Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, we review the implementation, reliability, and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), a measure of health-related quality of life, in young children in rural Guatemala. Mothers of 842 children (age range = 1-60 months) completed the PedsQL Generic Core Scales 4.0 serially for 1 year. Low (Pearson’s r = 0.28, P < .0001) to moderate (Pearson’s r = 0.65, P < .0001) consistency in responding over time was shown. The PedsQL did not discriminate reliably between healthy children and those with stunting or wasting. PedsQL scores were not lower during the time of an acute illness. While we found low to moderate evidence for the reliability of the PedsQL in healthy children, it did not discriminate between healthy children and those with stunting, wasting or other acute illness.

Keywords

PedsQL stunting wasting low resource settings Guatemala

What Do We Already Know About This Topic?

Children living in low resource settings are exposed to many risks to their physical health and therefore to their overall health-related quality of life.

How Does Your Research Contribute to the Field?

The most commonly used measure of health-related quality of life in children, the PedsQL, did not perform as expected and did not discriminate between groups of healthy children and those with chronic or acute illness.

What Are Your Research’s Implications Toward Theory, Practice, or Policy?

Future studies in low resource settings, particulary those involving the youngest children, should describe implementation of the health-related quality of life measure and analysis of reliability and validity to ensure that data accurately reflect what is occuring in that population.

Background

The World Health Organization defines health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as not simply an indicator of the presence or absence of disease, but as a more comprehensive metric of physical, mental and social well-being.¹ There is a growing recognition of the importance of measuring quality of life in health outcomes, because children who suffer from health-related conditions are not only impacted physically. Emotional, social and school functioning are also affected, placing these children at a disadvantage across all areas of daily living compared to their healthy peers.²

Measuring HRQOL is particularly important in low resource settings (LRSs) where children are exposed to many risks to their physical health.^3,4 The most common health problems, unique to children living in LRSs, are stunting and wasting, with incidence rates as high as 1/3 to 1/2 in the most impacted parts of the world.^5–8 Stunting and wasting are reported to be responsible for 2.2 million deaths a year and 35% of the disease burden in children under 5.⁸ Stunting is understood to be a proxy for chronic undernutrition and related to compromised immunity and repeated illness.^9–11 Wasting is thought to be a reversible condition related to acute undernutrition and can be seen in cases of food shortages or during outbreaks of disease, for example.¹² Not surprisingly then, several studies have shown stunting and wasting to be related to lower HRQOL^13–15 and consequently, poor long-term outcome.^16–21

While there is no agreed upon gold standard for the measurement of HRQOL, the PedsQL has emerged as one of the most commonly used tools in clinical practice and healthcare research. Many studies have shown it to be a valid instrument with good ability to discriminate between groups of healthy and ill children, differing levels of disease severity, and chronic and acute illness.^22–25 While it was developed in the United States, the PedsQL is widely used throughout the world including in LRSs.^22,26–28 However, the majority of studies outside of the US report PedsQL results without presenting data on whether it has been shown to be a reliable metric of HRQOL with good discriminability both cross-culturally and in that particular study setting.^29–32 Of the studies that do report on the psychometric properties of the PedsQL in LRSs, some have shown that it can be used successfully^13,33,34 while others have found that it did not discriminate as well as expected between groups of healthy and ill children and have called for more research when utilized in these settings.^27,35,36

Additionally, most studies of the PedsQL in LRSs have been conducted on school-aged children, and there is less evidence for its use in the very young, particularly infants and toddlers.^{13,27,34,37,38} In Argentina, the PedsQL, adapted for use at the study site, worked well for children ages 5 years and older, but was less reliable for children 2 to 4 years of age.³⁹ Even in the US, the research has been equivocal, with some studies showing that the PedsQL can be used successfully in infancy^23,26,40 and through the preschool years,^23,41 and another study showing that it may not perform as well with the youngest children.⁴² Few studies have focused on the reliability and discriminatory ability of the PedsQL to measure HRQOL in an infant/young child population in an LRS.^43,44

The objective of the current study was to report on implementation, reliability and discriminant validity of the caregiver report PedsQL in order to advance the understanding of HRQOL of young children living in poverty in rural Guatemala. We hypothesized that PedsQL scores would remain stable over time in healthy children and would discriminate between healthy children (i.e., children without a known, active health problem) and those meeting criteria for stunting or wasting. A secondary objective was to examine the sensitivity of the PedsQL to acute illness. We hypothesized that PedsQL scores would be lower for children during the time of acute illness compared to when they were healthy.

Methods

Study and Setting : In June 2017, we launched a prospective, natural history study (“the Parent Study”) of postnatally acquired Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in infants and young children at the University of Colorado Center for Human Development research and clinic site in Guatemala. The site is located at the intersections of the departments of San Marcos, Quetzaltenango and Retalhuleu, encompassing 22 rural communities with approximately 30 000 residents. These communities are monolingual Spanish-speaking. The population suffers from high rates of food insecurity and child undernutrition, diarrheal disease, maternal depression, and maternal and child morbidity and mortality.^45,46 The Parent Study was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the Baylor College of Medicine Vaccine and Treatments Evaluation Unit (VTEU). The Parent Study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Baylor College of Medicine, the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, and the Ethics Review Committee of the Ministry of Health in Guatemala.

The Parent Study enrolled children from birth to 5 years of age who were prospectively followed for 1 year to determine the incidence of postnatally acquired symptomatic and asymptomatic ZIKV infection. Infant-mother pairs were eligible if the child was 0 to 2.9 months of age and the mother was ≥16 years of age at enrollment. They were screened and enrolled from the Center maternal and child health program, from referrals of pregnant women who were close to delivery or had delivered an infant in the previous 2 months by community health workers. Older children (<5 years of age) were eligible if they either participated in a prior 2015 to 2016 dengue acute febrile illness surveillance study or were a sibling of an enrolled infant. Informed consent was obtained by research nurses. The research nurses were available to discuss the details of the study. Informed consent forms were signed according to the National Regulations in Guatemala, who were supplied with a copy of the form. If the parent was illiterate, they were provided a thumbprint on the consent document, and a witness who was not a member of the research team was present to countersign to attest that the study information was provided and the parent(s) understood the study procedures, risk, benefits and alternatives. There were no cases of acute ZIKV during the time of the study.

In addition to serial neurodevelopmental assessments, the PedsQL was administered to mothers at the following time points for each participating child: baseline (enrollment within the first 3 months of life), 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment for infants; baseline, 6 and 12 months for children under 36 months of age; and baseline and 12 months for children 36 months of age and older. For the purposes of consistency in comparing children for the current analyses, baseline, 6 months and 12 months PedsQL scores were used. Height and weight measurements were taken at each visit by study nurses. Salter and hanging scales were used to weigh infants and floor scales were used to weigh children. Seca infantometers were used to measure infants’ length and stadiometers were used to record children’s height.

Weekly illness surveillance was conducted, in which mothers were contacted by phone and asked about whether or not their child had suffered from fever >38.0°C, rash, conjunctivitis (non-purulent/hyperemic), arthralgia, myalgia, or peri-articular edema for more than 1 day. Any child with at least 2 of these symptoms met the case definition for a flavivirus-like illness (FLI), which prompted a case investigation and diagnostic testing for ZIKV, dengue, and chikungunya. Mothers were administered the PedsQL for the child within 4 weeks after every FLI episode in order to capture any effects of the recent illness.

PedsQL: Mothers were administered the PedsQL module appropriate for the age of the child (1-12 months, 13-24 months, 2-4 years, 5 years and up). There was very high completion rate of PedsQLs in this study. In infants, mothers completed 94% of PedsQLs at enrollment, and 99% for both the 6 months and 12 months visits. Likewise, in older children, 96% of enrollment visit PedsQLs were completed and 99% were completed from both the 6 months and 12 months visits.

The PedsQL Generic Core Scales 4.0 designed for use in both healthy and patient populations was administered.^24,47 Mothers were asked how much of a problem each item has been during the past month and are asked to respond on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, and 5 = almost always). Items are reverse scored and tranformed to a scale of 0 to 100 points with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. Three summary scores are derived from the PedsQL: Psychosocial Health (comprised of Emotional, Social and Cognitive Functioning for children <24 months and Emotional, Social, and School Functioning for children age 2 and older), Physical Health (comprised of Physical Functioning and Physical Symptoms for children <24 months and Physical Functioning for children 2 years and older) and Overall Health Related Quality of Life (all scales combined). Scores are raw scores and are not standardized. Composite data from 9430 school-aged children in the US showed a mean total score of 82.70 (SD = 15.40) on caregiver report with >1 standard deviation below the mean indicating at-risk status for impaired HRQOL.²⁵ A US sample of 246 healthy infants showed a similar mean total score of 82.47 (SD = 9.95) for healthy children.²⁶

Process of implementation of the PedsQL: While the PedsQL has been used widely throughout the world and in a variety of LRSs, many studies do not report on any specific challenges to implementation.^29–32 However, in pretesting the PedsQL in our setting, a few problems with standard administration were quickly identified and readily apparent. First, while we obtained a version of the PedsQL in Spanish, the version was from Mexico, which necessitated some minimal regional language changes.^22,37,48 Second, many mothers asked for clarification on every item. Follow-up questioning by examiners revealed problems related to literacy, confusion around the question stem and difficulty with the Likert scale. These issues were addressed and modifications from standard administration were made according to internationally accepted guidelines.^49–53

Literacy: A 2011 community needs survey found 21% of mothers reported having no formal education.⁴⁶ Overall, 52% of mothers completed school beyond second grade and only 7.5% of mothers attended school beyond the 6th grade. Therefore, given that it was likely that a sizable proportion of mothers may have struggled with the literacy demands of the PedsQL and were demonstrating difficulty during pretesting, we administered it orally to all mothers to ensure equal access to the test and consistency in test administration across the Parent Study.

Question stem: The question stem on the PedsQL refers to problem severity (i.e., “How much of a problem has your child had with..?”), but requires a response regarding frequency (e.g., never, almost always). While this seems to work in English, it appeared to create substantial confusion in our study. To address this, we modified the stem to “¿Qué tan seguido ha tenido problemas con. . .?,” which directly translates to “How often has he/she had problem with. . .?” This improved the ability to connect the stem to item responses and reduced the need for clarification from mothers.

Likert scale: During the pretesting, mothers also frequently expressed confusion about the 5 point Likert scale, its meaning and the variety of response options available. To address this, we worked to develop a visual prompt to represent each of the 5 options. Several visuals were attempted and failed during pilot testing. In the end, we adapted an unpublished illustration by Perez-Condor and Kohrt⁵⁴ of a Guatemalan woman burdened by a heavy sack, which illustrates that having “more” of something was negative. We created a visual of a child with an increasing number of mosquitos on his body (Figure 1). The artist, who is a nurse coordinator at the site (EEB), added the written answers above each drawing for those mothers who could rely on those as well. In introducing the questionnaire, we provided a verbal explanation about the frequency and not the burden/severity of the mosquitos. So, for example, we described that he “never” or “always” has mosquito bites. This resulted in improved ability to answer questions and in better variability in responding qualitatively.

Figure 1.

Visual of PedsQL Likert scale.

Analysis : The PedsQLs of all subjects who completed the Parent Study (n = 842) were included in the analysis. Children were categorized as “healthy” if they did not meet criteria for stunting or wasting at any time point and did not have a FLI episode. Stunting was defined as equal or greater than 2SD below the mean in height- or length-for-age z-scores using the WHO growth standards.⁵⁵ Wasting was defined as equal or greater than 2SD below the mean in weight-for-height/length z-score using the WHO growth standards.⁵⁵ Finally, because communities of young children with high rates of stunting and wasting are also believed to experience more frequent acute illess,^12,56–58 PedsQLs from children experiencing a FLI event were also analyzed.

A Pearson’s product moment correlation was computed to examine the correlation between PedsQL scores among children categorized as healthy at all time points. We expected to see consistent scores over time due to normal growth indicators for height and weight and lack of presence of acute illness. Next, multivariable mixed models were used to compare PedsQL scores over time between healthy children and children meeting criteria for stunting and between healthy children and children meeting criteria for wasting. PedsQL data was tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test at each time point for infants and young children separately. T tests (for normally distrbuted data) and Mann-Whitney U tests (for non-normally distributed data) were done to examine differences between PedQL scores at specific study time points between healthy children and children meeting criteria for stunting or wasting. We hypothesized that PedsQL scores would be lower for children meeting criteria for stunting and wasting in all analyses.

The “minimal clinically important difference” for the PedsQL was described in Varni et. al. (2003) as the smallest difference in a score that would trigger different patient management or would be perceived by parents to be beneficial.²⁴ Therefore, we also examined mean scores for healthy children and children meeting criteria for stunting or wasting to assess whether these differences met criteria for a minimal clinically important difference. Lastly, effect sizes were computed to analyze PedsQL scores at baseline, immediately after a FLI event, and then in the months following. We hypothesized that scores during a FLI event would be lower than before or several months later for a given child.

Results

Analysis of infants consisted of 486 subjects for whom anthropometric measurements and linked PedsQL data were available for at least 1 time point (enrollment, 6 months visit, or 12 months visit). Of these 486 subjects, 309 were healthy (no stunting or wasting and no FLI events) at all visits, 13 met criteria for stunting or wasting at all visits, and 159 met criteria for stunting or wasting at some but not all timepoints. Infant subjects were 47% female, and an average of 1.1 (SD 1.0) months old at first anthropometric measurement and PedsQL administration. Analysis of older children consisted of 357 subjects for whom anthropometric measurements and linked PedsQL data were available for at least 1time point (enrollment, 6 months visit, or 12 months visit). Of these 357 subjects, 182 were healthy at all visits, 114 met criteria for stunting or wasting at all visits, and 61 met criteria for stunting or wasting at some but not all timepoints. Older children were 48% female, and an average of 35.9 (SD 10.3) months old at first anthropometric measurement and PedsQL administration.

Test-retest reliability of the PedsQL for infants and children categorized as healthy (never meeting criteria for stunting or wasting or a FLI during the time of the study, n = 491) ranged from low (Pearson’s r = 0.28, P < .0001) to moderate (Pearson’s r = 0.65, P < .0001) with most time points showing moderate correlations (Table 1).

Table 1.

Pearson Correlation Coefficients of PedsQL Scores Across Visits in Healthy Infants and Older Children.

	Enrollment to 6 months		6 months to 12 months
Infants (n = 309) *	Pearson’s R	p-value	Pearson’s R	p-value
Psychosocial health	0.45	<0.0001	0.47	<0.0001
Physical health	0.41	<0.0001	0.47	<0.0001
Total score	0.50	<0.0001	0.51	<0.0001
Older children (n = 182) **	Enrollment to 6 months		6 months to 12 months
Psychosocial health	0.56	<0.0001	0.62	<0.0001
Physical health	0.53	<0.0001	0.28	0.025
Total score	0.65	<0.0001	0.54	<0.0001

Infants: children 0-3 months at the time of enrollment.

Older children: siblings and community controls ages 1 to 5 years at the time of enrollment.

T-tests were utilized to analyze differences between PedsQL scores of healthy infants and children and those meeting criteria for wasting or stunting at each of the time points separately. These differences were statistically significant at enrollment and 6 months for older children, but not at 12 months. No significant differences were found at any time point for infants. The minimal clinically important difference was compared to the observed difference in study children at all time points.²⁴ Only scores at 12 months for infants and at 6 months for older children met the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of Mean PedsQL Scores Between Infants and Children Healthy at All Time Points Compared to Those Who Met Criteria for Wasting or Stunting at All Time Points.

	Psychosocial health			Physical health			Total score
	Healthy M(SD)	Stunting or wasting M(SD)	t-test p-value	Healthy M(SD)	Stunting or wasting M(SD)	t-test p-value	Healthy M(SD)	Stunting or wasting M(SD)	t-test p-value
Infants
Enrollment n = 302 healthy, 11 with stunting or wasting	80.41 (13.13)	75.68 (5.45)	0.24	79.94 (12.33)	79.69 (14.66)	0.95	80.20 (11.31)	77.46 (12.96)	0.43
6 months n = 279 healthy, 7 with stunting or wasting	77.55 (14.23)	81.79 (11.08)	0.44	82.03 (12.73)	86.16 (10.19)	0.37	79.54 (12.43)	83.73 (10.24)	0.38
12 months n = 263 healthy, 7 with stunting or wasting	74.20** (14.94)	64.12** (17.53)	0.08	80.41** (11.91)	73.03** (10.72)	0.08	76.83** (12.27)	67.94** (13.94)	0.06
Older children
Enrollment n = 180 healthy, 114 with stunting or wasting	80.05 (14.68)	76.55 (15.60)	0.056	86.83 (13.23)	81.32 (16.41)	0.002*	83.02 (12.91)	78.61 (14.08)	0.006*
6 months n = 67 healthy, 61 with stunting or wasting	82.34** (13.12)	76.77** (19.18)	0.18	89.65** (12.86)	81.70** (18.11)	0.01*	85.59** (11.81)	78.95** (16.40)	0.03*
12 months n = 138 healthy, 84 with stunting or wasting	82.06 (15.00)	81.12 (15.77)	0.75	87.50 (13.35)	86.94 (14.87)	0.81	84.55 (12.96)	83.71 (13.81)	0.80

Statistically significant p-value (t-test for normally distributed data, and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data).

Met threshold for the minimal clinically significant difference (Psychosocial Health=5.49, Physical Health=6.92; Total Score 4.50).

Multivariable mixed models compared PedsQL scores at visits in which an infant or child met criteria for stunting with visits of those that were healthy, as well as visits in which an infant or child met criteria for wasting with healthy infants and children. Those who met criteria for a FLI at any point in the study were not included in this analysis. The models were adjusted for gender. At clinic visits in which an infant met criteria for stunting, the infant had significantly lower scores on Psychosocial Health (P = < .0001) and the Total Score of the PedsQL (P = .0003). In visits in which an older child met criteria for stunting, the child had significantly lower scores on Physical Health (P = .002) and the Total Score (P = .02). No statistically significant differences were evidenced between infants or children meeting criteria for wasting and healthy infants and children in any cohort (Table 3a and 3b).

Table 3a.

Association Between PedsQL Scores Collected at Visits During Which the Infant or Child Met Criteria for Stunting Versus Visits at Which the Infant or Child Did Not Meet stunting Criteria*, Adjusted for Relevant Confounders.

	Psychosocial health		Physical health		Total score
	Estimate (SE)	P-value	Estimate (SE)	P-value	Estimate (SE)	P-value
Infants
Stunting (n = 308)	−5.91 (1.25)	<0.0001**	−0.64 (1.13)	0.57	−3.68 (1.04)	0.0004**
Older children
Stunting (n = 299)	−1.91 (1.39)	0.17	−3.67 (1.26)	0.004**	−2.68 (1.20)	0.03**

Adjusted for gender; those with FLI events not included. Visits at which the infant or child also met criteria for wasting are not included.

Statistically significant (p < .05).

Table 3b.

Association Between PedsQL Scores Collected at Visits During Which the Infant or Child Met Criteria for Wasting Versus Visits at Which the Infant or Child Did Not Meet Wasting Criteria*, Adjusted for Relevant Confounders.

	Psychosocial health		Physical health		Total score
	Estimate (SE)	P-value	Estimate (SE)	P-value	Estimate (SE)	P-value
Infants
Wasting (n = 295)	−0.68 (2.07)	0.74	−0.52 (1.89)	0.78	−0.64 (1.71)	0.71
Older children
Wasting (n = 204)	−2.37 (3.59)	0.51	−0.81 (3.43)	0.81	−1.59 (3.18)	0.62

Adjusted for gender; those with FLI events not included. Visits at which the infant or child also met criteria for stunting are not included.

Statistically significant (p < .05).

Effect sizes were small to medium and frequently not in the expected direction for infants and children before, during and after a FLI event (Table 4).

Table 4.

Effect Sizes of the Means of PedsQL Scores for Children with a FLI Event.

	Enrollment to 12 months	Enrollment to FLI	FLI to 12 months
Infants
Psychosocial health	−0.53	−0.06	−0.44
Physical health	−0.14	−0.16	0.01
Overall HRQOL	−0.41	−0.11	−0.29
Older children
Psychosocial health	0.29	0.30	−0.01
Physical health	0.11	0.09	0.02
Overall HRQOL	0.25	0.23	0.02

Discussion

Low to moderate test-retest reliability was found demonstrating modest support for the PedsQL as a reliable measure of HRQOL in infants and children without known chronic or acute health problems. While the difference in scores between those meeting criteria for stunting and healthy infants and children was statistically significant when multiple test administrations were analyzed over time, this difference was not evident for wasting. Differences were also not consistently evident when stunting and wasting were combined and analyzed at specific time points for older children and was not evidenced at any time point in infants, although this latter analysis was limited by small sample size for the stunting/wasting group. For the time points that met statistical significance, the difference in means did not consistently meet the threshold for a minimal clinically important difference²⁴ potentially limiting any real world implications. Lastly, mothers did not report statistically significant lower scores in the weeks following an acute illness episode when compared to time points in which the same child was healthy. Therefore, like for wasting, the PedsQL did not appear to capture the impact of acute illness in this population.

While we found modest support for the PedsQL as a reliable measure of HRQOL in young children without known, active health problems, it did not function reliably as a discriminatory tool between healthy children and children meeting criteria for wasting, nor did it discriminate reliably when an individual child was experiencing acute illness. PedsQL scores were lower in certain indices for infants and children with stunting, but only when multiple assessments over time were included, which is likely not feasible for many smaller studies or for those planned to assess children at a single time point. While there is a growing body of literature supporting the use of measures developed in high-income countries to assess children in LRSs when carefully translated, adapted, and applied^59–61 and we have successfully shown other U.S.-developed measures to work reliably in our population,^62,63 our data suggest that the PedsQL did not function sufficiently as a reliable indicator of HRQOL in these groups of young children in rural Guatemala.

There were limitations of our study that may partially explain these results. In pretesting, there were significant problems with literacy and comprehension of test items, the question stem and the Likert scale of the PedsQL. Therefore, modifications to administration were necessary to address these problems. While some studies have shown that mode of adminstration (paper, computer, telephone interview) did not impact PedsQL results,^64,65 while minor, our additional modifications to administration potentially changed the measure in ways such that it performed differently than the original version. However, again, given the extent of problems evidenced during pretesting, we believe we would not have been able to use the PedsQL at all without modifiying how it was administered.

Additionally, there were limitations to how we categorized children into the healthy group. Due to the lack of available health care specialists in the area, there were likely children who would have met criteria for a chronic medical condition yet were undiagnosed and so were included in the healthy sample. There are also high background rates of infectious disease and other acute illnesses in the community^45,46,66 which may mean that even infants and children not meeting criteria for stunting or wasting or with an active FLI event were not truly “healthy,” also complicating any comparisons between groups and potentially attenuating our results.

It should be noted that in other analyses, our translated and adapted performance-based neurodevelopmental measure, the Mullen Scales of Early Learning,⁶⁷ did discriminate between children meeting criteria for stunting or wasting and children we categorized as “healthy” with the former performing more poorly across domains.⁶⁸ It is possible that a meaure focused on HRQOL, like the PedsQL, picks up on the elevated background rates of health problems in all children in a high risk community such as this and so fine distinctions between groups of children are more difficult to capture than differences between children on measures focused on developmental skill domains.

Presumably, this problem with high background rates of disease and unknown rates of other chronic and acute medical problems would be common in other LRSs around the world, as well. It is possible then that these factors would make it difficult for the PedsQL or any other health-focused measure to isolate the impact of any 1 disease or factor in these higher risk communities. It may also be challenging for caregivers to recognize and report a symptom as problematic that is normative in that particular high-risk community. For example, if there are high rates of stunting in a community, then low energy and lethargy may be commonly observed in children and so the mother of a child with stunting may not view her child as different in this way.

The PedsQL may also have functioned differently than the Mullen Scales of Early Learning in our study because the latter is a performance-based assessment and the PedsQL is caregiver report. In the field during administration of the PedsQL, we repeatedly observed incongruencies between what mothers reported during adminstration of the PedsQL and what was reported to clinic nurses in informal interview or observed by the team. For example, on 1 FLI visit, the mother reported a very recent hospitalization of the infant for bronchitis. The baby continued to have loud and labored breathing. Yet, on the PedsQL, the caregiver responded that the baby had not been struggling to breathe and was not making any sounds while breathing over the past 2 weeks. Therefore, while the PedsQL has been shown to be reliable in other settings and despite our efforts to modify administration to improve comprehension of the measure (described in detail above), we often struggled to obtain answers consistent with what mothers reported on more informal interview. Again, this may suggest some specific challenges, cultural and otherwise, to caregiver report in our study community that we have yet to fully understand and not a problem with the PedsQL in particular.

Conclusion

Understanding the impact of HRQOL in populations of children exposed to elevated and cumulative risk factors to their health and well-being is of utmost importance.^4,22 However, ensuring that these data accurately reflect what is occuring so that targeted and effective interventions can be developed is critical. Any future studies in LRSs, particulary those involving the youngest children, should describe implementation of the measure and analysis of reliability and validity in that population. Sharing this information will help other research and clinical teams apply lessons learned and more accurately assess the health of the pediatric populations they are supporting.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

AKC directed the local assessment team, efforts to adapt, pilot and implement the measure, and led manuscript preparation.

MML performed the data analysis and interpretation.

AMC assisted in supervision of the local assessment team, data analysis and interpretation.

DB, SH, PA, MAM were the local psychologists involved in piloting and adaptation of the PedsQL, test administration, data input and scoring.

EEB assisted in the piloting and adaptation of the PedsQL, as well as in the development and artwork for the visual Likert scales.

HME administered overall study procedures and provided oversight for data collection and quality control.

APA, MC, GAB, and DB were involved in the creation of study procedures, piloting and adaption of the measure, quality control and data collection.

EJA and FM are the co-PIs of the parent study, were involved in the development and oversight of all study procedures, as well as in data interpretation and initial to final manuscript development.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health provided contract funding for this project to the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEUs) at Baylor College of Medicine [HHSN272201300015I. Task Order No. HHSN27200013-16-0057.C1D1.0058].

ORCID iD

Amy K. Connery

References

CONSTITUTION of the world health organization. Chron World Health Organ. 1947;1(1-2):29-43.

Wallander

Varni

JW.

Effects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 1998;39(1):29-46.

Black

Richter

Risk of poor development in young children in low-income and middle-income countries: an estimation and analysis at the global, regional, and country level. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4:e916-e922.

Black

Walker

Fernald

LCH

, et al. Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course. Lancet. 2017;389:77-90.

Jiang

Tofail

, et al. Early life inflammation and neurodevelopmental outcome in Bangladeshi infants growing up in adversity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(3):974-979.

Prado

Abbeddou

Adu-afarwuah

Arimond

Linear growth and child development. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20154698.

Salomon

Mata

Gordon

JE.

Malnutrition and the common communicable diseases of childhood in rural Guatemala. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1968;58(3):505-516.

Black

Allen

Bhutta

, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371:243-260.

Prado

Dewey

KG.

Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(4):267-284.

10.

Suchdev

Boivin

Forsyth

Georgieff

Guerrant

Nelson

IIIrd

CA . Assessment of neurodevelopment, nutrition, and inflammation from fetal life to adolescence in low-resource settings. Pediatrics. 2017;139(Suppl 1):S23-S37.

11.

Vohr

Poggi Davis

Wanke

Krebs

NF.

Neurodevelopment: the impact of nutrition and inflammation during preconception and pregnancy in low-resource settings. Pediatrics. 2017;139(Suppl 1):S38-S49.

12.

Reinhardt

Fanzo

Addressing chronic malnutrition through multi-sectoral, sustainable approaches: a review of causes and consequences. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2016;114:120-127. doi:10.1159/000441823

13.

De Grandis

Armelini

Cuestas

Evaluation of quality of life in schoolchildren with a history of early severe malnutrition. An Pediatría (English Ed). 2014; 81(6):368-373.

14.

Terer

Bustinduy

Magtanong

, et al. Evaluation of the health-related quality of life of children in schistosoma haematobium-endemic communities in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(3):e2106.

15.

Erfanti

Setiabudi

Rusmil

The relationship of psychosocial dysfunction and stunting of adolescents in Suburban, Indonesia. Open J Med Psychol. 2016;5:57-65.

16.

Mendez

Adair

LS.

Severity and timing of stunting in the first two years of life affect performance on cognitive tests in late childhood. J Nutr. 1999;129(8):1555-1562.

17.

Berkman

Lescano

Gilman

Lopez

Black

MM.

Effects of stunting, diarrhoeal disease, and parasitic infection during infancy on cognition in late childhood: a follow-up study. Lancet. 2002;359:564-571.

18.

Powell

Walker

Himes

Fletcher

Grantham-McGregor

Relationships between physical growth, mental development and nutritional supplementation in stunted children: the Jamaican study. Acta Pædiatrica. 1995;84(1):22-29.

19.

Ivanovic

Leiva

Perez

, et al. Long-term effects of severe undernutrition during the first year of life on brain development and learning in Chilean high-school graduates. Nutrition. 2000;16:1056-1063.

20.

Casale

Desmond

Richter

The association between stunting and psychosocial development among preschool children: a study using the South African birth to twenty cohort data. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40(6):900-910.

21.

Walker

Chang

Wright

Osmond

Grantham-McGregor

SM.

Early childhood stunting is associated with lower developmental levels in the subsequent generation of children. J Nutr. 2015;145(4):823-828.

22.

Varni

Seid

Rode

CA.

The PedsQL^TM: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Med Care. 1999;37(2):126-139.

23.

Varni

Seid

Kurtin

PS.

PedsQL^TM 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory^TM version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800-812.

24.

Varni

Burwinkle

Seid

Skarr

The PedsQL^TM* 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(6):329-341.

25.

Varni

Limbers

Burwinkle

TM.

Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL^TM 4.0 generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):43.

26.

Varni

Limbers

Neighbors

, et al. The PedsQL^TM infant scales: feasibility, internal consistency reliability, and validity in healthy and ill infants. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(1):45-55.

27.

Jagnoor

Prinja

Christou

Baker

Gabbe

Ivers

Health-related quality of life and function after paediatric injuries in india: a longitudinal study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1144.

28.

Atilola

Stevanović

PedsQL^TM 4.0 generic core scales for adolescents in the Yoruba language: translation and general psychometric properties. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;19(2):286-298.

29.

Ladak

Hasan

Gullick

Gallagher

Health-related quality of life in congenital heart disease surgery in children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2019;104(4):340-347.

30.

Stevanovic

Atilola

Balhara

YPS

, et al. The relationships between alcohol/drug use and quality of life among adolescents: an international, cross-sectional study. J Child Adolesc Subst Abus. 2015;24(4):177-185.

31.

Carney

Petroni

Luján

, et al. Postdischarge care of pediatric traumatic brain injury in Argentina. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17:658-666.

32.

Gopakumar

Bhat

Joseph

Shetty

AK.

Health-related quality of life in children with HIV infection-a cross-sectional study from South India. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2017;12(2):104-109.

33.

Ladak

Hasan

Gullick

Awais

Abdullah

Gallagher

Health-related quality of life in surgical children and adolescents with congenital heart disease compared with their age-matched healthy sibling: a cross-sectional study from a lower middle-income country, Pakistan. Arch Dis Child. 2018;104(5):419-425.

34.

Power

King

Muhit

, et al. Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(5):469-479.

35.

Mabugu

Revill

van den Berg

The methodological challenges for the estimation of quality of life in children for use in economic evaluation in low-income countries. Value Health Reg Issues. 2013;2(2):231-239.

36.

Higuita-Gutiérrez

Cardona-Arias

JA.

Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en adolescentes: revisión sistemática de las investigaciones publicadas en el periodo 1970-2013. Rev Médicas UIS. 2014;28(1):23-30.

37.

González-Gil

Mendoza-Soto

Alonso-Lloret

Castro-Murga

Pose-Becerra

Martín-Arribas

MC.

The Spanish version of the health-related quality of life questionnaire for children and adolescents with heart disease (PedsQL^TM). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:249-257.

38.

Souza

Pamponet

Souza

Pereira

Souza

Martins

AM.

Tools used for evaluation of Brazilian children’s quality of life. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2014;32(2):272-278.

39.

Roizen

Rodriguez

Bauer

, et al. Initial validation of the Argentinean Spanish version of the PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales in children and adolescents with chronic diseases: acceptability and comprehensibility in low-income settings. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:59.

40.

Mohammad

Kaurs

Aguirre

Varni

Alonso

EM.

Health-related quality of life in infants with chronic liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(5):751-756.

41.

Varni

Limbers

Burwinkle

TM.

Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL^TM 4.0 generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):2.

42.

Schepers

van Oers

Maurice-Stam

, et al. Health related quality of life in Dutch infants, toddlers, and young children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):81.

43.

Raj

Sudhakar

Roy

, et al. Health-related quality of life in infants and toddlers with congenital heart disease: a cross-sectional survey from South India. Arch Dis Child. 2018;103(2):170-175.

44.

Kabak

Yakut

Çetin

Düger

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the PedsQL 3.0 cancer module for 2- to 7-year-old and the PedsQL 4.0 generic core scales for 5- to 7-year-old: the hacettepe university experience. Turkish J Hematol. 2016;33(3):236-243.

45.

Olson

Lamb

Lopez

, et al. A rapid epidemiological tool to measure the burden of norovirus infection and disease in resource-limited settings. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(2):ofx049.

46.

Asturias

Heinrichs

Domek

, et al. The center for human development in Guatemala: an innovative model for global population health. Adv Pediatr. 2015;63(1):357-387.

47.

Varni

Burwinkle

Seid

The PedsQL^TM 4.0 as a school population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Qual Life Res. 2006;15(2):203-215.

48.

Amaya-Arias

Alzate

Eslava-Schmalbach

JH.

Construct and criterion validity of the PedsQL^TM 4.0 instrument (pediatric quality of life inventory) in Colombia. Int J Prev Med. 2017;8:57.

49.

The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Int J Testing. 2018;18(2):101-134.

50.

Beaton

Bombardier

Guillemin

Ferraz

MB.

Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24): 3186-3191.

51.

Guillemin

Bombardier

Beaton

Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-1432.

52.

Geisinger

KF.

Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):304-312.

53.

Hambleton

. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In: Hambleton

Merenda

Spielberger

, eds. Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. Psychology Press; 2004:3-38.

54.

Perez Condor

Kohrt

. Woman with Sack. 2016. Unpublished illustration.

55.

WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-Forheight and Body Mass Index-for-Age : Methods and Development. World Health Organization; 2006.

56.

Jesmin

Yamamoto

Malik

Haque

MA.

Prevalence and determinants of chronic malnutrition among preschool children: a cross-sectional study in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2011;29(5): 494-499.

57.

John

Black

Nelson

CA.

Neurodevelopment: the impact of nutrition and inflammation during early to middle childhood in low-resource settings. Pediatrics. 2017;139:S59-S71.

58.

Black

Brown

Becker

Malnutrition is a determining factor in diarrheal duration, but not incidence, among young children in a longitudinal study in rural Bangladesh. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;39(1):87-94.

59.

Chernoff

Laughton

Ratswana

, et al. Validity of neuropsychological testing in young African children affected by HIV. J Pediatr Infect Dis. 2018;13(3):185-201.

60.

Boivin

Giordani

Neuropsychological assessment of African children: evidence for a universal brain/behavior omnibus within a coconstructivist paradigm. Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:113-135.

61.

Bornman

Sevcik

Romski

Pae

. Successfully translating language and culture when adapting assessment measures. 2010;7(2):111-118.

62.

Connery

Colbert

Lamb

, et al. Receptive language skills among young children in rural Guatemala: the relationship between the test de vocabulario en imagenes peabody and a translated and adapted version of the mullen scales of early learning. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(5): 702-708.

63.

Colbert

Lamb

Asturias

, et al. Reliability and validity of an adapted and translated version of the mullen scales of early learning (AT-MSEL) in rural Guatemala. Child Care Health Dev. 2020;46(3):327-335.

64.

Kruse

Schneeberg

Brussoni

Construct validity and impact of mode of administration of the PedsQL^TM among a pediatric injury population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:168.

65.

Soberg

Bautz-Holter

Roise

Finset

Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma - Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62(2):461-470.

66.

Rick

Domek

Cunningham

, et al. High background congenital microcephaly in rural Guatemala: implications for neonatal congenital Zika virus infection screening. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(4):686-696.

67.

Mullen

Mullen Scales of Early Learning. Pearson; 1995.

68.

Bauer

Connery

. The impact of stunting on early childhood neurodevelopment in rural Guatemala. In: Global Health Symposium, 2019.

Parent Report of Health Related Quality of Life in Young Children in Rural Guatemala: Implementation,Reliability,and Validity of the PedsQL in Stunting and Wasting

Abstract

Keywords

What Do We Already Know About This Topic?

How Does Your Research Contribute to the Field?

What Are Your Research’s Implications Toward Theory, Practice, or Policy?

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References