This study investigated the influence of supervisor communication on subordinates’ articulated dissent behaviors. Through the guidance of construal level theory, it was proposed that supervisor communicative behaviors (solidarity, immediate, and humor) indirectly influenced subordinate articulated dissent through the mediation of subordinates’ burnout and perceived immediacy with their supervisor. The data indicate that supervisor solidarity and immediate behaviors indirectly, positively influence subordinate articulated dissent through the mediation of burnout and perceived immediacy. However, perceived immediacy did not mediate the relationship between supervisor humor and subordinate articulate dissent. Further, supervisor humor increased subordinate burnout, decreasing articulated dissent intentions.
Booth-ButterfieldS.Booth-ButterfieldM. (1991). Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. Southern Communication Journal, 56(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949109372831
3.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
4.
CampbellK. L.MartinM. M.WanzerM. B. (2001). Employee perceptions of manager humor orientation, assertiveness, responsiveness, approach/avoidance strategies, and satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 18(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384783
5.
CharoensukmongkolP.PuyodJ. V. (2022). Mindfulness and emotional exhaustion in call center agents in the Philippines: Moderating roles of work and personal characteristics. The Journal of General Psychology, 149(1), 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1800582
6.
ChenF.CurranP. J.BollenK. A.KirbyJ.PaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(4), 462–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108314720
7.
CroucherS.KellyS. (2019). Measurement issues in intercultural communication. In MazerJ.GrahamE. (Eds.), Communication research measures III: A sourcebook (pp. 141–159). SAGE.
8.
CroucherS.KellyS.ChenH. (2018). Cross-cultural issues on organizational dissent and humor orientation. Business Communication Research and Practice, 1(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2018.1.2.102
9.
CroucherS. M.KellyS.ChenH.AshwellD. (2021). Examining the relationships between face concerns and dissent. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-11-2019-0215
10.
CroucherS. M.KellyS.GreenM.HomseyD. M.CullinaneJ.RockerK. T.NguyenT.AndersonK.ChenH.DingG. G.AshwellD.WrightM.PalakshappaN. (2022). The link between supervisor-subordinate computer-mediated immediate behaviors and organizational identification in US, English, and Australian organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(4), 688–709. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F08933189221076859
11.
CroucherS. M.KellyS.HuiC.RockerK. J.CullinaneJ.HomseyD.DingG. G.NguyenT.AndersonK. J.GreenM.AshwellD.WrightM.PalakshappaN. (2021). Articulated dissent and immediacy: A cross-national analysis of the effects of COVID-19 lockdowns. International Journal of Conflict Management, 33(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2021-0062
12.
CundallM. (2019). Using humor in business communication. In KellyS. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication for business: Theory to practice (pp. 67–76). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
De DreuC. K.WestM. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
15.
DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
16.
DiefendorffJ.MorehartJ.GabrielA. (2010). The influence of power and solidarity on emotional display rules at work. Motivation and Emotion, 34(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9167-8
17.
DyrbyeL. N.Major-ElechiB.HaysJ. T.FraserC. H.BuskirkS. J.WestC. P. (2020). Relationship between organizational leadership and health care employee burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95(4), 698–708.
18.
FiedlerK. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70015-3
GremlerD. D.GwinnerK. P. (2000). Customer-employee rapport in service relationships. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F109467050031006
21.
HallM. D. (2019). Relationship between employee development, employee burnout, and employee turnover intentions [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University].
22.
HarmanH. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
23.
ItzkovichY.HeilbrunnS. (2016). The role of co-workers' solidarity as an antecedent of incivility and deviant behavior in organizations. Deviant Behavior, 37(8), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1152865
24.
JiaM.ChengJ. (2021). Emotional experiences in the workplace: Biological sex, supervisor nonverbal behaviors, and subordinate susceptibility to emotional contagion. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1687–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033294120940552
25.
KassingJ. W. (1997). Articulating, antagonizing, and displacing: A model of employee dissent. Communication Studies, 48(4), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368510
26.
KassingJ. W. (1998). Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318998122002
27.
KassingJ. W. (2000). Investigating the relationship between superior-subordinate relationship quality and employee dissent. Communication Research Reports, 17(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090009388751
KellyS.DawkinsA.RockerK. T.SomeshwarS.PennyT. (2022). Supervisor computer-mediated immediate behaviors: Fostering subordinate communication. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/23294884221085724
30.
KellyS.GaytanJ. (2020). The effect of instructors’ immediate behaviors and clarity on student writing apprehension. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619868822
31.
KellyS.GrahamL.MacDonaldP.GokeR. (2018). Organizational citizenship behaviors as influenced by Supervisor communication: The role of solidarity and immediate behaviors. Business Communication Research and Practice, 1(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2018.1.2.61
32.
KellyS.MacDonaldP. (2019). A look at leadership styles and workplace solidarity communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416664176
33.
KellyS.RiceC.WyattB.DuckingJ.DentonZ. (2015). Teacher immediacy and decreased student quantitative reasoning anxiety: The mediating effect of perception. Communication Education, 64(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383
34.
KellyS.WestermanC. Y. K. (2014). Immediacy as an influence on supervisor-subordinate communication. Communication Research Reports, 31(3), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924335
35.
KellyS.WestermanD. (2020). Doing communication science: Thoughts on making more valid claims. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792789
36.
KellyS.WestermanD. K. (2016). New technologies and distributed learning systems. In WittP. L. (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Communication and learning (Vol. 16, pp. 455–480). DeGruyter Mouton.
37.
KimJ. (2013). Structural equation modeling for humor, job satisfaction, job stress and intention to turnover. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 19(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2013.19.2.265
38.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
39.
LeiterM. P.MaslachC. (2003). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In PerreweP.GansterD. (Eds.), Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies (pp. 91–134). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
40.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
41.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ. (2020). Conducting online research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and beyond. SAGE Publications.
42.
LybargerJ. E.RancerA. S.LinY. (2017). Superior–subordinate communication in the workplace: Verbal aggression, nonverbal immediacy, and their joint effects on perceived superior credibility. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1252909
43.
MacDonaldP.KellyS.ChristenS. (2019). A path model of workplace solidarity, satisfaction, burnout, and motivation. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525467
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ.WalkerR. (2020). Fundamental theories of business communication: Laying a foundation for the field. Springer Nature.
46.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.SallinenA.FayerJ. M.BarracloughR. A. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379019
MillikenF. J.MorrisonE. W.HewlinP. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
51.
MorganT.SolizJ.MinniearM.BergquistG. (2020). Communication accommodation and identity gaps as predictors of relational solidarity in interfaith family relationships. Communication Reports, 33(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1692052
52.
NevesP.KaragonlarG. (2020). Does leader humor style matter and to whom?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-12-2018-0552
53.
PayneH. J. (2014). Examining the relationship between trust in supervisor–employee relationships and workplace dissent expression. Communication Research Reports, 31(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.907141
54.
QinY. S.MenL. R. (2022). Exploring the impact of internal communication on employee psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of employee organizational trust. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221081838
55.
RockerK. T.KellyS.CullinaneJ.CroucherS. M.AndersonK. (2021). Computer-mediated immediate behaviors and their impact on structural divergence in superior-subordinate relationships. Communication Research Reports, 38(5), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1974825
56.
SacavémA.MartinezL. F.da CunhaJ. V.AbreuA. M.JohnsonS. K. (2017). Charismatic leadership: A study on delivery styles, mood, and performance. Journal of Leadership Studies, 11(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21519
57.
SandersK.FlacheA.van der VegtG.van de VliertE. (2006). Employees' organizational solidarity within modern organizations: A framing perspective on the effects of social embeddedness. In FetchenhauerD.FlecheA.BuunkA.LindenbergS. (Eds.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior: An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 141–156). Springer.
58.
SandersK.SchynsB. (2006). Leadership and solidarity behavior: Consensus in perception of employees within teams. Personnel Review, 35(5), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682280
59.
SayreJ. (2001). The use of aberrant medical humor by psychiatric unit staff. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 22(7), 669–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840119739
60.
SliterM.KaleA.YuanZ. (2014). Is humor the best medicine? The buffering effect of coping humor on traumatic stressors in firefighters. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1868
61.
SobralF.IslamG. (2015). He who laughs best, leaves last: The influence of humor on the attitudes and behavior of interns. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(4), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0368
62.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
63.
TalbotL. A.LumdenD. B. (2000). On the association between humor and burnout. DeGruyter.
64.
TremblayM. (2021). Understanding the effects of (dis)similarity in affiliative and aggressive humor styles between supervisor and subordinate on LMX and energy. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 34(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2020-0082
65.
TropeY.LibermanN.WakslakC. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
66.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Retrieved July 5, 2022 from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.htm
67.
WheelessL. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00604.x
68.
WiesenfeldB. M.ReytJ. N.BrocknerJ.TropeY. (2017). Construal level theory in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115
69.
WilkinsonA.GollanP. J.KalfaS.XuY. (2018). Voices unheard: Employee voice in the new century. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1427347
70.
WrenchJ. S.McCroskeyJ. C. (2001). A temperamental understanding of humor communication and exhilaratability. Communication Quarterly, 49(2), 142–159.
71.
ZengC. (2018). Employee dissent: A means to facilitate constructive conflicts in organizations. In CroucherS. M.Lewandowska-TomaszczykB.WilsonP. A. (Eds.), Conflict, mediated message, and group dynamics: Intersections of communication (pp. 67–80). Lexington Books.
72.
ZengC.ChenH. (2020). An exploration of the relationships between organizational dissent, employee burnout, and work-family balance: A cross-cultural comparison between China and Finland. Communication Studies, 71(4), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1749864
73.
ZengC.KellyS.GokeR. (2020). Exploring the impacts of leader integrity and ethics on upward dissent and whistleblowing intentions. Communication Reports, 33(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1761413
74.
ZengC.PermyakovaT. M.SmolianinaE. A.MorozovaI. S. (2020). Exploring the relationships between employee burnout, organizational dissent and work-family culture in Russian organizations. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2020.1719430
