This article focuses on support structures for care experienced young people (CEYP) in the context of education. It follows the question of what suitable support services for CEYP on their (educational) pathway might look like. Therefore, it first takes a closer look at the educational situation of CEYP by a narrative literature review to identify factors that promote or hinder their educational pathway. Further, ways to set up such support structures, taken from Germany, are presented. In conclusion, it is pointed out that there is a need for local, structurally anchored, cross-jurisdictional services to support CEYP on their (educational) pathway. Based on this, potential for additional research work and ideas for further developing supportive infrastructures for CEYP are suggested as a conclusion of this article.
AskewJ., RodgersP., & WestA. (2016). Who cares for care leavers?New Directions for Higher Education, 175, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20198
2.
BIBB. (2022). Jugendberufsagenturen bundesweit. Ergebnisse aus der Erhebung zu rechtskreisübergreifenden Kooperationsbündnissen am Übergang Schule-Beruf. Service Centre for Youth Employment Agencies at The Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training. www.servicestelle-jba.de/wws/sjba_erhebung_jugendberufsagenturen_bundesweit_barrierefrei.pdf
3.
Briheim-CrookallL., MichelmoreO., BakerC., OniO., TaylorS., & SelwynJ. (2020). What makes life good? Care leavers’ views on their well-being. Coram Voice & the Rees Centre, University of Oxford.
4.
CameronC., JacksonS., HauariH., & HollingworthK. (2012). Continuing educational participation among children in care in five countries: Some issues of social class. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2011.644811
5.
CourtneyM., DworskyA., BrownA., CaryC., LoveK., & VorhiesV. (2011). Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 26. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
6.
CourtneyM., TeraoS., & BostN. (2004). Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Conditions of youth preparing to leave state care (Executive summary). Chapin Hall Center for Children.
7.
DriscollJ. (2011). Making Up Lost Ground: Challenges in supporting the educational attainment of looked after children beyond Key Stage 4. Adoption and Fostering, 35(2), 18–33.
8.
DworskyA., & CourtneyM. E. (2010). Does extending foster care beyond age 18 promote postsecondary educational attainment? Emerging findings from the Midwest study. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
9.
EllisK., & JohnstonC. (2024). Resilience, higher education and widening participation: Generating change for care experienced students. Higher Education, 87, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00985-8
10.
EnggruberR., & NeisesF. (2025). Jugendberufsagenturen als Lotsen für junge Menschen imÜbergang Schule–Beruf. nfb-Newsletter, (2). Nationales Forum Beratung in Bildung, Beruf und Beschäftigung. https://www.forum-beratung.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Jugendberufsagenturen-als-Lotsen-fuer-junge-Menschen-im-Uebergang-Schule-Beruf.pdf
11.
ForsmanH., BrännströmL., VinnerljungB., & HjernA. (2016). Does poor school performance cause later psychosocial problems among children in foster care? Evidence from national longitudinal registry data. Child Abuse & Neglect, 57, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.006
12.
GilliganR. (2007). Adversity, resilience and the educational progress of young people in public care. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 12(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750701315631
13.
HirschfeldH., & LenzB. (2022). Young people’s use and construction of institutional support in transitions from school to work. In StauberB., WaltherA., & SetterstenR. A. (Eds.), Doing transitions in the life course (Life Course Research and Social Policies, Vol. 16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13512-5_4
14.
HirschiA., & BaumelerF. (2020). Berufswahltheorien—Entwicklung und Stand der Diskussion. In BrüggemannT. & RahnS.(Hrsg.), Berufsorientierung. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch(2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage) (pp. 31–42). Waxmann Verlag.
15.
HowardK., & MacQuarrieS. (2022). Perspectives of care experienced young people regarding their academic experiences in further education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 821783. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.821783
16.
JacksonS., AjayiS., & QuigleyM. (2005). Going to university from care. Institute of Education. University of London.
17.
JacksonS., & CameronC. (2011). Final Report of the YiPPEE Project WP12: young people from a public care background: Pathways to further and higher education in five European countries. http://tcru.ioe.ac.uk/yippee/
18.
JacksonS., & CameronC. (2012). Leaving care: Looking ahead and aiming higher. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(6), 1107–1114.
19.
KochskämperD., & ThomasS. (2023). Übergänge aus der stationären Jugendhilfe. Wie Jugendberufsagenturen Care Leaver*innen unterstützen können. https://www.servicestelle-YouthEmploymentAgency.de/wws/9.php#/wws/uebergaenge-stationaere-jugendhilfe.php
20.
Mann-FederV. R., & GoyetteM. (2019). Leaving care and the transition to adulthood: International contributions to theory, research, and practice. Oxford University Press.
21.
O’HigginsA., SebbaJ., & GardnerF. (2017). What are the factors associated with educational achievement for children in kinship or foster care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 198–220.
22.
O’HigginsA., SebbaJ., & LukeM. (2015). What is the relationship between being in care and the educational outcomes of children? An international systematic review. Rees Centre, University of Oxford. https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_33005-5_0.pdf
23.
PrendergastL., DaviesC., SeddonD., HartfielN., & EdwardsR. T. (2024). Barriers and enablers to care-leavers engagement with multi-agency support: A scoping review. Children and Youth Services Review, 159, 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107501
24.
RefaeliT., & StrahlB. (2014). Turning point processes to higher education among care leavers. Social Work & Society, 12(1), 8.
25.
SebbaJ., BerridgeD., LukeN., FletcherJ., BellK., StrandS., ThomasS., SinclairI., & O’HigginsA. (2015). The educational progress of looked after children in England: Linking care and educational data. Rees Centre, University of Oxford. https://www.education.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Linking-Care-and-Educational-Data-Overview-Report-Nov-2015.pdf
26.
SinclairI., LukeN., & BerridgeD. (2019). Children in care or in need: Educational progress at home and in care. Oxford Review of Education, 45(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1600488
27.
SmithL., & DowseL. (2019). Times during transition for young people with complex support needs: Entangled critical moments, static liminal periods and contingent meaning making times. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1575346
28.
StrahlB., van BredaA. D. P., Mann-FederV., & SchröerW. (2020). A multinational comparison of care-leaving policy and legislation. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 36, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2020.26
29.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights (217 [III] A). https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
30.
ZeiraA., AchdutN., & BenbenishtyR. (2023). Predicting educational attainments and enrollment to higher education: A longitudinal study of care leavers in Israel. Research in Higher Education, 64(8), 1165–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09742-x
31.
ZellerM., KöngeterS., & SchröerW. (2009). Traps in transition: A biographical approach to forms of collaboration between youth welfare services and employment promotion agencies. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 4(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450120902923205
