The objective of this study was to identify and analyze the geographic distribution of dentists, in the global context, through available scientific evidence, highlighting the following aspects: 1) the determinants of the geographic distribution of dentists, 2) corrective intervention implemented, and 3) their monitoring and evaluation. A scoping review of the published and gray literature was carried out in scientific databases and in relevant websites. We used an adaptation of a World Health Organization framework to study the distribution of human resources in health to analyze selected publications. After applying the eligibility criteria, 53 publications were included in the review; 10 related to the determinants of geographical distribution, 5 to interventions implemented, and 38 to the monitoring and evaluation process. More studies are needed to identify local determinants of the geographical distribution of dentists and to define adapted intervention strategies to make it more equitable.
Knowledge Transfer Statement: The geographic inequality of dentists is a problem for health systems because it has a direct impact on access to services and the oral health conditions of a population. Our study was based on a theoretical conceptual framework formulated in 3 components: 1) determinants of the geographical distribution, 2) strategies implemented to correct the problem, and 3) monitoring and evaluation. It can assist in designing oral health policy and guide decisions by policy makers.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method Theory Practice. 8(1):19–32.
2.
AwofesoN. 2010. Improving health workforce recruitment and retention in rural and remote regions of Nigeria. Rural Remote Health. 10(1):1319.
3.
BazarganNChiDLMilgromP. 2010. Exploring the potential for foreign-trained dentists to address workforce shortages and improve access to dental care for vulnerable populations in the United States: A case study from Washington State. BMC Health Serv Res. 10(1):336.
4.
BazenJJKrugerEDysonKTennantM. 2007. An innovation in Australian dental education: rural, remote and indigenous pre-graduation placements. Rural Remote Health. 7(3):703.
5.
CaneRJButlerDR. 2004. Developing primary health clinical teams for public oral health services in Tasmania. Aust Dent J. 49(4):162–170.
6.
CouperIDHugoJFConradieHMfenyanaK; Members of the Collaboration for Health Equity through Education and Research (CHEER). 2007. Influences on the choice of health professionals to practice in rural areas. South Afr Med J. 97(11):1082–1086.
7.
DagenaisCLaurendeauMCBriand-LamarcheM. 2015. Knowledge brokering in public health: a critical analysis of the results of a qualitative evaluation. Eval Program Planning. 53:10–17.
8.
DoleaCStormontLBraichetJM. 2010. Evaluated strategies to increase attraction and retention of health workers in remote and rural areas. Bull WHO. 88(5):379–385.
9.
DussaultGFranceschiniMC. 2006. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resources Health. 4:12.
10.
EmamiEHarnageaHGirardFCharbonneauAVoyerRBedosCPChartierMWoottonJCouturierY. 2016. Integration of oral health into primary care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 6(10):e013807.
11.
FDI (World Dental Federation). 2015. The challenge of oral disease—a call for global action: the oral health atlas. 2nd ed.Geneva (Switzerland): FDI.
FrehywotSMullanFPaynePWRossH. 2010. Compulsory service programmes for recruiting health workers in remote and rural areas: do they work?Bull WHO. 88(5):364–370.
14.
GlickMMonteirodaSilvaOSeebergerGKXuTPuccaGWilliamsDMKessSEiseléJLSéverinT. 2012. FDI vision 2020: shaping the future of oral health. Int Dent J. 62(6):278–291.
15.
Global Health Workforce Alliance. 2015. Synthesis paper of the thematic working groups—Health Work Force 2030—towards a global strategy on human resources for health. [cited 2018Apr11]. http://www.who.int/hrh/documents/synthesis_paper_them2015/en/
16.
GodwinDMHoangHCrocombeLABellE. 2014. Dental practitioner rural work movements: a systematic review. Rural Remote Health. 14(3):2825.
17.
HallDJGarnettSTBarnesTStevensM. 2007. Drivers of professional mobility in the northern territory: dental professionals. Rural Remote Health. 7(1):655.
18.
HassingerEWHuBLHastingsDVMcNamaraRL. 1975. Changes in number and location of health practitioners in a 20-county rural area of Missouri. Public Health Rep. 90(4):313–318.
19.
HatcherAMOnahMKornikSPeacockeJReidS. 2014. Placement, support, and retention of health professionals: national, cross-sectional findings from medical and dental community service officers in South Africa. Hum Resources Health. 12:14.
20.
HendersonLNTullochJ. 2008. Incentives for retaining and motivating health workers in pacific and Asian countries. Hum Resources Health. 6:18.
HuichoLDielemanMCampbellJCodjiaLBalabanovaDDussaultGDoleaC. 2010. Increasing access to health workers in underserved areas: A conceptual framework for measuring results. Bull WHO. 88(5):357–363.
23.
JohnsonGBlinkhornA. 2013. The influence of a clinical rural placement programme on the work location of new dental graduates from the university of Sydney, NSW, Australia. Eur J Dent Educ. 17(4):229–235.
24.
KollarEBuyxA. 2013. Ethics and policy of medical brain drain: a review. Swiss Med Wkly. 143:w13845.
25.
KroezenMDussaultGCraveiroIDielemanMJansenCBuchanJBarriballLRaffertyAMBremnerJSermeusW. 2015. Recruitment and retention of health professionals across Europe: a literature review and multiple case study research. Health Policy. 119(12):1517–1528.
26.
KrugerEJacobsATennantM. 2010. Sustaining oral health services in remote and indigenous communities: a review of 10 years experience in Western Australia. Int Dent J. 60(2):129–134.
27.
KrugerETennantM. 2004. A baseline study of the demographics of the oral health workforce in rural and remote Western Australia. Aust Dent J. 49(3):136–140.
28.
KrugerETennantM. 2005. Oral health workforce in rural and remote Western Australia: practice perceptions. Aust J Rural Health. 13(5):321–326.
29.
KrugerEWhymanRTennantM. 2012. High-acuity GIS mapping of private practice dental services in New Zealand: does service match need?Int Dent J. 62(2):95–99.
30.
LallooREvansJLJohnsonNW. 2013. Dental care provision by students on a remote rural clinical placement: Australian and New Zealand. J Public Health. 37(1):47–51.
31.
LewisJM. 2012. Influencing public policy on oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 40(Suppl 2):148–153.
32.
LiuXDouLZhangHSunYYuanB. 2015. Analysis of context factors in compulsory and incentive strategies for improving attraction and retention of health workers in rural and remote areas: a systematic review. Hum Resources Health. 13:61.
33.
LomazziMWordleyVBediR. 2016. Dental public health capacity worldwide: results of a global survey. J Public Health Policy. 37(4):528–542.
34.
LuzziLSpencerAJ. 2011. Job satisfaction of the oral health labour force in Australia. Aust Dent J. 56(1):23–32.
35.
McMillanWJBarrieRB. 2012. Recruiting and retaining rural students: evidence from a faculty of dentistry in South Africa. Rural Remote Health. 12:1855.
36.
McPakeBRussoGHipgraveDHortKCampbellJ. 2016. Implications of dual practice for universal health coverage. Bull WHO. 94(2):142–146.
37.
NkomazanaOMashRShaibuSPhaladzeN. 2015. Stakeholders’ perceptions on shortage of healthcare workers in primary healthcare in Botswana: focus group discussions. PLoS ONE. 10(8):e0135846.
38.
ÖcekZAVatanseverK. 2014. Perceptions of Turkish dentists of their professional identity in a market-orientated system. Int J Health Serv. 44(3):593–613.
39.
PuccaGAGabrielMDe AraujoMEDDe AlmeidaFCS. 2015. Ten years of a national oral health policy in brazil: innovation, boldness, and numerous challenges. J Dent Res. 94(10):1333–1337.
40.
RennerDMWestfallJMWilroyLAGindeAA. 2010. The influence of loan repayment on rural healthcare provider recruitment and retention in Colorado. Rural Remote Health. 10(4):1605.
41.
SanchezHFDrumondMMVilaçaÊL. 2008. The Family Health Program (FHP) and human resources: perceptions of students from two different dentistry schools [in Portuguese]. Cien Saude Colet. 13(2):523–531.
42.
SchwartzMR. 2007. The pipeline from dental education to practice: the Pennsylvania experience. J Dent Educ. 71(10):1299–1313.
43.
SheikhANaqviSHASheikhKNaqviSHSBandukdaMY. 2012. Physician migration at its roots: a study on the factors contributing towards a career choice abroad among students at a medical school in Pakistan. Global Health. 8:43.
44.
ShermanPMoscouSDang-VuC. 2009. The primary care crisis and health care reform. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 20(4):944–950.
45.
SkinnerJCMasseyWLBurtonMA. 2009. Rural oral health workforce issues in NSW and the Charles Sturt University Dentistry Program. New South Wales Public Health Bull. 20(3–4):56–58.
46.
TennantMKrugerE. 2014. Turning Australia into a ‘flat-land’: what are the implications for workforce supply of addressing the disparity in rural-city dentist distribution?Int Dent J. 64(1):29–33.
47.
ThammatachareeNSuphanchaimatRWisaijohnTLimwattananonSPutthasriW. 2013. Attitudes toward working in rural areas of Thai medical, dental and pharmacy new graduates in 2012: a cross-sectional survey. Hum Resources Health. 11:53.
48.
TheppanyaKSuwannapongNHowteerakulN. 2014. Health-science students’ self-efficacy, social support, and intention to work in rural areas of the lao people’s democratic republic. Rural Remote Health. 14:2530.
WiwanitkitV. 2011. Mandatory rural service for health care workers in Thailand. Rural Remote Health. 11(1):1583.
52.
ZurnPDal PozMRStilwellBAdamsO. 2004. Imbalance in the health workforce. Hum Resources Health. 2(1):13.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
