Slide decks are a ubiquitous form of communication in both academia and business, and business communication instructors must be able to model and teach multimedia design principles. The literature regarding multimedia design has traditionally fallen into two camps: the cognitive school, focused on designing multimedia messages that accommodate human cognitive architecture, and the graphic design school, focused on using visual appeal as a tool for conceptual organization. I synthesize representative models from each school to provide theoretically derived and empirically supported principles for designing slide decks that are both well-organized and visually appealing.
AdesopeO. O.NesbitJ. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 250-263. doi:10.1037/a0026147
2.
AkyürekE. G.KappelmannN.VolkertM.van RijnH. (2017). What you see is what you remember: Visual chunking by temporal integration enhances working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(12), 2025-2036. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01175
3.
AusubelD. P. (1962). A subsumption theory of meaningful verbal learning and retention. Journal of General Psychology, 66(2), 213-224.
4.
BerinatoS. (2016). Visualizations that really work. Harvard Business Review, 94(6), 93-100.
5.
CookL. K.MayerR. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448.
6.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87-185. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
7.
CraigR. J.AmernicJ. H. (2006). PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31(3), 147-160.
8.
De KoningB. B.TabbersH. K.RikersR. M.PaasF. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113-140.
9.
DuarteN. (2008). Slide:ology: The art and science of creating great presentations. O’Reilly Media.
GinnsP. (2006). Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 511-525. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
12.
GrossA. G.HarmonJ. E. (2009). The structure of PowerPoint presentations: The art of grasping things whole. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(2), 121-137.
13.
HarpS. F.MayerR. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92.
14.
JohnsonC.MayerR. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 178-191.
15.
KalyugaS.ChandlerP.SwellerJ. (2004). When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Human factors, 46(3), 567-581.
LevinJ. R.MayerR. E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In BrittonB. K.WoodwardA.BinkleyM. R. (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 95-113). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279-281.
20.
MayerR. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357-371.
21.
MayerR. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
22.
MayerR. E.JohnsonC. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380
23.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 91-97.
24.
MorenoR.MayerR. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156.
25.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS.AwhE.BrownG. D. A.ConwayA.CowanN.DonkinC.FarrellS.HitchG. J.HurlstoneM. J.MaW. J.MoreyC. C.NeeD. E.SchweppeJ.VergauweE.WardG. (2018). Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(9), 885-958. doi:10.1037/bul0000153
26.
PaivioA. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76(3), 241.
27.
PastoreR.BriskinJ.AsinoT. I. (2016). The multimedia principle. Instructional Technology, 17.
28.
PentakS.LauerD. A. (2016). Design basics. Cengage Learning.
29.
PoleA.ParasharS. (2020). Am I pretty? 10 tips to designing visually appealing slideware presentations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(4), 757-762. doi:10.1017/S1049096520000827
30.
ReyG. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216-237. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.003
31.
ReynoldsG. (2019). Presentation Zen: Simple ideas on presentation design and delivery. New Riders.
32.
RichterJ.ScheiterK.EitelA. (2016). Signaling text-picture relations in multimedia learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 17, 19-36.
33.
SeufertT. (2019). Training for coherence formation when learning from text and picture and the interplay with learners’ prior knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 193.
34.
SpanjersI. A. E.GogT. v.MerriënboerJeroen J. G. van. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 411-423. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
35.
TufteE. R. (2006). The cognitive style of PowerPoint: Pitching out corrupts within. Cheshire.
36.
UndrillG.McMasterF. (2013). PowerPoint: avoiding the slide to damnation. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 19(1), 14-22.
37.
Van GogT. (2014). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In MayerR. E. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 263-278). Cambridge University Press.
38.
WilliamsR. (2015). The non-designer’s design book: Design and typographic principles for the visual novice. Pearson Education.
39.
WilliamsR. (2017). The non-designer’s presentation book: principles for effective presentation design. Peachpit Press.
