Through the guidance of construal level theory, this paper tested a model in which supervisor computer-mediated immediate behaviors indirectly increased subordinates’ relational maintenance communication at work and decreased their self-censoring behaviors in the presence of their supervisor. The influence of supervisor computer-mediated immediate behaviors was mediated through the affective construal variable of job satisfaction and the psychological construal variable of perceived immediacy. Results indicate that even in the virtual workplace, strategic use of supervisor communicative behaviors can promote healthy workplace communication practices for subordinates.
AdamskaK. (2017). Self-censorship in organizations. In Bar-TalD.Nets-ZehngutR.SharvitK. (Eds.), Self-censorship in contexts of conflict: Theory and research (pp. 41–60). Springer International Publishing.
2.
AndrewsF. M.WitheyS. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. Plenum Press.
3.
BarryM. M.ClarkeA. M.PetersenR. J. (2019). Implementing mental health promotion. Springer.
4.
Bar-TalD. (2017). Self-censorship: The conceptual framework. In Bar-TalD.Nets-ZehngutR.SharvitK. (Eds.), Self-censorship in contexts of conflict: Theory and research (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing.
5.
BlauG. (1981). An empirical investigation of job stress, social support, service length, and job strain. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90050-7
6.
BurrisE. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0562
7.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
CanaryD. J.StaffordL. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
10.
CardonP. W.HuangY.PowerG. (2019). Leadership communication on internal digital platforms, emotional capital, and corporate performance: The case for leader-centric listening. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419828808
11.
CarreraP.FernándezI.MuñozD.CaballeroA. (2020). Using abstractness to confront challenges: How the abstract construal level increases people’s willingness to perform desirable but demanding actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 26(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000244
12.
ChickeringA. W.ReisserL. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
13.
CroucherS. M.KellyS.HuiC.RockerK. J.CullinaneJ.HomseyD.DingG. G.NguyenT.AndersonK. J.GreenM.AshwellD.WrightM.PalakshappaN. (2021). Articulated dissent and immediacy: A cross-national analysis of the effects of COVID-19 lockdowns. International Journal of Conflict Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2021-0062
14.
DaileyR. M.HampelA. D.RobertsJ. B. (2010). Relational maintenance in on-again/off-again relationships: An assessment of how relational maintenance, uncertainty, and commitment vary by relationship type and status. Communication Monographs, 77(1), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903514292
15.
DetertJ. R.EdmondsonA. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
16.
DindiaK. (2003). Definitions and perspectives on relational maintenance communication. In CannaryD. J.DaintonM. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
17.
FernándezI.CaballeroA.MuñozD.AguilarP.CarreraP. (2018). Abstract construal level and its link to self-control and to cross-situational consistency in self-concept: Predicting health-risk behavioral intentions. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, E47. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.43
18.
FiedlerK. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70015-3
Garro-AbarcaV.Palos-SanchezP.Aguayo-CamachoM. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 624637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637
21.
GaytanJ.KellyS.BrownW. S. (2021). Writing apprehension in the online classroom: The limits of instructor behaviors. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906211041088
22.
GokeR.KellyS. (2019). Developing presence. In KellyS. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication for business: Theory to practice (pp. 41–48). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
23.
GoldmanZ. W.GoodboyA. K. (2017). Explaining doctoral students’ relational maintenance with their advisor: A psychosocial development perspective. Communication Education, 66(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1202996
24.
HanG. H.JekelM. (2011). The mediating role of job satisfaction between leader-member exchange and turnover intentions. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01184.x
25.
HayesA. F.UldallB. R.GlynnC. J. (2010). Validating the willingness to self-censor scale II: Inhibition of opinion expression in a conversational setting. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.505503
26.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902
27.
HoughtonF. (2019). Geography, global pandemics & air travel: Faster, fuller, further & more frequent. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 12(3), 448–449. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jiph.2019.02.020
28.
JudgeT. A.WeissH. M.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D.HulinC. L. (2017). Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 356–374. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0000181
29.
JurczakL. P.ViolantiM. T. (2019). Geographically dispersed leadership. In KellyS. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication for business: Theory to practice (pp. 55–66). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
30.
KellyS. (2019). Writing emails. In KellyS. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication for business: Theory to practice (pp. 120–128). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
31.
KellyS.AutmanH. (2014). Effective computer-mediated business communication: Fostering immediacy. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 56(2), 48–58.
32.
KellyS.DryeS.WilliamsC. (2018). Business teacher immediacy and students’ affective learning: The mediating role of perceived immediacy. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 59(1), 12–24.
33.
KellyS.FallL. (2011). An investigation of computer-mediated instructional immediacy in online education: A comparison of graduate and undergraduate students’ motivation to learn. Journal of Advertising Education, 15(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/109804821101500107
34.
KellyS.GaytanJ. (2020). The effect of instructors’ immediate behaviors and clarity on student writing apprehension. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619868822
35.
KellyS.GrahamL.MacDonaldP.GokeR. (2018). Organizational citizenship behaviors as influenced by Supervisor communication: The role of solidarity and immediate behaviors. Business Communication Research and Practice, 1(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2018.1.2.61
36.
KellyS.KotowskiM.FallL. T. (2010). An examination of computer-mediated instructional immediacy: Scale development and validation [Paper presented]. National Communication Association: 96th Annual Convention.
37.
KellyS.MacDonaldP. (2019). A look at leadership styles and workplace solidarity communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416664176
38.
KellyS.RiceC.WyattB.DuckingJ.DentonZ. (2015). Teacher immediacy and decreased student quantitative reasoning anxiety: The mediating effect of perception. Communication Education, 64(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383
KellyS.WestermanC. Y. K. (2014). Immediacy as an influence on supervisor-subordinate communication. Communication Research Reports, 31(3), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.924335
41.
KellyS.WestermanD. (2020). Doing communication science: Thoughts on making more valid claims. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792789
42.
KellyS.WestermanD. K. (2016). New technologies and distributed learning systems. In WittP. L. (Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Communication and learning (Vol. 16, pp. 455–480). DeGruyter Mouton.
43.
KeytonJ.CaputoJ. M.FordE. A.FuR.LeibowitzS. A.LiuT.PolasikS. S.GhoshP.WuC. (2013). Investigating verbal workplace communication behaviors. Journal of Business Communication, 50(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612474990
44.
KimH.JohnD. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.006
45.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
46.
KoponenS.von BonsdorffM.InnanenH. (2016). Job satisfaction mediates the association between perceived leadership styles and early retirement intentions. Social Inquiry into Well-Being, 2(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.13165/SIIW-16-2-1-01
47.
LabrooA. A.PatrickV. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1086/593683
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
50.
MacDonaldP.KellyS.ChristenS. (2019). A path model of workplace solidarity, satisfaction, burnout, and motivation. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525467
51.
MadlockP. E.Booth-ButterfieldM. (2012). The influence of relational maintenance strategies among coworkers. Journal of Business Communication, 49(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943611425237
52.
MadsenV. T.VerhoevenJ. W. M. (2016). Self-censorship on internal social media: A case study of coworker communication behavior in a Danish bank. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(5), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2016.1220010
53.
MasonA. J.CarrC. T. (2021). Toward a theoretical framework of relational maintenance in computer-mediated communication. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa035
MishraP. K. (2013). Job satisfaction. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(5), 45–54.
58.
NappoN. (2020). Job stress and interpersonal relationships cross country evidence from the EU15: A correlation analysis. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1143–1211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09253-9
59.
NielsenL.HinrichsenC.MadsenK. R.NelausenM. K.MeilstrupC.KoyanagiA.KoushedeV.SantiniZ. I. (2021). Participation in social leisure activities may benefit mental health particularly among individuals that lack social connectedness at work or school. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 25, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-06-2021-0026
60.
NitschkeJ. P.ForbesP. A. G.AliN.CutlerJ.AppsM. A. J.LockwoodP. L.LammC. (2021). Resilience during uncertainty? Greater social connectedness during COVID-19 lockdown is associated with reduced distress and fatigue. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12485
61.
OzerM.ZhangG. (2021). Interpersonal relationships and creativity at work: A network building perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12575
62.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. Jossey-Bass Inc.
63.
RentschJ. R.SteelR. P. (1992). Construct and concurrent validation of the Andrews and Withey job satisfaction questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(2), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644920520020114
64.
RockerK. T.KellyS.CullinaneJ.CroucherS. M.AndersonK. (2021). Computer-mediated immediate behaviors and their impact on structural divergence in superior-subordinate relationships. Communication Research Reports, 38, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1974825
65.
RoyS. R. (2012). Digital mastery: The skills needed for effective virtual leadership. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 8(3), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.4018/jec.2012070104
66.
SearsL. E.ShiY.CoberleyC. R.PopeJ. E. (2013). Overall well-being as a predictor of health care, productivity, and retention outcomes in a large employer. Population Health Management, 16(6), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2012.0114
67.
ShiY.SearsL. E.CoberleyC. R.PopeJ. E. (2013). Classification of individual well-being scores for the determination of adverse health and productivity outcomes in employee populations. Population Health Management, 16(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2012.0039
68.
SmithP. C.KendallL. M.HulinC. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Rand McNally.
69.
StaffordL. (2003). Maintaining romantic relationships: Summary and analysis of one research program. In CannaryD. J.DaintonM. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 51–78). Cambridge University Press.
70.
StaffordL.CanaryD. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0265407591082004
71.
StaffordL.KlineS. L.DimmickJ. (1999). Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(4), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364515
72.
SzostekD. (2019). The impact of the quality of interpersonal relationships between employees on counterproductive work behavior: A study of employees in Poland. Sustainability, 11(21), 5916. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215916
73.
TimmingA. R.JohnstoneS. (2015). Employee silence and the authoritarian personality. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 23(1), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-06-2013-0685
74.
TropeY.LibermanN.WakslakC. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
75.
Van DroogenbroeckF.SpruytB.VanroelenC. (2014). Burnout among senior teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.005
76.
VarebergK. R.LuoZ.WestermanD.BartelsM.LindmarkP. (2020). For a good class, email: Technologically-mediated out-of-class communication and instructional outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 47(2020), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100761
77.
VarebergK. R.WestermanD. (2020). To: -) or to ☺, that is the question: A study of students’ initial impressions of instructors’ paralinguistic cues. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4501–4516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10181-9
78.
ViolantiM. T.KellyS. E.GarlandM. E.ChristenS. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Communication Studies, 69(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
79.
WaldronV. R.HuntM. D. (1992). Hierarchical level, length, and quality of supervisory relationship as predictors of subordinates’ use of maintenance tactics. Communication Reports, 5(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219209367550
80.
WaltherJ. B.BunzU. (2005). The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
81.
WoodS.Van VeldhovenM.CroonM.de MenezesL. M. (2012). Enriched job design, high involvement management and organizational performance: The mediating roles of job satisfaction and well-being. Human Relations, 65(4), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018726711432476
82.
ZengC. (2018). Employee dissent: A means to facilitate constructive conflicts in organizations. In CroucherS. M.Lewandowska-TomaszczykB.WilsonP. A. (Eds.), Conflict, mediated message, and group dynamics: The intersections of communication (pp. 67–80). Rowman & Littlefield.
83.
ZengC.KellyS.GokeR. (2020). Exploring the impacts of leader integrity and ethics on upward dissent and whistleblowing intentions. Communication Reports, 33(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1761413
