Reforming Watershed Management Institutions for Inclusive and Sustainable Growth: Role of Institutional Interaction and Participative Decision Making

Abstract

The rainfed areas of rural India often lack the services of able water management institutions. Thus, management of water in such areas is not a stand-alone activity but is significant for the overall development of the area, which also takes into account natural resource management, productivity enhancement and livelihood supporting activities. This is commonly referred to as watershed development (WSD). These WSD programmes are run on a massive scale and have been dovetailed with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). But, even after massive investment, these programmes or the institutions did not generate effective performance. There is an urgent need of good institutional arrangement that reduces transaction costs and favours co-operative solutions. In this context, the literature on new institutional economics identifies good interaction as one of the most important features of effective institutions. This article uses new institutional economics, theories of governance, management and organizational design to develop a conceptual framework for understanding the role of institutional interaction and participative decision-making in generating enhanced performance and sustainable outcome. Conceptually, the demand for interaction depends upon generic and specific drivers, and the supply of good interaction would come through structures, processes and governance features of institutions and also through consideration of different rationalities (e.g., technical and social). This article involved an exploratory research followed by an in-depth survey of 30 local watershed institutions in three districts of Andhra Pradesh. The findings indicate that the quantity of interaction alone is not sufficient in generating effective institutional performance. Quality of institutional interaction based on various rationalities is equally important. The study may help in designing the institutions involved in WSD in a better way for inclusive and sustainable outcomes.

Keywords

Natural resources rural social poverty institutions rationalities transaction costs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackroyd

(2002). Organisation of business: Applying organisational theory to contemporary change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brewer

J.D.

, Kolavalli

, Kalro

A.H.

, Naik

, Ramnarayan

, Raju

K.V.

, & Sakthivadivel

(1999). Irrigation Management Transfer. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing.

Bromley

D. W.

(1989). Economic interests and institutions—The conceptual foundations of public policy. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Coase

R. H.

(1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0427%28193711%292%3A4%3A16%3C386%3ATNOTF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B

Coase

R. H.

(1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3(1), 1–44. Retrieved from http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/tsc220/hallam/Coase.pdf

Commons

J. R.

(1924). Legal foundations of capitalism. New York: Macmillan.

Commons

J. R.

(1934). Institutional economics. New York: Macmillan.

Crase

, Dollery

, & Lockwood

(2002). Transaction Costs Emanating from Policy Flexibility in Water Markets. In Donna

Brennan,

(Ed.), Water Policy Reform: Lessons from Asia and Australia. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).

Crase

, Dollary

, & Wallis

(2004). Conceptualising community consultation in public policy formulation: The case of the living Murray debate in the Murray–Darling basin of Australia (Working Paper Series in Economics). Armidale: University of New England.

10.

Crase

, & Gandhi

V. P.

(Eds). (2009). Reforming institutions in water resource management: Policy and performance for sustainable development. London: Earthscan.

11.

Darghouth

, Ward

, Gambarelli

, Styger

, & Roux

(2008). Watershed management approaches, policies, and operations: Lessons for scaling up. Water Sector Board discussion paper series, no. 11. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrived from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/05/9608907/watershed-management-approaches-policies-operations-lessons-scaling-up

12.

Dash

(2011). Participation of local institutions for sustainable watershed management: A comparative analysis of two projects. Development in Practice, 21(2), 255–268.

13.

Dovers

(2001, April). Institutions for sustainabilty. TELA Environment, Economics and Society, 7.

14.

Drobak

John K.

, & Nye

John, V.C.

(1997). Introduction. In Drobak

and Nye

(Eds), The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. Saint Louis: Academic Press.

15.

Elly

R.T.

(1914). Property and Contract. New York: Macmillan.

16.

Fischer

, Petersen

, Feldkotter

, & Huppert

(2007). Sustainable governance of natural resources and institutional change: An analytical framework. Public Administration and Development, 27(2), 123–137.

17.

Gandhi

(1998, July). Rapporteur’s report on institutional framework for agricultural development. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53, 552–564.

18.

Gandhi

V. P.

(2010). A conceptual framework for studying institutions in watershed development (Working Paper No. 2010-11-04). Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad.

19.

Goodin

R.E.

(Ed.) (1996). The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Groth

(1999). Future organisational design: The scope for IT based enterprise. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

21.

ICAR. (2009). Handbook of agriculture. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

22.

Johnson

, Ravnborg

H. M.

, Westermann

, & Probst

(2002). User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy, 3(6), 507.

23.

Keefer

, & Shirley

M. M.

(2000). Formal versus informal institutions in economic development. In Menard

(Ed.), Institutions, contracts, and organizations: Perspectives from new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elger.

24.

Marothia

, & Phillips

(1985). Analyis of natural resource problems using a synthesis of neoclassical and institutional economics. Asian Journal of Economics and Social Studies, 4(4), 263–281.

25.

Marshall

G. R.

(2003). Towards a resource economics for adaptive managers, Paper presented at the 47th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Fremantle, 12–14 February. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/57921/2/2003_marshall.pdf

26.

Nee

, & Ingram

(1998). Embeddedness and beyond: Institution, exchange and social structure. In Brinton

& Nee

(Eds), The new institutionalism in sociology (pp. 19–45). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

27.

North

D. C.

(1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

28.

North

D. C.

(1997). Prologue. In Drobak

& Nye

(Eds), The frontiers of the new institutional economics. Saint Louis: Academic Press.

29.

North

D. C.

(2000). Understanding Institutions. In Menard

(2000). Institutions, Contracts and Organisations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgare.

30.

Nystrom

P. C.

, & Starbuck

W. H.

(Eds). (1981). Handbook of organisational design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

31.

Ostrom

(1992). Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. San Francisco: ICS Press.

32.

Ostrom

(1993). Design principles in long enduring irrigation institutions. Water Resources Research, 29(7), 1907–1919.

33.

Ostrom

(2009, 24 July). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.

34.

Ostrom

, & Cox

(2010). Moving beyond panaceas: A multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 451–463.

35.

Ostrom

(1972). Polycentricity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

36.

Pagan

(2003). Laws, customs and rules: Identifying the characteristics of successful water management institutions. Paper presented at a Workshop on Institutional Issues in Water Resources Allocation: Lessons from Australia and Implications for India, Beechworth, Australia.

37.

Pagan

(2009). Laws customs and rules: Identifying the characteristics of successful water. In Crase

& Gandhi

V. P.

(Eds), Reforming institution in water resource management: Policy and performance for sustainable development (pp. 20–44). London: Earthscan.

38.

Pejovich

(1999). The effects of the interaction of formal and informal institutions on social stability and economic development. Journal of Markets and Morality, 2(2), 164–181.

39.

Polski

M. M.

, & Ostrom

(1999). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. Paper prepared for the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, Indiana University.

40.

Rhoades

R. E.

, & Elliot

T. S.

(2000). Participatory watershed research and management: Where the shadow falls. London: International institute for Economic Development (IIED).

41.

Thomson

, & Freudenberger

K. S.

(1997). Crafting institutional arrangements for community forestry. FAO community forestry field manual. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organisation.

42.

Vaidyanathan

(1999). Water resource management: Institutions and irrigation development in India. New York: Oxford University Press.

43.

Williamson

(1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

44.

Williamson

(2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.

45.

World Resources Institute. (2005). World Resources Report 2005. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.

46.

Young

(1999). Individual strategy and social structure: An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.