Shuttle radar topography mission, College Park, MD: Global Land Cover Facility, University of Maryland.
50.
WadeR. (1997) Greening the Bank: The struggle over the environment, 1970-1995. In: KapurD.LewisJ. P.WebbR. (eds) The World Bank: Its first half centuryVol. 2, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 611–734.
51.
WadeR. (2016) Boulevard to broken dreams, part 1: The Polonoroeste road project in the Brazilian Amazon, and the World Bank’s environmental and indigenous peoples’ norms. Revista de Economia Política36(1): 214–230.
52.
WaldronA.MillerD. C.ReddingD.MooersA.KuhnT. S.NibbelinkN.GittlemanJ. L. (2017) Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending. Nature551: 364–367.
53.
World Bank (1999) Environmental assessment. Operational policy/bank procedures/good practices 4.01, Washington, DC: Author.
54.
World Bank (2001) Natural habitats. Operational policy/bank procedures/good practices 4.04, Washington, DC: Author.
55.
World Bank (2002) Promoting environmental sustainability in development: An evaluation of the World Bank’s performance, Washington, DC: Author.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
