Similar to many parts of South Asia, hijras in Pakistan define themselves as a distinctive gender that is neither men nor women. This article explores hijra identity in Pakistan by focusing on the creative appropriation of Sufi discourses, practices and organisational forms by hijras to construct a spiritual gender identity for themselves. The political significance of this Sufi-informed identity can be located at two different levels. One is the level of the self. I argue in this article that engagement with Sufi concepts, such as faqiri and mast, is central to the construction of a dignified and powerful image of the hijra self that challenges the marginalised status assigned to hijras. The second level of analysis is concerned with the hijra community’s connection with Sufi networks. My argument here is that basing their community, which is cut-off from society and rejects the blood-ties based model of the family, on the model of Sufi groups allows hijras to legitimise their alternative social organisation. However, even though, Sufism offers hijras a possibility to access power, this does not mean that their spiritual claims are always recognised or that a spiritual gender identity does not have its own limitations.
AsadT.1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BashirS.2007. ‘Islamic Tradition and Celibacy’, in C.Olson, Celibacy and Religious Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press, 133–50.
3.
BashirS.2011. Sufi Bodies: Religion and Society in Medieval Islam. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
BrennerL.1993. ‘Constructing Muslim Identities in Mali’, in L.Brenner, Muslim Identity and Social Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 59–79.
5.
ButlerJ.1999. Gender Trouble Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
6.
ChatterjeeP.2006. ‘Fasting for Bin Laden: The Politics of Secularization in Contemporary India’, in D.ScottC.Hirschkind, Powers of the Secular Modern: Talal Asad and His Interlocuters. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 57–74.
7.
DigbyS.1984. ‘Qalandars and Related Groups: Elements of Social Deviance in the Religious Life of the Delhi Sultanate of the XIIIth and XIVth Centuries’, in Y.Friedmann, Islam in Asia, Vol. 1, South Asia. Jerusalem, Magnes Press, 60–108.
8.
EliasJ.J.1998. Death before Dying: The Sufi Poems of Sultan Bahu.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
ErnstC.W.B.Lawrence. 2002. Sufi Martyrs of Love: Chishti Sufism in South Asia and Beyond. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
EwingK.P.1998. ‘A Majzub and His Mother’, in P.WerbnerH.Basu, Embodying Charisma: Modernity, Locality and the Performance of Emotion in Sufi Cults. New York: Routledge, 160–81.
11.
FoucaultM.1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
12.
FraserN.1990. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
13.
FraserN.2003. ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation’, in N.FraserA.Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. New York: Verso, 7–109.
14.
GilsenanM.1973. Saint and Sufi in Modern Egypt: An Essay in the Sociology of Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.
HabermasJ.1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
HermansenM.2000. ‘Hybrid Identity Formations in Muslim America: The Case of American Sufi Movements’. The Muslim World, Vol. 90 (1/2) 158–97.
17.
HirschkindC.2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
HussainiS.H.2012. ‘Beyond Binary Barzakhs: Using the Theme of Liminality in Islamic Thought to Question the Gender Bindary’. MA Thesis, Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
19.
KaramustafaA.T.1994. God’s Unruly Friends: Dervish Groups in the Islamic Later Middle Period, 1200–1550. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
20.
KhanA.2011. ‘Transgender Rights: SC Tells NADRA to Amend Gender Verification Process’. The Express Tribune, April 26.
21.
KhanF.A.2016. ‘Khwaja Sira Activism: The Politics of Gender Ambiguity in Pakistan’. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 3 (1/2) 158–64.
22.
KugleS.A.2007. Sufis & Saints’ Bodies: Mysticism, Corporeality, & Sacred Power in Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
23.
MahmoodS.2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
NandaS.1986. ‘The Hijras of India’. Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 11 (3/4) 35–54.
25.
NandaS.1990. Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
26.
NaqviN.H.Mujtaba. 1997. ‘Two Baluchi Buggas, a Sindhi Zenana, and the Status of Hijras in Contemporary Pakistan’, in W.RoscowS.Murray, Islamic Homosexualities: Culture, History. New York: New York University Press, 262–74.
27.
O’FlahertyW.D.1980. Women, Androgynes and Other Mythical Beasts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
PammentC.2010. ‘Hijraism: Jostling for a Third Space in Pakistani Politics’. TDR, Vol. 54 (2) 29–50.
29.
PintoP.2003. ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Sufism and the State in Syria’, in S.JakelicJ.Varsoke, Crossing Boundaries: From Syria to Slovakia, Vol. 14. Vienna: IWM Junior Visiting Fellows’ Conferences.
30.
ReddingJ.A.2015. ‘From “She-males” to “Unix”: Transgender Rights and the Productive Paradoxes of Pakistani Policing’, in D.BertiD.Bordia, Regimes of Legality: Ethnography of Criminal Cases in South Asia.New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 258–89.
31.
RoscowW.1997. ‘Precursors of Islamic Male Homosexualities’, in W.RoscowS.Murray, Islamic Homosexualities. New York: New York University Press, 55–86.
32.
RozehnalR.T.2007. Islamic Sufism Unbound: Politics and Piety in Twenty-first Century Pakistan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
ShardaS.R.1974. Sufi Thought: Its Development in Punjab and its Impact on Panjabi from Baba Farid to 1850 A.D.Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
SirriyehE.2014. Sufis and Anti-Sufis: The Defence, Rethinking and Rejection of Sufism in the Modern World. London: Routledge.
36.
StjernholmS.2011. Lovers of Muhammad: A Study of Naqshbandi-Haqqani Sufis in the Twenty-first Century. Lund: Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University.
37.
SuvorovaA.2004. Muslim Saints of South Asia: The Eleventh to Fifteenth Centuries. London: Routledge.
38.
TaylorC.1994. ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A.Gutmann, Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 25–73.
39.
TurnerV.W.2011 (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. New York: AldineTransaction.
40.
UsborneC.F.1976. Bullah Shāh: Sufi, Mystic, and Poet of the Punjab: A Study. Lahore: Saaddi Punjabi Academy.
41.
WerbnerP.2001. ‘The Limits of Cultural Hybridity: On Ritual Monsters, Poetic Licence and Contested Postcolonial Purifications’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 7 (1) 133–52.
42.
WerbnerP.2003. Pilgrims of Love: The Anthropology of a Global Sufi Cult. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
YoungI.M.2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
WolfR.K.2006. ‘The Poetics of “Sufi” Practice: Drumming, Dancing, and Complex Agency at Madho Lāl Husain (and Beyond)’. American Ethnologist, Vol. 33 (2) 246–68.
