Men are overrepresented in criminal offending, arrest, and incarceration rates, resulting in a gender gap in crime data. I use the mathematical structure and propositions of affect control theory to understand how the symbolic meanings society holds for gender and crime relate to this observed difference in women’s and men’s offending. While criminal behaviors are deviant for both men and women, I hypothesize that they produce even more deflection when enacted by a woman actor than by a man actor in computer simulations. This first hypothesis is supported in a dataset containing 109 criminal behaviors drawn from three affect control theory dictionaries collected in English in the United States in 1998, 2002 to 2004, and 2012 to 2014. Second, I hypothesize that when a crime produces a greater gender gap in deflection in simulations, there will be a greater observed gender gap in alleged offending. I test this hypothesis using four sources of crime data: victim self-reports, police reports, arrest data, and juvenile court statistics. I find hypothesis support using all data sources except victim self-reports. Affect control theory provides an explicit social psychological understanding of how gendered meanings of behavior translate into criminal behavior as recorded in offending data (e.g., Uniform Crime Report).
AdlerFreda. 1975. Sisters in Crime: The Rise of the New Female Criminal. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AdlerFreda. 1993. Wheeling and Dealing: An Ethnography of an Upper Level Dealing and Smuggling Community. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
ArcherJohn. 2004. “Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-World Settings: A Meta-analytic Review.” Review of General Psychology8(4):291–322.
4.
BoyleKaitlin M.2015. “Reports on Gender Differences in the U.S. Dictionary.” Pp. 749–65 in Interpreting and Responding to Events in Arabic Culture: Office of NavalResearch Grant N00014-09-1-0556, Final Report, edited by Smith-LovinL.RobinsonD. T. [Unpublished data].
5.
BoyleKaitlin M.2017. “Sexual Assault and Identity Disruption: A Sociological Approach to Posttraumatic Stress.” Society and Mental Health7(2):69–84.
6.
BoyleKaitlin M.McKinzieAshleigh E.2015. “Resolving Negative Affect and Restoring Meaning: Responses to Deflection Produced by Unwanted Sexual Experiences.” Social Psychology Quarterly78(2):151–72.
7.
BoyleKaitlin M.WalkerLisa Slattery. 2016. “The Neutralization and Denial of Sexual Violence in College Party Subcultures.” Deviant Behavior37(12):1392–410.
8.
CallensMelissa Vallens. 2022. “There Goes My Antihero: How Wendy Byrde Broke Bad.” Heroism Science7(2):2.
9.
CavenderGrayBond-MaupinLisaJurikNancy C.1999. “The Construction of Gender in Reality Crime TV.” Gender & Society13(5):643–63.
10.
ChodorowNancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
de CosterStacyHeimerKarenCumleySamantha R.2012. “Gender and Theories of Delinquency.” Pp. 313–30 in The Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory, edited by CullenF. T.WilcoxP.New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
de la TierraAlbert Lobo. 2016. “Essentializing Manhood in “the Street”: Perilous Masculinity and Popular Criminological Ethnographies.” Feminist Criminology11(4): 375–97.
16.
DentonBarbara. 2001. Dealing: Women in the Drug Economy. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
17.
DentonBarbaraO’MalleyPat. 1999. “Gender, Trust, and Business: Women Drug Dealers in the Illicit Economy.” British Journal of Criminology39(4):513–30.
18.
DurhamAlexis M.IIIElrodH. PrestonKinkadePatrick T.1995. “Images of Crime and Justice: Murder and the ‘True Crime’ Genre.” Journal of Criminal Justice23(2):143–52.
GraorChristine H.2008. “Weight Loss, Subculture Socialization, and Affective Meanings.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Kent State University.
21.
GrundetjernHeidiSandbergSveinung. 2012. “Dealing with a Gendered Economy: Female Drug Dealers and Street Capital.” European Journal of Criminology9(6):621–35.
22.
HarmonMark G.O’BrienRobert M.2011. “Gendered Arrests or Gendered Sentencing: Explaining the Narrowing of the Gender Gap in Imprisonment over Time: 1970–2008.” Sociological Perspectives54(4):641–64.
23.
HeimerKarende CosterStacy. 1999. “The Gendering of Violent Delinquency.” Criminology37(2):277–318.
24.
HeimerKarenLauritsenJanet L.LynchJames P.2009. “The National Crime Victimization Survey and the Gender Gap in Offending: Redux.” Criminology47:427.
25.
HeiseDavid R.1970. “The Semantic Differential and Attitude Research.” Pp. 235–53 in Attitude Measurement, edited by SummersG. F.Chicago: Rand McNally.
26.
HeiseDavid R.1977. “Social Action as the Control of Affect.” Behavioral Science22(3):163–77.
27.
HeiseDavid R.1979. Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HeiseDavid R.2007. Expressive Order: Confirming Sentiments in Social Actions. New York: Springer.
HeiseDavid R.MacKinnonNeil J.1987. “Affective Bases of Likelihood Judgments.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology13(1–2): 133–51.
31.
HuntPamela M.2010. “Are You Kynd? Conformity and Deviance within the Jamband Subculture.” Deviant Behavior31(6): 521–51.
32.
KalkhoffWill. 2002. “Delinquency and Violence as Affect-Control: Reviving the Subcultural Approach in Criminology.” Electronic Journal of Sociology6(3).
33.
KaplanJacob. 2021. Jacob Kaplan’s Concatenated Files: National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data, 1991-2019. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-07-10. https://doi.org/10.3886/E118281V4.
34.
KenaGraceTrumanJennifer L.2022. “Trends and Patterns in Firearm Violence, 1993–2018.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/tpfv9318.pdf.
35.
KingAdam B.2001. “Affective Dimensions of Internet Culture.” Social Science Computer Review19:414–30.
36.
KroskaAmyCasonTrent C.2019. “The Gender Gap in Business Leadership: Exploring an Affect Control Theory Explanation.” Social Psychology Quarterly82(1):75–97.
37.
KroskaAmyHarknessSarah K.2011. “Coping with the Stigma of Mental Illness: Empirically-Grounded Hypotheses from Computer Simulations.” Social Forces89(4):1315–39.
38.
KroskaAmySchmidtMarshall R.2018. “Occupational Status, Impression Formation, and Criminal Sanctioning: A Vignette Experiment.” Advances in Group Processes35:103–28.
39.
LloydAnn. 1995. Doubly Deviant, Doubly Damned: Society’s Treatment of Violent Women. New York: Penguin Books.
40.
MacKinnonNeil J.1994. Symbolic Interactionism as Affect Control. Albany: State University of New York Press.
41.
MacKinnonNeil J.HeiseDavid R.2010. Self, Identity, and Social Institutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MacKinnonNeil J.LukeAlison. 2002. “Changes in Identity Attitudes as Reflections of Social and Cultural Change.” Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie27(3):299–338.
43.
MaherLisaDalyKathleen. 1996. “Women in the Street-Level Drug Economy: Continuity or Change?” Criminology34(4):465–92.
44.
MerollaDavid. 2008. “The War on Drugs and the Gender Gap in Arrests: A Critical Perspective.” Critical Sociology34(2):255–70.
45.
MesserschmidtJames W.1993. Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
46.
MesserschmidtJames W.2000. Nine Lives: Adolescent Masculinities, The Body, and Violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47.
MesserschmidtJames W.2013. Crime as Structured Action: Doing Masculinities, Race, Class, Sexuality, and Crime. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
MillerJody. 2002. “The Strengths and Limits of ‘Doing Gender’ for Understanding Street Crime.” Theoretical Criminology6(4):433–60.
49.
MorashMerryChesney-LindMeda. 1991. “A Reformulation and Partial Test of the Power Control Theory of Delinquency.” Justice Quarterly8(3):347–77.
50.
OsgoodCharles E.1962. “Studies on the Generality of Affective Meaning Systems.” American Psychologist17(1):10.
51.
OsgoodCharles E.SuciGeorge J.TannenbaumPercy H.1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
52.
RennisonCallie Marie. 2009. “A New Look at the Gender Gap in Offending.” Women & Criminal Justice19(3):171–90.
53.
RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynn. 1992. “Selective Interaction as a Strategy for Identity Maintenance: An Affect Control Model.” Social Psychology Quarterly55(1):12–28.
54.
RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynnCannonBryan C.ClarkJesse K.FreelandRobertMorganJonathan H.RogersKimberly B.2016. “Mean Affective Ratings of 932 Identities, 810 Behaviors, and 660 Modifiers by University of Georgia Undergraduates in 2012-2014.” http://research.franklin.uga.edu/act.
55.
RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynnTsoudisOlga. 1994. “Heinous Crime or Unfortunate Accident? The Effects of Remorse on Responses to Mock Criminal Confessions.” Social Forces73(1):175–90.
56.
RogersKimberly B.2018. “Do You See What I See? Testing for Individual Differences in Impressions of Events.” Social Psychology Quarterly81(2):149–72. doi:10.1177/01902 72518767615.
57.
RogersKimberly B.SchröderTobiasSchollWolfgang. 2013. “The Affective Structure of Stereotype Content: Behavior and Emotion in Intergroup Context.” Social Psychology Quarterly76(2):125–50.
58.
RohnerRonald P.1976. “Sex Differences in Aggression: Phylogenetic and Enculturation Perspectives.” Ethos4(1):57–72.
SchröderTobiasSchollWolfgang. 2009. “Affective Dynamics of Leadership: An Experimental Test of Affect Control Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly72(2): 180–97.
61.
SchwartzJenniferSteffensmeierDarrellZhongHuaAckermanJeff. 2009. “Trends in the Gender Gap in Violence: Reevaluating NCVS and Other Evidence.” Criminology47:401.
62.
ShankDaniel B.2010. “An Affect Control Theory of Technology.” Current Research in Social Psychology15(10):1–13.
SimonRita James. 1975. The Contemporary Woman and Crime. Rockville, MD: Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency.
65.
Smith-LovinLynn. 1987. “Impressions from Events.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology13(1–2):35–70.
66.
Smith-LovinLynnDouglassWilliam. 1992. “An Affect Control Theory Analysis of Two Religious Subcultures.” Social Perspectives of Emotions1:217–48.
67.
Smith-LovinLynnHeiseDavid R.1988. Analyzing Social Interaction: Advances in Affect Control Theory. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
68.
SteffensmeierDarrel J.1983. “Organization Properties and Sex-Segregation in the Underworld: Building a Sociological Theory of Sex Differences in Crime.” Social Forces61(4):1010–32.
69.
SteffensmeierDarrel J.SchwartzJenniferZhongHuaAckermanJeff. 2005. “An Assessment of Recent Trends in Girls’ Violence Using Diverse Longitudinal Sources: Is the Gender Gap Closing?” Criminology43:355–406.
70.
StrykerSheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, NJ: Benjamin Cummings.
TsoudisOlga. 2002. “The Influence of Empathy in Mock Jury Criminal Cases: Adding to the Affect Control Model. Western Criminology Review4(1):55–67.
73.
U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2020. “National Crime Victimization Survey, Concatenated File, 1992-2018.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2020-03-05. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37322.v1.
74.
VicaryAmanda M.FraleyR. Chris. 2010. “Captured by True Crime: Why Are Women Drawn to Tales of Rape, Murder, and Serial Killers?” Social Psychological and Personality Science1(1):81–6.
WilliamsJoan C.2000. Unbending Gender. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
