Despite the political and economic importance of Arabic-speaking countries in the Middle East and Northern Africa, limited published research exists about how Arabic culture and language shape regional communication practices, particularly persuasion. This research describes key characteristics of Arabic persuasion by reviewing the extant research and analyzing the persuasion dynamics between a U.S. organization and a Jordanian organization attempting to form a service partnership. Both the literature and results from the case study indicate that Arabic persuasion strategies differ in fundamental ways from U.S. and Western strategies. Various forms of repetition, highly metaphoric language, and strong emotion characterize Arabic persuasion norms when using Arabic and English. These norms are created by the linguistic characteristics of Classical Arabic, the close connection between the Arabic language and Islam, and the social and political hierarchies that shape Arabic interaction.
AtiyehG. (1995). The book in the Islamic world: The written word and communication in the Middle East. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
AyishM. I. (1998). Communication research in the Arab world: A new perspective. The Public, 15, 33-57.
3.
BourdieuP. (1966). The sentiment of honor in Kabyle society. In PeristianyJ. (Ed.), Honor and shame: The values of Mediterranean society (pp. 191-241). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
DawoodN. J. (1990). The Koran. London, UK: Penguin.
5.
Du-BabcockB. (1999). Topic management and turn taking in professional communication: First versus second-language strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 544-574.
6.
Du-BabcockB. (2006). An analysis of topic management strategies and turn-taking behavior in the Hong Kong bilingual environment: The impact of culture and language use. Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 21-42.
7.
EckhouseB. (1999). Competitive communication: A rhetoric for modern business. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
FakhriA. (2004). Rhetorical properties of Arab research article introductions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1119-1138.
FergusonC. (1996). Diglossia. In HuebnerT. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives: Papers on language and society, 1959-1994/Charles Ferguson (pp. 25-39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
GershoniI.JankowskiJ. (1986). Egypt, Islam, and the Arabs: The search for Egyptian nationhood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
GreggG. S. (2005). The Middle East: A cultural psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
HaeriN. (2000). Form and ideology: Arabic sociolinguistics and beyond. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 61-87.
14.
HaeriN. (2003). Sacred language, ordinary people: Dilemmas of culture and politics in Egypt. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
15.
HittiP. K. (2002). History of the Arabs (10th ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
HuntE.AgnoliF. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98(3), 377-389.
17.
JohnstoneB. (1991). Repetition in Arab discourse: Paradigms, syntagms, and the ecology of language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
18.
JorgensenD. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
KamedaN. (1996). Business communication toward transnationalism: The significance of cross-cultural business English and its role. Tokyo, Japan: Kindainbungeishai.
20.
KhaliA. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students’ writing. System, 17(3), 359-371.
21.
KhuriF. (1990). Tents and pyramids: Games and ideology in Arab culture from backgammon to autocratic rule. London, UK: Saqi.
22.
KochB. J. (1983). The language of Arabic rhetoric. Anthropological Linguistics, 25(1), 47-60.
23.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LundgrenL. O. (1998). The technical communicator’s role in bridging the gap between Arab and American business. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 8(4), 335-344.
25.
NelsonK. (1985). The art of reciting the Quaran. Austin: University of Texas Press.
26.
PeristianyJ. (1966). Honor and shame: The values of Mediterranean society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
PerloffR. (2003). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
ReardonK. (1991). Persuasion in Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
RosenthalF. (1995). Of making books there is no end: The classical Muslim view. In AtiyehG. (Ed.), The book in the Islamic world: The written word and communication in the Middle East (pp. 33-55). Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
SaidE. (2002). Living in Arabic. Raritan, 21(4), 220-236.
31.
ShehuA. (2008). Intra Muslim conflicts: A linguistic representation. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 25(1), 1-19.
32.
SuleimanY. (2006). Charting the nation: Arabic and the politics of identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 125-148.
33.
SwalesJ. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
WhorfB. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writing of B. L. Whorf (CarrollJ. B., Ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
35.
ZaharnaR. S. (2009). An associative approach to intercultural communication competence in the Arab world. In DeardorffD. K. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 179-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
