This study situates young adolescents’ multimodal composing practices within two figured worlds—school and creative multimodal production. In a microanalysis of two focal students’ multimodal processes and products, I trace how pedagogical, interactional, and semiotic resources both reified and challenged students’ developing identities as multimodal composers. This research illustrates the necessity of critical perspectives on the design and implementation of multimodal composing activities for academic purposes.
BooneE. (2000). Stories in red and black: Pictorial histories of the Mixtecs and Aztecs. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2.
CanagarajahA. S. (2013). Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48, 40–67.
3.
CreechS. (2001). Love that dog. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
4.
DaltonB.GrishamD. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 Ways to use technology to build vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 64, 306–317.
5.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
6.
DePalmaM. J.AlexanderK. P. (2015). A bag full of snakes: Negotiating the challenges of multimodal composition. Computers and Composition, 37, 182–200.
7.
FeldmanA. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32, 26–28.
8.
GeeJ. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
HarsteJ.WoodwardV.BurkeC. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
HollandD.LachicotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2014). The ISTE national educational technology standards (NETS-S) and performance indicators for students. Retrieved fromwww.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-S_PDF.pdff
JewittC. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267. doi:10.3102/0091732X07310586
14.
JociusR. (2013). Exploring adolescents’ multimodal responses to The Kite Runner: Understanding how students use digital media for academic purposes. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 5, 310–325.
15.
KressG. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, England: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203164754
16.
KressG.van LeeuwenT. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, England: Arnold.
17.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
LuttrellW.ParkerC. (2001). High school students’ literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 235–247.
19.
MerriamS. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
MillsK. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80, 246–271. doi:10.3102/0034654310364401
21.
O’BrienD.ScharberC. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 66–68. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.1.7
22.
PachecoM. B.SmithB. E. (2015). Across languages, modes, and identities: Bilingual adolescents’ multimodal codemeshing in the literacy classroom. Bilingual Research Journal, 38, 292–312.
23.
RankerJ. (2015). Redesigning the everyday: Recognizing creativity in student writing and multimodal composing. Language Arts, 92, 359–365.
24.
RubinB. C. (2007). Learner identity amid figured worlds: Constructing (in) competence at an urban high school. The Urban Review, 39, 217–249.
25.
SmithB. E. (2014). Beyond words: The landscape of research on adolescents and multimodal composition. In PytashK. E.FerdigR. E. (Eds.), Exploring multimodal composition and digital writing (pp. 1–19). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
26.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
VasudevanL.CampanoG. (2009). The social production of adolescent risk and the promise of adolescent literacies. Review of Research in Education, 33, 310–353. doi:10.3102/0091732X08330003
28.
VasudevanL.ReillyM. A. (2013). In the middle of something: Reflections on multimodal inquiry as artful bricolage. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 455–459.
29.
ZeichnerK. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 36–46.
