This study investigated reasons for the outsourcing of a core HRM function, recruitment. Drawing from transaction costs and institutional theories, it was hypothesised that the pressure to minimise transaction costs and the presence of industry trends towards outsourcing would be positively associated with the outsourcing of recruitment.
Survey data were gathered from 1I 7 HR professionals in Australia. Both hypotheses were partially supported. Specifically, the outsourcing of recruitment activities was positively associated with trust in the agency supplying the recruitment service and with the need to reduce internal labour but not fixed costs. With regard to institutional theory, the outsourcing of recruitment was positively associated with mimetic but not coercive forces. The study concludes that although most assumptions about recruitment agency use are expressed in economic terms, in reality, HRM practices are also influenced by forces exerted by the institutional environment in which organisations are located.
Barber, A. , M. Wesson,Q. Robertson and M.S. Taylor. 1999. A tale of two job markets: Organisational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personnel Psychology52: 841-867.
2.
Barney, J.B. and W. Hesterly. 1996. Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In Handbook of Organization Studies, eds Clegg, S.R., C. Hardy and W.R. Nord, 115-147. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
3.
Barringer, M. and G. Milkovich. 1988. A theoretical exploration of the adoption and design of flexible benefit plans: A case of human resource innovation. Academy of Management Review23: 305-324.
4.
Carney, M.1998. The competitiveness of networked production: the role of trust and asset specificity. Journal of Management Studies35: 457-479.
5.
Chiles, T.H. and J.F. McMackin. 1996. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics. Academy of Management Review21: 73-99.
Deephouse, D.L.1996. Does isomorphism legitimate?Academy of Management Journal39: 1024-1039.
8.
DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and the collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147-160.
9.
DiMaggio, P. and W. Powell. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, eds Powell, W. and P. DiMaggio.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Eisenhardt, K.1988. Agency and institutional theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal31: 488-511.
11.
Fields, D. , A. Chan and A. Akhtar. 2000. Organizational context and human resource management strategy: A structural equation analysis of Hong Kong firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management11: 264-277.
12.
Galaskiewicz, J.1985. Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set. American Sociological Review50: 639-658.
13.
Galaskiewicz, J. and S. Wasserman. 1989. Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly34: 454-479.
14.
Gatewood, R.D. and H.S. Feild. 1998. Human Resource Selection. 4th edn.Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.
15.
Granovetter, M.1985. Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology91: 481-510.
16.
Greer, C.R. , S.A. Youngblood and D.A. Gray. 1999. Human resource management outsourcing: The make or buy decision. Academy of Management Executive13: 85-96.
17.
Hair, J. , R. Anderson, R. Tatham and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th edn.New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
18.
Jennings, P.D.1994. Viewing macro HRM from without: Political and institutional perspectives. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management12: 1-40.
19.
Jones, R. and P. Wright. 1992. An economic approach to conceptualizing the utility of human resource management practices. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management10: 271-299.
20.
Klaas, B.S. , J. McClendon and T.W. Gainey. 1999. HR outsourcing and its impact: The role of transaction costs. Personnel Psychology52: 113-136.
21.
Korczynski, M.2000. The political economy of trust. Journal of Management Studies37: 1-21.
22.
Kramer, R.M.1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology50: 569-599.
23.
Laabs, J.1998, September. The dark side of outsourcing. Workforce: 42-48.
24.
Lees, S.1997. HRM and the legitimacy market. The International Journal of Human Resource Management8: 226-243.
25.
Martinez, R. and M.T. Dacin. 1999. Efficiency motives and normative forces: Combining transaction costs and institutional logic. Journal of Management25: 75-96.
26.
Mayer, R.C. and J.H. Davis. 1999. The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology84: 123-136.
27.
Meyer, J. and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83: 340-363.
28.
Meyer, J. , R. Scott and T. Deal. 1981. Institutional and technical sources of organisational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organisations. In Organisation and the Human Services, ed. H. Stein, 151-178. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Morehead, A. , M. Steele, M. Alexander, K. Stephen and L. Duffin. 1996. Changes at work: The 1995 Australian workplace industrial relations survey. Canberra: Policy Division of the Commonwealth Department of Workplace Relations and Small Business.
30.
Pouder, R.1996. Privatizing services in local government: An empirical assessment of efficiency and institutional explanations. Public Administration Quarterly20: 103-126.
31.
Rowan, B.1982. Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools. Administrative Science Quarterly27: 196-198.
32.
Roberts, P. and R. Greenwood. 1997. Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories: Toward a constrained efficiency framework for understanding organizational design adoption. Academy of Management Review22: 346-373.
33.
Scott, W.R.1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly32: 493-511.
34.
Scott, W.R.1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
35.
Tolbert, P. and L. Zucker. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 22-39.
36.
Walker, G. and D. Weber. 1984. A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly29: 373-391.
37.
Williamson, O.E.1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
38.
Williamson, O.E.1985. Assessing contracts. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization1: 177-208.
39.
Williamson, O.E.1993. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Institutional and Corporate Change2: 107-156.
40.
Wright, P. and G. McMahan. 1992. Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management18: 295-320.
41.
Zand, D.E.1972. Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly17: 229-239.
42.
Zucker, L.1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review42: 726-743.
