This article examines how geocultural shifts provide new opportunities for internationalizing cultural entrepreneurship, using the case study of a unique international action company from Kazakhstan. Founded in 2000, Nomad Stunts has risen to international prominence, collaborating with leading studios across Hollywood, Bollywood and other major film industries. This study investigates how could geocultural shifts influence creative entrepreneurship and its internationalization? The findings highlight how geocultural changes—such as shifting production hubs and expanding global networks—enabled the company to transform local expertise in equestrian stunts, acrobatics and other disciplines into an internationally recognized brand. The research also reveals the critical role of discipline, resilience and versatility in the company’s growth and underscores the significance of combining cultural authenticity with global standards. This study contributes to understanding how creative enterprises can capitalize on geocultural changes to enhance their competitive advantage and international presence.
AlacovskaA. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12), 1563–1589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718754991
2.
AshtonC. (1996). How competencies boost performance. Management Development Review, 9(3), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09622519610115723
3.
AudretschD. B., & BelitskiM. (2021). Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711
4.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
5.
BaronR. A., TangJ., TangZ., & ZhangY. (2018). Bribes as entrepreneurial actions: Why underdog entrepreneurs feel compelled to use them. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.011
6.
BelfioreE. (2020). Whose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1495713
7.
Boix-DomènechR., & Rausell-KösterP. (2018). The economic impact of the creative industry in the European Union. In Segarra-OñaM. & Santamarina-CamposV. (Eds.), Drones and the creative industry (pp. 19–36). Springer.
8.
BujorA., & AvasilcaiS. (2016). The creative entrepreneur: A framework of analysis. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 21–28.
9.
BullI., & WillardG. E. (1993). Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90026-2
10.
CarcaryM. (2009). The research audit trail-enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), 11–24. http://www.ejbrm.com/issue/download.html?idArticle=198.
11.
ChancelL., PikettyT., SaezE., & ZucmanG. (Eds.). (2022). World inequality report 2022. Harvard University Press.
12.
ChatterjeeA., GhoshA., & LecaB. (2023). Double weaving: A bottom-up process of connecting locations and scales to mitigate grand challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 66(3), 797–828. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.1348
13.
ChenK. K. (2015). Using extreme cases to understand organizations. In KramerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative organizational research (pp. 33–44). Routledge.
14.
CookeP., & De ProprisL. (2011). A policy agenda for EU smart growth: The role of creative and cultural industries. Policy Studies, 32(4), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2011.571852
15.
CoyneK. P., HallS. J. D., & CliffordP. G. (1997). Is your core competence a mirage?The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 41–54.
16.
DenzinN. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
17.
DiMaggioP. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094962
18.
EisenhardtK. M., & GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
19.
EnginoğluD., & ArikanC. L. (2016). A literature review on core competencies. International Journal of Management, 7(3), 120–127. http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=3
20.
FleuryA., & Tereza FleuryM. (2003). Competitive strategies and core competencies: Perspectives for the internationalisation of industry in Brazil. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060310453317
21.
FlewT. (2010). Toward a cultural economic geography of creative industries and urban development: introduction to the special issue on creative industries and urban development. The Information Society, 26(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240903562704
22.
GehmanJ., & SoublièreJ. F. (2017). Cultural entrepreneurship: From making culture to cultural making. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 19(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268521
23.
Gelis-FilhoA. (2019). Geoculture: Missing in action. Evolution: Evolutionary Trends, Aspects, and Patterns, 167–184. https://www.sociostudies.org/upload/socionauki.ru/book/files/evol_6_en/010_Gelis-Filho.pdf
24.
GioiaD. A., CorleyK. G., & HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
25.
GhoshA. & RayS. (2017). Theorizing ’strategic transitiont towards organizational hybridism”: Action research with CINI India. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2017, No. 1, p. 15024). Academy of Management.
26.
HausmannA., & HeinzeA. (2016). Entrepreneurship in the cultural and creative industries: Insights from an emergent field. Artivate, 5(2), 7–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.34053/artivate.5.2.0007
27.
HenryC. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the creative industries: An international perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.
28.
HothoS., & ChampionK. (2011). Small businesses in the new creative industries: Innovation as a people management challenge. Management Decision, 49. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111094428.
29.
JavidanM. (1998). Core competence: What does it mean in practice?Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00091-5
30.
JayJ. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
31.
JohansonJ., & VahlneJ.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
32.
KabueL. W., & KilikaJ. M. (2016). Firm resources, core competencies and sustainable competitive advantage: An integrative theoretical framework. Journal of Management and Strategy, 7(1), 98–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jms.v7n1p98
33.
KüttimM., ArvolaK., & VenesaarU. (2011). Development of creative entrepreneurship: Opinion of managers from Estonia, Latvia, Finland and Sweden. Business: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2011.38
34.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
35.
LangleyA., & MontrealH. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007079965
36.
LangleyA., SmallmanC., TsoukasH., & Van De VenA. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.4001
37.
LounsburyM. & GlynnM. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188
38.
MelinL. (1992). Internationalization as a strategy process. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130908
39.
PengT. K., PetersonM. F., & ShyiY. P. (1991). Quantitative methods in cross-national management research: Trends and equivalence issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120203
40.
PettsN. (1997). Building growth on core competences—a practical approach. Long Range Planning, 30(4), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00034-4
41.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
42.
PrahaladC. K., & HamelG. (2009). The core competence of the corporation. Knowledge and Strategy, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-7223-8.50003-4
43.
RayS., & RamachandranK. (1996). Towards a framework for a comprehensive theory of entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135579600500101
44.
RyabovaK., FominaV., & GhoshA. (2022). ‘Challenging stereotypes’ as a core competence in creative entrepreneurship: Insights from ArtiShock Theatre, Kazakhstan. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221130436
45.
SaiyedA. A., WierengaM., FernhaberS. A., & NummelaN. (2023). From grassroots to international markets: A qualitative study of marginalized entrepreneurs in India. International Business Review, 32(5), 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102163
46.
SalmondA. (2012). Digital subjects, cultural objects: Special issue introduction. Journal of Material Culture, 17(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183512453531
47.
SantanaP., & SilveiraF. (2019). Entrepreneurship in the creative industries: A bibliometric study. Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 12(1), 125–141.
48.
SchwartzM. S., & SchwartzC. G. (1955). Problems in participant observation. American Journal of Sociology, 60(4), 343–353. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2772027
49.
ScottM. (2012). Cultural entrepreneurs, cultural entrepreneurship: Music producers mobilising and converting Bourdieu’s alternative capitals. Poetics, 40(3), 237–255.
50.
SilvermanH., & RugglesD. F. (Eds.) (2007). Cultural heritage and human rights. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71313-7_1
51.
SmitA. J. (2011). The influence of district visual quality on location decisions of creative entrepreneurs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.567924
52.
VaghelyI. P., & JulienP. A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.004Getrightsandcontent
53.
WelchL. S., & LuostarinenR. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630708801400203
54.
WerthesD., MauerR., & BrettelM. (2018). Cultural and creative entrepreneurs: Understanding the role of entrepreneurial identity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 24(1), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2016-0215
55.
WiklundJ., DavidssonP., AudretschD. B., & KarlssonC. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00420.x
