An understanding of patient expectations predicts better health outcomes following breast reconstruction. No study to date has examined how patient expectations for breast reconstruction and preoperative health-related quality of life vary with time since breast cancer diagnosis.
Methods:
Women consulting for breast reconstruction to a single surgeon’s practice over a 13-month period were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Patients were asked to prospectively complete the BREAST-Q expectations and preoperative reconstruction modules. A retrospective chart review was then performed on eligible patients, and patient demographics, cancer-related factors, and comorbidities were collected. BREAST-Q scores were transformed using the equivalent Rasch method. Multivariate linear regression models were constructed to assess the association between BREAST-Q scores and time since cancer diagnosis.
Results:
Sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria for analysis and are characterized by a mean age of 53 ± 11 (34-79) years and a mean body mass index of 28 ± 6 (19-49). Most patients were treated by mastectomy (58%) or lumpectomy (23%). At the time of retrospective chart review, 29 (43%) patients had undergone reconstruction, most of which were delayed (59%). The mean latency from cancer diagnosis to reconstruction was 685 ± 867 days (range: 28-3322 days). Latency from cancer diagnosis to reconstruction was associated with a greater expectation of pain (β = 0.5; standard error [SE] = 0.005; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.003-0.027; P < .05), and a slower expectation for recovery (β = −0.5; SE = 0.004; 95% CI: −0.021 to −0.001; P < .05) after breast reconstruction. Latency from cancer diagnosis to reconstruction was associated with an increase in preoperative psychosocial well-being (β = 0.578; SE 0.009; 95% CI: 0.002-0.046; P < .05).
Conclusion:
Delaying breast reconstruction may negatively impact patient expectations of postoperative pain and recovery. Educational interventions aimed at understanding and managing patient expectations in the preoperative period may improve health-related quality of life and patient-related outcomes following initial breast cancer surgery.
Statistics Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics Special topic: HPV Associated Cancers. Can Cancer Soc. 2014;2014:1–132. doi:0835-2976.
2.
DesantisCEFedewaSASauerAGKramerJLSmithRAJemalA. Breast cancer statistics, 2015: convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):31–42. doi:10.3322/caac.21320.
3.
FisherBAndersonSBryantJ, et al.Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–1241. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022152.
4.
ShomaAMMohamedMHNoumanN, et al.Body image disturbance and surgical decision making in egyptian post menopausal breast cancer patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2009;7:66. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-7-66.
5.
RothRSLoweryJCDavisJWilkinsEG. Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2008–2015. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000260584.09371.99.
6.
Al-GhazalSKSullyLFallowfieldLBlameyRW. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26(1):17–19. doi:10.1053/ejso.1999.0733.
7.
RabinowitzB. Psychosocial issues in breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 29;2002:233–247. doi:10.1016/S0889-8545(03)00065-2.
8.
FallowfieldLJ. Psychosocial adjustment after treatment for early breast cancer. Oncol (Williston Park). 1990;4(4):89–97-98, 100.
9.
FobairPStewartSLChangSBD’OnofrioCBanksPJBloomJR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(7):579–594. doi:10.1002/pon.991.
10.
WilmothMCTownsendJ. A comparison of the effects of lumpectomy versus mastectomy on sexual behaviors. Cancer Pract. 1995;3(5):279–285. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/7663546.
11.
McGaugheyA. Body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: an integrative literature review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006;51(6):e45–49. doi:10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.07.002.
12.
EltahirYWernersLLCHDreiseMM, et al.Quality-of-Life Outcomes between Mastectomy Alone and Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):201e–209e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586a7.
13.
BaxterNGoelVSempleJL. Utilization and Regional Variation of Breast Reconstruction in Canada. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):338–339. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000146061.86576.B2.
14.
AldermanAKMcMahonLWilkinsEG. The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):695–703. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000041438.50018.02.
15.
MorrowMMujahidMLantzPM, et al.Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104(11):2340–2346. doi:10.1002/cncr.21444.
16.
MorrowMScottSKMenckHRMustoeTAWinchesterDP. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a national cancer database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00747-X.
17.
RobbGL. Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9(1):S1. doi:10.1186/bcr1684.
18.
MalataCMMcIntoshSAPurushothamAD. Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2000;87(11):1455–1472. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01593.x.
19.
KhooAKrollSSReeceGP, et al.A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(4):964–970. doi:10.1097/00006534-199804040-00011.
20.
OlsenMANickelKBMargenthalerJA, et al.Development of a risk prediction model to individualize risk factors for surgical site infection after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(8):2471–2479. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-5083 -1.
21.
KronowitzSJHuntKKKuererHM, et al.Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(6):1617–1628. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000117192.54945.88.
22.
MomohAOAhmedRKelleyBP, et al.A Systematic review of complications of implant-based breast reconstruction with prereconstruction and postreconstruction radiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(1):118–124. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3284-z.
23.
CordeiroPGAlbornozCRMcCormickB, et al.What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant?Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1509–1517. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001278.
24.
CordeiroPGAlbornozCRMcCormickBHuQVan ZeeK. The impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on two-stage implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):588–595. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000523.
25.
RazdanSNCordeiroPGAlbornozCR, et al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast reconstruction options in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):510e–517e. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000479935.92904.a3.
26.
MetcalfeKASempleJQuanML, et al.Why some mastectomy patients opt to undergo delayed breast reconstruction: results of a long-term prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):267–275. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002943.
HoALKlassenAFCanoSScottAMPusicAL. Optimizing Patient-Centered Care in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):212e–220e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586fa.
29.
PusicALKlassenAFSnellL, et al.Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: Impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):149–158.
30.
BurtonKEWrightVRichardsJ. Patients’ expectations in relation to outcome of total hip replacment surgery. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979;38(5):471–474.
31.
CanoSJKlassenAFScottAMPusicAL. A closer look at the BREAST-Q??Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):287–296. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.002.
32.
vonEEAltmanDGEggerM, et al.Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies. Strobe Statement. 2008;53(1):3–4. doi: 10.1007/s00038-007-0239-9.
33.
PusicALKlassenAFScottAMKlokJACordeiroPGCanoSJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807.
34.
ZhongTMcCarthyCMinS, et al.Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer. 2012;118(6):1701–1709. doi:10.1002/cncr.26417.
35.
EislerTSvenssonOTengströmAElmstedtE. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(4):457–462. doi:10.1054/arth.2002.31245.
36.
MancusoCASculcoTPSalvatiEA. Patients with poor preoperative functional status have high expectations of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(7):872–878. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00276-6.
37.
HennRFKangLTashjianRZ, et al.Patients’ preoperative expectations predict the outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1913–1919. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00358.
38.
SoroceanuAChingAAbduWMcGuireK. Relationship between pre-operative expectations, satisfaction and functional outcomes in lumbar and cervical Spine Patients: a multi center study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(2):E103–108. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182245c1f.
39.
LutzGKButzlaffMEAtlasSJKellerRBSingerDEDeyoRA. The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(12):740–744. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.10417.x.
40.
KiyakHAVitalianoPPCrineanJ. Patients’ expectations as predictors of orthognathic surgery outcomes. Health Psychol. 1988;7(3):251–268. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3383832.
41.
FloodABLorenceDPDingJMcPhersonKBlackNA. The role of expectations in patients’ reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care. 1993;31(11):1043–1056. doi:10.1097/00005650-199311000-00006.
42.
WaljeeJMcGlinnEPSearsEDChungKC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014;155(5):799–808. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015.
43.
SnellLMcCarthyCKlassenA, et al.Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):1825–1830. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44580.
44.
MancusoCAGrazianoSBriskieLM, et al.Randomized trials to modify patients’ preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):424–431. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0052-z.
45.
MeadNBowerP. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1087–1110. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8.
46.
LevensteinJHMccrackenECMcwhinneyIRStewartMABrownJB. The patient- centred clinical method. 1. A model for the doctor- patient interaction in family medicine. Fam Pract. 1986;3(1):24.
47.
HelgesonVSSnyderPSeltmanH. Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Heal Psychol. 2004;23(1):3–15. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.3.
48.
PérezSConchadoAAndreuY, et al.Acute stress trajectories 1 year after a breast cancer diagnosis. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(4):1671–1678. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2960-x.
49.
SipiläRMHaasioLMeretojaTJRipattiSEstlanderAMKalsoEA. Does expecting more pain make it more intense? Factors associated with the first week pain trajectories after breast cancer surgery. Pain. 2017;158(5):922–930. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000859.
50.
HuberCKunzMArteltCLautenbacherS. Attentional and emotional mechanisms of pain processing and their related factors: a structural equations approach. Pain Res Manag. 2010;15(4):229–237.
51.
ChengGSIlfeldBM. A review of postoperative analgesia for breast cancer surgery. Pain Manag. 2016;6(6):603–618. doi:10.2217/pmt-2015-0008.
52.
FischerJPNelsonJAKovachSJSerlettiJMWuLCKanchwalaS. Impact of Obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Datasets. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):656–664. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.031.
53.
NguyenKTHanwrightPJSmetonaJTHirschEMSethAKKimJYS. Body mass index as a continuous predictor of outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(1):19–24. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318276d91d.
54.
SchaverienM V.McCulleySJ. Effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2014;34(6):484–497. doi:10.1002/micr.22244.
55.
FischerJPWesAMTuggleCTSerlettiJMWuLC. Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):780–787. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.004.
56.
GarveyPBBuchelEWPockajBAGrayRJSamsonTD. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):447–457. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000149588.09148.53.
57.
ChangDWWangBRobbGL, et al.Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(5):1640–1648. doi:10.1097/00006534-200004050-00007.
58.
MehraraBJSantoroTDArcillaEWatsonJPShawWWDa LioAL. Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5):1100–1109. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000236898.87398.d6.
59.
OzturkCNKunduNBernardSCooperKOzturkCDjohanR. Breast reconstruction with abdominal-based free flaps in high body mass index population: postoperative complications and impact of weight loss. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(1):13–22. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31825c07f3.
60.
LarsonKEOzturkCNKunduNCooperKRBernardSDjohanR. Achieving patient satisfaction in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction: correlation with body mass index subgroups and weight loss. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(4):763–773. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000027.
61.
BoberSLSanchez VarelaV. Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: Challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(30):3712–3719. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.41.7915.
62.
TaylorSHarleyCZieglerLBrownJVelikovaG. Interventions for sexual problems following treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(3):711–724. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1722-9.
63.
PaxtonRJPhillipsKLJonesLA, et al.Associations among physical activity, body mass index, and health-related quality of life by race/ethnicity in a diverse sample of breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(16):4024–4031. doi:10.1002/cncr.27389.
64.
AndersenBLShapiroCLFarrarWBCrespinTWells-DigregorioS. Psychological responses to cancer recurrence. Cancer. 2005;104(7):1540–1547. doi:10.1002/cncr.21309.
65.
AndersenBLCarpenterKMYangHCShapiroCL. Sexual well-being among partnered women with breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(21):3151–3157. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6958.
66.
YoonAPQiJBrownDL, et al.Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast. 2018;37:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.009.
67.
AlbornozCRBachPBMehraraBJ, et al.A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1):15–23. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde.
WrightFCLook HongNJQuanML, et al.Indications for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;XX(Xx):1. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002309.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
