Research suggests dependence on natural resource development leads to decreases in per capita income, increases in inequality, and elevated poverty. Natural resource development generally takes two forms—extractive (e.g., oil and gas, mining, timber) and nonextractive (e.g., tourism, recreation, real estate). However, research has rarely examined both in tandem. Drawing on the concept of dependence (i.e., overspecialization), the author tests the hypothesis that increasing levels of both forms of development were associated with diminishing returns to economic prosperity—operationalized as per capita income, inequality, and poverty—in rural America over the period of 2000 to 2015. Extractive development exhibited the expected relationship in remote rural counties for all outcomes, while nonextractive development had a generally negative relationship with per capita income, a positive relationship with poverty, and no relationship with inequality. Support for the overall hypothesis was limited due to the returns of nonextractive development being more negative than expected.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4j72
3.
ArmstrongA.StedmanR. C. (2013). Culture clash and second home ownership in the U.S. Northern Forest. Rural Sociology, 78(3), 318-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12010
4.
BillingsD. B.BleeK. M. (2000). The road to poverty: The making of wealth and hardship in Appalachia. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BrooksM. M. (2019). The advantages of comparative LISA techniques in spatial inequality research: Evidence from poverty change in the United States. Spatial Demography, 7(2-3), 167-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-019-00052-4
6.
BrooksS. M.KurtzM. J. (2016). Oil and democracy: Endogenous natural resources and the political “resource curse.”International Organization, 70(2), 279-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000072
7.
BrownD. L.SchafftK. A. (2019). Rural people and communities in the 21st century: Resilience and transformation (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
BunkerS. G. (2003). Matter, space, energy, and political economy: The Amazon in the world-system. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9(2), 219-258. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2003.241
CameronA. C.MillerD. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
13.
ChiG.ZhuJ. (2019). Spatial regression models for the social sciences. Sage.
DellerS. C.LledoV.MarcouillerD. W. (2008). Modeling regional economic growth with a focus on amenities. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 20(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2008.00139.x
DellerS. C.TsaiT.-H.MarcouillerD. W.EnglishD. B. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00161
18.
DouglasS.WalkerA. (2017). Coal mining and the resource curse in the eastern United States. Journal of Regional Science, 57(4), 568-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12310
19.
DuncanC. M. (2014). Worlds apart: Poverty and politics in rural America (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
20.
Economic Research Service. (2020). Documentation of rural urban continuum codes (Technical report). U. S. Department of Agriculture.
21.
EnglishD. B.MarcouillerD. W.CordellH. K. (2000). Tourism dependence in rural America: Estimates and effects. Society & Natural Resources, 13(3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200279054
22.
FrankeA. G. (2007). The development of underdevelopment. In RobertsJ. T.HiteA. B. (Ed.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (pp. 76-85). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1969)
FreudenburgW. R. (1992). Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociology, 57(3), 305-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00467.x
25.
FreudenburgW. R.GramlingR. (1994). Natural resources and rural poverty: A closer look. Society & Natural Resources, 7(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380841
26.
FreudenburgW. R.WilsonL. J. (2002). Mining the data: Analyzing the economic implications of mining for nonmetropolitan regions. Sociological Inquiry, 72(4), 549-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00034
GolgherA. B.VossP. R. (2016). How to interpret the coefficients of spatial models: Spillovers, direct and indirect effects. Spatial Demography, 4(3), 175-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0016-y
29.
GreenG. (2017). The opportunities and limits of economic growth. In TickamyerA. R.ShermanJ.WarlickJ. (Eds.), Rural poverty in the United States (pp. 416-438). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tick17222-026
HarveyD. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism. Verso.
32.
HarveyD. (2018). The limits to capital. Verso books. (Original work published 1982)
33.
HarveyM. H. (2017). Racial inequalities and poverty in rural America. In TickamyerA. R.ShermanJ.WarlickJ. (Eds.), Rural poverty in the United States (pp. 141-167). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tick17222-009
HooksG.MosherC.RotoloT.LobaoL. (2004). The prison industry: Carceral expansion and employment in US counties, 1969–1994. Social Science Quarterly, 85(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.08501004.x
36.
HumphreyC. R.BerardiG.CarrollM. S.FairfaxS.FortmannL.GeislerC.JohnsonT. G.KuselJ.LeeR. G.MacinkoS.PelusoN. L.SchulmanM. D. (1993). Theories in the study of natural resource-dependent communities and persistent rural poverty in the United States. In SummersG. (Ed.), Persistent poverty in rural America (pp. 136-172). Westview Press.
37.
HunterL. M.BoardmanJ. D.OngeJ. M. S. (2005). The association between natural amenities, rural population growth, and long-term residents’ economic well-being. Rural Sociology, 70(4), 452-469. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601105775012714
38.
IssermanA. M.WesterveltJ. (2006). 1.5 Million missing numbers: Overcoming employment suppression in county business patterns data. International Regional Science Review, 29(3), 311-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017606290359
39.
JamesA.AadlandD. (2011). The curse of natural resources: An empirical investigation of us counties. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(2), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.05.006
40.
JohnsonK. M.LichterD. T. (2019). Rural depopulation: Growth and decline processes over the past century. Rural Sociology, 84(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12266
KimK.-k.MarcouillerD. W.DellerS. C. (2005). Natural amenities and rural development: Understanding spatial and distributional attributes. Growth and Change, 36(2), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00277.x
43.
KrannichR. S.GentryB.LuloffA.RobertsonP. (2014). Resource dependency in rural America: Continuities and change. In BaileyC.JensenL.RansomE. (Eds.), Rural America in a globalizing world (pp. 208-225). West Virginia University Press.
44.
LeichtK. T.JenkinsJ. C. (2007). New and unexplored opportunities: Developing a spatial perspective for political sociology. In LobaoL. M.HooksG.TickamyerA. R. (Eds.), The sociology of spatial inequality (pp. 63-84). State University of New York Press.
LobaoL.KraybillD. S. (2005). The emerging roles of county governments in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: Findings from a national survey. Economic Development Quarterly, 19(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242405276514
47.
LobaoL.ZhouM.PartridgeM.BetzM. (2016). Poverty, place, and coal employment across Appalachia and the United States in a new economic era. Rural Sociology, 81(3), 343-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12098
48.
LobaoL. M.HooksG.TickamyerA. R. (2007). The sociology of spatial inequality. SUNY Press.
49.
MansonS.SchroederJ.Van RiperD.RugglesS. (2017). IPUMS: National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 12.0 [Data set]. University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V12.0
50.
MatsuyamaK. (1992). Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 58(2), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90057-O
51.
MonnatS. M.ChandlerR. F. (2017). Immigration trends and immigrant poverty in rural America. In TickamyerA. R.ShermanJ.WarlickJ. (Eds.), Rural poverty in the United States (pp. 167-201). Columbia University Press.
NelsonP. B.LeeA. W.NelsonL. (2009). Linking baby boomer and Hispanic migration streams into rural America: A multi-scaled approach. Population, Space and Place, 15(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.520
54.
PapyrakisE. (2017). The resource curse-what have we learned from two decades of intensive research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Development Studies, 53(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1160070
55.
PapyrakisE.GerlaghR. (2004). The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(1), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.11.002
PelusoN. L.HumphreyC. R.FortmannL. P. (1994). The rock, the beach, and the tidal pool: People and poverty in natural resource-dependent areas. Society & Natural Resources, 7(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380842
58.
PerdueR. T.PavelaG. (2012). Addictive economies and coal dependency: Methods of extraction and socioeconomic outcomes in West Virginia, 1997-2009. Organization & Environment, 25(4), 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612464767
59.
PoudyalN. C.HodgesD. G.CordellH. K. (2008). The role of natural resource amenities in attracting retirees: Implications for economic growth policy. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.022
60.
SachsJ. D.WarnerA. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (NBER Working Paper 5398). https://doi.org/10.3386/w5398
61.
SchistermanE. F.ColeS. R.PlattR. W. (2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20(4), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1
62.
ShermanJ. (2009). Those who work, those who don’t: Poverty, morality, and family in rural America. University of Minnesota Press.
63.
ShermanJ. (2018). Not allowed to inherit my kingdom: Amenity development and social inequality in the rural West. Rural Sociology, 83(1), 174-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12168
64.
SklairL. (2002). Democracy and the transnational capitalist class. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 581(1), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620258100113
65.
SmithM. D.KrannichR. S. (2000). “Culture clash” revisited: Newcomer and longer-term residents’ attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology, 65(3), 396-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00036.x
66.
SmithN. (1984). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Basil Blackwell.
StedmanR. C.ParkinsJ. R.BeckleyT. M. (2005). Forest dependence and community well-being in rural Canada: Variation by forest sector and region. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(1), 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1139/x04-140
69.
ThiedeB.KimH.ValasikM. (2018). The spatial concentration of America’s rural poor population: A postrecession update. Rural Sociology, 83(1), 109-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12166
70.
ThiedeB.SlackT. (2017). The old versus the new economies and their impacts. In TickamyerA. R.ShermanJ.WarlickJ. (Eds.), Rural poverty in the United States (pp. 231-256). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tick17222-015
71.
ThiedeB. C.BrownD. L.SandersS. R.GlasgowN.KulcsarL. J. (2017). A demographic deficit? Local population aging and access to services in rural America, 1990–2010. Rural Sociology, 82(1), 44-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12117
72.
TsvetkovaA.PartridgeM. (2017). The shale revolution and entrepreneurship: An assessment of the relationship between energy sector expansion and small business entrepreneurship in US counties. Energy, 141(December), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.101
73.
Ulrich-SchadJ. D. (2018). “We didn’t move here to move to Aspen”: Community making and community development in an emerging rural amenity destination. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 13(4), 43-46.
74.
Ulrich-SchadJ. D.QinH. (2018). Culture clash? Predictors of views on amenity-led development and community involvement in rural recreation counties. Rural Sociology, 83(1), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12165
Von HippelP. T.ScarpinoS. V.HolasI. (2016). Robust estimation of inequality from binned incomes. Sociological Methodology, 46(1), 212-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175015599807
78.
WallersteinI. (2015). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. In RobertsJ. T.HiteA. B.ChorevN. (Eds.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (2nd ed., pp. 126-146). John Wiley. (Original work published 1979)
79.
WestP. C. (1994). Natural resources and the persistence of rural poverty in America: A Weberian perspective on the role of power, domination, and natural resource bureaucracy. Society & Natural Resources, 7(5), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929409380878
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
