The Lebanese resistance movement and political party, Hezbollah, benefited from the Arab Spring to spread its hegemony over Lebanon through democratic means. In January 2011, the party and its allies forged a majority in the parliament and formed a cabinet. The cabinet collapsed two months before Hezbollah’s overt acknowledgement of involvement in the Syrian quagmire. Since March 22, 2013, a power vacuum has been reigning in Lebanon: there is no cabinet; no functioning parliament; and no properly running institutions. This situation increased sectarian tensions, especially the Sunni–Shia divide or discord (fitna). In spite of the relative stability of Lebanon, like the Arab uprisings, the country lacks a clear ideological vision, unified leadership, and has serious problems with institutionalization and constitutionalism.
Al-SadaawiNawal (2013). Al-Thawwrat al-’Arabiyya (The Arab uprisings). Beirut: All Prints.
2.
Al-SadaawiNawal (2014). Inahu Al-Damm (It is the blood [of the Egyptian revolution]). Beirut: All Prints.
3.
AlaghaJoseph (2011a). Hezbollah’s identity construction. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
4.
AlaghaJoseph (2011b). Hezbollah’s documents: From the 1985 open letter to the 2009 manifesto. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
5.
AlaghaJoseph (2013). Hezbollah’s infitah: A post-Islamist trend? In BayatAsef (Ed.), Post-Islamism: The changing faces of political Islam (pp. 240–54). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
AndersonJon W. (2009). Electronic media and new Muslim publics. The New Cambridge History of Islam, Vol. 6: Muslims & modernity. (pp. 648–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BayatAsef (1996). The coming of a post-Islamist Society. Critique: Critical Middle East Studies, 9(Fall), 43–52.
8.
BayatAsef (2007). Making Islam democratic: Social movements and the post-Islamist turn. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
HefnerRobert W. (2012). New media in the Arab Middle East and the emergence of open societies. In HefnerR.W. (Ed.), Remaking Muslim politics: Pluralism, contestation, democratization (pp. 37–59). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
LynchMarc (2011). The big think behind the Arab Spring. Foreign Policy, 190(December), 46–47.
RoyOlivier (2012). Islam: The democracy dilemma. In WrightRobin (Ed.), The Islamists are coming: Who they really are (pp. 13–19). Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
21.
SalmanTalal (2011). Nahwa nazariyya siyasiyya lil tahawulat al-’Arabiyya (Toward a political theory of the Arab uprisings). In SalmanTalal (Ed), Qira’at fi al-intifadat al-’Arabiyya (A reading in Arab revolutions), Ma’lumat, Vol. 90 (pp. 109–14). Beirut: Al-Markaz Al-’Arabi lil Ma’lumat.
22.
ScottJohn G.CarringtonPeter J. (Eds) (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. New York: SAGE.
23.
ShamiSeteney (Ed.) (2009). Publics, politics and participation: Locating the public sphere in the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Social Science Research Council of America.
24.
WendtAlexander (1994). Collective identity formation and the international state. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 384–96.
25.
WendtAlexander (1999). Social theory of international politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
