Abstract
Many scholars have expressed fears that the 2019 coronavirus pandemic may exacerbate gender inequalities. Indeed, studies have suggested that women, and mothers in particular, have been particularly affected by reducing their participation in the paid labor market to meet increased caregiving needs. What is less clear is whether the pandemic has also shifted attitudes about mothers’ and fathers’ roles. We collected data on gendered parenting attitudes both before and during the pandemic and report shifts in attitudes in this data visualization. Consistent with fears of exacerbated gender inequality, we find a shift toward more conventional gender parenting attitudes. We also find an increase in the importance placed on mothers’ and fathers’ earning money and a decrease in the role mothers and fathers play in child development, both of which may be due to the pandemic’s effects on the economy and schooling.
Increasingly, more Americans hold egalitarian gender beliefs, while those with traditional ideals have been replaced by those with more ambivalent attitudes (Scarborough, Sin, and Risman 2019), with increased support in particular for working mothers (Kaufman and Bair 2021). Although attitudes have generally shifted slowly over time, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced society to confront a new work-family situation for most families. Numerous studies show that the pandemic has reinforced traditional gendered divisions of labor among parents (Landivar et al. 2020; Petts, Carlson, and Pepin forthcoming), but less is known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has shaped attitudes about parenting roles.
We collected data on a range of gendered parenting attitudes at two opportune time points for examining how the pandemic influenced attitudes: March 2019 and August 2020. To isolate the effect of the pandemic, we use causal inference methods to produce an “average treatment effect,” which represents the difference in attitudes mid- versus prepandemic, accounting for differences across samples (see the Online Appendix for a detailed description of our sample and statistical methodology).
Our data visualization (Figure 1) is an effects plot with a row for each attitude and the corresponding pandemic effect visualized. We center all effects at zero, which is the baseline rate of the attitude (i.e., the rate in the pre-COVID-19 sample for that variable). Lines and arrowheads are added to show the shift in the attitude (i.e., the average treatment effect of the pandemic). We have coded all items so that positive changes reflect a shift in attitudes in the direction of more traditional attitudes. Solid lines indicate statistically significant changes (at the p < .05 level in a two-tailed test).

Shifts in gendered parenting attitudes from pre- to mid-COVID-19 (average treatment effects).
Findings
Increasing Importance of Moms’ and Dads’ Making Money
Attitudes regarding the importance of parents making money have shifted. Specifically, there was a significant increase in agreement that both “Dad should make money” and “Mom should make money.” We also note there was an increase in agreement that “Dad can work and parent” and “Mom can work and parent,” though the latter increase is not statistically significant.
Decreasing Importance of Moms and Dads for Child Development
Attitudes regarding the importance of parents for child development have also shifted. Specifically, there was a decrease in agreement that “Dad is key to child development” and “Mom is key to child development.” We note that there was a decrease in agreement that “It is fulfilling to be a mom” and “It is fulfilling to be a dad,” though the latter decrease is not statistically significant.
Increasing Support for Some Traditional Roles
Several traditional gender role attitudes gained support. The largest shifts show increased support of fathers as disciplinarians and mothers as schedulers for their children. There were also significant decreases in agreement that it is essential for fathers to play with their children and that they should spend less time working. Furthermore, there were significant increases in agreement that mothers are happier at home, should not work when they have young children, and should usually stay home.
Discussion
The COVID-19 pandemic has had mixed effects on gendered parenting attitudes, although the primary effect has been a shift toward more traditional attitudes. Since the start of the pandemic, greater importance has been placed on parents’ making money. Within the pandemic context, it is likely that more people recognize the financial needs of families and encourage income contributions from both parents. In addition, shifts in attitudes during the pandemic have resulted in less importance placed on parental roles in child development. Lengthy school closures have likely elucidated how important schools are not only for children’s academic needs but also their physical and mental well-being (Hoffman and Miller 2020). There is also increased support for some traditional roles within families. This may be related to the particularly large declines in labor force participation rates for mothers of young children during the pandemic (Landivar et al. 2020) and the impact of homeschooling and lack of childcare affecting mothers more than fathers (Petts et al. forthcoming). Overall, we find evidence that the pandemic has shifted public opinions about mothers’ and fathers’ roles in ways that coincide with how the pandemic has affected parents’ economic and domestic outcomes.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-srd-10.1177_23780231211013128 – Supplemental material for Visualizing Shifts in Gendered Parenting Attitudes during COVID-19
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-srd-10.1177_23780231211013128 for Visualizing Shifts in Gendered Parenting Attitudes during COVID-19 by Trenton D. Mize, Gayle Kaufman and Richard J. Petts in Socius
Footnotes
Supplemental Material
Author Biographies
.
.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
