Comprised of seven intergenerational dialogues, this article brings together emerging and established scholars to query into the future of queer literacy research. Addressing generational shifts in queer method(ologie)s, these dialogues advance epistemological, ontological, and ethical research quandaries related to queer and trans studies today. Holding implications for literacy research broadly, this article presents queer futurity as a research approach for addressing some of our field's most pressing concerns.
BrockenbroughE. (2015). Queer of color agency in educational contexts: Analytic frameworks from a queer of color critique. Educational Studies, 51(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.979929
4.
BrowneK.NashC. J.(Eds.). (2016). Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research. Routledge.
5.
Combahee River Collective (1977). A Black feminist statement. Freedom Organizing Series #1.
6.
DavisS. (2019). Shade: Literacy narratives at black gay pride. Literacy in Composition Studies, 7(2), 56–89. https://doi.org/10.21623/1.7.2.4
7.
ForbesT. D.UenoK. (2020). Post-gay, political, and pieced together: Queer expectations of straight allies. Sociological Perspectives, 63(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419885353
8.
FreemanE. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Duke University Press.
9.
GadamerH. G. (1996 [1975]). Truth and method. Continuum.
10.
GhazianiA.BrimM.(Eds.). (2019). Imagining queer methods. New York University Press.
11.
GrzankaP. R.AdlerJ.BlazerJ. (2015). Making up allies: The identity choreography of straight LGBT activism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0179-0
12.
Gunn AllenP. (1992). The sacred hoop: Recovering the feminine in American Indian traditions. Beacon Press.
13.
GutiérrezK. D.MoralesP. Z.MartinezD. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33(1), 212–245. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X08328267
HooksB. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as a practice of freedom. Routledge.
16.
HullA. G.Bell-ScottP.SmithB.(Eds.). (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black women's studies. Feminist Press.
17.
JohnsonG. M. (2020). All boys aren't blue: A memoir-manifesto. Farrar, Straus and Giroux (BYR).
18.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist queer crip. Indiana University Press.
19.
KeatingA.AnzaldúaG. (2015). Light in the dark/Luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Duke University Press.
KeenanH.Hot MessL. M. (2020). Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(5), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2020.1864621
22.
KumashiroK. K. (2001). Queer students of color and antiracist, antiheterosexist education: Paradoxes of identity and activism. In KumashiroK. K. (Ed.), Troubling intersections of race and sexuality: Queer students of color and anti-oppressive education (pp. 1–25). Rowman & Littlefield.
LammersJ. C.MarshV. L. (2018). “A writer more than … a child”: A longitudinal study examining adolescent writer identity. Written Communication, 35(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735835
25.
LeonardiB.StaleyS. (2021). Cultivating a queer mindset: How one elementary school teacher is rattling common sense. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 123(7), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300703
26.
LizárragaJ. R.CortezA. (2019). Gentrification, cultural erasure, and the (im)possibilities of digital queer gestures. In DeKosnikA.FeldmanK. (Eds.), Identity: Hashtagging race, gender, sex, and nation. University of Michigan Press, 152-164.
27.
LoveB. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
28.
LoveH. (2007). Feeling backward: Loss and the politics of queer history. Harvard University Press.
29.
MoragaC.AnzalduaG.(Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Kitchen Table Press.
30.
MuhammadG. E.MosleyL. T. (2021). Why we need identity and equity learning in literacy practices: Moving research, practice, and policy forward. Language Arts, 98(4), 189–196.
31.
MuñozJ. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York University Press.
Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp.
34.
PittsM. J.Miller-DayM. (2007). Upward turning points and positive rapport-development across time in researcher-participant relationships. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071409
35.
RodríguezJ. M. (2014). Sexual futures, queer gestures, and other Latina longings. New York University Press.
36.
SedgwickE. K. (1993). Tendencies. Duke University Press.
37.
SimonR.CampanoG. (2015). Hermeneutics of literacy pedagogy. In PahlK.RowsellJ. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 476–482). Routledge.
38.
SpivakG. C. (1974). Translator’s preface. In DerridaJ. (Ed.), Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, trans., pp. ix–xc). Johns Hopkins University Press.
TrainorA.BouchardK. A. (2013). Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(8), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.724467
TuckE.YangK. W. (2018). Toward what justice? Describing diverse dreams of justice in education. Taylor & Francis.
43.
WardJ. (2019). Dyke methods: A meditation on queer studies and the gay men who hate it. In GhazianiA.BrimM. (Eds.), Imagining queer methods (pp. 259–276). New York University Press.
