This study examines the impact of charismatic leadership communication in corporate social advocacy (CSA) campaigns on employees’ organizational engagement and cross-cutting discussion behaviors through the mediation of employees’ psychological need satisfaction. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), the conceptual model is tested through an online survey among 716 full-time employees who work in various industries in the U.S. Findings of the study contribute to the CSA and leadership communication literature by unveiling the effectiveness of a particular leadership communication approach, charismatic leadership communication, on creating positive employee outcomes at the organizational and societal level (i.e., organizational engagement and cross-cutting discussion regarding sociopolitical issues). Additionally, our study adds to the CSA literature by identifying employees’ psychological need satisfaction as a mediator driving the aforesaid positive impacts of charismatic leadership communication. It highlights the importance of fulfilling employees’ psychological needs when addressing sociopolitical issues in order to unleash the power of charismatic leadership communication in promoting employees’ engagement with the organization and participation in issue-related conversation.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
2.
AntonakisJ.BastardozN.JacquartP.ShamirB. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293–319.
3.
AntonakisJ.FenleyM.LiechtiS. (2011). Can charisma be taught? Tests of two interventions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 374–396.
4.
AppelsM. (2023). CEO sociopolitical activism as a signal of authentic leadership to prospective employees. Journal of Management, 49(8), 2727–2765.
5.
AwamlehR.GardnerW. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 345–373.
6.
BanksG. C.EngemannK. N.WilliamsC. E.GootyJ.McCauleyK. D.MedaughM. R. (2017). A meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(4), 508–529.
7.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.LiN. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132–153.
8.
BaurD.WettsteinF. (2016). CSR’s new challenge: Corporate political advocacy. In de ArrudaM. C. C.RokB. (Eds.), Understanding ethics and responsibilities in a globalizing world (pp. 171–187). Springer International Publishing.
9.
BhagwatY.WarrenN. L.BeckJ. T.WatsonG. F.IV. (2020). Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing, 84(5), 1–21.
10.
BohonosJ. W.SiscoS. (2021). Advocating for social justice, equity, and inclusion in the workplace: An agenda for anti-racist learning organizations. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2021(170), 89–98.
11.
BranickiL.BrammerS.PullenA.RhodesC. (2021). The morality of “new” CEO activism. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(2), 269–285.
12.
CapizzoL.IannaconeJ. I. (2023). Citizen brand: The emergence of brandstanding as organizational engagement and civic duty. Public Relations Review, 49(2), Article 102307.
13.
ChatterjiA. K.ToffelM. W. (2019). Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 159–185.
14.
ChenH. T.LinJ. S. (2021). Cross-cutting and like-minded discussion on social media: The moderating role of issue importance in the (de) mobilizing effect of political discussion on political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65(1), 135–156.
15.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637–647.
16.
CongerJ. A.KanungoR. N.MenonS. T. (2000). Charismatic leadership and follower effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 747–767.
17.
Den HartogD. N.VerburgR. M. (1997). Charisma and rhetoric: Communicative techniques of international business leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(4), 355–391.
18.
De VriesR. E.Bakker-PieperA.OostenveldW. (2010). Leadership= communication? The relations of leaders’ communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 367–380.
19.
DoddM. D. (2018). Globalization, pluralization, and erosion: The impact of shifting societal expectations for advocacy and public good. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2), 221–221.
20.
DoddM. D.SupaD. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2–23.
21.
DoddM. D.SupaD. W. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 287–293.
EwingM.MenL. R.O’NeilJ. (2019). Using social media to engage employees: Insights from internal communication managers. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(2), 110–132.
25.
FarooqR. (2022). Heywood cases: Possible causes and solutions. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 14(1), 79–88.
26.
FrancisH.KeeganA. (2020). The ethics of engagement in an age of austerity—A paradox perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 593–607.
27.
Gallup. (2023, December29). In depth: Topics A-Z—Confidence in institutions.
28.
GutmannA.ThompsonD. F. (2009). Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.
29.
HambrickD. C.WowakA. J. (2021). CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 33–59.
30.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.SchulerD. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30(6), 837–857.
31.
HongC.JiY. G. (2022). When transparent leadership communication motivates employee advocacy: Testing the mediator roles of employee attributions in CEO activism. Public Relations Review, 48(3), Article 102202.
32.
HouseR. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339.
33.
HouseR. J.BaetzM. L. (1979). Leadership: Some empirical generalisations and new research directions: In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organisational behaviour (Vol. 1, pp. 341–423). Elsevier.
34.
HsiehS. H.ChangA. (2016). The psychological mechanism of brand co-creation engagement. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33(1), 13–26.
35.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
36.
JamalJ.Abu BakarH. (2017). The mediating role of charismatic leadership communication in a crisis: A Malaysian example. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(4), 369–393.
37.
JiY. G.HongC. (2023). Engaging employees in CEO activism: The role of transparent leadership communication in making a social impact. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(1), 78–99.
38.
JiY. G.TaoW. (2024). Channeling employees’ positive moral emotions in CEO activism: The role of care-oriented Leadership Communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(3), 210–232.
39.
JohnstonK. A.LaneA. B. (2021). Communication with intent: A typology of communicative interaction in engagement. Public Relations Review, 47(1), Article 101925.
40.
JohnstonK. A.TaylorM. (Eds.). (2018). The handbook of communication engagement. John Wiley & Sons.
41.
KahnW. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
42.
KahnW. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45(4), 321–349.
43.
KaoK. Y.HsuH. H.ThomasC. L.ChengY. C.LinM. T.LiH. F. (2021). Motivating employees to speak up: Linking job autonomy, PO fit, and employee voice behaviors through work engagement. Current Psychology, 41, 1–15.
44.
KimJ. K.OvertonH.BhallaN.LiJ. Y. (2020). Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses. Public Relations Review, 46(2), Article 101856.
45.
KimH.WooE.UysalM.KwonN. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee well-being in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1584–1600.
46.
LanX.TarasevichS.ProverbsP.MyslikB.KiousisS. (2020). President Trump vs. CEOs: A comparison of presidential and corporate agenda building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(1–2), 30–46.
47.
LeeY.TaoW. (2021). Does perceived morality of CEO activism matter? Understanding employees’ responses to CEO actions on sociopolitical issues. Management Decision, 59(10), 2329–2354.
48.
LemonL. L.BomanC. D.(2022). Ethics of care in action: Overview of holistic framework with application to employee engagement. Public Relations Review, 48(4), Article 102232.
49.
LiZ.XueJ.LiR.ChenH.WangT. (2020). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and employee’s pro-environmental behavior: The mediating roles of environmental passion and autonomous motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1408.
50.
LimJ. S.YoungC. (2021). Effects of issue ownership, perceived fit, and authenticity in corporate social advocacy on corporate reputation. Public Relations Review, 47(4), Article 102071.
51.
LuY.LeeJ. K. (2021). Determinants of cross-cutting discussion on Facebook: Political interest, news consumption, and strong-tie heterogeneity. New Media & Society, 23(1), 175–192.
52.
McWilliamsA.ParhankangasA.CoupetJ.WelchE.BarnumD. T. (2016). Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 193–204.
53.
MaslachC.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.
54.
MenL. R.QinY. S.MitsonR. (2021). Engaging startup employees via charismatic leadership communication: The importance of communicating “vision, passion, and care”. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211020488
55.
MenL. R.YueC. A.LiuY. (2020). “Vision, passion, and care:” The impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change. Public Relations Review, 46(3), Article 101927.
56.
MutzD. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
57.
MutzD. C.MondakJ. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155.
58.
NadlerD. A.TushmanM. L. (1990). Beyond the charismatic leader: Leadership and organizational change. California Management Review, 32(2), 77–97.
59.
OvertonH.KimJ. K.ZhangN.HuangS. (2021). Examining consumer attitudes toward CSR and CSA messages. Public Relations Review, 47(4), Article 102095.
60.
ParkK.JiangH. (2023). Signaling, verification, and identification: The way corporate social advocacy generates brand loyalty on social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(2), 439–463.
61.
RimH.LeeY.YooS. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review, 46(2), Article 101869.
62.
RobinsonS. R.IrmakC.JayachandranS. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139.
63.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
64.
SaksA. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.
65.
SchoenbergA. (2005). Do crisis plans matter? A new perspective on leading during a crisis. Public Relations Quarterly, 50(1), 2–6.
66.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.
67.
SongB.ChoiM. (2023). Testing publics’ perceptions of corporate social advocacy messaging: Linking organizational and social outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(4), 325–344.
68.
SurieG.AshleyA. (2008). Integrating pragmatism and ethics in entrepreneurial leadership for sustainable value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 235–246.
69.
TaoW.SongB.FergusonM. A.KochharS. (2018). Employees’ prosocial behavioral intentions through empowerment in CSR decision-making. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 667–680.
70.
TowlerA. J. (2003). Effects of charismatic influence training on attitudes, behavior, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 363–381.
71.
TuanL. T. (2019). Catalyzing employee OCBE in tour companies: Charismatic leadership, organizational justice, and pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 43(5), 682–711.
72.
Van den BroeckA.FerrisD. L.ChangC. H.RosenC. C. (2016). A review of self- determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229.
73.
WaymerD.LoganN. (2021). Corporate social advocacy as engagement: Nike’s social justice communication. Public Relations Review, 47(1), Article 102005.
74.
XenikouA. (2014). The cognitive and affective components of organisational identification: The role of perceived support values and charismatic leadership. Applied Psychology, 63(4), 567–588.
75.
YangS. U.KangM.KimY.LeeE. (2022). The effects of leadership in corporate social advocacy on positive employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(6), 296–316.
76.
YorgesS. L.WeissH. M.StricklandO. J. (1999). The effect of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 428–436.
77.
YuklG. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
78.
ZhouZ.DongC. (2022). Matching words with actions: Understanding the effects of CSA stance-action consistency on negative consumer responses. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 27(1), 167–187.
