Performance Management System as a Predictor of Organizational Effectiveness: Insights from Indian Manufacturing Industries

Abstract

Assessment of performance in a regular and systematic manner is an essential activity on the part of the management, because it not only serves to evaluate and monitor the growth and development of the organization; but also provides necessary career direction for an individual employee. By establishing clear performance expectations which includes results, actions, and behaviors, the process helps the employees in understanding what exactly is expected out of their jobs. Clearly defined goals blended with regular assessments of individual performance is pertinent for defining the corporate competencies and exploring the major skill gaps that serves as a useful input for designing the HRD plans for the employees. However, in many organizations there happens to be a gap between the intention and actual practice of performance appraisal systems. Especially in Indian organizations, earlier research has surfaced the fact that, the existing performance management systems (PMSs) though provides for use of appraisal data for administrative purposes, but in actual practice there is missing link between the appraisal outcomes and subsequent design and execution of developmental program. Keeping in view of the importance of such an emerging area, an attempt has been made by the researchers to assess the perceptions of employees regarding the PMS and its role in achieving organizational effectiveness. A survey has been conducted though a questionnaire along with focused group discussion to examine the efficacy of performance management as a tool of HR interventions with 200 purposive sample professionals employed in Indian manufacturing industries. The analysis confirms the association between PMS and organizational effectiveness. However, there are difference of perception between line managers about PMS and where agreement exists; it is not associated with superior outcomes because of lack of clarity in the existing system. By analyzing the discussions, it was concluded that, there is distinct differentiation of involvement of different levels of management in the performance appraisal mechanism. Moreover, the reciprocal trigonometric relationship between the PMS, competency management system, and training and development is also emphasized.

Keywords

Manufacturing industry professionals performance appraisal (PA)performance management system (PMS)perception key result areas (KRAs)organizational effectiveness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

(2012). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (12th ed.). London: Kogan Page.

Armstrong

, & Baron

(1988). Performance management: The new realities. London: IPD.

Austin

J. T.

(1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 836–874.

Bernardin

H. J.

, & Beatty

(1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent Wadsworth Publishing.

Bernardin

H. J.

, Hagan

C. M.

, Kane

J. S.

, & Villanova

(1998). Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints. In Smither

J. W.

(Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 3–48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

Birdi

, Allan

, & Warr

(1997). Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 845–857.

Boswell

W. R.

, & Boudreau

J. W.

(2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283–299.

Bretz Jr.

R. D.

, Milkovich

G. T.

& Read

(1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18(2), 321.

Cannell

(2006). Performance management: An overview, CIPD. Retrieved from http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/mp90.pdf

10.

Cardy

R. L.

, & Dobbins

G. H.

(1994). Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South Western Publishing Company.

11.

Cederblom

, & Pemerl

D. E.

(2002). From performance appraisal to performance management: One agency’s experience. Public Personnel Management, 31(2), 131.

12.

Coens

, & Jenkins

(2000). Abolishing performance appraisals: Why they backfire and what to do instead. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

13.

Conry

, & Kemper

(1993). Performance evaluations: Bridging the gap between today’s goals and tomorrow’s reality. CUPA Journal, 44(3), 29–33.

14.

Cunneen

(2006). How to improve performance management. People Management, 12(2), 42–43.

15.

DeCotiis

, & Petit

(1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 635–646.

16.

DeNisi

, & Pritchard

(2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–277.

17.

Eckerson

W.W.

(2009). Performance Management Strategies. Business Intelligence Journal, 14(1), 24–27.

18.

Fletcher

(2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487.

19.

Gates

(1999). Aligning strategic performance measures and results. New York, US: The Conference Board.

20.

Gratton

, & Ghoshal

(2002). Improving the quality of conversations. Organizational Dynamics, 31(3), 209–223.

21.

Grote

(2000). Public sector organizations: Today’s innovative leaders in performance management. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 1–20.

22.

S.-J. K.

, & McKay

R. B.

(2002). Balanced scorecard: Two perspectives. The CPA Journal, 72(3), 20–25.

23.

Hurst

(2009). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the national KSF system for NHS staff (unpublished Doctorate of Education thesis). Retrieved from http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/mp90.pdf

24.

Ittner

, Larcker

, & Rajan

(1997). The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. Accounting Review, 72(2), 231–255.

25.

Ittner

, Larcker

, & Rajan

(2002). Determinants of performance measure choices in worker incentive plans. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), S58–S90.

26.

Ittner

, Larcker

D. F.

, & Randall

(2003). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 715–741.

27.

Kald

, & Nilsson

(2002). Recent advances in performance management at Nordic companies. European Management Journal, 18(1), 113–127.

28.

Kane

J. S.

, & Kane

K. F.

(1992). The analytic framework: The most promising approach for the advancement of performance appraisal. Human Resource Management Review, 2(1), 37–70.

29.

Kaplan

R. S.

, & Norton

D. P.

(2001). The strategy focused organization. US: Harvard Business Press.

30.

Kennedy

P. W.

, & Dresser

S. G.

(2001). Appraising and paying for performance: Another look at an age-old problem. Employee Benefits Journal, 26(4), 8–15.

31.

Lawler

E. E., III

. (1994). Performance management: The next generation. Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(3), 16–19.

32.

Lewis

P. H.

(1996). Making change happen through appraisal and development. CUPA Journal, 47(1), 7.

33.

Lockett

(1992). Effective performance management: A strategic guide to getting the best from people. London: Kogan Page.

34.

Locke

E. A.

, & Latham

G. P.

(1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

35.

Lipe

M. G.

, & Salterio

S. E.

(2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. Accounting Review, 75(3), 283–298.

36.

Lipe

M. G.

, & Salterio

S. E.

(2002). A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard’s information organization. Accounting Organizations and Society, 27(6), 531–540.

37.

Maisel

L. S.

(2001). Performance measurement practices: Survey results. AICPA, US.

38.

Meyer

M. W.

, & Gupta

(1994). The performance paradox. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 309–369.

39.

Mohrman

A. M.

, Resnick-West

S. M.

, & Lawler

E. E. III

. (1989). Designing performance appraisal systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers.

40.

Murphy

K. R.

, & Cleveland

J. N.

(1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

41.

Neely

(1999). The performance measurement revolution: why now and where next. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(2), 205–228.

42.

Poon

J. M. L.

(2004). Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention. Personnel Review, 33(3), 322–334.

43.

Pettijohn

C. E.

, Pettijohn

L. S.

, & D’Amico

(2001). Characteristic of performance appraisals and their impacts on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127–146.

44.

Rasch

(2004). Employee performance appraisal and the 95/5 rule. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 28(5), 407–414.

45.

Roberts

G. E.

(1992). Linkages between performance appraisal system effectiveness and rater and rate acceptance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12(3), 19–41.

46.

Roberts

G. E.

(1998). Perspectives on enduring and emerging issues in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 301–319.

47.

Roberts

G. E.

(2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 32(1), 89.

48.

Simon

H. A.

(1991). Organizations and Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25–44.

49.

Spangenburg

, & Theron

(2001). Adapting the systems model of performance management. South African Journal of Business Management, 32(1), 35–48.

50.

Wanguri

D. M.

(1995). A review, integration, and a critique of cross-disciplinary research on performance appraisals, evaluations, and feedback: 1980–1990. Journal of Business Communication, 32(3), 267–293.

51.

Weber

, & Schaffer

(2000). On the way to active management of performance measures. In Neely

(Ed.), Performance measurement—past, present and future (pp. 672–679). Conference Proceedings, Cranfield University.