Recent studies of the content of television ads of female versus male political candidates have shown that women and men are increasingly similar in their communication styles and strategies, with some notable exceptions. However, few studies examining gender and political ad content have focused exclusively on US Senate races, considered the influence of the candidates’ political party, or compared the messages of women running against female versus male opponents. This study examines 236 political ads—160 from mixed-gender and 76 from female–female—U.S. Senate races in 2020 for their verbal and visual content. Results show gendered and partisan differences in the issues emphasized and the tone used. Candidates were similar in the images emphasized. Female candidates were more balanced between formal and casual attire compared to previous election cycles. And candidates in mixed-gender races used different strategies than those in female–female contests as to the issues and political actors mentioned.
BodeL., & HenningsV. M. (2012). Mixed signals? Gender and the media’s coverage of the 2008 Vice Presidential candidates. Politics & Policy, 221-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00350.x.
2.
BystromD.BanwartM. C.KaidL. L.RobertsonT. (2004). Gender and campaign communication: Videostyle, webstyle and newsstyle. Routledge.
3.
BystromD. G.,BrownN. J. (2011). Videostyle 2008: A comparison of female vs. male political candidate television ads. In McKinneyM. S.BanwartM.C. (Eds.), Communication in the 2008 U.S. election: Digital natives elect a president (pp. 211-240). Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
4.
BystromD.,KaidL. L. (2002). Are women candidates transforming campaign communication? A comparison of advertising videostyle in the 1990s. In RosenthalC. S. (Ed.), Women transforming Congress (pp. 146-169). University of Oklahoma Press.
5.
BystromD. G., & NelsonK. (2018). The Media was the Message: Gendered Coverage of Hillary Clinton’s Historic 2016 Campaign for President. In HayesA. S. (Ed.), Communication and Media in the Age of Trump: Assessing Campaign Coverage, Social Media Use and Political Rhetoric. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
6.
CarpinellaC.,BauerN. M. (2021). A visual analysis of gender stereotypes in campaign advertising. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1637353
DolanK.,LynchT. (2017). Do candidates run as women and men or democrats and republicans? The impact of party and sex on issue campaigns. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(4), 522-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268876
FridkinK. L.,KenneyP. J. (2014). The changing face of American representation: The gender of U.S. senators and constituent communications. University of Michigan Press.
JamiesonK. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press.
14.
KahnK. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for U.S. Senate. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600303.
15.
KaidL. L.,DavidsonJ. (1986). Elements of videostyle: Candidate presentation through television advertising. In KaidL. L.NimmoD.SandersK. R. (Eds.), New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 184-209). Southern Illinois Press.
16.
NorthR. C.HolstiO.ZaninovichM. G.ZinnesD. A. (1963). Content analysis: A handbook with applications for the study of international crisis. Northwestern University Press.
SapiroV.Cramer WalshK.StrachP.HenningsV. (2011). Gender, context, and television advertising: A comprehensive analysis of 2000 and 2002 House races. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909343583.
20.
ShamesS. (2003). The “un-candidates”: Gender and outsider signals in women’s political advertisements. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 25(1), 115-147. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v25n01_05.
WinfreyK. L. (2020). Hope and fear in a pandemic: Videostyle in 2020 presidential advertising. In WarnerB. R.BystromD.G.BanwartM C.McKinneyM. S. (Eds.), Democracy disrupted: Communication in the volatile 2020 presidential election. Praeger.
23.
WinfreyK. L.,SchnoebelenJ. M. (2018). Gender and videostyle in 2016: Advertising in mixed-gender races for the U.S. House. In WarnerB. R.BystromD. G.McKinneyM. S.BanwartM. C. (Eds.), An unprecedented election: Media, communication, and the electorate in the 2016 election (pp. 274-295). Praeger.
