This manuscript explores an organization’s listening environment as a mechanism used by employees to interpret organizational information and translate signals into meaning and relevance, culminating in identification with and commitment to the organization. Firmly grounded in theory and research from diverse academic literatures and research traditions, especially Social Learning Theory from Social Psychology, hypotheses are developed and then tested in a carefully designed study. Data collected from employees in a high-performing manufacturing organization offer an ideal setting for testing hypotheses, while holding other contextual variables constant. Statistical findings imply that employees who perceive work environments as being facilitative of interactive communication between and among employees respond with heightened attachments to organizations. The study’s results admonish scholars to include listening in future studies of business communication and organizational behavior, while managers are encouraged to assess the mechanisms their organizations use to facilitate an organizational listening climate at work.
AshforthB. E.HarrisonS. H.CorleyK. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374.
2.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BarronR. B.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
5.
BartelsJ.DouwesR.de JongM.PruynA. (2006). Organizational identification during a merger: Determinants of employees’ expected identification with the new organization. British Journal of Management, 17, s49–s67.
6.
BartelsJ.PruynA.de JongM.JoustraI. (2007). Multiple organizational identifications levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 173–190.
7.
BaruchY.HoltomB. C. (2008). Survey response rates and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1180.
8.
BodieG. D.JonesS. M. (2012). The nature of supportive listening, II: The role of verbal personal centeredness and nonverbal immediacy. Western Journal of Communications, 76, 250–269.
9.
BrownellJ. (1994). Creating strong listening environments: A key hospitality management task. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 6(3), 3–10.
10.
BrunnerB. R. (2008). Listening, communication, & trust: Practitioners’ perspectives of business/organizational relationships. International Journal of Listening, 22, 73–82.
11.
CalleroP. L. (1985). Role–identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 203–215.
12.
CarmeliA.GilatG.WeisbergJ. (2006). Perceived external prestige, organizational identity and affective commitment: A stakeholder approach. Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 92–104.
13.
ChatmanJ. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.
14.
ChurchillG. (1979). A paradigm for developing better marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.
15.
ColeM. S.BruchH. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationship to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 585–605.
16.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284–295.
17.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517–554.
18.
FlynnB. B.SchroederR. G.SakakibaraS. (1994). A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. Journal of Operations Management, 11, 339–366.
19.
FlynnJ.ValikoskiT. R.GrauJ. (2008). Listening in the business context: Reviewing the state of research. International Journal of Listening, 22, 141–151.
20.
GefenD.StraubD. W.BoudreauM. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1– 79.
21.
GilchristJ. A.van HoevenS. A. (1994). Listening as an organizational construct. Journal of the International Listening Association, 8, 6–30.
22.
GriffinR. W. (1983). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 184–203.
23.
GuzleyR. M. (1992). Organizational climate and communication climate: Predictors of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 379–402.
24.
HaasJ. W.ArnoldC. L. (1995). An examination of the role of listening in judgments of communication competence in co-workers. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 123–139.
25.
HaslamS. A.RyanM. K.PostmesR. S.JettenJ.WebleyP. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment of faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607–628.
26.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
27.
HelmsM. M.HaynesP. J. (1992). Are you really listening? The benefit of effective intra-organizational listening. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7(6), 17–21.
28.
HerrbachO. (2006). A matter of feeling? The affective tone of organizational commitment and identification. Journal of Organization Behavior, 27, 629–643.
29.
JacobsC.CoghlanD. (2005). Sound from silence: On listening in organizational learning. Human Relations, 58, 115–138.
30.
JohnstonM. K.ReedK.LawrenceK. (2011). Team Listening Environment (TLE) Scale: Development and validation. Journal of Business Communication, 48, 3–26.
31.
JosephN. I.RajendranC.KamalanabhanT. J.AnantharamanR. N. (1999). Organizational factors and total quality management: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 1337–1352.
32.
LevinD. M. (1989). The listening self: Personal growth, social change, and the closure of metaphysic. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
34.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
35.
MariqueG. M.StinglhamberF. (2011). Identification to proximal targets and affective organizational commitment: The mediation role of organizational identification. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 107–117.
36.
MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.
37.
MatthewsR. A.DiazW. M.ColeS. G. (2003). The organizational empowerment scale. Personnel Review, 32, 297–319.
38.
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.VanderbergheC. (2004). Employee commitment and motivations: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007.
39.
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.van DickR. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 665–683.
40.
MeyerJ. P.HerscovitchL. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 266–326.
41.
MowdayR. T. (1998). Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 387–401.
NakaraR. (2006). Relationship between communication satisfaction and organizational identification: An empirical study. Journal of Business Perspective, 10(2), 41–51.
44.
NeterJ.WassermanW.KutnerW. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Richard Irwin.
45.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
46.
ParkerC. P.BaltesB. B.YoungS. A.HuffJ. W.AltmannR. A.LacostH. A.RobertsJ. E. (2003). Relationship between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
48.
RikettaM.van DickR. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 490–510.
49.
RogersC. R.RothelisbergerF. J. (1952). Barriers and gateways to communication. Harvard Business Review, 30(4), 46–52.
50.
SmidtsA.PruynA. T. H.van RielC. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1051–1062.
51.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. C. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
52.
ThomasG. F.ZolinR.HartmanJ. L. (2009). The central role of communication in developing trust and its effect on employee involvement. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 287–310.
53.
TollerP. (2011). Bereaved parents’ experience of supportive and unsupportive communication. Southern Communication Journal, 76, 17–34.
54.
van DickR.BeckerT. E.MeyerJ. P. (2006). Commitment and identification: Forms, foci and future. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 545–548.
55.
van KippenbergD.SleebosE. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 517–584.
56.
van KippenbergD.van KippenbergB.MondenL.de LimaF. (2002). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233–252.
57.
van VuurenM.de JongM.SeydelE. (2007). Direct and indirect effects of supervisor communication on organizational commitment. Corporate Communications, 12, 116–128.
58.
WiesenfeldB. M.RaghuramS.GarudR. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organizational Science, 10, 777–790.
