Virtually all social diffusion work relies on a common formal basis, which predicts that consensus will develop among a connected population as the result of diffusion. In spite of the popularity of social diffusion models that predict consensus, few empirical studies examine consensus, or a clustering of attitudes, directly. The empirical studies that do examine consensus either focus on the coordinating role of strict hierarchies, or on the results of online experiments, and do not consider how consensus occurs among groups in situ. This study uses longitudinal data on adolescent social networks to show how meso-level social structures, such as informal peer groups, moderate the process of consensus formation. Using a novel method for controlling for selection into a group, I find that centralized peer groups, meaning groups with clear leaders, have very low levels of consensus, while cohesive peer groups, meaning groups where more ties hold the members of the group together, have very high levels of consensus. This finding is robust to two different measures of cohesion and consensus. This suggests that consensus occurs either through central leaders’ enforcement or through diffusion of attitudes, but that central leaders have limited ability to enforce when people can leave the group easily.
BaldassarriDeliaBearmanPeter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review72(5):784–811.
3.
BatesDouglasMächlerMartinBolkerBenWalkerSteve. 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using Eigen and S4. Retrieved January5, 2015 (http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4).
4.
BergerRoger L.1981. “A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Reaching a Consensus Using DeGroot’s Method.” Journal of the American Statistical Association76(374):415–18.
5.
BlondelVincent D.GuillaumeJean-LoupLambiotteRenaudLefebvreEtienne. 2008. “Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2008(10):P10008.
6.
BorgattiStephen P.CarleyKathleen M.KrackhardtDavid. 2006. “On the Robustness of Centrality Measures under Conditions of Imperfect Data.” Social Networks28(2):124–36.
7.
BrownB. Bradford B. 1990. “Peer Groups and Peer Cultures.” Pp. 171–96 in At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent, edited by FeldmanShirley S.ElliottGlen R.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CairnsRobert B.CairnsBeverley D.1994. Lifelines and Risks: Pathways of Youth in Our Time. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CarleyKathleen. 1991. “A Theory of Group Stability.” American Sociological Review56(3):331–54.
10.
CentolaDamonBaronchelliAndrea. 2015. “The Spontaneous Emergence of Conventions: An Experimental Study of Cultural Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(7):1989–94.
11.
CentolaDamonMacyMichael. 2007. “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.” American Journal of Sociology113(3):702–34.
12.
ChatterjeeS.SenetaE.1977. “Towards Consensus: Some Convergence Theorems on Repeated Averaging.” Journal of Applied Probability14(1):89–97.
13.
ChildressC. ClaytonFriedkinNoah E.2012. “Cultural Reception and Production: The Social Construction of Meaning in Book Clubs.” American Sociological Review77(1):45–68.
14.
ChristakisNicholas A.FowlerJames H.2007. “The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years.” The New England Journal of Medicine357(4):370–79.
15.
CohenAyala. 1986. “Statistical Analysis of Mahalanobis Distances of Students from Their Fathers.” Sociological Methods & Research14(4):381–402.
16.
ColemanJames S.KatzElihuMenzelHerbert. 1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co.
17.
CorrellShelley JoyceRidgewayCecilia L.2006. “Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs.” Social Forces85(1):431–53.
18.
CorsaroWilliam A.EderDonna. 1990. “Children’s Peer Cultures.” Annual Review of Sociology16(1):197–220.
19.
DeGrootMorris H.1974. “Reaching a Consensus.” Journal of the American Statistical Association69(345):118–21.
20.
DellaPostaDanielShiYongrenMacyMichael. 2015. “Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes?”American Journal of Sociology120(5):1473–11.
21.
DurrettRichardGleesonJames P.LloydAlun L.MuchaPeter J.ShiFengSivakoffDavidSocolarJoshua E. S.VarghesefChris. 2012. “Graph Fission in an Evolving Voter Model.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(10):3682–87.
22.
EriksonErik Homburger. 1968. Identity, Youth, and Crisis. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
23.
FineGary Alan. 2012. “Group Culture and the Interaction Order: Local Sociology on the Meso-level.” Annual Review of Sociology38(1):159–79.
24.
FisherJacob C.2015. “Latent Space Diffusion.” MS thesis, Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
25.
FortunatoSanto. 2010. “Community Detection in Graphs.” Physics Reports486(3–5):75–174.
26.
FrenchJohn R. P.Jr.1956. “A Formal Theory of Social Power.” Psychological Review63(3):181–94.
27.
FriedkinNoah E.1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
FriedkinNoah E.CookKaren S.1990. “Peer Group Influence.” Sociological Methods & Research19(1):122–43.
29.
FriedkinNoah E.JohnsenEugene C.2011. Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GestScott D.MoodyJamesRulisonKelly L.2007. “Density or Distinction? The Roles of Data Structure and Group Detection Methods in Describing Adolescent Peer Groups.” Journal of Social Structure 8:np. (https://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/GestMoody/)
31.
GoldbergAmir. 2011. “Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology116(5):1397–1436.
32.
GranovetterMark. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology83(6):1420–43.
33.
HararyFrank. 1959. “A Criterion for Unanimity in French’s Theory of Social Power.” Pp. 168–82 in Studies in Social Power, edited by CartwrightDorwin. Oxford, England: University of Michigan.
34.
HirschmanAlbert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
35.
HoffmanBethSussmanSteveUngerJennifer B.ValenteThomas W.2006. “Peer Influences on Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Theoretical Review of the Literature.” Substance Use & Misuse41(1):103–55.
36.
HoggMichael A.1992. The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity. New York: New York University Press.
37.
HolmePetterNewmanM. E. J.2006. “Nonequilibrium Phase Transition in the Coevolution of Networks and Opinions.” Physical Review E74(5):56108.
38.
JohnsonJeffrey C.BosterJames S.PalinkasLawrence A.2003. “Social Roles and the Evolution of Networks in Extreme and Isolated Environments.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology27(2/3):89–121.
39.
KreagerDerek A.HaynieDana L.2011. “Dangerous Liaisons? Dating and Drinking Diffusion in Adolescent Peer Networks.” American Sociological Review76(5):737–63.
40.
KreagerDerek A.RulisonKellyMoodyJames. 2011. “Delinquency and the Structure of Adolescent Peer Groups.” Criminology49(1):95–127.
41.
MacyMichael W.KittsJames A.FlacheAndreas. 2003. “Polarization in Dynamic Networks: A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure.” Pp. 162–73 in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, edited by BreigerRonald L.CarleyKathleenPattisonPhilippa. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved May6, 2015 (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10735/dynamic-social-network-modeling-and-analysis-workshop-summary-and-papers).
42.
MarkNoah. 1998. “Beyond Individual Differences: Social Differentiation from First Principles.” American Sociological Review63(3):309–30.
43.
MartinJohn Levi. 1999. “Entropic Measures of Belief System Constraint.” Social Science Research28(1):111–34.
44.
MartinJohn Levi. 2000. “The Relation of Aggregate Statistics on Beliefs to Culture and Cognition.” Poetics28(1):5–20.
45.
MartinJohn Levi. 2002. “Power, Authority, and the Constraint of Belief Systems.” American Journal of Sociology107(4):861–904.
46.
McFarlandDaniel A.MoodyJamesDiehlDavidSmithJeffrey A.ThomasReuben J.2014. “Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure.” American Sociological Review79(6):1088–1121.
47.
McPhersonMiller. 1983. “An Ecology of Affiliation.” American Sociological Review48(4):519–32.
48.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
49.
MoodyJames. 2001. “Peer Influence Groups: Identifying Dense Clusters in Large Networks.” Social Networks23(4):261–83.
50.
MoodyJamesBentonRichard A.2016. “Interdependent Effects of Cohesion and Concurrency for Epidemic Potential.” Annals of Epidemiology26(4):241–48.
51.
MoodyJamesWhiteD. R.2003. “Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups.” American Sociological Review68(1):103–27.
52.
MuchaPeter J.RichardsonThomasMaconKevinPorterMason A.OnnelaJukka-Pekka. 2010. “Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks.” Science328(5980):876–78.
53.
NewmanM. E. J.2006. “Modularity and Community Structure in Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103(23):8577–82.
54.
NewmanM. E. J.GirvanM.2004. “Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks.” Physical Review E69(2):26113.
PorterMason A.OnnelaJukka-PekkaMuchaPeter J.2009. “Communities in Networks.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society56(9):1082–97.
57.
R Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved January5, 2015 (http://www.R-project.org).
58.
SalganikMatthew J.DoddsPeter SheridanWattsDuncan J.2006. “Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market.” Science311(5762):854–56.
59.
ShwedUriBearmanPeter S.2010. “The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation.” American Sociological Review75(6):817–40.
60.
Simons-MortonBruce G.FarhatTilda. 2010. “Recent Findings on Peer Group Influences on Adolescent Smoking.” The Journal of Primary Prevention31(4):191–208.
61.
SmithJeffrey A.MoodyJames. 2013. “Structural Effects of Network Sampling Coverage I: Nodes Missing at Random.” Social Networks35(4):652–68.
62.
SmithJeffrey A.MoodyJamesMorganJonathan H.2017. “Network Sampling Coverage II: The Effect of Non-random Missing Data on Network Measurement.” Social Networks48:78–99.
63.
SpothRichardRedmondCleveShinChungyeolGreenbergMarkClairScottFeinbergMark. 2007. “Substance-use Outcomes at 18 Months Past Baseline: The PROSPER Community–University Partnership Trial.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine32(5):395–402.
64.
SpothRichardGreenbergMarkBiermanKarenRedmondCleve. 2004. “PROSPER Community–University Partnership Model for Public Education Systems: Capacity-building for Evidence-based, Competence-building Prevention.” Prevention Science5:31–39.
65.
TajfelH.1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology33(1):1–39.
66.
TurnerJohn C.1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: Self-categorization Theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
67.
ValenteThomas W.2010. Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
68.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
