How Corporate Social Advocacy Affects Attitude Change Toward Controversial Social Issues

Abstract

The current study reveals that a corporate statement on a controversial social issue is effective in changing an individual’s attitude toward the issue depending on how much the issue is relevant to the individual’s goals and/or if the corporate statement is supported by other corporations. Advocacy fit, corporate credibility, the bandwagon heuristic, and position advocated were varied in a fully crossed 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 experiment (N = 677). The relevance of the controversial social issue to each participant’s goals and values was also considered. Findings indicate that the fit of an issue mattered for attitude change when the issue was relevant to one’s goals. The number of corporations that agreed with the corporate statement affected attitude change when the issue was relevant to each participant’s goals and values. Corporate credibility did not have any significant effect on whether individuals changed their attitudes. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

corporate social advocacy advocacy fit bandwagon heuristic corporate credibility involvement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera

R. V.

Rupp

D. E.

Williams

C. A.

Ganapathi

(2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159338

Becker-Olsen

K. L.

Cudmore

B. A.

Hill

R. P.

(2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001

Blankenship

K. L.

Wegener

D. T.

(2008). Opening the mind to close it: Considering a message in light of important values increases message processing and later resistance to change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.196

Bloom

P. N.

Hoeffler

Keller

K. L.

Meza

C. E. B.

(2006). How social-cause marketing affects consumer perceptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 49–55.

Blume

K. A.

(2012, July 16). “Guilty as charged,” Cathy says of Chick-fil-A’s stand on biblical & family values. Baptist Press. http://www.bpnews.net/38271

Bohner

Dickel

(2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

Carpenter

C. J.

(2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality × processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41, 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12054

Chaiken

(1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In Zanna

M. P.

Olson

J. M.

Herman

C. P.

(Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–40). Psychology Press.

10.

Cho

Boster

F. J.

(2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research, 32, 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204273764

11.

Cook

(2015, March 29). Tim Cook: Pro-discrimination “religious freedom” laws are dangerous. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pro-discrimination-religious-freedom-laws-are-dangerous-to-america/2015/03/29/bdb4ce9e-d66d-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html?utm_term=.bee9b3c312fb

12.

Coombs

W. T.

Holladay

S. J.

(2012). Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach. Wiley-Blackwell.

13.

Davenport

(2018, February 23). Millennials could change our political landscape, if they vote. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/article/Millennials-could-change-our-political-landscape-12667886.php

14.

Davis

(2016, September 28). Why corporations have begun taking a stand on divisive social issues in recent years. Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/why-corporations-have-begun-taking-a-stand-on-divisive-social-issues-in-recent-years-2016-9

15.

Deetz

(1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. SUNY Press.

16.

Dodd

M. D.

(2014, November 17). The new corporate social responsibility: Company stances on controversial issues. Adweek. https://www.adweek.com/digital/the-new-corporate-social-responsibility-company-stances-on-controversial-issues/

17.

Dodd

M. D.

Supa

D. W.

(2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8, 1–23.

18.

Dodd

M. D.

Supa

D. W.

(2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089853

19.

Bhattacharya

C. B.

Sen

. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

20.

Edelman Trust Barometer. (2017). https://www.edelman.com/research/2017-edelman-trust-barometer

21.

Edelman Trust Barometer. (2018). https://www.edelman.com/research/2018-edelman-trust-barometer

22.

Edelman Trust Barometer. (2019). https://www.edelman.com/trust-barometer

23.

W. W.

Sim

C. C.

(2011). Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62, 2382–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21641

24.

Gelles

(2017, August 19). The moral voice of corporate America. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/19/business/moral-voice-ceos.html

25.

Global Strategy Group. (2018). Call to action in the age of Trump. http://www.globalstrategygroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/BusinessPolitics_2018.pdf

26.

Goldsmith

R. E.

Lafferty

B. A.

Newell

S. J.

(2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616

27.

Hansen

S. D.

Dunford

B. B.

Boss

A. D.

Boss

R. W.

Angermeier

(2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0903-0

28.

Hellmann

(2019, June 10). 180 companies condemn state abortion restriction in New York Times ad. The Hill. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/447783-180-companies-condemn-state-abortion-restrictions

29.

Hoban

(2018, February 2). Millennials are on the frontlines of political and cultural change in America. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2018/02/02/millennials-are-on-the-frontlines-of-political-and-cultural-change-in-america/

30.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

M. R.

(2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.

31.

Johnson

B. T.

Eagly

A. H.

(1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290

32.

Kim

Sundar

S. S.

(2014). Can online buddies and bandwagon cues enhance user participation in online health communities? Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.039

33.

Krone

(2005). Trends in organizational communication research: Sustaining the discipline, sustaining ourselves. Communication Studies, 56, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0008957042000332269

34.

Lafferty

B. A.

(2007). The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60, 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.030

35.

Lafferty

B. A.

Goldsmith

R. E.

(1999). Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00002-2

36.

Lafferty

B. A.

Goldsmith

R. E.

(2004). How influential are corporate credibility and endorser attractiveness when innovators react to advertisements for a new high-technology product? Corporate Reputation Review, 7, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540209

37.

Lange

Washburn

N. T.

(2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0522

38.

Lin-Hi

Müller

(2013). The CSR bottom line: Preventing corporate irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1928–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.015

39.

Luttrell

Petty

R. E.

Briñol

Wagner

B. C.

(2016). Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003

40.

McCroskey

J. C.

Teven

J. J.

(1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464

41.

McGregor

(2018, March 6). Dick’s Sporting Goods took a stand on gun sales—And made a big statement. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2018/03/06/dicks-sporting-goods-took-a-stand-on-gun-sales-and-made-a-big-statement/?utm_term=.69ad3e4b7bbc

42.

Menon

Kahn

B. E.

(2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_12

43.

Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210–220. https://doi.org/1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012

44.

Nadeau

Cloutier

Guay

J. H.

(1993). New evidence about the existence of a bandwagon effect in the opinion formation process. International Political Science Review, 14, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219301400204

45.

Nan

Heo

(2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360204

46.

O’Connor

Gronewold

K. L.

(2012). Black gold, green earth: An analysis of the petroleum industry’s CSR environmental sustainability discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318912465189

47.

O’Connor

Shumate

Meister

(2008). Walk the line: Active Moms define corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.06.005

48.

O’Keefe

D. J.

(2013). The elaboration likelihood model. In Dillard

J. P.

Shen

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 137–149). Sage.

49.

Park

H. S.

Levine

T. R.

Westerman

C. Y. K.

Orfgen

Foregger

(2007). The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: A test of dual-process and social judgment predictions. Human Communication Research, 33, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00290.x

50.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915

51.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press.

52.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367

53.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Westview Press.

54.

Pornpitakpan

(2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x

55.

Rudominer

(2017, December 6). Corporate social responsibility matters: Ignore millennials at your peril. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/corporate-social-responsi_b_9155670

56.

Sachs

(2015, January 2). 2015 will be the year brands take a public stand on social issues. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jan/02/2015-social-justice-race-equality-rights-climate-business-marketing

57.

Shear

M. D.

(2012, July 27). Amazon’s founder pledges 2.5 million in support of same-sex marriage. The New York Times. https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/27/amazons-founder-pledges-2-5-million-in-support-of-same-sex-marriage/

58.

Stanchi

K. M.

(2012). Involvement. In Edwards

L. H.

(Ed.), Readings in persuasion: Briefs that changed the world (pp. 131–145). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

59.

Starbucks. (2012, January 25). In Facebook [Fan page]. https://www.facebook.com/Starbucks/posts/258532964214857

60.

Sundar

S. S.

(2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). The MIT Press.

61.

Sundar

S. S.

Knobloch-Westerwick

Hastall

M. R.

(2007). News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20511

62.

Sundar

S. S.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

(2009). Authority vs. peer: How interface cues influence users. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 4231–4236). https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520645

63.

Waddock

Googins

B. K.

(2014). The paradoxes of communicating corporate social responsibility. In Ihlen

Ø.

Bartlett

J. L.

May

(Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 23–44). John Wiley.

64.

Weinzimmer

L. G.

Esken

C. A.

(2016). Risky business: Taking a stand on social issues. Business Horizons, 59, 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.007

65.

Westerman

Spence

P. R.

Van Der Heide

(2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12041

66.

Wettstein

Baur

(2016). “Why should we care about marriage equality?” Political advocacy as a part of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2631-3

67.

Winston

(2016, May 9). Business is taking action on LGBT rights. Will climate change be next? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/05/business-is-taking-action-on-lgbt-rights-will-climate-change-be-next

68.

Worthington

A. K.

Nussbaum

J. F.

Parrott

R. L.

(2015). Organizational credibility: The role of issue involvement, value-relevant involvement, elaboration, author credibility, message quality, and message effectiveness in persuasive messages from public health advocacy organizations. Communication Research Reports, 32, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1016153

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB