This article examines how the levels of student interaction change through the use of small groups and moderators in online writing courses. The study examines three technical and professional online writing courses: one course that employs small groups and group moderators and two courses that have no small groups or moderators. The results of this study show that the amount of interaction between students in online writing courses increases dramatically by incorporating small groups and peer moderators.
AnH.ShinS.LimK.(2009).The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions.Computers & Education,53,749-760.
2.
AveryC.CivjanJ.JohriA.(2005).Assessing student interaction in the global classroom project: Visualizing communication and collaboration patterns using online transcripts. InCookK. C.Grant-DavieK.(Eds.),Online education: Global questions, local answers(pp.245-264).Amityville, NY:Baywood.
3.
BeckC. E.(1993).Rhetoric and the collaborative nature of technical communication.Technical Communication,40,781-785.
4.
BreuchL.-A. K.(2004).Virtual peer review: Teaching and learning about writing in online environments.Albany:State University of New York Press.
5.
BuderJ.SchwindC.RudatA.BodemerD.(2015).Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning.Computers in Human Behavior,44,191-201. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.043
6.
ChenG.ChiuM. M.(2008).Online discussion processes: Effects of earlier messages’ evaluations, knowledge content, social cues and personal information on later messages.Computers & Education,50,678-692. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.007
7.
ConawayR. N.EastonS. S.SchmidtW. V.(2005).Strategies for enhancing student interaction and immediacy in online courses.Business Communication Quarterly,68,23-35.
8.
Conference on College Composition and Communication, Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013).A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Groups/CCCC/OWIPrinciples.pdf
9.
ConradR.-M.DonaldsonJ. A.(2011).Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction(Updated ed.).San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
10.
DelahuntyJ.JonesP.VerenikinaI.(2014).Movers and shapers: Teaching in online environments.Linguistics and Education,28,54-78. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.004
11.
DennenV. P.(2008).Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior.Computers in Human Behavior,24,1624-1633.
12.
DingH.DingX.(2008).Project management, critical praxis, and process-oriented approach to teamwork.Business Communication Quarterly,71,456-471. doi:10.1177/1080569908325861
13.
DonnellyR.GardnerJ.(2011).Content analysis of computer conferencing transcripts.Interactive Learning Environments,19,303-315. doi:10.1080/10494820903075722
14.
Gairín-SallánJ.Rodríguez-GómezD.Armengol-AsparóC.(2010).Who exactly is the moderator? A consideration of online knowledge management network moderation in educational organisations.Computers & Education,55,304-312. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.016
15.
HazariS.ThompsonS.(2015).Investigating factors affecting group processes in virtual learning environments.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,78,33-54. doi:10.1177/2329490614558920
16.
HerringS.(2004).Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. InBarabS. A.KlingR.GrayJ. H.(Eds.),Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning(pp.338-376).New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
17.
HewK. F.CheungW. S.(2008).Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation.Computers & Education,51,1111-1124.
HillS.GriswoldP.(2013).Potential for collaborative writing in professional communication and health studies through service-learning.Business Communication Quarterly,76,54-71. doi:10.1177/1080569912470711
20.
KeytonJ.BeckS. J.(2008).Team attributes, processes, and values: A pedagogical framework.Business Communication Quarterly,71,488-504. doi:10.1177/1080569908325863
21.
LahaieU.(2007).Web-based instruction: Getting faculty onboard.Journal of Professional Nursing,23,335-342.
22.
LamC.(2015).The role of communication and cohesion in reducing social loafing in group projects.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,78,454-475. doi:10.1177/2329490615596417
23.
LanderJ.(2015).Building community in online discussion: A case study of moderator strategies.Linguistics and Education,29,107-120. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.007
24.
LimbuL.MarkauskaiteL.(2015).How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments.Computers & Education,82,393-408. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.024
25.
LowryP. B.RobertsT. L.RomanoN. C.Jr.CheneyP. D.HightowerR. T.(2006).The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference?Small Group Research,37,631-661.
26.
McNeilS. G.RobinB. R.MillerR. M.(2000).Facilitating interaction, communication and collaboration in online courses.Computers & Geosciences,26,699-708.
27.
MehlenbacherB.MillerC. R.CovingtonD.LarsenJ. S.(2000).Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of web-based and conventional writing classes.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,43,166-184.
28.
MelonconL.(2012).The rise of academic programs: A call for collaboration.Intercom,59(7),13-15.
29.
Pena-ShaffJ. B.NichollsC.(2004).Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions.Computers & Education,42,243-265. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
30.
RestaP.LaferrièreT.(2007).Technology in support of collaborative learning.Educational Psychology Review,19,65-83.
31.
SalterN. P.ConneelyM. R.(2015).Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement.Computers in Human Behavior,46,18-25. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.037
32.
SeoK. K.(2007).Utilizing peer moderating in online discussions: Addressing the controversy between teacher moderation and nonmoderation.American Journal of Distance Education,21,21-36. doi:10.1080/08923640701298688
33.
StaggersJ.GarciaS.NagelhoutE.(2008).Teamwork through team building: Face-to-face to online.Business Communication Quarterly,71,472-487. doi:10.1177/1080569908325862
34.
Tallent-RunnelsM. K.LanW. Y.FryerW.ThomasJ. A.CooperS.WangK.(2005).The relationship between problems with technology and graduate students’ evaluations of online teaching.Internet and Higher Education,8,167-174.
35.
ThomasM. J. W.(2002).Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18,351-366. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.03800.x
36.
WeiH.-C.PengH.ChouC.(2015).Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement.Computers & Education,83,10-21. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
37.
WiseA. F.PereraN.HsiaoY.-T.SpeerJ.MarboutiF.(2012).Microanalytic case studies of individual participation patterns in an asynchronous online discussion in an undergraduate blended course.Internet and Higher Education,15,108-117.
38.
XieK.KeF.(2011).The role of students’ motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions.British Journal of Educational Technology,42,916-930. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
39.
ZingaroD.(2012).Student moderators in asynchronous online discussion: A question of questions.Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,8,159-173.
