This study examines abortion bills proposed in the Texas legislature between 1993 and 2015 to explore how legislators respond to the power resources of minorities versus the (supposed) threat that they pose and how these responses vary across partisan lines to hamper or further pro-life interests. To test competing hypotheses about the influences of women’s socioeconomic and political resources, and the representation of poor, Black, and Hispanic constituents, multilevel models analyze a key behavior that strategically demonstrates issue-positions, that is, authorship of abortion bills. The findings largely support power resources accounts but also detect minority threat processes, and they reveal that beyond mean differences in support for restrictions on legal abortions, Democrats and Republicans respond distinctly to their constituent contexts. This detailed look at an early stage of the legislative process in a major battleground state highlights the multifaceted nature of abortion politics and the importance of considering both partisan and minority interests, especially in the face of sociodemographic shifts within the state and beyond.
AdamsGreg D.1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science41(3):718–37.
2.
AikenAbigail R. A.ScottJames G.2016. “Family Planning Policy in the United States: the Converging Politics of Abortion and Contraception.” Contraception93(5):412–20.
3.
AkeeRandallJonesMaggie R.PorterSonya R.2019. “Race Matters: Income Shares, Income Inequality, and Income Mobility for All U.S. Races.” Demography56(3):999–1021.
4.
BeckettKatherine. 1999. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BenstonMargaret. 1995. “The Political Economy of Women’s Liberation.” Pp. 100–109 in The Politics of Housework, edited by MalosEllen. Cheltenham, England: New Clarion Press.
BlalockHubert. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations. New York: Wiley.
8.
BlumbergRae Lesser. 1984. “A General Theory of Gender Stratification.” Sociological Theory2:23–101.
9.
BolzendahlCatherine. 2009. “Making the Implicit Explicit: Gender Influences on Social Spending in Twelve Industrialized Democracies, 1980–99.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society16(1):40–81.
10.
BolzendahlCatherine I.MyersDaniel J.2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces83(2):759–89.
11.
BoyleElizabeth H.KimMinzeeLonghoferWesley. 2015. “Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960–2009.” American Journal of Sociology121(3):882–913.
12.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1(1):97–125.
13.
BrattonKathleen A.RayLeonard P.2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science46(2):428–37.
14.
BrownmillerSusan. 1975. Against Our Will. New York: Simon & Schuster.
15.
BuddeEmmaHeichelStephan. 2017. “Women Matter: The Impact of Gender Empowerment on Abortion Regulation in 16 European Countries between 1960 and 2010.” Politics & Gender13(3):432–57.
16.
Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2019. State BEARFACTS: Texas. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
17.
BurrisVal. 1983. “Who Opposed the ERA? An Analysis of the Social Bases of Anti-Feminism.” Social Science Quarterly64(2):305–17.
18.
CalfanoBrian R.OldmixonElizabeth AnneVonDoeppPeter. 2006. “Religious Advocacy in the Texas Legislature.” Pp. 101–28 in Representing God at the Statehouse: Religion and Politics in the American States, edited by ClearyE. L.HertzkeA. D.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review74(1):78–91.
20.
CarminesEdward G.StimsonJames A.1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
CarminesEdward G.WoodsJames. 2002. “The Role of Party Activists in the Evolution of the Abortion Issue.” Political Behavior24(4):361–77.
22.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2020. Women in State Legislatures 2020. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
23.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2016. “United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Bridged-Race Population Estimates, United States July 1st Resident Population by State, County, Age, Sex, Bridged-Race, and Hispanic Origin. Compiled from 1990-1999 Bridged-Race Intercensal Population Estimates (Released by NCHS on 7/26/2004); Revised Bridged-Race 2000-2009 Intercensal Population Estimates (Released by NCHS on 10/26/2012); and Bridged-Race Vintage 2015 (2010-2015) Postcensal Population Estimates (Released by NCHS on 6/28/2016).” Retrieved December 14, 2016 (http://wonder.cdc.gov/bridged-race-v2015.html).
24.
CollinsGail. 2012. As Goes Texas. . .: How the Lonestar State Hijacked the American Agenda. New York: Liveright Publishing.
25.
CollinsRandallChafetzJanet SaltzmanBlumbergRae LesserColtraneScottTurnerJonathan H.1993. “Toward an Integrated Theory of Gender Stratification.” Sociological Perspectives36(3):185–216.
26.
CunninghamSean P.2010. Cowboy Conservatism: Texas and the Rise of the Modern Right. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
27.
EdsallThomas B.EdsallMary D.1991. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
28.
FaganPatrick F.TalkingtonScott. 2014. Demographics of Women Who Report Having an Abortion. Washington, DC: National Survey of Family Growth2006-2010.
29.
FennoRichard F.1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review71(3):883–917.
30.
FoxJohn. 1997. Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
FraadHarrietResnickStephen A.WolffRichard David. 1994. Bringing It All Back Home: Class, Gender and Power in the Modern Household. London, England: Pluto Press.
32.
HallElaine J.FerreeMyra Marx. 1986. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly50(2):193–207.
HoodM. V.KiddQuentinMorrisIrwin L.2001. “The Key Issue: Constituency Effects and Southern Senators’ Roll-call Voting on Civil Rights.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26(4):599–621.
38.
HuangPo-ChunYouHelenValenciaLilaPotterLloyd B.2019. 2018 Estimated Population of Texas, Its Counties, and Places. San Antonio, TX: Texas Demographic Center.
39.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. 2015. Status of Women in Texas, 2015: Highlights. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
40.
Institute for Women’s Policy Research. 2018. The Economic Status of Women in Texas. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
41.
JaccardJamesTurrisiRobertJaccardJim. 2003. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
JacksonAubrey L.2015. “State Contexts and the Criminalization of Marital Rape across the United States.” Social Science Research51:290–306.
43.
JacksonAubrey L.2016. “The Combined Effect of Women’s Neighborhood Resources and Collective Efficacy on IPV.” Journal of Marriage and Family78(4):890–907.
44.
JacobsDavidMyersLindsey. 2014. “Union Strength, Neoliberalism, and Inequality: Contingent Political Analyses of U.S. Income Differences since 1950.” American Sociological Review79(4):752–74.
45.
JacobsDavidTopeDaniel. 2007. “The Politics of Resentment in the Post–Civil Rights Era: Minority Threat, Homicide, and Ideological Voting in Congress.” American Journal of Sociology112(5):1458–94.
46.
JelenTed G.WilcoxClyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly56(4):489–500.
JonesNancy BakerWinegartenRuthe. 2000. Capitol Women: Texas Female Legislators, 1923–1999. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
49.
JonesRachel K.KavanaughMegan L.2011. “Changes in Abortion Rates between 2000 and 2008 and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion.” Obstetrics & Gynecology117(6):1358–66.
50.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28(2):225–46.
51.
KorpiWalter. 1974. “Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation.” American Political Science Review68(4):1569–78.
52.
KorpiWalter. 1985. “Power Resources Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power.” Sociological Theory3(2):31–45.
53.
KorpiWalter. 1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights During Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries Since 1930.” American Sociological Review54(3):309–28.
LilieJoyce R.HandbergRogerLowreyWanda. 1982. “Women State Legislators and the ERA: Dimensions of Support and Opposition.” Women & Politics2(1–2):23–38.
LublinDavid. 2007. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
LukerKristin. 1985. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62.
LynxwilerJohnGayDavid. 1994. “Reconsidering Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly75(1):67–84.
63.
MansbridgeJaneShamesShauna L.2008. “Toward a Theory of Backlash: Dynamic Resistance and the Central Role of Power.” Politics & Gender4(4):623–34.
64.
MasketSeth E.2008. Where You Sit Is Where You Stand: The Impact of Seating Proximity on Legislative Cue-taking. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 1503596. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
65.
MatthewsDonald R.StimsonJames A.1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-making in the U.S. House of Representatives. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
66.
MayhewDavid R.2004. Congress: The Electoral Connection. 2nd ed.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67.
McCammonHolly J.CampbellKaren E.GranbergEllen M.MoweryChristine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review66(1):49–70.
68.
MedoffMarshall H.2002. “The Determinants and Impact of State Abortion Restrictions.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology61(2):481–93.
69.
MedoffMarshall H.DennisChristopherStephensKerri. 2011. “The Impact of Party Control on the Diffusion of Parental Involvement Laws in the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11(3):325–47.
OrloffAnn Shola. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review58(3):303–28.
73.
PascallGillian. 1997. Social Policy: A New Feminist Analysis. 2nd ed.London, England: Routledge.
74.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheriHughesMelanie M.2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology33(1):263–84.
75.
QuadagnoJill S.1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
77.
RosenthalCindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
RussellDiana E. H.1984. The Politics of Rape: The Victim’s Perspective. New York: Stein and Day.
79.
ScalaDante J.JohnsonKenneth M.2017. “Political Polarization along the Rural-Urban Continuum? The Geography of the Presidential Vote, 2000–2016.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science672(1):162–84.
80.
SchecterDavid. 2001. “What Drives the Voting on Abortion Policy? Investigating Partisanship and Religion in the State Legislative Arena.” Women & Politics23(4):61–83.
SouleSarah A.SusanOlzak. 2004. “When Do Movements Matter? The Politics of Contingency and the Equal Rights Amendment.” American Sociological Review69(4):473–97.
83.
SwersMichele L.1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly23(3):435–48.
84.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
Taylor-RobinsonMichelle M.HeathRoseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test: Women & Politics.” Women & Politics24(4):77–101.
86.
Texas Secretary of State. 2018. “General Election: County by County Canvass Reports.” 1992–Current Election History. Retrieved July 24, 2018 (https://elections.sos.state.tx.us/index.htm)
87.
ThomasSue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” The Journal of Politics53(4):958–76.
88.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2008. A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What General Data Users Need to Know. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
89.
U.S. Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2016a. “1990 Census.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office.
90.
U.S. Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2016b. “B23001; S1702; B15002; S1903; S2001; B16005; B05002.” 2009, 2014 and 2015 5-Year Estimates, American Community Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office.”
91.
U.S. Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2016c. “DP1, P043, P053, P085, DP3, CY10, P037, PCT012, P021.” 2000 Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office.
92.
U.S. Census Bureau/American FactFinder. 2016d. “GCT-PH1.” 2010 Census. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Office.
WängnerudLena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science12(1):51–69.
95.
WolbrechtChristina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
96.
WrightLawrence. 2018. God Save Texas: A Journey into the Soul of the Lone Star State. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
97.
XieMinHeimerKarenLauritsenJanet. 2012. “Violence against Women in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Changes in Women’s Status and Risk, 1980–2004.” Criminology50(1):105–43.
98.
ZingherJoshua N.2014. “An Analysis of the Changing Social Bases of America’s Political Parties: 1952–2008.” Electoral Studies35:272–82.
99.
Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
100.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
101.
Whole Women’s Health vs. Hellerstedt, 790 F.3d. 563 (2016).
