This study examines students’ perceptions of an open pedagogy experiment in which they created their own textbook for an undergraduate public health course. The lead author’s primary motivation for developing this assignment was the high cost associated with the traditional textbooks that were otherwise needed to cover the breadth of subject matter in the course. The resulting open textbook included 19 chapters, covering all the required components of the course, and the final version was published in a statewide open educational resource repository. Students provided feedback about this undertaking by way of an end-of-term survey. The results showed high percentages of students who associated the textbook creation project with greater engagement and satisfaction than the passive use of traditional textbooks. Students also reported their perception of a learning benefit related to the creation of course content. Pedagogical implications of this study are discussed, and future research questions are proposed.
AllenE.SeamanJ. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2014 (Report). Babson Survey Research Group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572730
2.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.AirasianP. W.CruikshankK. A.MayerR. E.PintrichP. R.RathsJ.WittrockM. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
3.
BeauchampD. (2003). Public health as social justice. In HofricherR. (Ed.), Health and social justice (pp. 267–284). Jossey-Bass.
4.
BelikovO. M.BodilyR. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
5.
BunnM. (2013). Motivation and connection: Teaching reading (and writing) in the composition classroom (Report). National Council of Teachers of English. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1008559
CroninC. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
DeRosaR.JhangianiR. (2017). Open pedagogy. In MaysE. (Ed.), A guide to making open textbooks with students (pp. 7–20). Rebus Community.
10.
DeRosaR.RobisonS. (2017). From OER to open pedagogy: Harnessing the power of open. In JhangianiR. S.Biswas-DienerR. (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 115–124). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.i
11.
FischerL.ErnstD.MasonS. (2017). Rating the quality of open textbooks: How reviewer and text characteristics predict ratings. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.2985
12.
GardnerJ.RonzioC.SnellingA. (2018). Transformational learning in undergraduate public health education: Course design for Generation Z. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 4(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379917721722
13.
GoldmanR. H.CohenA. P.SheahanF. (2008). Using seminar blogs to enhance student participation and learning in public health school classes. American Journal of Public Health, 98(9), 1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.133694
HiltonJ. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
16.
HiltonJ. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
17.
HiltonJ.WileyD.ChaffeeR.DarrowJ.GuilmettJ.HarperS.HiltonB. (2019). Student perceptions of open pedagogy: An exploratory study. Open Praxis, 11(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.973
18.
HollisterC. (2020). Using open pedagogy to engage LIS students: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8(1), eP2357. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2357
19.
JohnsonF.HooperM. W. (2018). iFixit with the library: Partnering for open pedagogy in technical writing. OLA Quarterly, 24(3), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1950
20.
KriegerN.BirnA. (1998). A vision of social justice as the foundation of public health: Commemorating 150 years of the spirit of 1848. American Journal of Public Health, 88(11), 1603–1606. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.11.1603
21.
KrugerJ.AbramovichS. (2019). Open educational resources: The new frontier. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 5(2), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379918799767
22.
LangD.WalkerE.SteinerR.WoodruffR. (2018). Implementation and mixed-methods evaluation of team-based learning in a graduate public health research methods course. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 4(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379917707222
23.
LangT. A. (2019). Who me? Ideas for faculty who never expected to be teaching public health students to write. Public Health Reports, 134(2), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918821880
24.
MackenzieS. L. C. (2018). Writing for public health: Strategies for teaching writing in a school or program of public health. Public Health Reports, 133(5), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918785374
25.
MartinM. T.BelikovO.M.HiltonJ.WileyD.FischerL. (2017). Analysis of faculty and student perceptions of textbook costs in higher education. Open Praxis, 9(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.432
26.
MaysE. (Ed.). (2017). A guide to making open textbooks with students. Rebus Community.
27.
McDermottM.HandB. (2010). A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of non-traditional writing tasks over a ten year period. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 518–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20350
RandallD. L.JohnsonJ. C.WestR. E.WileyD. (2013). Teaching, doing and sharing project management: The development of an instructional design project management textbook. Educational Technology, 53(6), 24–28. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/175050/
32.
SchulleryN.ReckR.SchulleryS. (2011). Toward solving the high enrollment, low engagement dilemma: A case study in introductory business. International Journal of Business, Humanities, and Technology, 1(2), 1–9.
ValloneD.SmithA.KenneyT.GreenbergM.HairE.CantrellJ.RathJ.KovalR. (2016). Agents of social change: A model for targeting and engaging generation Z across platforms. Journal of Advertising Research, 56(4), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2016-046
WileyD.HiltonJ. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
41.
YuT.-C.WilsonN.SinghP.LemanuD.HawkenS.HillA. (2011). Medical students-as-teachers: A systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S14383
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
