PowerPoint has received much criticism regarding excessive use of text and the lack of contact with the audience. Why presenters use PowerPoint in this way has not been studied so far. Our study using interviews with beginning and advanced presenters shows that some use the program as a speaking note and as a means to draw the attention away from themselves. Some even think that PowerPoint can replace rhetorical skills. Slides are mainly designed on the basis of commonsense, instead of guidelines based on human information processing. Implications for the teaching of PowerPoint use in business communication are discussed.
AtkinsonC.(2005).Beyond bullet points: Using Microsoft PowerPoint to create presentations that inform, motivate, and inspire.Redmond, WA:Microsoft Press.
BanduraA.(1989).Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.Developmental Psychology,25,729-735.
4.
BlokzijlW.NaeffR.(2004).The instructor as stagehand: Dutch student responses to PowerPoint.Business Communication Quarterly,67,70-77.
5.
BucherH-J.NiemannP.(2012).Visualizing science: The reception of PowerPoint presentations.Visual Communication,11,283-306.
6.
BurkeL. A.(2007).Lessons learned from instructional design theory: An application in management education.Business Communication Quarterly,70,414-430.
7.
CornelisL.TielensT.(2004).Boodschap in beeld. Professioneel presenteren met PowerPoint[Message in the picture. Professional presentations with PowerPoint].Den Haag, Netherlands:Academic Service.
8.
CyphertD.(2004).The problem of PowerPoint: Visual aid or visual rhetoric?Business Communication Quarterly,67,80-84.
9.
De GrezL.ValckeM.RoozenI.(2009).The impact of goal orientation, self-reflection and personal characteristics on the acquisition of oral presentation skills.European Journal of Psychology of Education,24,293-306.
10.
DownsE.BoysonA. R.AlleyH.BloomN. R.(2011).iPedagogy: Using multimedia learning theory to iDentify best practices for MP3 player use in higher education.Journal of Applied Communication Research,39,184-200.
11.
DuFreneD. D.LehmanC. M.(2004).Concept, content, construction, and contingencies: Getting the horse before the PowerPoint cart.Business Communication Quarterly,67,84-88.
12.
FarkasD. K.(2005).Understanding and using PowerPoint. InProceedings of the STC annual conference(pp.313-320).Arlington, VA:STC.
JamesK. E.BurkeL. A.HutchinsH. M.(2006).Powerful or pointless? Faculty versus student perceptions of PowerPoint use in business education.Business Communication Quarterly,69,374-396.
LowR.SwellerJ.(2005).The modality principle in multimedia learning. InMayerR. E.(Ed.),The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp.147-158).New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
25.
LucasS. E.(2004).The art of public speaking.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
26.
MalmforsB.GarnsworthyP.GrossmanM.(2004).Writing and presenting scientific papers.Nottingham, England:Nottingham University Press.
27.
MayerR. E.(2009).Multimedia learning.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
28.
MayerR. E.JohnsonC. I.(2008).Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,100,380-386.
29.
MayerR. E.MorenoR.(1998).A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,312-320.
30.
MayerR. E.MorenoR.(2002).Animation as an aid to multimedia learning.Educational Psychology Review,14,87-99.
31.
McCroskeyJ. C.(2006).An introduction to rhetorical communication. A Western rhetorical perspective.New York, NY:Pearson Education.
NorvigP.(2003).PowerPoint: Shot with its own bullets.Lancet,362,343-344.
34.
Rowley-JolivetE.(2004).Different visions, different visuals: A social semiotic analysis of field-specific visual composition in scientific conference presentations.Visual Communication,3,145-175.
35.
ShephardK.(2005).Presenting at conferences, seminars and meetings.London, England:Sage.
36.
ShwomB. L.KellerK. P.(2003).“The great man has spoken. Now what do I do?” A response to Edward R. Tufte’s “The cognitive style of PowerPoint.”Communication Insight,1(1). Retrieved fromhttp://www.communipartners.com/documents/ComInsV1._000.pdf
37.
SwellerJ.(2005).The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. InMayerR. E.(Ed.),The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning(pp.159-167).New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
van WassenhoveV.GrantK. W.PoeppelD.(2005).Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102,1181-1186.
40.
VikG. N.(2004).Breaking bad habits: Teaching effective PowerPoint use to working graduate students.Business Communication Quarterly,67,225-228.
41.
WeckerC.(2012).Slide presentations as speech suppressors: When and why learners miss oral information.Computers & Education,59,260-273.
42.
WorleyR. B.DyrudM. A.(2004).Presentations and the PowerPoint problem–Part II.Business Communication Quarterly,67,214-215.
43.
ZandersE.MacLeodL.(2010).Presentation skills for scientists.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
