This study investigates the role of an employee’s age on the development of PsyCap through moderated mediation analysis. It extends by exploring various work characteristics, such as job resource (transformational leadership) and cognitive resource (meaningful work), in the motivational process of the job demand–resource model of psychological capital (PsyCap) at work. The sample of 350 IT/ITeS employees recruited using a purposive sampling technique belonged to major IT hubs in India. The results disconfirm the moderated mediation of an employee’s age on PsyCap; however, it emerges as a statistically significant moderator influencing perceptions of transformational leadership at work culminating into PsyCap. Cognitive resource of meaningful work also emerges as a crucial mediator in the relationship between transformational leadership and PsyCap. The novelty of the finding is attributed to the fact that an increase in age may not always promise increased maturity and ability to draw meaningful inferences, yet it may radically shift perceptions of various job resources and, consequently, hopefulness, optimism, resilience and efficacy related to their organisation. It broadens the scope of organisational literature by conjecturing the developmental perspective to the shift in the importance of different resources over time.
AntonakisJ. (2012). Transformational and charismatic leadership. InDayD. D. & AntonakisJ.(Eds.), The nature of leadership (2nd ed., pp. 256–288). Sage Publications.
2.
AntonyR., KhanapuriV. B., & JainK. (2018). Customer expectations and moderating role of demographics in fresh food retail: A study among Indian consumers. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46(9), 870–890. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJRDM-05-2017-0104
3.
ArnoldK. A., TurnerN., BarlingJ., KellowayE. K., & McKeeM. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193–203. https://doi.org.10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.193
4.
AvolioB. J. (2004). Examining the full range model of leadership: Looking back to transform forward. InDayD. V., ZaccaroS. J. & HalpinS. M.(Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations: Growing leaders for tomorrow (pp. 71–98). Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
BakH. U., JinM. H., & McDonaldB. D. (2022). Unpacking the transformational leadership-innovative work behavior relationship: The mediating role of psychological capital. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(1), 80–105. https://doi.org.10.1080/15309576.2021.1939737
6.
BakkerA. B., & DemeroutiE. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
7.
BergJ. M., DuttonJ. E., & WrzesniewskiA. (2013). Job crafting and meaningful work. InDikB. J., ByrneZ. S., & StegerM. F.(Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 81–104). American Psychological Association.
8.
BhatnagarJ., & AggarwalP. (2020). Meaningful work as a mediator between perceived organizational support for environment and employee eco-initiatives, psychological capital and alienation. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(6), 1487–1511. https://doi.org.10.1108/ER-04-2019-0187
9.
CaiW., LysovaE. I., KhapovaS. N., & BossinkB. A. G. (2018). Servant leadership and innovative work behavior in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model of meaningful work and job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(October), 1767. https://doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01767
10.
ChangS. J., Van WitteloostuijnA., & EdenL. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(February). https://doi.org.10.1057/jibs.2009.88
11.
ChristensenJ., AarøeL., BaekgaardM., HerdP., & MoynihanD. P. (2020). Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizen-state interactions. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 127–136. https://doi.org.10.1111/puar.13134
12.
DahiyaR., & RangnekarS. (2019). Relationship between forgiveness at work and positive affect: The role of age as a moderator. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 5(3), 247–268. https://doi.org.10.1504/IJEWE.2019.103399
13.
DesaiN., & PatelV. (2018). Demographic moderators in the relationship between positive behavior and performance: A study from India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(1), 76–89.
14.
Dobrow RizaS., GanzachY., & LiuY. (2018). Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2558–2579. https://doi.org.10.1177/0149206315624962
15.
EdgarF., & GeareA. (2004). Employee demographics in human resource management research. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 12(1), 61–91.
16.
FriederR. E., WangG., & OhI. S. (2018). Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 324–333. https://doi.org.10.1037/apl0000274
17.
FroidevauxA., AltermanV., & WangM. (2020). Leveraging aging workforce and age diversity to achieve organizational goals: A human resource management perspective. Current and Emerging Trends in Aging and Work, 33–58. https://doi.org.10.1007/978-3-030-24135-3_3
18.
GargP., HanK. S., & MalikP. (2021). Exploring the nexus between job design and work engagement: mediating role of meaning in work. International Journal of Business Excellence, 23(3), 389–414.
19.
GhadiM. Y. (2017). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and intention to quit: A sequential mediation model of meaning in work and work engagement. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 27(1), 145–164.
20.
GroblerA., & JoubertY. T. (2018). Psychological capital: Convergent and discriminant validity of a reconfigured measure. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(10), 1–14. https://doi.org.10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1715
21.
HanS. H., OhE. G., & KangS. Pil. (2020). The link between transformational leadership and work-related performance: Moderated-mediating roles of meaningfulness and job characteristics. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 519–533. https://doi.org.10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0181
22.
HanhT. N. (2017). The art of living. Penguin Books.
23.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
24.
HobfollS. E., HalbeslebenJ., NeveuJ.-P., & WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
JoseG., & MampillyS. R. (2015). Relationships among perceived supervisor support, psychological empowerment and employee engagement in Indian workplaces. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 30(3), 231–250. https://doi.org.10.1080/15555240.2015.1047498
27.
KarimiS., Ahmadi MalekF., Yaghoubi FaraniA., & LiobikienėG. (2023). The role of transformational leadership in developing innovative work behaviors: The mediating role of employees’ psychological capital. Sustainability, 15(2), 1267. https://doi.org.10.3390/su15021267
28.
KimN., & KangS.-W. (2016). Older and more engaged: The mediating role of age-linked resources on work engagement. Human Resource Management, 1–16. https://doi.org.10.1002/hrm.21802
29.
KlenkM., BjorklundT., GilmartinS., & SheppardS. (2018). Early-career engineers at the workplace: Meaningful highs, lows, and innovative work efforts. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 24–27, 2018. Salt Lake City, Utah.
30.
KooijD. T., GuestD. E., ClintonM., KnightT., JansenP. G., & DikkersJ. S. (2013). How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(1), 18–35.
31.
KumarS., & JainP. (2021). Sector-specific dynamics of positive organizational behavior: Evidence from India’s IT and service sectors. Journal of Business Research, 29(4), 210–228.
32.
LambertL., TopolskayaE., WarrenM. A., & HabibM. A. (2019). Positivity at work: It’s not a contradiction!InLambertL. & Pasha-ZaidiN.(Eds.), Positive psychology in the Middle East/North Africa: Research, policy, and practise (pp. 133–156). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org.10.1007/978-3-030-13921-6_7
33.
LichtenthalerP. W., & FischbachA. (2018). Leadership, job crafting, and employee health and performance. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 620–632. https://doi.org.10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0191
34.
LoghmanS., QuinnM., DawkinsS., WoodsM., SharmaS. O., & ScottJ. (2022). A comprehensive meta-analyses of the nomological network of psychological capital. Psychological Capital. https://doi.org.10.1177/15480518221107998
35.
LopesI. T., & SerrasqueiroR. M. (2017). Editorial for the special issue on linking theory and practice in intellectual capital—Proquest. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 145–146.
36.
LorenzT., BeerC., PützJ., & HeinitzK. (2016). Measuring psychological capital: Construction and validation of the compound PsyCap scale (CPC-12). PLoS One, 11(4), e0152892. https://doi.org.10.1371/journal.pone.0152892
37.
LuthansF., AvolioB. J., AveyJ. B., & NormanS. M. (2007a). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 143–165.
38.
LuthansF., & FreyR. (2017). Positive psychology in the workplace: The important role of psychological capital (PsyCap). In Positive psychology (pp. 169–196). Routledge.
39.
LuthansF., Youssef-MorganC. M., & AvolioB. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford university Press.
40.
LuthansF., & Youssef-MorganC. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339–366. https://doi.org.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych
41.
LuthansF., YoussefC. M., & AvolioB. J. (2007b). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
42.
MahaptraM., & PatiS. P. (2018). Can meaningful work mitigate the impact of techno stress creators? Evidence from India(Working papers, 243).
43.
ManachaS. (2020), Step up: Women’s journey to identity, success and power. Sage Publications.
44.
McKee-RyanF. M. (2021). Coming of age in a global pandemic: HRM perspectives on generation Z’s workforce entry. In Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 39, pp. 99–128). Emerald Publishing Limited.
45.
MenaryR. (Ed.). (2010). The extended mind, a Bradford book. The MIT Press.
46.
MengF., WangY., XuW., YeJ., PengL., & GaoP. (2020). The diminishing effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between task characteristics, perceived meaningfulness, and work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 585031. https://doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585031
47.
MengF., XuY., LiuY., ZhangG., TongY., & LinR. (2022). Linkages between transformational leadership, work meaningfulness and work engagement: A multilevel cross-sectional study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 367–380. https://doi.org.10.2147/PRBM.S344624
48.
MonetaG. B., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275–310. https://doi.org.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00512.x
49.
NgT. W. H., & FeldmanD. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org.10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
50.
NielsenK., YarkerJ., RandallR., & MunirF. (2009). The mediating effects of team and self-efficacy on the relationship between transformational leadership, and job satisfaction and psychological well-being in healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(9), 1236–1244. https://doi.org.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.001
51.
OhS., & RohS.-C. (2019). A moderated mediation model of self-concept clarity, transformational leadership, perceived work meaningfulness, and work motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(July), 1756. https://doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01756
52.
OkrosA. (2020). Generational theory and cohort analysis. In Harnessing the potential of digital post-millennials in the future workplace (pp. 33–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25726-2_2
53.
OpreaB., PăduraruL., & IliescuD. (2020). Job crafting and intent to leave: The mediating role of meaningful work and engagement. Journal of Career Development, 089484532091866. https://doi.org.10.1177/0894845320918666
54.
PandeyJ. (2017). Job performance of women at work in rural India: Job demands-resources (JD-R) perspective. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad.
55.
ParkerS. K. (1998). Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 835.
56.
PaulM., & JenaL. K. (2022). Workplace spirituality, teachers’ professional well-being and mediating role of positive psychological capital: An empirical validation in the Indian context. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(4), 633–660. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJOES-08-2021-0163/FULL/PDF
57.
PradhanS., & JenaL. K. (2017). Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 825–838. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJOA-01-2017-1107
58.
PradhanS., & JenaL. K. (2019). Does meaningful work explain the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour?VIKALPA: The Journal of Decision Makers, 44(1), 30–40. https://doi.org.10.1177/0256090919832434
59.
PradhanS., & PradhanR. K. (2013). Karma-yoga (spirit at work) and job attitudes: Applying Indian wisdom to today’s business problems. IIM HR Summit 2013, Indian Institute of Management.
60.
PrakashK., & TiwariP. (2021). Millennials and post millennials: A systematic literature review. Publishing Research Quarterly, 1–18. https://doi.org.10.1007/s12109-021-09794-w
61.
QuickJ. C., WrightT. A., AdkinsJ. A., NelsonD. L., & QuickJ. D. (2013). Preventive stress management in organizations (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
62.
RastogiA., & Prakash PatiS. (2015). Towards a conceptualization of karma yoga. Journal of Human Values, 21(1), 51–63. https://doi.org.10.1177/0971685815579985
63.
RudolphC. W., LavigneK. N., & ZacherH. (2017). Career adaptation: A review and future agenda for understanding proactive career behaviors. Journal of Management, 43(1), 225–247.
64.
SammarraA., ProfiliS., MaimoneF., & GabrielliG. (2017). Enhancing knowledge sharing in age-diverse organizations: The role of HRM practices. Age Diversity in the Workplace (Advanced Series in Management), 17, 161–187. https://doi.org.10.1108/S1877-636120170000017009
65.
Sánchez-CardonaI., VeraM., Martínez-LugoM., Rodríguez-MontalbánR., & Marrero-CentenoJ. (2020). When the job does not fit: The moderating role of job crafting and meaningful work in the relation between employees’ perceived overqualification and job boredom. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 257–276. https://doi.org.10.1177/1069072719857174
66.
SarkarA., & GargN. (2020). ‘Peaceful workplace’ only a myth? Examining the mediating role of psychological capital on spirituality and nonviolence behaviour at the workplace. International Journal of Conflict Management, 31(5), 709–728. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJCMA-11-2019-0217
67.
ScheibeS., & MoghimiD. (2021). Age and context effects in daily emotion regulation and well-being at work. InWangM.(Ed.), Work, aging and retirement (Vol. 7, pp. 31–45). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org.10.1093/workar/waz014
68.
ScheierM. F., & CarverC. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Sssessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219.
69.
ShahidS., & MuchiriM. K. (2019). Positivity at the workplace: Conceptualising the relationships between authentic leadership, psychological capital, organisational virtuousness, thriving and job performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(3), 494–523. https://doi.org.10.1108/IJOA-05-2017-1167
70.
SharmaP. (2017). Organizational culture as a predictor of job satisfaction: The role of age and gender. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 22(1), 35–48.
71.
SinghN., & RangnekarS. (2016). Relationship between meaningful work and organizational trust a study of techno-managers in the Indian power sector relationship between meaningful work and organizational trust: A study of techno-managers in the Indian power sector. Proceedings of GLOGIFT, 16, 247–255.
72.
StegerM. F., DikB. J., & DuffyR. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org.10.1177/1069072711436160
73.
Su TengL. (2020). Bracing for the multi-generational workforce: What we need to know. Management Revue, 31(3), 324–345. https://doi.org.10.5771/0935-9915-2020-3-324
74.
SwansonJ. L., & SchneiderM. (2020). The theory of work adjustment. In BrownS. D. & LentR. W.(Eds.)Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 33–60). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
75.
SnyderC. R., SympsonS. C., YbascoF. C., BordersT. F., BabyakM. A., & HigginsR. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 321.
76.
TanK. L. (2018). Effects of psychological capital on the relationship between meaningful work, job burnout and employee engagement of social workers in Singapore. Curtin University.
77.
TanK.-L., LewT.-Y., & SimA. K. S. (2020). Effect of work engagement on meaningful work and psychological capital: Perspectives from social workers in New Zealand. Employee Relations: The International Journal. https://doi.org.10.1108/ER-11-2019-0433
78.
TripathiS. (2018). Moderating effects of age and experience on the factors influencing the actual usage of cloud computing. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1373
79.
TummersL. G., & KniesE. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 859–868. https://doi.org.10.1111/puar.12138
80.
VermootenN., BoonzaierB., & KiddM. (2019). Job crafting, proactive personality and meaningful work: Implications for employee engagement and turnover intention. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45(1), 1–13. https://doi.org.10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1567
81.
von BonsdorffM. E., ZhouL., WangM., VanhalaS., von BonsdorffM. B., & RantanenT. (2018). Employee age and company performance: An integrated model of aging and human resource management practices. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3124–3150.
82.
WangM., & FangY. (2020). Age diversity in the workplace: Facilitating opportunities with organizational practices. Public Policy & Aging Report, 30(3), 119–123. https://doi.org.10.1093/ppar/praa015
83.
WagnildG. M., & YoungH. M. (1993). Development and psychometric. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–17847.
84.
WarrP. (1992). Age and occupational well-being. Psychology and Aging, 7(1), 37.
85.
WeberG. (2018), Millennials expect less and more: Workplace writing for today’s workforce, technical communication capstone course. Mankato.
86.
YavuzM. (2020). Transformational leadership and authentic leadership as practical implications of positive organizational psychology. In AlayoğluN., BayraktarO., TorresF. N. C.(Eds.), Handbook of Research on Positive Organizational Behavior for Improved Workplace Performance (pp. 122–139). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
87.
ZaykoT., & VinichenkoV. (2021, May). Generational theory: An overview of the research conducted. InManakovA. & EdigarianA.(Eds), International scientific Siberian transport forum (pp. 802–809). Springer International Publishing.
