The following article has been retracted at the request of the Journal Editor and the Publisher:
AlHelal A, AlShehri K, AlOmairy A, et al. Comparison of adhesive bond strength among fiber reinforced post and core with different cementation techniques: in vitro study. J Appl Biomater Func 2021; 19. doi:10.1177/22808000211058867
After an internal investigation Sage has become aware that the submission contains indicators of third-party involvement and attempts to manipulate the peer-review process.
As the peer-review process has not met Sage’s expectations of high quality and ethical peer-review, the publisher cannot uphold the integrity of the research. In line with COPE guidelines and Sage policies, this article is retracted.
The authors did not respond to the final notice.
References
1.
AlQahtaniAAlbargashAAbduljabbarT, et al. Fracture resistance of maxillary lateral incisors restored with different post systems. J Biomater Tissue Eng2017; 7: 1203–1207.
2.
VohraFBukhariIASheikhSANaseemMHussainM.Photodynamic activation of irrigation (using different laser prototypes) on push out bond strength of fiber posts. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2020; 30: 101716.
3.
Al-QahtaniASAlZainSAAlHamdanEM, et al. A comparative evaluation of the effect of phototherapy of fiber post on its bond strength to dental composite. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2018; 24: 228–231.
4.
MaawadhAMAlmoharebTAl-HamdanRS, et al. Repair strength and surface topography of lithium disilicate and hybrid resin ceramics with LLLT and photodynamic therapy in comparison to hydrofluoric acid. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2020; 18: 2280800020966938.
5.
AkramZShafqatSSNiazMORazaANaseemM.Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy and laser irradiation as an adjunct to open flap debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed2020; 36: 3–13.
6.
BraunJ.Aesthetic treatment of devital teeth rebuilding strength and shade from within. Dent Today2002; 21: 44–46, 48.
7.
SchwartzRSRobbinsJW.Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod2004; 30: 289–301.
8.
AssisRSLopesFCRopertoR, et al. Bond strength and quality of bond interface of multifilament fiberglass posts luted onto flat-oval root canals without additional dentin wear after biomechanical preparation. J Prosthet Dent2020; 124: 738.e1–738.e8.
9.
MartelliR.Fourth-generation intraradicular posts for the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent2000; 12: 579–584; quiz 586.
10.
SignoreABenedicentiSKaitsasVBaroneMAngieroFRaveraG.Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage. J Dent2009; 37: 115–121.
11.
AlkhudhairyFIYamanPDennisonJMcDonaldNHerreroABin-ShuwaishMS.The effects of different irrigation solutions on the bond strength of cemented fiber posts. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent2018; 10: 221–230.
12.
KaurJSharmaNSinghH.In vitro evaluation of glass fiber post. J Clin Exp Dent2012; 4: e204–e209.
13.
AlkhudhairyFAlKheraifABin-ShuwaishMAl-JohanySNaseemMVohraF.Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and ascorbic acid on the bond strength and microleakage of bleached enamel surface. Photomed Laser Surg2018; 36: 431–438.
14.
DasAKAKMuddugangadharBCAmarnathGSGargAKumarURaoTRP.Comparative evaluation of push out bond strength of a fiber post system using four different resin cements: an in-vitro study. J Int Oral Health2015; 7: 62–67.
15.
ReisJMDSNOliveiraCRMReisEGJMascaroBAAbi-RachedFO.One-step fiber post cementation and core build-up in endodontically treated tooth: a clinical case report. J Esthet Restor Dent2020; 32: 5–11.
16.
ÖzyürekTTopkaraCKoçakİYılmazKGündoğarMUsluG.Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with different fiber post and core systems. Odontology2020; 108: 588–595.
17.
JongsmaLABolhuisPBPallavPFeilzerAJKleverlaanCJ.Benefits of a two-step cementation procedure for prefabricated fiber posts. J Adhes Dent2010; 12: 55–62.
18.
de MoraesAPCenciMSde MoraesRRPereira-CenciT.Current concepts on the use and adhesive bonding of glass-fiber posts in dentistry: a review. Appl Adh Sci2013; 1: 1–12.
19.
Al JeaidiZA. Influence of resin cements and root canal disinfection techniques on the adhesive bond strength of fibre reinforced composite post to radicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2021; 33: 102108.
20.
Al AhdalKAl DeebLAl-HamdanRS, et al. Influence of different photosensitizers on push-out bond strength of fiber post to radicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2020; 31: 101805.
21.
AljamhanASAlrefeaiMHAlhabdanAAlkhudhairyFAbrarEAlhusseiniSA.Push out bond strength of glass fiber post to radicular dentin irrigated with Nisin and MTAD compared to methylene blue photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2021; 34: 102304.
22.
TayFRPashleyDH.Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod2007; 33: 391–398.
23.
AlkhudhairyFNaseemMAhmadZHAlnoohANVohraF.Efficacy of phototherapy with different conventional surface treatments on adhesive quality of lithium disilicate ceramics. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther2019; 25: 292–295.
24.
AlkhudhairyFAl-JohanySSNaseemMBin-ShuwaishMVohraF.Dentin bond strength of bioactive cement in comparison to conventional resin cement when photosensitized with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Pak J Med Sci2020; 36: 85–90.
25.
HegdeMNManjunathJ.Bond strength of newer dentin bonding agents in different clinical situations. Oper Dent2011; 36: 169–176.
26.
MishraLKhanASVeloMMAC, et al. Effects of surface treatments of glass fiber-reinforced post on bond strength to root dentine: a systematic review. Materials2020; 13: 1967.
27.
AlkhudhairyFAlKheraifANaseemMVohraFKhanR.Degree of conversion and depth of cure of ivocerin containing photo-polymerized resin luting cement in comparison to conventional luting agents. Pak J Med Sci2018; 34: 253–259.
28.
AlkhudhairyFVohraFNaseemMOwaisMMAmerAHBAlmutairiKB.Color stability and degree of conversion of a novel dibenzoyl germanium derivative containing photo-polymerized resin luting cement. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2020; 18: 2280800020917326.
29.
MakarewiczDLe Bell-RönnlöfAMLassilaLVVallittuPK.Effect of cementation technique of individually formed fiber-reinforced composite post on bond strength and microleakage. Open Dent J2013; 7: 68–75.
30.
PfeiferCS.Polymer-Based direct filling materials. Dent Clin North Am2017; 61: 733–750.
31.
MarigoLD’ArcangeloCDE AngelisFCordaroMVadiniMLajoloC.Evaluation of in vitro push-out bond strengths of different post-luting systems after artificial aging. Minerva Stomatol2017; 66: 20–27.
32.
SterzenbachGKarajouliGNaumannMPerozIBitterK.Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements—an evaluation of different adhesive approaches. Acta Odontol Scand2012; 70: 368–376.
33.
CunhaLGAlonsoRCde Souza-JuniorEJNevesACCorrer-SobrinhoLSinhoretiMA.Influence of the curing method on the post-polymerization shrinkage stress of a composite resin. J Appl Oral Sci2008; 16: 266–270.
