Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

The Combined Quality Care Anterior Cruciate Ligament registry provides data for clinical research regarding primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

Purpose:

To explore the data with regard to the clinical outcomes between sexes after ACL reconstruction in a Dutch population.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Data involving patients diagnosed with an ACL tear and eligible for surgery were recorded. Isokinetic muscle strength, functional muscle performance, and anterior-posterior translation of the knee joint were documented preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, and Tegner rating scales during each examination using a web-based questionnaire.

Results:

Approximately 90% of ACL injuries occurred during sport activities. The mean (SD) age at surgery was 28 (11) years for both men and women, and the majority of patients were treated with hamstring tendon autografts (94%). Four percent received bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts, and 2% of the patients received other grafts. Preoperatively, the KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were significantly higher in males. Twelve months postoperatively, both sexes showed comparable isokinetic strength (P = .336), knee laxity (P = .680), and hop test for distance (P = .122) when comparing the injured with the uninjured side. Self-reported knee function was comparable between sexes as assessed by the KOOS (P = .202), Lysholm (P = .872), and Tegner (P = .767) questionnaires during the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusion:

One year after ACL surgery, all patients had improved greatly, showing only minor differences between sexes. The male group showed slightly better results when evaluating self-reported knee questionnaires. Comparable outcomes and knee function between sexes can therefore be presumed with patients who are treated with hamstring tendon autografts in a Dutch population.

Clinical Relevance:

These results can be used during the clinical evaluation of patients who are eligible for ACL reconstruction.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament clinical outcome sexes epidemiology

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears occur frequently among young athletes during activities that include pivot maneuvers.^5,30 Repeated loading could cause the ACL to fail suddenly under routine landing conditions, especially when muscle fatigue occurs.³⁰ Diagnosis of ACL tears relies on injury history, clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy.^11,15,31 The most common indication for reconstructive surgery is the desire of the athlete to return to sport, whereas the aim is to restore the mechanical stability of the knee. The primary goal is to achieve preinjury sport activity level and reduce the perception of instability in daily living.²⁷ However, only approximately 33% of patients will play a competitive sport at their preinjury level after ACL reconstruction, and only 67% will return to some form of sport participation at 12 months after surgery.⁶ The timing of return to unrestricted sport activity and how level of performance could be affected due to ACL surgery are still major issues within the rehabilitation process.⁵⁵ The most frequently used evaluation methods for return to sport are measurements of knee laxity, range of motion, isokinetic muscle strength, and functional tests such as the 1-legged hop test for distance.^38,39,49 In addition, self-reported questionnaires such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, and Tegner are used to evaluate subjective knee functionality when deciding to resume sport activities.^3,39,49 However, little is known about differences in clinical outcomes between males and females and whether sex differences influence rehabilitation. The majority of the studies focus on investigating risk factors that predict inferior outcomes between sexes. For instance, it is known that the incidence of ACL ruptures is higher in females because of anatomic factors such as the width of the intercondylar notch, as well as neuromuscular function, and physiological factors such as hormonal regulation.^14,46,50 Only a few studies^{1,14,17,44,49} have critically analyzed sex differences in clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction. To our knowledge, no studies have yet been conducted that evaluate possible differences between sexes at regular intervals during the first year after surgery. Our intention was not only to report on postoperative outcomes but also to report results of the course of recovery during the first year after ACL reconstruction. The primary aim of this study was to present pre- and postoperative measurements of patients who were eligible for primary ACL reconstruction with emphasis on differences between the sexes in a Dutch population. Patients were eligible for surgery when they were diagnosed with an ACL tear and experienced instability during daily living or sport activities. Furthermore, the secondary aim of this study is to report patient demographics and injury occurrence based on data collection from a relatively large cohort.

Methods

Research Design

A retrospective case series design was used to evaluate pre- and postoperative measurements of patients who were eligible for ACL reconstruction surgery. This study was approved by the medical ethical committee of Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Data Collection

This retrospective study included men and women who were eligible for arthroscopic ACL reconstructive surgery. Data for analysis were acquired by the first author (X.M.T.) from the Combined Quality Care (CQC) Anterior Cruciate Ligament registry. This web-based registry collects outcome scores of the patient during pre- and postoperative measurements. Each patient’s health record was divided into 3 components containing personal information, including screening, surgery, and clinical measurements. In the screening section, information regarding age, smoking, ethnicity, the mechanism of injury, and the activity during which the injury occurred was documented. An orthopaedic surgeon registered the surgical information such as graft selection and duration of the surgical procedure. Isokinetic strength and knee laxity measurements were performed preoperatively by (sport) physical therapists and were repeated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. Patients also completed the KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner questionnaires during each examination. The physical therapists who performed clinical measurements were required to attend special practical training courses provided by the CQC. During these courses, the therapists were taught the same techniques for all clinical measurements, thus enhancing intertester reliability and minimizing variability. All retrievable data were selected for analysis from patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between November 1, 2008, and February 28, 2013. A personal registration number was assigned to each patient for maintaining complete anonymity during data extraction.

Because of multiple measurements, there was a large group of patients who were not measured at all the intervals. Therefore, we chose to use and analyze all available data from each health record for evaluating preliminary results. ACL revisions could, however, not be identified separately in the register, and consequently, are included in the analyses of postoperative outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction. However, according to a recent systematic review, the expected revision rate after primary ACL reconstruction is approximately 5.8% at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.⁵⁸ Because of this relatively low incidence of revision, it can be presumed that inclusion of these patients may not bias the results.

Outcome Measures

Isokinetic Muscle Strength

Bilateral isokinetic strength of the thigh muscles was measured with the Biodex Dynamometer System 3 and 4 (Biodex Medical Systems Inc).²³ The patient was seated with the hip flexed to 90°. This position was maintained during the test by straps secured around the chest, hip, and thigh. To determine the height of the chair, the lateral femoral condyle was aligned with the rotational axis of the dynamometer. The arm of the dynamometer was secured to the tibia approximately 2 cm above the malleoli. The quadriceps and hamstring peak torques were measured in newton meters (N·m), with knee angle velocities at 60 deg/s (5 repetitions) and 180 deg/s (20 repetitions) where the noninvolved side was tested first. The rest period between the velocities was 45 seconds for preventing muscle fatigue. Before each test, the patient was instructed to perform 2 practice repetitions. A standardized protocol was used during measurements for enhancing reproducibility and consistency. The peak torque of the involved side was divided by the noninvolved side and multiplied by 100 for calculating the side-to-side difference in percentages. A negative value indicates a strength deficit of the involved side. Isokinetic strength was tested during all follow-up measurements. Strength testing within the first year after surgery has been examined previously and has shown to be reliable and safe when evaluating quadriceps and hamstring muscle recovery.^33,56

Knee Laxity Measurement

The instrumented KT-2000 knee arthrometer (MEDmetric Co) was used during the clinical examination for measuring the anterior-posterior (AP) translation at a knee angle of 30° using a force of 132 N.^22,26,40,47 The patient was placed in a supine position where the arthrometer was secured to the tibia using 2 straps.¹⁶ The instrument was calibrated to 0° before each displacement test. The noninvolved side was tested first and compared with the involved side, whereas side-to-side differences in millimeters were calculated.

One-Legged Hop for Distance

Functional muscle performance was tested using the 1-legged hop test for distance. Each subject performed 2 practice trials followed by 2 test trials. When the subject increased the distance of the second test trial, additional trials were performed until no improvement was seen. During each trial, patients were asked to maintain both hands on their lower back, and free swings of the contralateral leg were allowed. The uninvolved limb was tested first and the distance was measured in centimeters from the toe at the push-off line to the heel where the subject landed.^21,41 The limb symmetry index (LSI) score was calculated by dividing the result for the involved limb by that of the uninvolved limb and multiplied by 100. An LSI score of <90% is considered as abnormal and ≥90% as normal. Hop tests were not performed during the 3-month postoperative measurement because of the high likelihood of sustaining a second injury. The first postoperative evaluation of the 1-legged hop test was performed during the 6-month follow-up measurement, in accordance with the study of Gustavsson et al.²¹

Knee Rating Scale Scores

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to assess subjective knee function and consists of 5 different subscales: (1) pain, (2) symptoms, (3) function in daily living, (4) function in sport and recreation, and (5) knee-related quality of life. The score for each subscale was calculated, where 0 indicates severe knee problems and 100 indicates no knee problems. The KOOS questionnaire has been found to be useful and valid when evaluating clinical functionality after ACL reconstruction.⁴⁸ The Lysholm score was used for the evaluation of knee symptoms and functional impairments.^10,24,32,53 A score of 0 represents major disability or symptoms due to knee problems, and a score of 100 represents no limitations. The Tegner score was used for scoring a person’s activity level between 0 and 10, where 0 represents being on sick leave/disabled and 10 represents participation in competitive sports at the (inter)national elite level. The combination of Lysholm score and Tegner score has shown to be valid in the evaluation of the return of function after ACL reconstruction.¹³

Statistical Analyses

Demographic characteristics and baseline variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Means ± SDs are reported for continuous variables and median (range) for ordinal variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for testing normality of the variances. Differences between groups were analyzed using the independent t test for parametric continuous variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric continuous variables. The Pearson χ² was used for dichotomous variables. The total number of included patients in the analysis for each measurement was presented in the appropriate tables. Significance level was set at P < .05, and analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp).

Results

Demographics

A total of 375 surgical records were identified. A summary of demographics and baseline values are presented in Table 1. The mean age at surgery was 28 ± 10 years for male patients and 28 ± 11 years for female patients, and the mean duration of surgery was 61.5 ± 23 minutes for men and 59.7 ± 19 minutes for women. The percentage of active smokers was significantly higher (P = .019) among men (24%) than among women (14%). The majority of the study population was white (93%). No significant differences were found in ethnicity between sexes (P = .333). The majority of the patients received hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (94%), 4% received bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autografts, and 2% received other grafts. No significant differences were noted between sexes when evaluating the prevalence of HT (P = .296) and BPTB (P = .427) autografts. The most common activity of injury occurrence was sports participation (89%) or daily activities (6%).

TABLE 1

Demographic Characteristics and Baseline Epidemiology ^a

	All	Males	Females	P Value
No. of patients	375 (100)	222 (59.2)	153 (40.8)	—
Age, y, mean ± SD	28 ± 10	28 ± 10	28 ± 11	.956
Smoker:nonsmoker, n	76:299	54:168	22:131	.019
Ethnicity
White	347 (93)	203 (92)	144 (94)	.333
Black	7 (2)	7 (3)	—	—
Asian	9 (2)	5 (2)	4 (3)	.822
Other	12 (3)	7 (3)	5 (3)	.950
Activity at injury
ADL	23 (6)	16 (7)	7 (5)	296
Sports	333 (89)	193 (87)	140 (91)	.168
Other	19 (5)	13 (6)	6 (4)	.401
Duration of surgery, min, mean ± SD	60.8 ± 21	61.5 ± 23	59.7 ± 19	.551
Graft selection
HT	352 (94)	206 (93)	146 (96)	.296
BPTB	16 (4)	11 (5)	5 (3)	.427
Other	7 (2)	5 (2)	2 (1)	.506

^a Values are expressed as frequencies (%) unless otherwise indicated. P value in boldface indicates statistical significance (P < .05). ADL, activities of daily living; BPTB, bone–patellar tendon–bone; HT, hamstring tendon.

Isokinetic Muscle Strength

Isokinetic thigh muscle strength measurements were retrieved for 624 patients (61% male, 39% female). The pre- and postoperative side-to-side strength deficits are presented in Table 2. Significant differences were noted between sexes when evaluating quadriceps peak torque at 180 deg/s preoperative (P = .016) and 3 months postoperative (P = .010). No statistical differences in side-to-side strength deficits were found 12 months after surgery when comparing quadriceps peak torque at 60 deg/s (P = .621) and 180 deg/s (P = .336) and hamstring peak torque at 60 deg/s (P = .632) and 180 deg/s (P = .416).

TABLE 2

Isokinetic Strength, Quadriceps and Hamstrings ^a

	Speed of Movement, deg/s	All (N = 624)		Males (n = 382)		Females (n = 242)		P Value
	Speed of Movement, deg/s	%	No. of Patients	%	No. of Patients	%	No. of Patients	P Value
Preoperative
Quadriceps peak torque	60	–19 ± 19	249	–18 ± 18	156	–20 ± 19	93	.202
	180	–12 ± 17	261	–10 ± 16	162	–15 ± 17	99	.016
Hamstring peak torque	60	–10 ± 19	249	–7 ± 19	156	–13 ± 18	93	.038
	180	–4 ± 18	261	–3 ± 17	162	–7 ± 19	99	.108
3 months postoperative
Quadriceps peak torque	60	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b
	180	–25 ± 16	289	–23 ± 16	180	–28 ± 15	109	.010
Hamstring peak torque	60	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b	— ^b
	180	–17 ± 17	289	–16 ± 18	180	–19 ± 16	109	.144
6 months postoperative
Quadriceps peak torque	60	–19 ± 15	211	–20 ± 17	117	–18 ± 13	76	.558
	180	–14 ± 14	193	–12 ± 12	125	–16 ± 15	86	.159
Hamstring peak torque	60	–14 ± 16	211	–13 ± 17	117	–16 ± 14	76	.063
	180	–10 ± 14	193	–8 ± 14	125	–13 ± 13	86	.015
9 months postoperative
Quadriceps peak torque	60	–13 ± 15	125	–13 ± 16	79	–12 ± 14	46	.621
	180	–10 ± 15	129	–9 ± 16	81	–11 ± 14	48	.796
Hamstring peak torque	60	–11 ± 14	125	–11 ± 14	79	–11 ± 14	46	.344
	180	–9 ± 17	129	–9 ± 19	81	–9 ± 14	48	.764
12 months postoperative
Quadriceps peak torque	60	–14 ± 18	96	–13 ± 16	59	–15 ± 21	37	.795
	180	–8 ± 15	97	–7 ± 17	60	–10 ± 13	37	.336
Hamstring peak torque	60	–11 ± 15	96	–10 ± 14	59	–13 ± 15	37	.632
	180	–8 ± 14	97	–7 ± 14	60	–8 ± 14	37	.416

^a Strength deficits are reported in percentages as mean ± SD. Negative values indicate a strength deficit of the involved side compared with the noninvolved side. Boldfaced values indicate statistically significant differences between male and female patients (P < .05).

^b Test was not performed because of graft healing.

Knee Laxity

Knee laxity measurements were available for 493 patients (65% male, 35% female). The mean difference in AP translation of the knee joint was 3.9 mm preoperative and 1.8 mm postoperative when comparing the involved and noninvolved sides. We found no statistically significant differences between sexes in mean side-to-side differences during preoperative (P = .903) and postoperative (P = .680) measurements (Table 3). In addition, 26 of the 99 female patients (26%) and 35 of the 123 male patients (29%) had >3 mm side-to-side difference during postoperative measurements (P = .716).

TABLE 3

Knee Laxity ^a

	All (N = 493)		Males (n = 322)		Females (n = 171)		P Value
	Side-to-Side Difference, mm	No. of Patients	Side-to-Side Difference, mm	No. of Patients	Side-to-Side Difference, mm	No. of Patients	P Value
Preoperative	3.9 ± 3	456	3.9 ± 3	305	3.9 ± 3	151	.903
Postoperative	1.8 ± 2	222	1.7 ± 2	123	2.0 ± 2	99	.680

^a Values are reported as mean ± SD.

One-Legged Hop Test for Distance

One-legged hop test data were available for 529 patients (58% male, 42% female). The LSI score of the pre- and postoperative measurements is presented in Figure 1. Preoperative, 6-, 9-, and 12-month measurements were available for 295 (59% male, 41% female), 217 (53% male, 47% female), 138 (62% male, 38% female), and 64 (63% male, 37% female) patients, respectively.

Figure 1.

Mean limb symmetry index scores.

Knee Rating Scale Scores

Lysholm scores were available for 1052 patients (62% male, 38% female), Tegner scores were available for 790 patients (65% male, 35% female), and KOOS scores were available for 790 patients (64% male, 36% female). The mean scores for the Lysholm, Tegner, and KOOS questionnaires during all measurements are presented in Figures 2, 3, and 4, respectively. During the first 9 months, there were some minor differences between the sexes, where male patients tended to present higher outcome scores on the self-reported questionnaires. However, at 12 months after surgery, there were no differences between sexes in the KOOS (P = .202), Lysholm (P = .872), and Tegner scores (P = .767).

Figure 2.

Mean Lysholm scores. Boldfaced P values indicate statistical significance.

Figure 3.

Mean Tegner scores. Boldfaced P values indicate statistical significance.

Figure 4.

Mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for subscales (A) symptoms, (B) pain, (C) daily living, (D) sport/recreation, and (E) quality of life. Boldfaced P values indicate statistical significance.

Discussion

The CQC Anterior Cruciate Ligament registry provides epidemiological data of patients who were eligible and underwent primary ACL reconstructive surgery. The general conclusion of the present study is that 12 months after surgery, no significant differences were noted between sexes when evaluating isokinetic strength, knee laxity, 1-legged hop test for distance, and subjective knee function as measured by the KOOS, Tegner, and Lysholm questionnaires. These findings are in accordance with previous results.³ However, this study differs from previous studies because, to our knowledge, no detailed results have yet been reported of clinical measurements that were obtained from a large cohort at regular intervals during the rehabilitation phase (<1 year). The aim of this study was not only to present results using the most commonly used health questionnaires but also to present overall scores of objective measurements such as isokinetic strength, knee laxity, and hop tests. The results of this study can be used during the rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction to evaluate overall knee function. These clinical measurements allow surgeons to monitor the health status of the patient more adequately. Significant differences were found between sexes during several intervals within the first 9 months after surgery when evaluating the KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner questionnaires. These results indicate a higher subjective knee function of male patients, and this should be taken into account.

In terms of demographics such as age, ethnicity, and graft choice, both groups were comparable. In this study, the mean age at ACL reconstruction was 28 years, and 59.2% were male. The ratio of male to female corresponds to a Scandinavian registry (Danish 60%, Swedish 57.5%, and Norwegian 57.5%)^2,19,29 and a community-based registry in the United States (63.6%).³⁵

The mean age of patients in the Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, and US registries (25, 30, 27, and 29.5 years, respectively) is comparable with our results (mean ± SD, 28 ± 10 years). We would like to emphasize that when comparing sex differences after ACL reconstruction, age differences could cause bias presuming that younger athletes have a different desire to return to sports compared with relatively older athletes.

When analyzing results from previous studies it appears that the incidence of ACL tears is higher in female patients. However there has been very little published comparing the surgical success between the sexes.^20,25 Barber-Westin et al⁹ and Ferrari et al¹⁷ both analyzed objective measurements and subjective assessment of knee symptoms between men and women undergoing ACL reconstructive surgery and showed no statistical or clinical differences in their outcome analysis. These findings are in accordance with our results, although both studies differed from ours in several aspects. Barber-Westin et al⁹ and Ferrari et al¹⁷ included patients only with BPTB grafts. Our study included all patients who underwent ACL surgery for outcome score analysis. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical measurements preoperatively and during relatively short intervals after surgery to detect possible differences between the sexes. Barber-Westin et al⁹ and Ferrari et al¹⁷ used longer follow-up intervals but included fewer patients in their analyses. An important feature of this study is that the analysis not only included objective measurements such as isokinetic strength, knee laxity, and functional muscle performance but also used subjective evaluation of knee function as measured by the KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner score. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome scores that are currently used by some orthopaedic surgeons as return-to-sports criteria. To our knowledge, such detailed results from large numbers of measurements performed within the first year after surgery are not described in the present literature. This study presents results regarding the most commonly used measurements after ACL reconstructive surgery; the conclusions can then be used by physical therapists in clinical practices and orthopaedic surgeons when deciding whether the patient can return to sport.

In this study, 94% of reconstructions were performed using an HT autograft. Superior results were found for the HT grafts in clinical functionality during the rehabilitation. According to a recently published Cochrane review by Mohtadi et al,³⁷ there are no significant differences in static stability measurements, clinical outcome scores, range of motion, and isokinetic strength between BPTB and HT grafts. However, the general incidence of anterior knee symptomatology was significantly greater (rate ratio [RR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.05-2.01) in the BPTB group. Kneeling discomfort occurrence was also almost 4.5 times greater (RR, 4.46; 95% CI, 2.97-6.69) in the BPTB group, resulting in inferior results compared with HT grafts when evaluating knee-associated symptoms. The same authors reported that patients with HT grafts are less likely to develop anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and patellofemoral problems during the rehabilitation phase. There are, however, differences between HT and PT grafts in terms of revision rate. Previous studies reported a higher revision rate (>1.8 RR) for HT grafts after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and ethnicity.^34,45 A possible cause for this increased risk is the difference in fixation methods and fixation devices that have been introduced for HT grafts that have evolved in the past few years.⁴⁵ Future randomized controlled studies should address differences between fixation methods for the graft types to support this hypothesis.

For return-to-sport activities, surgeons mostly rely on static laxity tests¹⁸; physical indicators, including the thigh muscle circumference and range of motion; and the thigh muscle peak torque.⁵⁴ Lephart et al²⁸ reported that isokinetic strength tests alone could not appropriately evaluate a patient’s ability to return to sport because peak torque has no direct correlation with functional performance. Barber et al⁷ reported that the single-leg hop test and single-leg vertical jump test are more reliable tools than the isokinetic strength measurements for assessing functional recovery after ACL reconstruction. Assessment of return to sports depends on various factors such as muscle strength, neuromuscular control, psychosocial factors,^4,36,52 and knee laxity.^12,18 We believe that all these factors should be measured before allowing the athlete to resume sports activities. We therefore advise physicians to use multiple measurements when deciding to resume sports activities. Barber-Westin and Noyes⁸ have suggested the following tests as criteria for returning to sport activities: less than 10% deficit in strength of the quadriceps/hamstrings and in single-leg hop testing (normal LSI score), less than 3-mm difference in AP translation between the reconstructed and healthy knee, no effusion or reactive knee, and a full range of motion. Based on our findings, we support this algorithm for preventing reinjury when deciding to return to unrestricted sports activities in a Dutch population. Besides these physical indicators of recovery, psychosocial aspects are also of significant value to achieve a successful outcome. It is important to understand and address factors such as cognition and behavior, which are related to the rehabilitation process and thus influence the final outcome after ACL reconstruction.⁵²

Increased knee laxity is suggested to be a risk factor for ACL injury⁵¹ and should be taken into consideration during the evaluation of return to sports. Also, surgical success is often defined by evaluating side-to-side differences in AP knee laxity.⁴⁴ The most commonly used threshold for defining arthrometric failure of the reconstructed ACL graft is 3 to 5 mm of side-to-side difference, and this is widely accepted.⁴⁴ In the present study, there were no significant differences (P = .903) between sexes in knee laxity during the preoperative measurement. When evaluating the postoperative knee laxity, there were minor differences between men (1.7 ± 2.9 mm) and women (2.0 ± 2.4 mm), indicating a slightly greater AP knee translation in female patients. However, these differences were not significant (P = .680). A recent published systematic review⁴⁴ reported that females who undergo ACL reconstruction using hamstring grafts demonstrate increased AP knee laxity over time compared with males undergoing the same procedure. A possible explanation for this difference in comparison with our findings is the relatively short follow-up measurements of this study. Therefore, we strongly suggest the implementation of a national Dutch registry for monitoring the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction with longer follow-up intervals. The risk of sustaining a second ACL injury is highest during the first year after return to sports,^42,43,57 and differences between sexes should be emphasized more in future research for reducing injury incidence. Based on the results of previously published studies, it can be presumed that a nationwide ACL registry is of major value for deciding when to return to sport activities based on clear objective outcome parameters. Large cohorts are valuable for identifying possible risk and prognostic factors for superior functional outcomes after ACL reconstructive surgery.

Limitations

An important limitation of this study is a possible bias due to a large drop out in the follow-up. The patients in our study who were followed in the web-based registry lived in several regions within the Netherlands. A relatively large number of these patients were unable to attend all the follow-up measurements due to demographic considerations. Second, not all measurements were reimbursed by the patient’s health insurance, thus negatively influencing compliance of patients. Therefore, only a limited set of data could be retained and used for analysis. Due to these practical limitations, we focused on reporting descriptive statistics whereas the analyses were mainly exploratory. Another limitation of this study is the relatively short follow-up period compared with other national registries. The Dutch Combined Quality Care ACL registry has follow-ups at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. In Denmark, these follow-ups are done at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. In Norway, they are done at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively, and in Sweden, they are done at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.² Long-term effects (>1 year) of ACL reconstructive surgery regarding clinical outcomes could therefore not be evaluated and compared with other registries. However, the follow-up of these Scandinavian registries mainly included questionnaires and not objective functional outcomes such as isokinetic strength, knee laxity, and hop tests. Our aim was not only to report on self-reported questionnaires but also to present clinical results of the commonly used objective measurements after ACL reconstruction.

Conclusion

Twelve months after ACL reconstruction surgery, there were no statistically significant differences between men and women in isokinetic muscle strength deficits, knee laxity, and hop test for distance when comparing with the contralateral limb. In addition, no differences were found 12 months after surgery for KOOS, Lysholm, and Tegner scores. However, during the first 9 months after ACL surgery, men showed slightly superior results in the evaluation of isokinetic strength and subjective knee questionnaires. However, the clinical relevance of our findings in relation to function and timing of return to sports after ACL reconstructive surgery requires further investigation.

Footnotes

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: This study was funded by the ONVZ Dutch health insurance company. The company does not benefit from the presented results and was not involved in the professional judgment of the contributors. Direct financial support (a 15,000 Euro grant) was given as compensation for hours worked by the contributors. This was a one-time grant for performing the analysis and writing the manuscript. The intention of ONVZ for supporting this study was the desire to gain a clear insight into the functional status of a large group of patients after anterior cruciate ligament surgery in a Dutch population.

Acknowledgment

This project was funded by a grant from ONVZ, for which the authors are extremely grateful. The authors thank Combined Quality Care for allowing them to use the data from their database. The authors also thank J.J. Caron, MD; C.H. Geerdink, MD, PhD; T. Sijbesma, MD, PhD; H.M. Schuller, MD, PhD; R. Krips, MD, PhD; E. Raven, MD; and J.A.C. Zijl, MD, who provided data for the registry.

References

Ageberg

Forssblad

Herbertsson

Roos

. Sex differences in patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish knee ligament register. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1334–1342.

Ahlden

Samuelsson

Sernert

Forssblad

Karlsson

Kartus

. The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2230–2235.

Ahlden

Sernert

Karlsson

Kartus

. Outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with emphasis on sex-related differences. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22:618–626.

Ardern

Taylor

Feller

Webster

. Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:488–495.

Ardern

Webster

Taylor

Feller

. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:596–606.

Ardern

Webster

Taylor

Feller

. Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:538–543.

Barber

Noyes

Mangine

DeMaio

. Rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: function testing. Orthopedics. 1992;15:969–974.

Barber-Westin

Noyes

. Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1697–1705.

Barber-Westin

Noyes

Andrews

. A rigorous comparison between the sexes of results and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:514–526.

10.

Bengtsson

Mollborg

Werner

. A study for testing the sensitivity and reliability of the Lysholm knee scoring scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4:27–31.

11.

Benjaminse

Gokeler

van der Schans

. Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:267–288.

12.

Branch

Mayr

Browne

Campbell

Stoehr

Jacobs

. Instrumented examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: minimizing flaws of the manual clinical examination. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:997–1004.

13.

Briggs

Lysholm

Tegner

Rodkey

Kocher

Steadman

. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:890–897.

14.

Chandrashekar

Slauterbeck

Hashemi

. Sex-based differences in the anthropometric characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relation to intercondylar notch geometry: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1492–1498.

15.

Crawford

Walley

Bridgman

Maffulli

. Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2007;84:5–23.

16.

Daniel

Stone

Sachs

Malcom

. Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:401–407.

17.

Ferrari

Bach

Jr Bush-Joseph

Wang

Bojchuk

. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in men and women: an outcome analysis comparing gender. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:588–596.

18.

Giove

Miller

SJ 3rd

Kent

Sanford

Garrick

. Non-operative treatment of the torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:184–192.

19.

Granan

Inacio

Maletis

Funahashi

Engebretsen

. Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry comparison between Norway and the USA. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:577–582.

20.

Gray

Taunton

McKenzie

Clement

McConkey

Davidson

. A survey of injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in female basketball players. Int J Sports Med. 1985;6:314–316.

21.

Gustavsson

Neeter

Thomeé

. A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:778–788.

22.

Hanten

Pace

. Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer. Phys Ther. 1987;67:357–359.

23.

Hole

Smit

Hammond

Kumar

Saxton

Cochrane

. Dynamic control and conventional strength ratios of the quadriceps and hamstrings in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Ergonomics. 2000;43:1603–1609.

24.

Hrubesch

Rangger

Reichkendler

Sailer

Gloetzer

Eibl

. Comparison of score evaluations and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:850–856.

25.

Hutchinson

Ireland

. Knee injuries in female athletes. Sports Med. 1995;19:288–302.

26.

Khan

Lie

Cashman

Thomas

Amis

. Measurement of laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: a comparison of three different methods in vitro. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221:653–663.

27.

Lam

Fong

Yung

Chan

. Knee stability assessment on anterior cruciate ligament injury: clinical and biomechanical approaches. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1:20.

28.

Lephart

Perrin

Gieck

McCue

Irrgang

. Relationship between selected physical characteristics and functional capacity in the anterior cruciate ligament-insufficient athlete. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16:174–181.

29.

Lind

Menhert

Pedersen

. Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1551–1557.

30.

Lipps

Wojtys

Ashton-Miller

. Anterior cruciate ligament fatigue failures in knees subjected to repeated simulated pivot landings. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1058–1066.

31.

Lubowitz

Bernardini

Reid

3rd . Current concepts review: comprehensive physical examination for instability of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:577–594.

32.

Lysholm

Gillquist

. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150–154.

33.

Majima

Yasuda

Tago

Tanabe

Minami

. Rehabilitation after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;(397):370–380.

34.

Maletis

Inacio

Desmond

Funahashi

. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revision. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:623–628.

35.

Maletis

Inacio

Funahashi

. Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2090–2098.

36.

McCullough

Phelps

Spindler

. Return to high school- and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:2523–2529.

37.

Mohtadi

Chan

Dainty

Whelan

. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005960.

38.

Moisala

Jarvela

Kannus

Jarvinen

. Muscle strength evaluations after ACL reconstruction. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28:868–872.

39.

Moller

Weidenhielm

Werner

. Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:786–794.

40.

Myrer

Schulthies

Fellingham

. Relative and absolute reliability of the KT-2000 arthrometer for uninjured knees. Testing at 67, 89, 134, and 178 N and manual maximum forces. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:104–108.

41.

Neeter

Gustavsson

Thomeé

Augustsson

Thomeé

Karlsson

. Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:571–580.

42.

Paterno

Ford

Myer

Heyl

Hewett

. Limb asymmetries in landing and jumping 2 years following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17:258–262.

43.

Paterno

Schmitt

Ford

. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1968–1978.

44.

Paterno

Weed

Hewett

. A between-sex comparison of anterior-posterior knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstrings autograft: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42:135–152.

45.

Persson

Fjeldsgaard

Gjertsen

. Increased risk of revision with hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 12,643 patients from the Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry, 2004-2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:285–291.

46.

Prodromos

Han

Rogowski

Joyce

Shi

. A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1320.e6–1325.e6.

47.

Pugh

Mascarenhas

Arneja

Chin

Leith

. Current concepts in instrumented knee-laxity testing. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:199–210.

48.

Roos

Lohmander

Ekdahl

Beynnon

. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88–96.

49.

Salmon

Refshauge

Russell

Roe

Linklater

Pinczewski

. Gender differences in outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:621–629.

50.

Söderman

Alfredson

Pietilä

Werner

. Risk factors for leg injuries in female soccer players: a prospective investigation during one out-door season. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:313–321.

51.

Tagesson

Witvrouw

Kvist

. Differences in knee joint stabilization between children and adults and between the sexes. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:678–683.

52.

Te Wierike

van der Sluis

van den Akker-Scheek

Elferink-Gemser

Visscher

. Psychosocial factors influencing the recovery of athletes with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23:527–540.

53.

Tegner

Lysholm

. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(198):43–49.

54.

Walla

Albright

McAuley

Martin

Eldridge

El-Khoury

. Hamstring control and the unstable anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13:34–39.

55.

Warner

Smith

Wright

Matava

Brophy

. Sport-specific outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:1129–1134.

56.

Wells

Dyke

Albaugh

Ganley

. Adolescent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of quadriceps strength recovery and return to full activity after surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:486–489.

57.

White

Di Stasi

Smith

Snyder-Mackler

. Anterior cruciate ligament–specialized post-operative return-to-sports (ACL-SPORTS) training: a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:108.

58.

Wright

Gill

Chen

. Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:531–536.

Impact of Patient Sex on Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Background:

Purpose:

Study Design:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Clinical Relevance:

Keywords

Methods

Research Design

Data Collection

Outcome Measures

Isokinetic Muscle Strength

Knee Laxity Measurement

One-Legged Hop for Distance

Knee Rating Scale Scores

Statistical Analyses

Results

Demographics

Isokinetic Muscle Strength

Knee Laxity

One-Legged Hop Test for Distance

Knee Rating Scale Scores

Discussion

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgment

References