The paper argues that a mathematical approach might contribute to the consolidation of time as an epistemic object, while strengthening the sociology of time as a more influential domain in social sciences. This might be accomplished due to the performative role of mathematical formalisations. Also, it means appropriating the textual reality resulted in formalising processes as a space which researchers act through and upon. Thus, mathematical formalisations should be understood not only as modelling and data processing devices but also as relevant actors in networks of knowledge production. In this context, we reassess the practice of formalisation by proposing a vocabulary through which mathematical language might be used to meaningfully approach the socio-temporal order, with positive consequences in the reinforcement of a scientific community of practice.
AdamB (2005) Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment & Invisible Hazards, London: Routledge.
3.
AggerB (2011) iTime: Labor and life in a smartphone era. Time & Society20(1): 119–136.
4.
AustinJ (1962) How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5.
BergerJ (2000) Theory and formalization: Some reflections on experience. Sociological Theory18(3): 482–489.
6.
BergerJCohenBSnellLet al.(1962) Types of Formalization in Small Group, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
7.
BergsonH (2004) Matter and Memory, New York: Dover Publications.
8.
BirthK (2012) Objects of Time. How Things Shape Temporality, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BonacichPLuP (2012) Introduction to Mathematical Sociology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity, Oxford: Polity.
11.
BréeDFeddagAPrattI (1993) Towards a formalization of the semantics of some temporal prepositions. Time and Society2(2): 219–240.
12.
BrysonV (2007a^) Time culture(s) and the social nature of time. In: BrysonV (ed.) Gender and the Politics of Time. Feminist Theory and Contemporary Debates, Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol, pp. 23–34.
13.
BrysonV (2007b) Women’s time. In: BrysonV (ed.) Gender and the Politics of Time. Feminist Theory and Contemporary Debates, Bristol: The Policy Press, University of Bristol, pp. 121–144.
14.
BurchardtT (2010) Time, income and substantive freedom: A capability approach. Time and Society19(3): 318–344.
15.
BurtG (2010) Conflict, Complexity and Mathematical Social Science, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
16.
CetinaK (2001) Objectual practice. In: SchatzkiTCetinaKvon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 184–197.
17.
ColemanJ (1964) An Introduction to Mathematical Sociology, London: Free Press.
18.
ColemanJ (2007) Mathematics of Collective Action, Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
19.
ComteA (1844) A General View of Positivism, London: Trubner and Co.
20.
DanzigerK (1993) Psychological objects, practice, and history. Annals of Theoretical Psychology8: 15–47.
21.
DerrySSchunnCGerM (2005) Interdisciplinary Collaboration: An Emerging Cognitive Science, New York: Psychology Press.
22.
DoreianP (1970) Mathematics and the Study of Social Relations, London: Weiden-feld & Nicolson.
23.
EdlingC (2002) Mathematics in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology28: 197–220.
24.
ErmarthE (2010) What if time is a dimension of events, not an envelope for them?Time and Society19(1): 133–150.
25.
EspositoE (2011) The Future of Futures: The Time of Money in Financing and Society, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
26.
FararoT (1978) Mathematical Sociology: An Introduction to Fundamentals, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
FararoT (1984) Neoclassical theorizing and formalization in social theory. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology10(3–4): 361–394.
28.
FararoT (1997) Reflections on mathematical sociology. Sociological Forum12(1): 73–101.
29.
FararoT (2001) Social Action Systems-Foundation and Synthesis in Sociological Theory, Westport, CT: Praeger.
30.
FolbreN (2011) Inequality and time use in the household. In: NolanBSalverdaWSmeedingT (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 342–363.
31.
FranzosiRMohrJ (1997) New directions in formalization and historical analysis. Theory and Society26(2–3): 133–160.
32.
FreeseL (1980) Formal theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology6: 187–212.
33.
FurfeyPH (1954) The formalization of sociology. American Sociological Review19(5): 525–528.
34.
GlorieuxIMestdagIMinnenJ (2008) The coming of the 24-hour economy? Changing work schedules in Belgium between 1966 and 1999. Time & Society17(1): 63–83.
35.
HallJ (2010) Apocalipsa: Din Antichitate până în imperiul Modernităţii: [Apocalypse: From Antiquity to the Empire of Modernity], Cluj-Napoca: CA Publishing.
36.
HanssonS (2000) Formalization in philosophy. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic6(2): 162–175.
HawkingS (1988 [2012]) O scură Istorie a Timpului. De la Big Bang la găruile negre [A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes], Bucureşti: Humanitas.
39.
HayesA (1984) Formal model building and thoeretical interests in sociology. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology10(3–4): 325–342.
40.
HedstromPSwedbergR (1998) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HeylighenF (1999) Advantages and limitations of formal expression. Foundations of Science4(1): 25–56.
42.
Holme P (2014) Analyzing temporal networks in social media. Proceedings of the IEEE 102(12): 1922–1933.
43.
HolmesM (2002) Politicizing time: Temporal issues for second-wave feministsts. In: CrowGSueH (eds) Social Conceptions of Time. Structure and Process in Work and Everyday Life, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 230–263.
44.
HutchinsE (1995) Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
JoiremanJ (2005) Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In: StrathmanAJoiremanJ (eds) Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research, and Application, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, pp. 305–326.
46.
JonesJBrownW (2005) Any time is trinidad time! Cultural variations in the value and functions of time. In: StrathmanAJoiremanJ (eds) Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time: Theory, Research, and Application, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 305–326.
47.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1980) Conceotual metaphors in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy77(8): 453–486.
48.
LatourBWoolgarS (1986) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, New Jersey: Princeton.
49.
LattucaL (2001) Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
50.
LaveJWengerE (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
51.
LevineR (2006) A Geography of Time. The Temporal Misadventure of a Social Psychologist or How Every Culture Keeps Time Just a Little Bit Differently, Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
52.
LevinsR (1966) The strategy of model building. American Scientist54(4): 421–431.
53.
LokajíèekM (1998) Time in Natural Sciences, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, Jacques Maritain Center.
54.
LundbergG (1939) Foundations of Sociology, New York: Macmillan.
55.
MacKenzieDMuniesaFSiuL (2007) Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
MarcusS (1985) Timpul, Bucureşti: Editura Albatros.
57.
NicoliniDMengisJSwanJ (2013) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science23: 612–629.
58.
PachecoJ (2008) Does More Abstraction Imply Better Understanding? (“Apuntes de Mecánica Social”, by Antonio Portuondo), Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.
59.
PitirinSMertonR (1937) Social time. A methodological and functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology42(5): 615–629.
60.
PolitisC (1965) Limitations of formalization. Philosophy of Science32(3–4): 356–360.
61.
PredaM (2013) Time capital and social gravity: Two new concepts for sociology of time. In: PiraniBSmithT (eds) Body and Time: Bodily Rhythms and Social Synchronism in the Digital Media Society, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 24–40.
62.
RitzerG (1993) The McDonaldization of Society, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
63.
SayerL (2005) Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces84(1): 285–303.
64.
SimonH (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting, New York: Wiley.
65.
SkvoretzJ (2000) Looking backwards into the future: Mathematical sociology then and now. Sociological Theory18: 510–517.
66.
SorensenA (1978) Mathematical models in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology5: 345–371.
67.
StarSGriesemerJ (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19: 389–420.
68.
Starnini M (2014) Time-varying Networks Approach to Social Dynamics: From Individual to Collective Behavior. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, New York, USA.
69.
StolarskiMBitnerJZimbardoP (2011) Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time and Society20(3): 346–363.
70.
SwanJBresnenJNewellSet al.(2007) The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations60: 1809–1837.
71.
ThomasWThomasD (1928) The Child in America; Behavior Problems and Programs, New York: A. A. Knopf.
72.
UrryJ (1994) Time, leisure and social identity. Time & Society3(2): 131–149.
73.
VerbeekP-P (2006) Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technologym and Human Values31(3): 361–380.
74.
WangH (1955) On formalization. Mind64(254): 226–238.
75.
WardL (1896) The mechanics of society. American Journal of Sociology2(2): 234–254.
76.
WeardenJLejeuneH (1993) Across the great divide. Animal psychology and time in humans. Time and Society2(1): 97–106.
77.
WhiteL (1943) Sociology, physics and mathematics. American Sociological Review8(4): 373–379.
78.
WilliamsJMasudaYTallisH (2016) A measure whose time has come: Formalizing time poverty. Social Indicators Research128(1): 265–283.
79.
WilsonT (1984) On the role of mathematics in the social sciences. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology10(3–4): 221–240.
