An online survey examined the comparative benefits of traditional in-person networking and networking via LinkedIn in a US sample of full-time working adults who use LinkedIn. Participants answered questions about internal and external networking, active and passive LinkedIn use, face-to-face networking, and networking benefits. A structural regression model revealed internal and external networking were positively related to networking benefits, in line with the model of networking. Working adults reported internal networking in person, not via LinkedIn, and external networking via LinkedIn, not in person. Both in-person networking and active and passive LinkedIn use were positively related to networking benefits. Indirect effects emerged between internal networking and networking benefits via in-person networking and between external networking and networking benefits via passive LinkedIn use. Results suggest in-person networking and networking via LinkedIn are both advantageous as they are related to distinct networking benefits and potentially motivated by different types of networking.
AhmadZ.SoroyaS. H.MahmoodK. (2023). Bridging social capital through the use of social networking sites: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33(4), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2022.2064025
3.
AikinsD. E. (2021). Redirect your efforts: Extraversions effect on the informational benefits received from active and passive LinkedIn use (Publication No. 4746600) [Master’s thesis, Utrecht University]. UU Theses Repository.
4.
BaumannL.UtzS. (2021). Professional networking: Exploring differences between offline and online networking. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-1-2
5.
BendellaH.WolffH. G. (2020). Who networks?–A meta-analysis of networking and personality. Career Development International, 25(5), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2019-0289
6.
BurkeM.KrautR.MarlowC. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571–580). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979023
DavisJ.WolffH. G.ForretM. L.SullivanS. E. (2020). Networking via LinkedIn: An examination of usage and career benefits. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103396
10.
ForretM. L.DoughertyT. W. (1997, April). Networking: Job and career benefits for male and female professionals [Paper presentation]. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
11.
ForretM. L.DoughertyT. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253
12.
GodardR.HoltzmanS. (2024). Are active and passive social media use related to mental health, wellbeing, and social support outcomes? A meta-analysis of 141 studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), Article zmad055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad055
13.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS.WormleyW. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.5465/256352
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Evaluating model fit: A synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In BrownA. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th European conference on research methods in business and management (pp. 195–200). Academic Publishing.
KashianN. (2025). Prevalence and outcomes of seeking social support online and offline. Health Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2531426
18.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Publications.
19.
KlineR. B. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In PetscherY.SchatschneiderC.ComptonD. L. (Eds.), Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (pp. 171–207). Taylor & Francis.
20.
KluemperD. H.RosenP. A. (2009). Future employment selection methods: Evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910974134
21.
LaukkarinenM. (2023). Social media as a place to see and be seen: Exploring factors affecting job attainment via social media. The Information Society, 39(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2023.2199418
LiuD.AinsworthS. E.BaumeisterR. F. (2016). A meta-analysis of social networking online and social capital. Review of General Psychology, 20(4), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000091
24.
LuthansF.RosenkrantzS. A.HennesseyH. W. (1985). What do successful managers really do? An observation study of managerial activities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638502100303
25.
NgT. W.FeldmanD. C. (2014). A conservation of resources perspective on career hurdles and salary attainment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.008
26.
NikitkovA.SaintyB. (2014). The role of social media in influencing career success. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 22(4), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-02-2014-0009
RichterD.RiemerK.vom BrockeJ. (2011). Internet social networking. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 3, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-011-0151-y
31.
RamadhantyL. U.PuspariniE. S. (2023). Characteristics of social networking sites users: LinkedIn in obtaining career benefits. Global conference on business, management, and entrepreneurship (pp. 1402–1411). Atlantis Press.
32.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
33.
SteinfieldC.DiMiccoJ. M.EllisonN. B.LampeC. (2009, June). Bowling online: Social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on communities and technologies (pp. 245–254).
34.
SteinfieldC.EllisonN. B.LampeC.VitakJ. (2013). Online social network sites and the concept of social capital. In LeeF. L.LeungL.QuiJ. S.ChuD. (Eds.), Frontiers in new media research (pp. 115–131). Taylor & Francis Group.
35.
ThewD. (2008). LinkedIn—A user’s perspective: Using new channels for effective business networking. Business Information Review, 25(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382108090810
UtzS.BreuerJ. (2019). The relationship between networking, LinkedIn use, and retrieving informational benefits. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0294
38.
WanbergC. R.KanferR.BanasJ. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of networking intensity among unemployed job seekers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.491
39.
WanigasekaraS. K.AliM.FrenchE. (2022). The link between networking behaviours and work outcomes: The role of political skills. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2021-0067
40.
WolffH. G.MoserK.GrauA. (2008). Networking: Theoretical foundations and construct validity. In DellerJ. (Ed.), Readings in applied organizational behavior from the Lüneburg Symposium (pp. 101–115). Rainer Hampp.
41.
WolffH. G.MoserK. (2009). Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013350
42.
WolffH. G.MoserK. (2010). Do specific types of networking predict specific mobility outcomes? A two-year prospective study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.03.001
43.
WolffH. G.SpurkD. (2020). Developing and validating a short networking behavior scale (SNBS) from Wolff and Moser’s (2006) measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719844924
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
