Group decision making in organizations represents an opportunity for group members to seek to exert social influence. Whining and bullying are examined as nonrational influence tactics used by individuals in groups. Both tactics are envisioned as forms of aggression, differing across a dominance—submissiveness continuum. The impact of whining and bullying as compliance gaining tactics for organizational group decision making is examined using 234 individuals whose jobs include group decision making in organizations. The use of bullying and whining tactics are positively correlated indicating dominance complementarity, with increases in one tactic being associated with increases in the other. In addition, bullying and whining are found to have negative effects on cohesiveness and group decision-making effectiveness.
BosterF. J.LevineT. (1988). Individual differences and compliance gaining message selection: The effects of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness, dogmatism, and negativism. Communication Research Reports, 5, 114-119. doi:10.1080/08824098809359811
2.
CameronK. A.CampoS.BrossardD. (2003). Advocating for controversial issues: The effect of activism on compliance-gaining strategy likelihood of use. Communication Studies, 54, 265-281. doi:10.1080/10510970309363286
3.
CartwrightD. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In CartwrightD.ZanderA. (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 91-109). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
4.
DeutschM.GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon social judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. doi:10.1037/h0046408
5.
ForsythD. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
GoodboyA. K.MartinM. M.KnightJ. M.LongZ. (2015). Creating the Boiler Room Environment The Job Demand-Control-Support Model as an Explanation for Workplace Bullying. Communication Research, 44, 1-20. doi: 0093650215614365.
7.
HenningsenD. D.BrazM. E.DaviesE. (2008). Why do we flirt? Flirting motivations and sex differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication, 45, 483-502. doi:10.1177/0021943608319390
8.
HenningsenD. D.HenningsenM. L. M. (2015). A preliminary examination of perceptions of group decision-making in the workplace. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 188-204. doi:10.1177/2329488414525448
9.
HenningsenD. D.HenningsenM. L. M.BoothP. (2013). Predicting social and personal attraction in task groups. Groupwork, 23, 73-93. doi:10.1921/gpwk.v23i1.758
10.
HenningsenD. D.HenningsenM. L. M.EdenJ.CruzM. G. (2006). Examining the symptoms of groupthink and retrospective sensemaking. Small Group Research, 37, 36-64. doi:10.1177/1046496405281772
11.
HenningsenM. L. M.HenningsenD. D.CruzM. G.MorrillJ. (2003). Social influence in groups: A comparative application of relational framing theory and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Communication Monographs, 70, 175-197. doi:10.1080/0363775032000167398
12.
HershcovisM. S.BarlingJ. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24-44. doi:10.1002/job.621
13.
HollanderE. P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 365-369. doi:10.1037/h0049199
14.
HunterJ. E.BosterF. J. (1987). A model of compliance-gaining message selection. Communications Monographs, 54, 63-84. doi:10.1080/03637758709390216
15.
KaplanM. F.MillerC. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.306
16.
KellermanK.ColeT. (1994), “Classifying Compliance Gaining Messages: Taxonomic Disorder and Strategic Confusion,” Communication Theory, 4, 3-60.
17.
KellermanK.SheaB. C. (2009). Threats, suggestions, hints, and promises: Gaining compliance efficiently and politely. Communication Quarterly, 44, 145-165. doi:10.1080/01463379609370007
18.
MarwellG.SchmittD. R. (1972). Cooperation and interpersonal risk: Cross-cultural and cross-procedural generalizations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 594-599. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(72)90081-9
19.
McWorthyL.HenningsenD. D. (2014). Looking at superior-subordinate relationships through dominance and affiliation lenses. International Journal of Business Communication, 51, 123-137. doi:10.1177/2329488414525195
20.
Parrish-SprowlJ.CarvethR.SenkM. (1994). The effect of compliance-gaining strategy choice and communicator style on sales success. Journal of Business Communication, 31, 291-310. doi:10.1177/002194369403100404
21.
Schenck-HamlinW. J.WisemanR. L.GeorgakarakosG. N. (1982). A model of properties of compliance gaining strategies. Communication Quarterly, 30, 92-100. doi:10.1080/01463378209369434
22.
TiedensL. Z.FragaleA. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558-568. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.558
23.
TiedensL. Z.UnzuetaM. M.YoungM. J. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 402-414. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.402
24.
ValdeK. S.HenningsenM. L. M. (2015). Facework in responding to unethical communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 369-403. doi:10.1080/01463378209369434
25.
WongE. M.OrmistonM. E.TetlockP. E. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1207-1228. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.0762
