BaileyTSGrunbergerGBodeBW. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology 2016 outpatient glucose monitoring consensus statement. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(2):231-261.
2.
CerielloABarkaiLChristiansenJS. Diabetes as a case study of chronic disease management with a personalized approach: the role of a structured feedback loop. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(1):5-10.
3.
GeePMGreenwoodDAPaternitiDAWardDMillerLM.The eHealth enhanced chronic care model: a theory derivation approach. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e86.
4.
GreenwoodD.Better type 2 diabetes self-management using paired testing and remote monitoring. Am J Nurs. 2015;115(2):58-65.
5.
GreenwoodDABlozisSAYoungHMNesbittTSQuinnCC.Overcoming clinical inertia: a randomized clinical trial of a telehealth remote monitoring intervention using paired glucose testing in adults with type 2 diabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e178.
6.
GreenwoodDAQuinnCYoungHM.Telehealth remote monitoring systematic review: structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and impact on A1C. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8(2):378-389.
7.
KlonoffDCBlondeLCembrowskiG. Consensus report: the current role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5(6):1529-1548.
8.
ParkinCGBuskirkAHinnenDAAxel-SchweitzerM.Results that matter: structured vs. unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;97(1):6-15.
9.
PolonskyWHFisherLSchikmanCH. A structured self-monitoring of blood glucose approach in type 2 diabetes encourages more frequent, intensive, and effective physician interventions: results from the STeP study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(8):797-802.
10.
SchnellOAlawiHBattelinoT. Addressing schemes of self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: a European perspective and expert recommendation.” Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13(9):959-965.
