Partible inheritance, alone or together with population growth, is widely assumed to be the fundamental cause of land fragmentation in Bulgaria. This study questions the explanatory power of these two supply-side causes of fragmentation. Relying on historical sources and an analysis of historical agricultural census data, the article presents evidence that partible inheritance and population growth are unlikely causes of land fragmentation. The study also traces the development of land markets to establish the purchasing behaviour of farmers. It reveals documented high demand for scattered plots of land in the years before Liberation from Ottoman rule. Attention is drawn to demand-side factors such as the risk aversion of farmers and optimization of self-employment, among others, as the likely fundamental causes of fragmentation. The article suggests that the possible endogenous nature of fragmentation in the country must be taken into account when policies are designed to target its undesirable aspects.
BellJ. D. (1977). Peasants in power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BentleyJ. W. (1987). Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: In defense of a much-maligned phenomenon. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16(October), 31–67.
3.
BerovLyuben. (1979). Ravnishte na ikonomicheskoto razvitie na B”lgarskite zemi po vreme na Osvobozhdenieto. [The Level of Economic and Land Development in Bulgaria during Liberation]. In Trudove na Visshiya Ikonomicheski Institut Karl Marks, [Publications of the Karl Marx Institte of Economics] (Vol. 1, pp. 19–59). Sofia: Vissh Ikonomicheski Institut Karl Marks.
4.
BerovL. (1981). Ikonomicheskoto razvitie na B”lgariya ot Osvobozhdenieto do kraya na XIX v. [Economic development of Bulgaria from Liberation to the end of 19th century]. In BerovL. (Eds), Economic history of Bulgaria 681–1981 (pp. 217–262). Sofia, Bulgaria: D”rzhavno izdatelstvo nauka i izkustvo.
5.
BerovL. (1984). Promeni v razpredelenieto na pozemlenata sobstvenost v Severna B”lgariya prez p”rvite dve desetiletiya sled Osvobozhdeniet [Changes in the distribution of land ownership during the two decades after Liberation]. In KhristovK. (Ed.), History of the economic and social life on Bulgarian lands (pp. 224–273). Sofia, Bulgaria: Izdatelstvo na B”lgarskata akademiya na naukite.
6.
BishopS. C.HoweK. S.KopevaD. & MishevP. (1995). Formi na sobstvenost i pazari na zemiata [Land ownership and markets]. In BuckwellA.SchmitzA.MoultonK.TrendafilovR. & DavidovaS. (Eds), Reforms of the rural economy (pp. 89–100). Sofia: IPK Racio-90.
7.
BlarelB.HazellP.PlaceF. & QuigginJ. (1992). The economics of farm fragmentation: Evidence from Ghana and Rwanda. World Bank Economic Review, 6(2), 233–254.
8.
BoliariN. (2013a). Land fragmentation in Bulgaria: Reconsidering its measurement and extent. Review of European Studies, 5(1), 99–109.
9.
BoliariN. (2013b). Does land fragmentation affect land productivity? Empirical evidence from Bulgaria. Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies, 94(3), 273–302.
10.
CramptonR. J. (1997). A concise history of Bulgaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DahlmanC. J. (1980). The open field system and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Di FalcoS.PenovI.AleksievA. & Van RensburgT. M. (2008). Biodiversity and land fragmentation: The case of Bulgaria (Working Paper No. 123). Department of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
13.
DolinskyN. V. (1932). Difficulties in Bulgarian farming. Journal of Farm Economics, 14(2), 355–358.
14.
DraganovaS. T. (2005). Selskoto naselenie na Dunavski vilaet [The rural population of the Danubian province]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Avangard Prima.
15.
DrägerD. & JakschT. (2001). Bulgaria. In GoetzS. J.JakschT. & SiebertR. (Eds), Agricultural transformation and land use in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 177–195). Burlington, NJ: Ashgate.
16.
FenoalteaS. (1976). Risk, transaction costs, and the organization of medieval agriculture. Explorations in Economic History, 13(2), 129–151.
17.
GeorgievM. & PenovI. (2006). Vliyanie na razhodite po prehv”rlyane na zemedelska zemya v”rhu konsolidatsiyata na pozemlenata sobstvenost [The costs of transferring land ownership and their impact on land consolidation]. Ikonomika i upravlenie na selskoto stopanstvo, 51(3), 19–26.
18.
HestonA. & KumarD. (1983). The persistence of land fragmentation in peasant agriculture: An analysis of South Asian cases. Explorations in Economic History, 20(2), 199–220.
19.
HomansG. C. (1937). Partible inheritance of villagers’ holdings. The Economic History Review, 8(1), 48–56.
20.
HoweK. S. (1998). Politics, equity, and efficiency: Objectives and outcomes in Bulgarian land reform. In WegrenS. K. (Ed.), Land reform in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe (pp. 208–223). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
IgbozurikeM. U. (1970). Fragmentation in tropical agriculture: An overrated phenomenon. The Professional Geographer, 22(6), 321–325.
22.
IgbozurikeM. U. (1974). Land tenure, social relations and the analysis of special discontinuity. Area, 6(2), 132–136.
23.
IvanovM. & ToozeA. (2007). Convergence or decline on Europe’s south-eastern periphery? Agriculture, population, and GNP in Bulgaria, 1892–1945. The Journal of Economic History, 67(3), 672–704.
24.
JabarinA. S. & EpplinF. M. (1994). Impact of land fragmentation on the cost of producing wheat in the rain-fed region of northern Jordan. Agricultural Economics, 11(2/3), 191–196.
25.
KingR. L. & BurtonS. P. (1982). Land fragmentation: Notes on a fundamental rural spatial problem. Progress in Human Geography, 6(4), 475–494.
26.
KopevaD. (2001). Land markets in Bulgaria. InLand settlement and cooperatives (Land Reform 2003/3 Special Edition, pp. 41–58). FAO, Corporate Document Repository. Retrieved 3December2017, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5026e/y5026e05.htm
27.
LampeJ. R. & JacksonM. R. (1982). Balkan economic history, 1550–1950: From imperial borderlands to developing nations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
28.
LermanZ. (2005). Farm fragmentation and productivity: Evidence from Georgia (Discussion Paper No. 8.05). Center for Agricultural Economic Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
29.
McCloskeyD. N. (1975a). The persistence of English common fields. In ParkerW. N. & JonesE. L. (Eds), European peasants and their markets: Papers in agrarian economic history (pp. 73–119). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
McCloskeyD. N. (1975b). The economics of enclosure: A market analysis. In ParkerW. N. & JonesE. L. (Eds), European peasants and their markets: Papers in agrarian economic history (pp. 123–160). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
McIntyreR. J. (1988). Bulgaria: Politics, economics and society. London: Pinter.
32.
MouzelisN. (1976). Greek and Bulgarian peasants: Aspects of their sociopolitical situation during the interwar period. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 18(1), 85–105.
33.
Sabates-WheelerR. (2002). Consolidation initiatives after land reform: Responses to multiple dimensions of land fragmentation in Eastern European agriculture. Journal of International Development, 14(7), 1005–1018.
34.
Sabates-WheelerR. (2005). Cooperation in the Romanian countryside: An insight into post-Soviet agriculture. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
35.
SandersI. T. (1976). The Balkan peasant moves toward industrialization. Proceedings of the Association of South-Eastern European Studies and UNESCO International Conference held on 23–26 March 1976 in Hamburg, Germany (Supplementary Issue of Balkanistica, pp. 315–327).
36.
SenguptaN. (2006). Fragmented landholding, productivity, and resilience management. Environment and Development Economics, 11(4), 507–532.
37.
Statistical Yearbook of the Kingdom of Bulgaria (1909). Statisticheski godishnik na Tsartsvo B”lgariya, 1909. Sofia: D”rzhavna pechatnitsa.
38.
Statistical Yearbook of the Kingdom of Bulgaria (1915). Statisticheski godishnik na Tsartsvo B”lgariya, 1915. Sofia: D”rzhavna pechatnitsa.
39.
Statistical Yearbook of the Kingdom of Bulgaria (1935). Statisticheski godishnik na Tsartsvo B”lgariya 1935. Sofia, Bulgaria: D”rzhavna pechatnitsa.
40.
Statistical Yearbook of the Kingdom of Bulgaria (1939). Statisticheski godishnik na Tsartsvo B”lgariya, 1939. Sofia: D”rzhavna pechatnitsa.
41.
StoianovichT. (1976). Balkan peasants and landlords and the Ottoman State: Familial economy, market economy and modernization. Proceedings of the Association of South-Eastern European Studies and UNESCO International Conference held on 23–26 March 1976 in Hamburg, Germany (Supplementary Issue of Balkanistica, pp. 164–204).
42.
TanS.QuF. & HeerinkN. (2005). What drives land fragmentation? Theoretical approaches and empirical analysis. In HoP. (Ed.), Developmental dilemmas: Land reform and institutional change in China (pp. 201–229). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
TodorovaM. (2002). Balkanskoto Semeystvo: Istoricheska demografiya na B”lgarskoto obshchestvo prez osmanskiya period[The Balkan family: Historical demography of Bulgarian society under Ottoman rule]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Amicitia.
44.
ToshevD. I. (1937). Razpredelenieto i komasatsiyata na zemite v B”lgariya [Land distribution and consolidation in Bulgaria]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Ministertsvo na zemedelieto i d”rzhavnite imoti.
45.
VladigerovT. A. (1942). Agrarni Otnosheniya v B”lgariya: Etnografski Svedeniya [Agrarian attitudes in Bulgaria: Ethnographic evidence]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Godishnik na vissheto t”rgovsko uchilishche ‘Dimit”r A. Tsenov’.
46.
V”lchanovD. (1954). Istoriya na Pozemlenite Otnosheniya i Zemeustroystvoto [History of landownership relations and land reform]. Sofia, Bulgaria: D”rzhavno izdatelstvo: Nauka i izkustvo.
47.
V”lchevN. (1999). Agrarnata Struktura na B”lgarskoto Zemedelie [The Agrarian structure of Bulgarian farming]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Gorekspres.
48.
WakaleyR. E. (1958). Peasantisms. In SandersI. T. (Ed.), Collectivization of agriculture in Eastern Europe (pp. 207–208). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
49.
YovchevskaP. (2002). Agrarnite otnosheniya v sledosvobozhdenska B”lgariya [Agraraian relations in post-Liberation Bulgaria]. Sofia: Bulgaria: Ikonomika i upravlenie na selskoto stopanstvo, 3, 41–44.
