The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine reignited scholarly debates on Russian expansionism, highlighting overlooked colonial tendencies in its foreign policy. This invasion catalysed a postcolonial shift in Eurasian studies, prompting a re-evaluation of Russia’s colonial posture and fostering dialogue between postsocialist and postcolonial scholars. Traditional postcolonial studies, focused on Western colonialism, often miss the unique aspects of Russian colonialism. This research emphasizes the need to understand Russian imperial ideology, which legitimizes regional aggression and obscures colonial history. It explores how Russia’s “household” narrative masks power imbalances, justifies intervention, and perpetuates imperial aspirations under the guise of protection and kinship.
AgadjanianA (2024) Russian and Soviet imperial legacy in postcolonial eurasia: an overview of the revived debate. Armenological Issues28(2): 2007.
2.
AndersonJ (2007) Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church: asymmetric symphonia?Journal of International Affairs61(1): 185–200.
3.
AvramchukO (2025) The decolonisation trap and the quest to reclaim a “kidnapped” Europe. Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe23(4): 123–148. https://doi.org/10.36874/RIESW.2025.4.5
4.
BarnettM (2012) Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Cornell University Press.
BogachenkoTOleinikovaO (2024) The ghosts of “internal colonisation”: anthropogenic impacts of Russian imperial ambitions in Ukraine. Ethnicities24(4): 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968231219774
9.
BogatovaG (2019) Wielding the ‘energy weapon’: the dilemma of Russian gas liberalization and dual pricing policy. The Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies44(3–4): 339–365.
10.
BotanovaKPalkoO (2024) From the decolonial à la Russe to the colonial à la Ukrainienne. Forum for Modern Language Studies60(3): 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqae040
11.
BowenM (1978) Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson.
12.
BreuningM (2011) Role theory research in international relations: state of the art and blind spots. In: HarnischSFrankCMaullHW (eds) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. Routledge, pp. 16–35.
13.
BrukD (2013) The best of Vladimir zhirinovsky, the clown prince of Russian politics. Vice Magazine8(11): 410–444.
14.
BudrytėDDavoliūtėV (2025) Continuity or change? The russo-Ukrainian war and decolonization of memory in Lithuania. Global Studies Quarterly5(4): ksaf102. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksaf102
15.
BusyginaITevdoy-BurmuliA (2025) Institutional and discursive attributes of the imperial project in modern Russia. In: Journal of Eurasian Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665251401935
16.
ByfordADoakCBHutchingsS (2024) Decolonizing the transnational, transnationalizing the decolonial: russian studies at the crossroads. Forum for Modern Language Studies60(3): 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqae038
ConklinAL (2011) A Mission to Civilize: The Republican Idea of Empire in France and West Africa, 1895–1930. Stanford University Press.
19.
CunliffeP (2010) Critical perspectives on the responsibility to protect: interrogating theory and practice. In: CunliffeP (ed) Critical Perspectives on the Responsibility to Protect: Interrogating Theory and Practice. Routledge, pp. 1–21.
20.
DawishaK (2015) Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia?Simon & Schuster.
21.
Drolet-DuguayM (2023) Russian Colonialism in the North Caucasus: The Chechen Case (master’s Thesis, University of Victoria). University of Victoria.
22.
FortuinE (2022) “Ukraine commits genocide on Russians”: the term “genocide” in Russian propaganda. Russian Linguistics46(3): 313–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09258-5
23.
GoodeP (2025) Russian propaganda from V to Z: projecting banal and everyday nationalism in unsettled times. Nationalities Papers54: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2025.28
HarnischS (2010) Role theory: operationalization of key concepts. In: HarnischSFrankCMaullHW (eds) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. Routledge, pp. 7–15.
HayozNSergeyevV (2003) Social networks in Russian politics. In: HayozNSergeyevV (eds) Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy. Routledge, pp. 123–137.
28.
HolstiKJ (1970) National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly14(3): 233–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584
29.
HosakaS (2025) Locked in a new ivory tower: beyond self-victimization and depoliticization in Russian studies. Problems of Post-Communism73: 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2025.2503886
30.
HoskingG (2000) Patronage and the Russian state. Slavonic and East European Review78(2): 301–320.
31.
Interfax (2017) Zhirinovsky compared lukashenko with an affectionate calf [Жириновский сравнил Лукашенко с ласковым теленком]. https://www.interfax.ru/russia/548478
32.
Interfax (2018) Patriarch kirill declared the inadmissibility of creating an independent church. in Ukraine [Патриарх Кирилл заявил о недопустимости создания независимой церкви на Украине]. https://www.interfax.ru/world/641468
33.
JudahB (2013) Fragile Empire: How Russia Fell in and out of Love with Vladimir Putin. Yale University Press.
34.
KashnikovB (2026) The rise of militant kleptocracy. In: The War in Ukraine and the Changing World Order. Routledge.
KroshnevaMMitrofanovaV (2017) Политический дискурс С. Шойгу [the political discourse of S. Shoigu]. Vestnik Ul’yanovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta1(77): 34–38.
37.
KumankovA (2023) Nazism, genocide and the threat of the global west: russian moral justification of war in Ukraine. Etikk i Praksis17(1): 4997. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v17i1.4997
38.
KuzioT (2022) Russian Nationalism and the Russian-Ukrainian War: Autocracy, Orthodoxy, Nationality. Routledge.
39.
LebedevD (2025) Propaganda networks, media imperialism, and the war in Ukraine. In: Studies in East European Thought. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-025-09785-z
40.
LedenevaAV (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Exchange. Cambridge University Press.
41.
LedenevaAV (2013) Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge University Press.
42.
LentonA (2025) Decolonizing Russia? Disentangling Debates. Cambridge University Press.
LoB (2015) Russia and the New World Disorder. Brookings Institution Press.
48.
LytvynenkoO (2022) Historical politics as a tool of the ideological justification of Russian neo-imperialism. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society12(S1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2022.S1.04
NoordenbosBTutersM (2026) The counter-hegemonic hegemon: A cross-platform analysis of a Kremlin-backed strategic narrative. Platforms & Society3: 285133543.
Patriarchia.ru (2009) Everything that is aimed at artificially separating russians and Ukrainians provokes division within Ukraine. [Все то, что направлено на искусственное разделение россиян и украинцев…]. https://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/726785.html
55.
Patriarchia.ru (2010) Interview of his Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and all Russia to Ukrainian TV Journalists. [Интервью Святейшего Патриарха Московского и всея Руси Кирилла украинским тележурналистам]. https://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/1223635.html
56.
PingeotL (2014) Corporate influence in the post-2015 process. Bischöfliches Hilfswerk MISEREOR e.V., Brot für die Welt – Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst. & Global Policy Forum(40).
57.
PrasadS (2005) Colonialism as civilizing mission: cultural ideology in British India. Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History6(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2005.0016
58.
Pravoslavie.ru (2022) Patriarch kirill: belarus, Russia, Ukraine have one united future. [Патриарх Кирилл: Беларусь, Россия, Украина – имеют одно единое будущее]. https://pravoslavie.ru/146184.html
59.
President of Russia (2008) Congratulations to President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili on the national holiday of Georgia – the Day of Restoration of State Independence [Поздравление Президенту Грузии Михаилу Саакашвили]. https://special.kremlin.ru/catalog/keywords/82/events/214
60.
President of Russia (2014) Vladimir Putin answered journalists’ questions about the situation in Ukraine [Владимир Путин ответил на вопросы журналистов о ситуации на Украине]. https://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20366
Regnum (2009) Regimes like saakashvili come and go, but feelings between nations remain [Режимы, подобные Саакашвили, приходят и уходят…]. https://regnum.ru/news/polit/1189944.html
RothacherA (2021) Putin’s autocracy: siloviki rule and their kleptocracy. In: Putinomics: Power and Money in Resurgent Russia. Springer, pp. 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59191-1_2
State Duma of the Russian Federation (2011b) Discussion of the draft law no. 597857-5 on amendments to the collective security treaty [Стенограммы обсуждения законопроекта № 597857-5]. https://api.duma.gov.ru/api/transcript/597857-5
70.
State Duma of the Russian Federation. (2012, December 5). On the interaction of border and other departments of the CIS in providing assistance in the emergence and settlement of crisis situations at external borders. Plenary session [О взаимодействии пограничных и иных ведомств СНГ в оказании помощи при возникновении и урегулировании кризисных ситуаций на внешних границах. Пленарное заседание]. https://duma.gov.ru/news/4494/
71.
State Duma of the Russian Federation (2013) On amendments to the treaty of friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance between Russia and Kazakhstan. Plenary meeting [О внесении изменений в Договор о дружбе, сотрудничестве и взаимной помощи между Россией и Казахстаном. Пленарное заседание Госдумы]. https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/166225-6
72.
State Duma of the Russian Federation (2017) Vladimir Zhirinovsky: it is time to bring the official Russian language to uniformity. [Владимир Жириновский: пора привести официальный русский язык к единообразию]. https://api.duma.gov.ru/api/transcriptFull/2019-01-17
73.
StoianVSurduIGarcía-JiménezA, et al. (2023) Information manipulation and historical revisionism: russian disinformation and foreign interference through manipulated history-based narratives. Open Research Europe3: 121. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16087.1
74.
TASS (2019) Kazakhstan is studying the possibility of joining the power of Siberia-2 project [Казахстан изучает возможность присоединения к проекту «Сила Сибири – 2»]. https://tass.ru/ekonomika/7199069
75.
TerentyevaO (2025) The right to freedom: state-driven institutionalization of decolonization through memory politics in Ukraine (2022–2024). Global Studies Quarterly5(4): ksaf107. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksaf107
76.
ThiesCG (2009) Role theory and foreign policy. In: SmithSHadfieldADunneT (eds) Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford University Press, pp. 158–175.
TolzVHutchingsS (2023) Truth with a Z: disinformation, war in Ukraine, and Russia’s contradictory discourse of imperial identity. Post-soviet Affairs39(5): 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2023.2202581
VentselA (2025) The role of affect and history in Russia’s strategic conspiracy narratives in the context of the war in Ukraine. In: Russian Influence Operations and the War in Ukraine: Hybrid Warfare and Disinformation Campaigns. Nature Switzerland: Springer, pp. 25–45.
WalkerSG (1987) Role theory and foreign policy analysis: an evaluation. In: WalkerSG (ed) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Duke University Press, pp. 1–28.
ZavershinskaiaP (2024) State’s legitimisation of violence through strategic narration: how the Kremlin justified the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The International Spectator59(2): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2024.2327492
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
