Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Perception of Ethicality of CSA on Employees’ Advocacy and Ethical Behavior: The Role of Positive Emotional Response and Perceptions of Organization Congruence
Corporate Social Advocacy (CSA) has increasingly gained popularity in today’s workplace, yielding diverse outcomes for employees and organizations. Grounded in Social Learning Theory, this study explores CSA efforts on racial diversity and examines its impact on employees’ behaviors in the workplace. By conducting an online survey with 401 full-time U.S. employees, the study found that employees’ perceptions of the ethicality of CSA encourage their acceptance of diversity and advocacy for companies’ CSA actions. Furthermore, the study revealed that employees’ perceptions of ethicality are shaped by their views on both the CSA issue and the organization’s image. Specifically, positive emotions toward the CSA issue and perceptions of congruence between the organization and the social causes advocated by the CSA play a significant role. Theoretical and practical implications for public relations and the CSA actions are discussed.
AbitbolA.VanDykeM. S. (2023). Analyzing the nature of self-transcendent emotional elicitors in corporate social advocacy messages. Public Relations Review, 49(4), 102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102364
2.
AhmadN.AhmadA.SiddiqueI. (2024). Beyond self-interest: How altruistic values and human emotions drive brand advocacy in hospitality consumers through corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2439–2453. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2701
3.
AlharbiK.KimJ. K.NolandC.CarterJ. (2022). When corporate social advocacy meets controversial celebrity: the role of consumer–brand congruence and consumer-celebrity congruence. Sustainability, 14(3), 1811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031811
4.
AlhoutiS.JohnsonC. M.HollowayB. B. (2016). Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.007
5.
Al HalbusiH.WilliamsK. A.RamayahT.AldieriL.VinciC. P. (2021). Linking ethical leadership and ethical climate to employees’ ethical behavior: The moderating role of person–organization fit. Personnel Review, 50(1), 159–185.
6.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
7.
AngongaM. C.FlorahO. M. (2019). A theoretical account of human resource management practices, ethical work climate and employee ethical behavior: A critical literature review. Business Management Dynamics, 9(4), 1–8.
8.
BanduraA. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391
9.
BanduraA. (1997). Bandura (Vol. 2). FrancoAngeli.
10.
Becker-OlsenK. L.CudmoreB. A.HillR. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
11.
BushJ. T.WelshD. T.BaerM. D.WaldmanD. (2021). Discouraging unethicality versus encouraging ethicality: Unraveling the differential effects of prevention-and promotion-focused ethical leadership. Personnel Psychology, 74(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12386
12.
BožacM. G.SušanjZ.AgušajB. (2017). Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of PO fit and work engagement in hotel staff. Organizational Cultures, 17(1), 21.
13.
ChaudhuriA.HolbrookM. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
14.
DawkinsJ. (2005). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540510621362
15.
de Oliveira SantiniF.LadeiraW. J.PintoD. C.HerterM. M.SampaioC. H.BabinB. J. (2020). Customer engagement in social media: A framework and meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1211–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00731-5
16.
DemirtasO. (2015). Ethical leadership influence at organizations: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1950-5
17.
DhananiL. Y.BeusJ. M.JosephD. L. (2018). Workplace discrimination: A meta-analytic extension, critique, and future research agenda. Personnel Psychology, 71(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12254
18.
DoddM. D.SupaD. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089853
19.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001
20.
ElyR. J.ThomasD. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087
21.
EscadasM.JalaliM. S.FarhangmehrM. (2019). Why bad feelings predict good behaviours: The role of positive and negative anticipated emotions on consumer ethical decision making. Business Ethics: A European Review, 28(4), 529–545.
22.
FaheemM. A.AhmedI.AinI.IqbalZ. (2021). Authentic leadership and follower’s role ethnicality: The role of leader’s ethical voice and ethical culture. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(3), 422–441.
23.
FomaE. (2014). Impact of workplace diversity. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(1), 382.
24.
FredricksonB. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367–1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
25.
FredricksonB. L.TugadeM. M.WaughC. E.LarkinG. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States onSeptember11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365.
GreeneJ. D.SommervilleR. B.NystromL. E.DarleyJ. M.CohenJ. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
29.
GrappiS.BergiantiF.GabrielliV.BaghiI. (2024). The effect of message framing on young adult consumers’ sustainable fashion consumption: The role of anticipated emotions and perceived ethicality. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114341
30.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.
31.
HannaR.MullainathanS.SchwartzsteinJ. (2012). Learning through noticing: Theory and experimental evidence in farming (No. w18401). National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
HannaR. C.CrittendenV. L.CrittendenW. F. (2013). Social learning theory: A multicultural study of influences on ethical behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 35(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312474279
33.
HeatherlyK. A.YangS. U.BrowningN.KimE. (2022). Words, money, or action? How corporate social advocacy drove media coverage in response to the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020. The Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.
34.
HecklerS. E.ChildersT. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1086/209275
35.
HerringC. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400203
36.
HongC.LiC. (2020). To support or to boycott: A public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(5–6), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841
37.
HosmerL. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379. https://doi.org/10.2307/258851
38.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.
39.
HuhtalaM.FeldtT.LämsäA.-M.MaunoS.KinnunenU. (2011). Does the ethical culture of organisations promote managers’ occupational well-being? Investigating indirect links via ethical strain. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 231–247.
40.
IllerisK. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(4), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370304837
41.
IvensB. S.LeischnigA.MullerB.ValtaK. (2015). On the role of brand stereotypes in shaping consumer response toward brands: An empirical examination of direct and mediating effects of warmth and competence. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20820
42.
IzardC. E. (1993). Four systems for emotion activation: cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.68
43.
JohnsonK. J.FredricksonB. L. (2005). “We all look the same to me”: Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16(11), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01631.x
44.
KapteinM. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.520
45.
KhanU.KalraA. (2022). It’s good to be different: How diversity impacts judgments of moral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab061
46.
KimS.FergusonM. A. T. (2018). Dimensions of effective CSR communication based on public expectations. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(6), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2015.1118143
47.
LeeY. (2021). Bridging employee advocacy in anonymous social media and internal corporate social responsibility (CSR). Management Decision, 59(10), 2473–2495. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2020-0101
48.
LeeY.KimK. H. (2021). Enhancing employee advocacy on social media: The value of internal relationship management approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 26(2), 311–327.
49.
LeeY.LiJ. Y.TaoW. (2024). Toward an authentic corporate social advocacy (CSA): An internal perspective of BLM advocacy. Public Relations Review, 50(5), 102508.
50.
LeeY.LiJ.-Y.TsaiW.-H. S. (2021). Diversity-oriented leadership, internal communication, and employee outcomes: A perspective of racial minority employees. Journal of Public Relations Research, 33(5), 314–334. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1062726X.2021.2007388
LiY.XuJ.TuY.LuX. (2014). Ethical leadership and subordinates’ occupational well-being: A multi-level examination in China. Social Indicators Research, 116, 823–842.
53.
LiJ. Y.KimJ. K.AlharbiK. (2022). Exploring the role of issue involvement and brand attachment in shaping consumer response toward corporate social advocacy (CSA)initiatives: The case of Nike’s Colin Kaepernick campaign. International Journal of Advertising, 41(2), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.185711
54.
LimJ. S.YoungC. (2021). Effects of issue ownership, perceived fit, and authenticity in corporate social advocacy on corporate reputation. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102071
55.
Luís AbrantesJ.SeabraC.Raquel LagesC.JayawardhenaC. (2013). Drivers of in-group and out-of-group electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). European Journal of Marketing, 47(7), 1067–1088.
ManthiouA.HickmanE.KlausP. (2020). Beyond good and bad: Challenging the suggested role of emotions in customer experience (CX) research. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102218
58.
McConnellC. R. (2003). The manager’s approach to employee performance problems. The Health Care Manager, 22(1), 63–69.
McShaneL.CunninghamP. (2012). To thine own self be true? Employees’ judgments of the authenticity of their organization’s corporate social responsibility program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1064-x
61.
MenL. R.YueC. A. (2019). Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.001
62.
NelsonD. W. (2009). Feeling good and open-minded: The impact of positive affect on cross cultural empathic responding. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802357859
63.
O’KeefeD. F.MesserveyD.SquiresE. C. (2018). Promoting ethical and prosocial behavior: The combined effect of ethical leadership and coworker ethicality. Ethics & Behavior, 28(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1365607
64.
OvertonH.ChoiM.WeatherredJ. L.ZhangN. (2020). Testing the viability of emotions and issue involvement as predictors of CSA response behaviors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(6), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1824074
65.
OvertonH.XiaoA. (2022). Conscience-driven corporate social advocacy: Analyzing moral conviction and perceived motives as predictors of organization-public relationships. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(4), 641–653.
ParchaJ. M.Kingsley WestermanC. Y. (2020). How corporate social advocacy affects attitude change toward controversial social issues. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(3), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920912196
68.
ParkK.JiangH. (2023). Signaling, verification, and identification: The way corporate social advocacy generates brand loyalty on social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420907121
69.
PonterottoJ. G.BurkardA. W.RiegerB. P.GriegerI.D’OnofrioA.DubuissonA.HeenehanM.MillsteinB.ParisiM.RathJ. F.SaxG. (1995). Development and initial validation of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(6), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055006011
70.
ReidenbachR. E.RobinD. P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383391
71.
ResendeS.Monje-AmorA.CalvoN. (2024). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility in the European Union region. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 2852–2864. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2719
72.
RestJ. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Bloomsbury Academic.
RimH.XuH.DongC. (2022). Triadic public-company-issue relationships and publics’ reactions to corporate social advocacy (CSA): An application of balance theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(3–4), 109–134.
75.
SaleemM.QadeerF.MahmoodF.Ariza-MontesA.HanH. (2020). Ethical leadership and employee green behavior: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Sustainability, 12(8), 3314.
76.
ShettyS.ChaudhuriM. S.ShettyA. (2022). The nexus of corporate social responsibility and consumer perception: Systematic review of the evidence. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(7), 25–42.
77.
SinclairA. (1993). Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 63–73.
78.
SnyderT.HonigD. (2016). Unleashing your silent majority: How employee advocacy and engagement build your brand and trust via digital strategies. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 4(3), 217–231.
79.
ThelenP. D. (2020). Internal communicators’ understanding of the definition and importance of employee advocacy. Public Relations Review, 46(4), 101946.
80.
ThelenP. D.MenL. R. (2023). Commentary: The role of internal communication in fostering employee advocacy: An exploratory study. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420975832
81.
ThomasT. (2020). Employee advocacy as a marketing strategy to power brand promotion: an employee perspective. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 167–181.
82.
TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D.McCabeD. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.
83.
TreviñoL. K.ButterfieldK. D.McCabeD. L. (2001). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. In The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics (pp. 301-337). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03018-8
84.
TwymanN. W.StanleyS. M.ElrodC. C.MastersT. M. (2023). The impact of perceived manipulation, motives, and ethicality in cause-related marketing: a CRM+ model. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 31(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2074462
85.
Van BirgelenM. J.WetzelsM. G.van DolenW. M. (2008). Effectiveness of corporate employment web sites: How content and form influence intentions to apply. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720810919323
86.
WangZ.XuH.LiuY. (2018). How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 691–705.
87.
WaldenJ. A.Kingsley WestermanC. Y. (2018). Strengthening the tie: Creating exchange relationships that encourage employee advocacy as an organizational citizenship behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(4), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918783612
88.
WaymerD.LoganN. (2021). Corporate social advocacy as engagement: Nike’s social justice communication. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102005
89.
XieC.BagozziR. P.GrønhaugK. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences. Journal of Business Research, 95, 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.043
90.
XuA. J.LoiR.NgoH. Y. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2457-4
91.
YeungE.ShenW. (2020). Diversity climate promises in ideological psychological contracts: Racial differences in responses to breach and fulfilment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1703804
92.
YimM. C. (2024). Bottom-up corporate social advocacy: Examining the impact of employees’ empowered engagement on advocacy willingness and mediating roles of value congruency and moral elevation. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884241242111
93.
YoungL.DanielK. (2003). Affectual trust in the workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210158565
94.
ZhangX. A.BordenJ. (2024). How legitimate are corporate social advocacy campaigns? An examination of the role of legitimacy in stakeholder perceptions of CSA. Journal of Marketing Communications, 30(1), 123–147.
