It has been claimed that Turkey and Egypt possess a similar pattern of interest representation in which the earlier state-corporatism has been giving way to a more variegated form of corporatism. However, the seemingly similar structure of post state-corporatist system in both countries displays explicit differences given the distinguished and disaggregated stages of their transitional regime types. Namely, the representational dualism in which preexisting corporatism coexists with resurgent pluralism in post-Kemalist Turkey and post-Nasserist Egypt, does not share much similarity. Although both Turkey and Egypt have not reached the stage of liberal democracy or consolidated democracy, the former is classified as ambiguous regime moving toward electoral democracy while the latter is distinctively categorized as electoral authoritarian regime, typical pseudo democracy.
Al-SayyidMustapha Kamel. “The Concept of Civil Society and the Arab World,” In BrynenRexKoranyBahgatNoblePaul, ed., Political Liberalization and Democratization in the Arab World, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers1995
2.
AyubiNazih N.Over-stating the Arab State, London: I. B. Tauris, 1995
3.
BellinEva. Stalled Democracy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002
4.
BellinEva. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective,”Comparative Politics36 (2), (2004)
5.
BianchiRobert. Interest Groups and Political Development in Turkey, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984
6.
BianchiRobert. Unruly Corporatism, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989
7.
BrownleeJason. “The Decline of Pluralism in Mubarak's Egypt,”Journal of Democracy13 (4), (2002)
8.
BrownleeJason. “Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies,”World Politics59 (4), (2007a)
9.
BrownleeJason. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007b
10.
BrumbergDaniel. “The Trap of Liberalized Autocracy,”Journal of Democracy13 (4), (2002)
11.
BrynenRexKoranyBahgatNoblePaul. “Introduction: Theoretical Perspectives on Arab Liberalization and Democratization,” In BrynenRexKoranyBahgatNoblePaul, ed., Political Liberalization and Democratization in the Arab World, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers1995
12.
BugraAyse. State and Business in Modern Turkey, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994
13.
CantoriLouis J., “Americanized Political Science and the State as a Coercive Institution in the Middle East,”Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (September, 1999)
14.
Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier.“Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating Corporatism,”The American Political Science Review73 (4), (1979)
15.
DahlRobert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971
16.
DiamondLarry. Developing Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999
17.
DiamondLarry. “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes,” in Journal of Democracy13 (2), (2002)
18.
HouseFreedom. Freedom in the World, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008
19.
GrantWyn. “Introduction,” In GrantWyn, ed., The Political Economy of Corporatism, London: Macmillan1985
20.
HenryClement M.SpringborgRobert. Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001
21.
HuntingtonSamuel P.The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991
22.
JangJi-Hyang. “Islamic Fundamentalism,” In DarityWilliam A., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference2008
23.
KienleEberhard. “More Than a Response to Islamism: The Political Deliberalization of Egypt in the 1990s,”Middle East Journal52 (2), (1998)
24.
KramerGudrun. “Islam and Pluralism,” In BrynenRexKoranyBahgatNoblePaul, ed., Political Liberalization and Democratization in the Arab World, Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers1995
25.
LangohrVickie. “Too Much Civil Society, Too Little Politics: Egypt and Liberalizing Arab Regimes,” in Comparative Politics36 (2), (2004)
26.
MooreClement Henry. “Authoritarian Politics in Unincorporated Society: The Case of Nasser's Egypt,”Comparative Politics6 (2), (1974)
27.
MooreClement Henry. Images of Development: Egyptian Engineers in Search of Industry, Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1994
28.
O'DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe C.. Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986
29.
OffeClaus. “The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups: Observations on the West German Case,” In BergerSuzanne, ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1981
30.
OlsonMancur. The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965
31.
OnisZiyaKeymanFuat. “Turkey at the Polls: A New Path Emerges,”Journal of Democracy14 (2), (2003)
32.
OnisZiya“Political Islam at the Crossroads: From Hegemony to Co-existence,” in Comparative Politics34 (4), (2001)
33.
OwenRoger. “Socio-economic Change and Political Mobilization: The Case of Egypt,” In SalameGhassan, ed., Democracy without Democrats?London: I. B. Tauris1994
34.
OwenRoger. State, Power, and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East, London: Routledge, 2004
PerthesVolker. “The Private Sector, Economic Liberalization, and the Prospects of Democratization: The Case of Syria and Some Other Arab Countries,” In SalameGhassan, ed., Democracy without Democrats?London: I. B. Tauris1994
37.
PosusneyMarsha Pripstein. “Enduring Authoritarianism: Middle East Lessons for Comparative Theory,”Comparative Political Studies36 (2), (2004)
38.
PrzeworskiAdam. Democracy and the Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991
39.
PutnamRobert D.Making Democracy Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993
40.
RustowDankwart. “Transitions to Democracy,”Comparative Politics2 (3), (1970)
41.
SchmitterPhilippe C.“Still the Century of Corporatism?” In SchmitterPhilippe C.LehmbruchGerhard, ed., Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications1979
42.
SchmitterPhilippe C.“Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going,” In SchmitterPhilippe C.LehmbruchGerhard, ed., Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications1982
43.
SunarIlkaySayariSabri. “Democracy in Turkey: Problems and Prospects,” In O'DonnellGuillermoSchmitterPhilippe C.WhiteheadLaurence, ed., Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press1986
44.
WaterburyJohn. “Democracy without Democrats?” In SalameGhassan, ed., Democracy without Democrats?London: I. B. Tauris1994
45.
WhiteJenny B.“The End of Islamism? Turkey's Muslimhood Model,” In HefnerRobert W., ed., Remaking Muslim Politics: Pluralism, Contestation, Democratization, Princeton: Princeton University Press2005
46.
WilsonFrank L.“Interest Groups and Politics in Western Europe: The Neo-Corporatist Approach,”Comparative Politics16 (1) 1983)
47.
ZubaidaSami. “Islam, the State and Democracy,”Middle East Report (November/ December, 1992)
