This article examines how Web 2.0 technologies can be used to “flip” the online classroom by creating asynchronous workshops in social environments where immediacy and social presence can be maximized. Using experience teaching several communication and writing classes in Google Apps (Google+, Google Hangouts, Google Drive, etc.), I argue that flipping the classroom online with Web 2.0 technologies can maximize student participation and engagement, while also helping students develop flexible strategies for writing collaboratively and publicly in online spaces.
AlexanderB.(2008).Deepening the chasm: Web 2.0, gaming, and course management systems.Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,4,198-204.
2.
ArbaughJ. B.(2001).How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses.Business Communication Quarterly,64(4),42-54.
3.
ArditoC.CostabileM. F.De MarsicoM.LanzilottiR.LevialdiS.RoselliT.RossanoV.(2006).An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications.Universal Access in the Information Society,4,270-283.
4.
BarkerT. T.KempF. O.(1990).Network theory: A postmodern pedagogy for the writing classroom. InHandaC.(Ed.),Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twenty-first century(pp.1-27).Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
BohleyK. A.(2010).Web 2.0: What is it and is it for me?American Journal of Business Education,3(7),7-9.
7.
BuechlerS.(2010).Using web 2.0 to collaborate.Business Communication Quarterly,73,439-443.
8.
CardonP. W.OkoroE.(2010).A measured approach to adopting new media in the business and professional communication classroom.Business Communication Quarterly,73,434-438.
9.
ConawayR. N.EastonS. S.SchmidtW. V.(2005).Strategies for enhancing student interaction and immediacy in online courses.Business Communication Quarterly,68,23-35.
10.
CummingsL.FreyR.IrelandR.MartinC.McKeeH.PalmeriJ.PorterJ.(in press).Kairotic design: Building flexible networks for online composition. InPurdyJ. P.DeVossD. N.(Eds.),Making space: Writing instruction, infrastructure, and multiliteracies.Logan:Utah State University Press/Computers and Composition Digital Press.
11.
GallienT.Oomen-EarlyJ.(2008).Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online courseroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor?International Journal on E-Learning,7,463-476.
JacksonB.WallinJ.(2009).Rediscovering the “back-and-forthness” of rhetoric in the age of YouTube.College Composition and Communication,61,374-396.
14.
KittleP.HicksT.(2009).Transforming the group paper with collaborative online writing.Pedagogy,9,525-538.
15.
KnowltonD. S.(2000).A theoretical framework for the online classroom: A defense and delineation of a student-centered pedagogy.New Directions for Teaching & Learning,2000(84),5-14.
16.
LageM. J.PlattG. J.TregliaM.(2000).Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment.Journal of Economic Education,31,30-43.
17.
MabritoM.(2006).A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class.American Journal of Distance Education,20,93-107.
McLoughlinC.LeeM. J.(2007).Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the web 2.0 era. InICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of Ascilite(pp.664-675).Singapore:Nanyang Technological University.
20.
MooreM. G.KearsleyG.(1996).Distance education: A systems view.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
21.
MyersC.HaynesC.(2002).Transforming undergraduate science through interdisciplinary inquiry. InHaynesC.(Ed.),Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching(American Council on Education/Oryx Press series on higher education, pp.179-197).Westport, CT:Onyx Press.
RichardsonJ. C.SwanK.(2003).Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction.Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,7,68-88.
27.
SauersD.WalkerR. C.(2004).A comparison of traditional and technology-assisted instructional methods in the business communication classroom.Business Communication Quarterly,67,430-442.
28.
SchneckenbergD.EhlersU.AdelsbergerH.(2011).Web 2.0 and competence-oriented design of learning: Potentials and implications for higher education.British Journal of Educational Technology,42,747-762.
29.
ShwomB.SnyderL. G.(2014).Business communication: Polishing your professional presence.Boston, MA:Prentice Hall.
30.
StaggersJ.GarciaS.NagelhoutE.(2008).Teamwork through team building: Face-to-face to online.Business Communication Quarterly,71,472-487.
31.
SwanK.(2002).Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction.Education, Communication & Information,2,23-49.
32.
WalkerK.(2003).Applying distributed learning theory in online business communication courses.Business Communication Quarterly,66(2),55-67.
33.
WarnockS.(2009).Teaching writing online: How and why.Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English.
34.
WienerM.MehrabianA.(1968).Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication.New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
