Drawing from theories of visual culture, social semiotics, and multimodality, the researchers conducted a qualitative multimodal content analysis of the covers of 21 young adult (YA) books that had been adapted as graphic novels (GNs). This study showed that the GN covers emphasized character and that the ages of the represented characters seemed to shift during the process of adaptation. However, publishers linked the two covers through branding, color schemes, and visual elements. These findings suggest that publishers view the readership of GNs differently than the readership of YA novels. This article encourages literacy education researchers and classroom practitioners to support students in analyzing visual artifacts designed for particular consumers. Critical readers could examine the sites of production and dissemination in addition to the text itself.
FitzpatrickB. (2009). Hush, hush. Simon & Schuster.
15.
FordJ. A. (2016). What students and teachers can learn by judging a book by its cover. The Australian Library Journal, 65(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.20161125757
16.
GaimanN.Craig RussellP. (2014). The graveyard book: Graphic novel. HarperCollins.
17.
GarciaK.StohlM. (2009). Beautiful creatures. Little, Brown and Company.
18.
GarciaK.StohlM. (2013). Beautiful creatures: The manga. Yen Press.
19.
GilbertL.ViswanathanL. (2007). Covering multiculturalism: Popular images and the politics of a nation as reflected on the covers of Maclean’s and L’Actualite. Canadian Ethnic Studies/Etudes Ethniques Au Canada, 39(3), 189–205.
HallS. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. (Vol. 2). Sage.
22.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.
23.
Harris-FainD. (2015). Putting the graphic in graphic novel: P. Craig Russell’s adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s Coraline. Studies in the Novel, 47(3), 335–345.
24.
HateleyE. (2016). Judging books by their covers: Australian children’s classics in the twenty-first century. Bookbird: A Journal of International Children’s Literature, 54(3), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/bkb.2016.0098
25.
HattonE.TrautnerM. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of rolling stone. Sexuality & Culture, 15(3), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
26.
HodgeB.KressG. (1988). Social semiotics. Cornell University Press.
27.
HsiehH.-F.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
28.
HutcheonL. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.
29.
IedemaR. (2003). Multimodality and resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751
30.
JaffeM. (2007). Bad kitty(Reprint ed.). HarperCollins.
31.
JanksH. (2010). Literacy and power. Routledge.
32.
JewittC. (2009). Different approaches to multimodality. In JewittC. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 28–39). Routledge. http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/13981
33.
JewittC. (2017). An introduction to multimodality. In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 15–30). Routledge.
34.
JiménezL. M.MeyerC. K. (2016). First impressions matter: Navigating graphic novels utilizing linguistic, visual, and spatial resources. Journal of Literacy Research, 48(4), 423–447.
35.
Jupowicz-GinalskaA. (2018). Print magazine covers as packaging. Communication Today, 9(1), 94–113.
36.
KimY.MeyerS. (2010). Twilight: The graphic novel (Vol. 1). Yen Press.
37.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
38.
KressG. (2009). What is mode? In JewittC. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 54–67). Routledge.
39.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
40.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.
41.
LuM. (2013). Legend. Penguin.
42.
LuM. (2015). Legend: The graphic novel. Penguin.
43.
MartinezM.StierC.FalconL. (2016). Judging a book by its cover: An investigation of peritextual features in Caldecott award books. Children’s Literature in Education, 47(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9272-8
MeisnerM. S.TakahashiB. (2013). The nature of time: How the covers of the world’s most widely read weekly news magazine visualize environmental affairs. Environmental Communication, 7(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.772908
MeyerS. (2009). The twilight saga collection. Little, Brown and Company.
49.
MoenC. B. (2010). Stepping into the classics. The Booklist (March), 43–46.
50.
Munson-WarnkenM. (2017). The high cost of “girl books” for young adolescent boys. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1562
NilsenA. P.BlasingameJ.DonelsenK. L.NilsenD. L. F. (2013). Literature for today’s young adults. Pearson.
56.
NöthW. (2011). Visual semiotics: Key features and an application to picture ads. In MargolisE.PauwelsJ. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 298–316). Sage.
57.
OsvathC. (2020). Uncovering death: A dialogic, aesthetic engagement with the covers of death-themed picture books. Children’s Literature in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-020-09399-5
58.
PattersonJ. (2005). Maximum ride: The angel experiment. Little, Brown and Company.
59.
PeirceC. S. (2011). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In BuchlerJ. (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98–119). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1955)
60.
PetroneR.SarigianidesS. T.LewisM. A. (2015). The Youth Lens: Analyzing adolescence/ts in literary texts. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(4), 506–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15568926
RinehartS. D.GerlachJ. M.WisellD. L.WelkerW. A. (1998). Would I like to read this book? Eighth graders’ use of book cover clues to help choose recreational reading. Reading Research and Instruction: The Journal of the College Reading Association, 37(4), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079809558270
64.
RiordanR. (2010a). The lightning thief. Hyperion.
65.
RiordanR. (2010b). The red pyramid. Penguin UK.
66.
RoseG. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (3rd ed.). Sage.
SerafiniF. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.
69.
SerafiniF.KachorskyD.AguileraE. (2015). Picturebooks 2.0: Transmedical features across narrative platforms. Journal of Children’s Literature, 41(2), 16–24.
70.
SerafiniF.KachorskyD.GoffM. (2015). Representing reading an analysis of professional development book covers. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 11(1), 94–115.
71.
SerafiniF.ReidS. F. (2019). Multimodal content analysis: expanding analytical approaches to content analysis. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219864133
72.
SheridanM. P.RowsellJ. (2010). Design literacies: Learning and innovation in the digital age. Routledge.
73.
SimsG. A.MyersW. D. (2015). Monster: A graphic novel. Amistad.
74.
SulzerM. A.TheinA. H.SchmidtR. R. (2018). What is adapted in youth adaptations? A critical comparative content analysis of military memoirs repackaged as young adult literature. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 14(1), 27.
75.
van LeeuwenT. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
76.
VendittiR.RiordanR. (2010). The lightning thief: The graphic novel. Disney Hyperion Books.
77.
YampbellC. (2005). Judging a book by its cover: Publishing trends in young adult literature. The Lion and the Unicorn, 29(3), 348–372.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
