Our understanding of reading—including reading multimodal texts—is always constrained or opened up by what we consider to be a text, what aspects of a reader’s embodied activity we focus on, and how we draw a boundary around a reading event. This article brings together five literacy researchers who respond to a human-scale graphic novel, comprised of over 300 large-scale paintings, recently exhibited in an art gallery and also published in print form. The researchers' responses reflect a variety of theoretical orientations, including postcolonial theory, critical theory, affect theories, new materialisms, social semiotics, and reading development theories. The author of the novel also reflects on his own creative processes and goals. These various responses, and the multiple modalities of the work itself, are intentionally juxtaposed in order to create productive tensions, contrasts, and open spaces for reconsidering how multimodal texts are read and experienced. Dimensions of reading as a meaning-making, affective, embodied experience are productively put into play with one another.
BarkerM. (1989). Comics: Ideology, power and the critics. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
2.
BlommaertJ.BackusA. (2012). Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In de Saint-GeorgesI.WeberJ. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 11–32). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
3.
BogueR. (2003). Deleuze on literature. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BotzakisS.BurnsL. D.HallL. A. (2014). Literacy reform and common core state standards: Recycling the autonomous model. Language Arts, 91, 223–235.
5.
BurnsA.ParkerD. (2003). Analysing media texts. London, England: Continuum International.
6.
CohnN. (2013). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
7.
DeleuzeG. (2000). Proust and signs: The complete text. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1972)
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DittmerJ. (2005). Captain America’s empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture, and post-9/11 geopolitics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 626–643.
10.
DuncanR.SmithM. J. (2009). The power of comics: History, form and culture. New York, NY: Continuum.
11.
EhretC.HollettT.JociusR. (2016). The matter of new media making: An intra-action analysis of adolescents making a digital book trailer. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 346–377.
12.
EisnerE. (2008). Persistent tensions in arts-based research. In Cahnmann-TaylorM.SiegesmundR. (Eds.), Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (pp. 16–27). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
GoughP. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6, 291–320.
14.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
15.
HarawayD. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
HarsteJ. (2010). Multimodality. In AlbersP.SandersJ. (Eds.), Literacies, the arts & multimodality (pp. 27–43). NCTE.
17.
IserW. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
JanksH. (2010). Literacy and Power. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
JimenezL. M.MeyerC. K. (2016). First impressions matter: Navigating graphic novels utilizing linguistic, visual, and spatial resources. Journal of Literacy Research, 48, 423–447.
20.
KressG. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
21.
KressG. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
KressG.StreetB. (2006). Foreword. In PahlK.RowsellJ. (Eds.), Travel notes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice (pp. vii–x). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
23.
LatourB. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture and Present, 6, 1–40.
24.
LeanderK. M.BoldtG. (2013). Rereading “a pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45, 22–46.
25.
LewisC.TierneyJ. D. (2013). Mobilizing emotion in an urban classroom: Producing identities and transforming signs in a race-related discussion. Linguistics and Education, 24, 289–304.
26.
LopesP. (2009). Demanding respect: The evolution of the American comic book. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
MasseyD. (2009). I’m a geographer. Geographical, 81, 82.
28.
MassumiB. (2016). Such as it is: A short essay in extreme realism. Body & Society, 22, 115–127.
29.
McCloudS. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. Northampton, MA: Tundra.
30.
McCloudS. (2016). Reinventing comics. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
31.
MeierD.WoodG. (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
32.
NodelmanP. (1990). Words about pictures: The narrative art of children’s picture books. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
33.
PahlK. (2014). Materializing literacies in communities: The uses of literacy revisited. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
34.
RosenblattL. (1964). The poem as event. College English, 26, 123–128.
35.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
36.
RowsellJ.PahlK. (2013). After writing: Rethinking the paths to composition. In BockM.PachlerN. (Eds.), Multimodality and social semiosis: Communication, meaning-making, and learning in the work of Gunther Kress (pp. 162–174). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
RuddellR. B.UnrauN. J. (Eds.). (2004). Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38.
SadoskiM.PaivioA. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In RuddellR. B.UnrauN. J. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1329–1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
39.
SaidE. W. (1978). Orientalism. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
40.
SaidE. W. (1994). Culture and imperialism. London, England: Vintage.
41.
SamuelsS. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In RuddellR. B.RuddellM. R.SingerH. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 816–837). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42.
SchwartzJ. M. (2003). Photographs from the edge of empire. In BluntA.GruffuddP.MayJ.OgbornM.PinderD. (Eds.), Cultural geography in practice (pp. 154–171). London, England: Arnold.
43.
SchwartzJ. M.RyanJ. R. (2003). Introduction: Photography and the geographical imagination. In SchwartzJ. M.RyanJ. R. (Eds.), Picturing place: Photography and the geographical imagination (pp. 1–18). London, England: I.B. Tauris.
44.
SerafiniF. (2010). Reading multimodal texts: Perceptual, structural and ideological perspectives. Children’s Literature in Education, 41, 85–104.
45.
SerafiniF. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46.
SmithA. R. (2017). Bare writing: Comparing multiliteracies theory and nonrepresentational theory approaches to a young writer writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 125–140.
47.
StephensJ. (2013). Subjectivity in Asian children’s literature and film: Global theories and implications. New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
Van LeeuwenT. (2015). Looking good: Aesthetics, multimodality and literacy studies. In RowsellJ.PahlK. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 426–439). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
WarshowR. (2001). The immediate experience: Movies, comics, theatre and other aspects of popular culture(Expanded Edition ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
