This article examines how individuals’ perceptions of free choice influence their likelihood to engage in unconventional political activism, including signing petitions, joining boycotts, demonstrations, and strikes, across transitional regimes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, and how this relationship is mediated by each country’s voice and accountability score. By merging the sixth and seventh waves of the World Values Survey datasets, with a sample of more than 15,000 participants, the study employed Bayesian multilevel multivariate modeling and compared the studied countries. The main findings of the study contradict prevailing theories built on democratic contexts that emphasize a strong correlation between free choice and unconventional participation. First, the analysis revealed that perceived free choice is not a driving factor for unconventional political engagement. While there are minor correlations with joining boycotts and demonstrations, free choice shows no significant effects on signing petitions and joining strikes. Second, this relationship is not significantly mediated by the countries’ voice and accountability score. Third, the correlation exhibits a complex cubic relationship rather than a linear association.
BarberBenjamin. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
2.
BerlinIsaiah. (1990). Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press.
3.
BinderMartin. (2021). Enhancing democracy: Can civic engagement foster political participation? Social Science Quarterly, 102(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12882
4.
BogaardsMatthijs. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16(2), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340902777800
5.
BrownleeJason. (2009). Portents of pluralism: How hybrid regimes affect democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00384.x
6.
BürknerPaul-Christian. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
7.
BürknerPaul-Christian, & VuorreMatti. (2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199
8.
CasatiNoemi. (2016). Political participation in a Palestinian university: Nablus undergraduates’ political subjectivities through boredom, fear and consumption. Ethnography, 17(4), 518–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138116649976
9.
CheesemanNic. (2015). Democracy in Africa. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030892
10.
CorstangeDaniel. (2014). Anti-American behavior in the Middle East. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2444102
11.
DahlRobert. (1983). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. Yale University Press.
12.
DaltonRussel. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. CQ Press.
13.
DienerEd, SuhEunkook M., LucasRichard E., & SmithHeidi L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
14.
DworkinGerald. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
15.
EkmanJoakim, & AmnåErik. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
16.
ErisenCengiz, & KubicekPaul. (2018). Democratic consolidation in Turkey: Micro and macro challenges. Routledge.
17.
ErisenCengiz, & WiltseEvren. (2017). Dividedness, institutions and economic performance: A cross-national analysis of democratic stability. Social Indicators Research, 132(3), 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1343-0
18.
GiddensAnthony. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
19.
GutierrezLey, & JessicaSandra. (2014). Citizens in fear: Political participation and voting behavior in the midst of violence[Doctoral Thesis]. Duke University.
20.
HeldDavid. (2007). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
21.
HinnebuschRaymond. (2014). Change and continuity after the Arab uprising: The consequences of state formation in Arab North African States. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2015.973182
22.
HoleczValentina, FernándezEva, & GiugniMarco. (2022). Broadening political participation: The impact of socialising practices on young people’s action repertoires. Politics, 42(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957211041448
23.
InglehartRonald, & WelzelChristian. (2001). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881
24.
KarpJeffrey, & BanducciSusan. (2008). Political efficacy and participation in twenty-seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000161
25.
KerrisseyJasmine, & SchoferEvan. (2018). Labor unions and political participation in comparative perspective. Social Forces, 97(1), 427–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/SF/SOY044
26.
KiessJohannes. (2022). Learning by doing: The impact of experiencing democracy in education on political trust and participation. Politics, 42(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721990287
27.
LevitskySteven, & ZiblattDaniel. (2019). How democracies die. Broadway Books.
28.
McAdamDoug. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.
29.
McAdamDoug, & PaulsenRonnelle. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640–667. https://doi.org/10.1086/230319
30.
NepstadSharon, & SmithChristian. (1999). Rethinking recruitment to high-risk/cost activism: The case of Nicaragua Exchange. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 4(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.1.8152670287r21558
31.
PackJason. (2022). Libya and the global enduring disorder. Hurst & Company.
32.
PittiIlaria. (2018). Unconventional political participation: An overview. In Youth and unconventional political engagement (pp. 7–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75591-5_2
33.
PowellBingham. (1981). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Samuel H. Barnes, Max Kaase, Klaus R. Allerback, Barbara Farah, Felix Heunks, Ronald Inglehart, M. Kent Jennings, Hans D. Klingemann, Allan Marsh, Leopold Rosenmayr. American Journal of Sociology, 87(2), 505–507. https://doi.org/10.1086/227490
34.
RyanRichard, & DeciEdward. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
35.
SchlumbergerOliver. (2020). Debating Arab authoritarianism: Dynamics and durability in nondemocratic regimes. Stanford University Press.
36.
ScottJames. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
37.
StoykovaPetrana. (2021). Education as a cause for participation in politics: A case study in Bulgaria. Balkan Social Science Review, 18(18), 299–323.
38.
TillyCharles. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. The University of Chicago Press.
39.
ValbjørnMorten. (2012). Upgrading post-democratization studies: Examining a re-politicized Arab world in a transition to somewhere. Middle East Critique, 21(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2012.658496
40.
ValbjørnMorten, & BankAndré. (2012). The New Arab Cold War: Rediscovering the Arab dimension of Middle East regional politics. Review of International Studies, 38(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000283
41.
WhiteleyPaul, StewartMarianne, SandersDavid, & ClarkeHarold. (2010). Do institutions really influence political participation? Contextual influences on turnout and participation in the world’s democracies. International Journal of Market Research, 52(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.2501/S1470785310201041
42.
WigellMikael. (2008). Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime types and concepts in comparative politics. Democratization, 15(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701846319
43.
ZafirovicJovana, MatijevicBranka, & FilipovicBožidar. (2021). Institutional trust, political participation, and corruption: A European comparative perspective. Sociologija, 63(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2102336Z
