We synthesize the interdisciplinary literature into a heuristic for crafting effective organizational and supervisory apologies (the OOPS four-component apology). In the first experiment, we demonstrate how an offense committed by an organization is perceived to be more egregious than an offense committed by a friend or supervisor. Furthermore, results did not support that OOPS apologies are unequally effective if issued by a friend, supervisor, or organization. In the second experiment, we test OOPS apology-training effectiveness. Results indicated that trained participants crafted more effective apologies. Our apology heuristic is an innovation for training business communicators how to apologize effectively.
AdlerR. B.ElmhorstJ. M. (2008). Communicating at work: Principles and practices for business and the professions (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AndrewsP. H.BairdJ. E. (2005). Communication for business and the professions (8th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
3.
AquinoK.GroverS. L.GoldmanB.FolgerR. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209-216. doi:10.1177/1056492603256337
4.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BachmanG. F.GuerreroL. K. (2006). Forgiveness, apology, and communicative responses to hurtful events. Communication Reports, 19, 45-56. doi:10.1080/08934210600586357
6.
BaeJ.ParkS. (2011). Socio-contextual influences on the Korean news media’s interpretation of Samsung’s $847.6 million donation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23, 141-166.
7.
BeebeS. A. (2007). Raising the question #6: What do communication trainers do?Communication Education, 56, 249-254. doi:10.1080/03634520601145266
8.
BenoitW. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23, 177-186. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0
9.
BenoitW. L.BrinsonS. L. (1994). AT&T: “Apologies are not enough.”Communication Quarterly, 42, 75-88. doi:10.1080/01463379409369915
10.
BiselR. S.MessersmithA. S.KeytonJ. (2010). Understanding organizational culture and communication through a gyroscope metaphor. Journal of Management Education, 34, 342-366. doi:10.1177/1052562909340879
11.
BlanchardK.McBrideM. (2003). The one minute apology. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
12.
Blum-KulkaS.OlshtainE. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patters (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196-213. doi:10.1093/applin/5.3.196
13.
BolkanS.DalyJ. A. (2009). Organizational responses to consumer complaints: An examination of effective remediation tactics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 21-39. doi:10.1080/00909880802592656
14.
BolkanS.GoodboyA. K.DalyJ. A. (2010). Consumer satisfaction and repatronage intentions: The importance of perceived control with an organizational complaint. Communication Reports, 23, 14-25. doi:10.1080/08934211003598767
15.
BrownA. D.StarkeyK. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 102-120.
16.
CameronK. S.BrightD.CazaA. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766-790. doi:10.1177/0002764203260209
17.
CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
18.
CampbellK. S.WhiteC. D.DurantR. (2007). Necessary evils, (in)justice, and rapport management. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 161-185. doi:10.1177/0021943606297904
19.
CappellaJ. N.StreetR. L. (1989). Message effects: Theory and research on mental models of messages. In BradacJ. (Ed.), Message effects in communication science (pp. 24-51). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
CheneyG.ChristensenL. T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
ClampittP. G. (2010). Communicating for managerial effectiveness: Problems, strategies, solutions (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (2008). Comparing apology to equivalent crisis response strategies: Clarifying apology’s role and value in crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 34, 252-257.
23.
DavisP. (2002). On apologies. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19, 169-173. doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00213
24.
FehrR.GelfandM. J. (2010). When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.obhp.2010.04.002
25.
GoffmanE. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York, NY: Basic Books.
26.
GriceP. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HearitK. M. (2006). Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
HoffmanM. F.FordD. J. (2010). Organizational rhetoric: Situations and strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
HorsleyJ. S.BarkerR. T. (2002). Toward a synthesis model for crisis communication in the public sector: An initial investigation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, 406-440. doi:10.1177/105065102236525
30.
JoyceR. (1999). Apologizing. Public Affairs Quarterly, 13, 159-173.
31.
KelleyD. L. (1998). The communication of forgiveness. Communication Studies, 49, 255-271. doi:10.1080/10510979809368535
32.
KelleyD. L.WaldronV. R. (2005). An investigation of forgiveness-seeking communication and relational outcomes. Communication Quarterly, 53, 339-358. doi:10.1080/01463370500101097
33.
KelleyD. L.WaldronV. R. (2006). Forgiveness: Communicative implications for social relationships. In BeckC. S. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 30 (pp. 303-341). Mahwah, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
LazareA. (2004). On apology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
LevineT. R.WeberR.HullettC.ParkH. S.LindseyL. L. M. (2008). A critical assessment of null hypothesis significance testing in quantitative communication research. Human Communication Research, 34, 171-187. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00317.x
36.
LockerK. O.KaczmarekS. K. (2010). Business communication: Building critical skills (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
37.
LockerK. O.KienzlerD. S. (2013). Business and administrative communication (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
38.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.BrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
39.
McCulloughM. E.RootL. M.TabakB.WitvlietC. v. O. (2009). Forgiveness. In LopezS. J. (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 427-435). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
41.
MorrealeS. P.PearsonJ. C. (2008). Why communication education is important: The centrality of the discipline in the 21st century. Communication Education, 57, 224-240. doi:10.1080/03634520701861713
42.
OberS. (2009). Contemporary business communication (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
43.
PatelA.ReinschL. (2003). Companies can apologize: Corporate apologies and legal liability. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 9-25.
44.
ScherS. J.DarleyJ. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 127-140.
45.
SearleJ. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46.
ShwomB.SnyderL. G. (2012). Business communication: Polishing your professional presence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
SmithN. (2005). The categorical apology. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36, 473-496.
48.
SmithN. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SmuddeP. M.CourtrightJ. L. (2011). A holistic approach to stakeholder management: A rhetorical foundation. Public Relations Review, 37, 137-144. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.01.008
50.
StevensB. (1999). Persuasion, probity, and paltering: The Prudential crisis. Journal of Business Communication, 36, 319-334.
51.
TabachnikB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
TavuchisN. (1991). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
53.
ThillJ. V.BovéeC. L. (2013). Excellence in business communication (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54.
TuckerS.TurnerN.BarlingJ.ReidE. M.ElvingC. (2006). Apologies and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 195-207. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3571-0
55.
TylerL. (1997). Liability means never being able to say you’re sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraint, and defensiveness in corporate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 51-73. doi:10.1177/0893318997111003
56.
UlmerR. R.SellnowT. L.SeegerM. W. (2007). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
WaldronV. R.KelleyD. L. (2005). Forgiving communication as a response to relational transgressions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 723-742. doi:10.1177/0265407505056445
58.
WareB. L.LinkugelW. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 273-283. doi:10.1080/00335637309383176
59.
WeickK. E. (2003). Positive organizing and organizational tragedy. In CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 66-80). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
60.
ZeithamlV. A.BerryL. L.ParasuramanA. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60, 31-46.
