Given that many doctoral programs do not provide extensive training on how to present course information in the classroom, the current paper looks to educational psychology theory and research for guidance. Richard Mayer and others' copious empirical work on effective and ineffective instructional design, along with relevant research findings in cognitive science, are summarized and adapted to the management education context. The goal of this article is to enhance instructors' ability to effectively relay course material and to offer specific advice for how instructors can implement prior research findings.
Andres, H.P., & Petersen, C. (2001). Presentation media, information complexity, and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Systems , 30, 225-246.
2.
Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
3.
Baddeley, A.D. (1999). Human memory. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bartsch, R.A., & Cobern, K.M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers &Education, 41, 77-86.
6.
Bearden, W.O., Scholder, E., & Netemeyer, R.G. (2000). Challenges and prospects facing doctoral education in marketing. MarketingEducation Review, 10, 1-13.
7.
Beets, D.S., & Lobingier, P.G. (2001). Pedagogical techniques: Student performance and preferences. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 231-235.
8.
Bligh, D. (2000). What's the use of lectures?New York: John Wiley.
9.
Blokzijl, W., & Naeff, R. (2004). The instructor as stagehand. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 70-77.
10.
Butler, J.B., & Mautz, R.D., Jr. (1996). Multimedia presentations and learning: A laboratory experiment. Issues in Accounting Education, 11, 259-280.
11.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction . Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
12.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 62, 233-246.
13.
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: John Wiley.
14.
Froehle, C.M., & Roth, A.V. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 1—22.
15.
Griffith, D. (1997). An examination of marketing educator training in U.S. doctoral programs. MarketingEducation Review, 7, 81-95.
16.
Hanft, A. (2003). More power than point. Inc., 25(8), 116.
17.
Hede, A. (2002). An integrated model of multimedia effects on learning . Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 177-191.
18.
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1996). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts . In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 641-668). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
James, K., Burke, L.A., & Hutchins, H. (2006). Powerful or pointless: Faculty vs. student perceptions of PowerPoint usage in business education. Business Communication Quarterly, 69, 374-396.
20.
Lammers, W., & Murphy, J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 54-67.
21.
Mayer, R.E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 240-246.
22.
Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
25.
Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
26.
Mayer, R.E., Fennell, S., & Farmer, L. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389-395.
27.
Mayer, R.E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
28.
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
29.
McDaniel, M.A., & Waddill, P.J. (1994). The mnemonic benefit of pictures in text: Selective enrichment for differentially skilled readers. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Advances in psychology: Comprehension of graphics (Vol. 108, pp. 165-185). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30.
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
31.
Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E.V., & Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 227-238.
32.
Paas, F.G.W.C., & van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual & Motor Skills , 79, 419-430.
33.
Schnotz, W., & Kulhavy, R.W. (Eds.) (1994). Comprehension of graphics (Advances in Psychology series). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34.
Speaker, K. (2004). Student perspectives: Expectations of multimedia technology in a college literature class. Reading Improvement , 41, 241-254.
35.
Titsworth, S. (2004). Students' notetaking: The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity. Communication Education, 53, 305-320.
36.
Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education . Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 616-622.
37.
Weiner, B. (1992). Motivation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 860-865). New York: Macmillan.
38.
Wildavsky, B. (2002). Professors in training. U.S. News & World Report: Special Issue Graduate Schools, 131, 74.
39.
Winn, W. (1994). Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Advances in psychology: Comprehension of graphics (Vol. 108, pp. 2-29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
